California’s Multi-Billion Dollar Battle Against Wildfire Highlighted During Town Hall

River Fire Flows Towards a Home [Mark McKenna]

The River Fire consumes a home off of Scott’s Valley Road near the town of Lakeport in Lake County California in 2018. [Photo by Mark McKenna]

California could be facing another challenging wildfire season but during a livestreamed town hall event, Senator Mike McGuire highlighted what he described as the state’s “historic investments” in fighting and preventing fires.

Wildfire conditions – and the increased resources available to meet them – were discussed during the April 15 town hall meeting.

McGuire said “unfortunately our region has been devastated by wildfire over the past decade” but the state is “laser-focused on making historic investments to be able to better protect our communities big and small.”

That includes funding for more Cal Fire firefighters and the training and equipment needed to combat fires, as well as preventative measures.

California, over the past many years, has invested nearly $4 billion in vegetation management and wildfire prevention efforts, dead and dying tree removal, clearing back brush and trees from evacuation routes around communities, and more fire breaks,” McGuire said.

Another $4 billion is “on the way,” he continued, “thanks to California voters passing Proposition 4.”

The additional funding is “embedded” in the bond measure and will be spent “in the coming years for wildfire prevention in our communities,” said McGuire.

State Senator Mike McGuire talks about firefighting efforts during the town hall

State Senator Mike McGuire talks about firefighting efforts during the town hall

North Coast investments include what McGuire described as “10 new quick attack type fire engines” for southern Humboldt and northern Mendocino counties, and a new fire academy serving Mendocino and Lake counties.

But McGuire raised a “red flag,” saying funding for the U.S. Forest Service – which holds the majority of the state’s forestland – could be cut by up to 60 percent if the Trump administration’s proposed budget is approved.

And that will come on top of the recent loss of 7,000 US Forest Service employees that McGuire said have “either left, taken early retirements, or been fired.”

But state-level improvements were reemphasized by McGuire later in the town hall, in an exchange with Cal Fire Northern Region Chief George Morris.

In your tenure in Cal Fire, this has been the biggest change, the biggest enhancement, and the most major improvements that we’ve seen in generations for Cal Fire,” said McGuire, who asked for Morris’s take.

Cal Fire Northern Region Chief George Morris

Cal Fire Northern Region Chief George Morris

I’ve been a fire chief in Cal Fire for the last 12 years, running a unit and running regions, and I don’t recognize my own department, that’s how much it’s changed in that time period,” Morris said.

In 2015, Cal Fire had 6,500 firefighters, he continued, and the number is now up to 12,000.

I think we’ve made quantum leaps in this decade with the support of the administration and the legislature,” he said. “It can feel slow and it can feel daunting but the investments are making a difference.”

As for what lies ahead this summer and fall, what’s described as a “Super El Niño” weather pattern could develop. Morris suggested it’s a wild card in the upcoming season, saying, “weather patterns are going to be difficult to predict under an El Niño condition.”

He said the last strong El Niño was in 2015 and 2016, when a number of “severe fires” happened.

“And that really ushered in the era of the mega fire with those fires,” Morris continued. “The El Niño can mean a lot of things – it can mean that we’re going to see more moisture than normal, it can mean heat domes followed by tropical moisture. It can also mean extended dry periods over a swath of California.”

Given the variability, Morris advised against banking on long range forecasts. Short range forecasts of hot and dry conditions should be heeded, he continued, using information from Cal Fire and other agencies as a basis for decision-making on actions like preparing to evacuate.

If conditions run hot and dry, wildfires will have plenty of fuel.

We’re seeing an incredible amount of growth in our grasslands,” said Morris. “This late rain means that we’ll get secondary and tertiary growth in the grasslands – I think that can be the fuse for a bomb that could be a very difficult fire season.”

McGuire said El Niño and other conditions “could spell trouble” but he reiterated the state’s readiness.

It will continued to be bolstered. McGuire said about 2,000 more firefighters will be hired in the next four years.

Morris reflected on “some of the scars that we’ve had,” saying his hometown is the town of Paradise, which was largely destroyed by the 2018 Camp Fire.

“Many of my friends and my family lost everything and I lost a home in that fire.” he said. “The level of preparation is what is key to peoples’ survival in these events.”

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

37 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Kris
Guest
Kris
2 months ago

California’s budget is already on fire and burning thru cash. I just hope this plan doesn’t go up in smoke.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago

See CA Senate Bill 1404 being introduced to reinstate the State Responsibility Area fees. The charge of $150 (in the old law) per dwelling. But as far as I can tell without the provision that the money be spent in the area of the fees are taken. A recent version mention prioritizing “disadvantaged communities.”

Virtually all Humboldt Co is a State Responsibility Area. And it doesn’t seem to exempt places that already pay fees for local fire services. Mostly Calfire is responsible in Humboldt but as far as I can tell they won’t show up for a local fire. Here just stage for fighting large fires in State owned public lands.

https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB1404/id/3405057

1000001834
Last edited 2 months ago
Dot
Member
Dot
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

Cal Fire has had excellent response in the rural parts of Humboldt … what do you mean by ‘local fires’? We see them working, not just staging, often these past summers.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Dot

Do you see even one response to a Humboldt Co fire this year?

https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2026

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut
Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut
Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

In fact the only time I ever saw Calfire is 1) the time before the fee was was suspended when they came to evaluate my house from a hundred twenty feet away while I was standing there watching and 2) at the grocery store during staging at Redwood Acres. Yet virtually all of Humboldt will be paying this fee again. Almost all of Humboldt will fall into the high wildfire risk zone. No discrimination. We pay but only a few selected of us will see any benefit. I do not feel represented by McQuire.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

But local volunteers? All the time. I’d rather up the fees I already pay them than pay California who a best will use this money for people outside the area and at worst will just take it for their political agenda.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

CF evaluated mine by doing an onsite visit that we actually requested because they wanted to charge $300 for a couple tool sheds that on aerial views (not drone, more like Google Earth) appear to be “habitable structures”. Never mind the fact that 2/3 of the square footage of them were just awnings. We had to prove otherwise.

Also, CF issues our burn permits and can at times be present if you’d like help keeping a slash pile from getting out of hand. That fee we can’t contest if nobody is around to complain about it too short of some sternly worded letter to somebody in Sacramento.

So what are you really saying? That we don’t need them or just have them be on call from a far off base? They do serve a purpose. The fees can be argued, but I can attest that having an OK on your property for yearly fire mitigation looks real good to your insurer when they come to readjust rates. Again.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago

No. I’m complaining about just what I said. Almost everyone in Humboldt Co will be subject to a fee, many more than one, but will rarely see service for it. Maybe this applies in Mendocino too, IDK. But most counties where they are present for firefighting have much less land under SRA, being either mostly federal or not covered at all. We pay but don’t get. And I have yet to see CalFire show up to a local fire. I suppose that some places without a volunteer group may see someone sooner or later but I have yet to see one here. They pretty much protect state lands and that should be the state’s bill to may. Not mine.

And I’m sorry but having to request CalFire to come out because they overcharged is not a plus. And willy nilly putting me in a high fire zone does nothing for insurance. I suspect that the presence of redwood trees was the sole criteria. And my experience was just what I said- they showed up at the gate for all of 10 seconds then left before I could get down the drive. As we stared at each other. These weren’t, I gather, regular CalFire employees but some contracted company.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

It’s not just CF doing a once over on the property, it’s also that the info is shared with the county and now they get on peoples asses about things like unpermitted ADUs or drying barns or code compliance things. All those departments share property data to some extent and at times, wholly inaccurate so we have to be more proactive. CalFire isn’t the only entity that likes to impose fees based on some fuzzy Google Earth screenshot from 10 years ago. I’m not outright against fees, but I am if they’re for things that don’t exist.

willow creeker
Member
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

I’m complaining about just what I said. Almost everyone in Humboldt Co will be subject to a fee, many more than one, but will rarely see service for it.”

Thats kinda how firefighting works.

Kym Kemp
Admin
2 months ago
Reply to  willow creeker

Cal Fire is roughly like insurance. You pay for it hoping you never need it.

Beyond that, one thing that sometimes gets lost in these discussions is that Cal Fire’s work isn’t limited to the larger incidents that show up on their public incident map.

A lot of their activity never makes those lists because it’s the kind of early response that keeps fires small in the first place. In rural areas, that can mean helicopters or engines knocking down a vegetation fire before it ever becomes a named incident.

They’re also regularly involved in mutual aid—supporting local volunteer departments, responding to medical calls as EMTs, assisting at traffic collisions, and helping with rescues in remote areas. In places like Humboldt, where distances are long and resources are stretched, that backup can really matter even if it isn’t always visible but almost all fires beyond the tiniest that are first dealt with by VFD’s have Cal Fire support.

On top of that, they handle things like burn permits, defensible space inspections, and prescribed burns—all aimed at preventing the bigger fires that do make headlines.

That said, there are fair criticisms of the State Responsibility Area fee. Questions about who pays, whether services feel evenly distributed, and where the money ultimately goes are legitimate concerns worth discussing.

But the idea that Cal Fire only “stages” for big fires or doesn’t operate locally doesn’t really match the multiple fires we cover every year here in Humboldt with Cal Fire at the scene.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Show me the stories you cover where CalFire has consistently shown up for the not large fires in our particular section of the SRA. Because my complaint is based on my experience only reinforced by this incident reports that shows they hardly even have to spend much resources here while the fees are almost universal charged just because we are designated a SRA.

Put it this way. There are plenty of times when CalFire is not wholly occupied elsewhere and could show up locally, but they don’t. There are plenty times where emergency services are needed in humboldt where they don’t show up. Many volunteer fire departments are burdened because a large number of such things happen in their service area but they get no help from the State to cover people using thise services who are outside the district paying for them. There is plent of scope for things like assistance in fire hardening residents but all you’ll ever see of funding is some big sign saying it your responsibility. But the state never seems to acknowledge it.

Last edited 2 months ago
Kym Kemp
Admin
2 months ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

One instance I can think of off the top of my head recently because my kids were there and it was in my neighborhood: https://kymkemp.com/2026/03/20/smoke-from-rekindle-fire-seen-on-ridge-between-salmon-creek-and-myers-flat/

Here’s another one: https://kymkemp.com/2026/01/27/escaped-debris-fire-jumps-highway-36-east-of-bridgeville/

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  willow creeker

No it’s not. This is more like being required to pay for fire fighting but knowing they will be fighting fires for everyone but yourself. If it was just the way firefighting works they would show up at your fire too.

This is not about fire fighting. Hello? This is about paying for firefighting. In this case, relieving the state from the burden of paying in some heavy users by taking money from those who will not add to the cost.

Farce
Guest
Farce
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

I love CalFire. They show up at rural fires and work. However this tax is some more bullshit. I have a spot “in town” that is in state responsibility area. So I will be made to pay the fee. But if I had a fire the Arcata Fire Department will come. Well- I pay taxes for them and I don’t mind that. But why would I be paying CalFire fees for a house they won’t show up for?!! That’s some bullshit right there and I can’t afford bullshit anymore…

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

You do realize that’s not all they do. They get called all over the state, hold prescribed burns (so they’re not needed later) and provide backup to rural VFDs, if they even exist, or have able bodied persons with good backs to jump into a fire fight. Some of them are also EMTs and can provide emergency care until LifeFlight or an ambulance can reach them. Yes, they don’t have many official fire responses in Humboldt, but they provide other first responder services. It goes with the territory.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago

Yes. In fact that is much of my point. They fight fires mostly in other places who are not in the SRAs and don’t get charged a fee. That they should fight fires is good. That they don’t fight them here but charge a fee is not.

Again I repreat- they may do those things but not here. I can remember waiting at the site of a fatal car accident here where CalFire had a base less than 10 miles away but they never showed up while the lone volunteer fought the fire and the injured waited for more than 45 minutes until an ambulance from Eureka came. I’m not sure the CalFire station was even manned.

Your milage may vary but I’m telling you mine is non-existent.

Tangled Massocells
Guest
Tangled Massocells
2 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

The money will disappear!

Apopa
Guest
Apopa
2 months ago

There’s Maguire patting himself on the back again for hard work done by others. The only thing he is Lazer focused on is getting elected to Congress so he can retire.

Mr. Clark
Member
2 months ago
Reply to  Apopa

so he can retire with 30 million in the bank of Caymans.

Geoff
Guest
Geoff
2 months ago

So the East Coast elite like Trump want the West to burn. No excuses for gutting the Forest Service from a man who thinks the wilderness has 18 holes and manicured greens.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Geoff

Newsom is playing plenty of politics with this too. What is being proposed as cut in the USFS is not firefighting funding, which is being moved to a new agency. Trump touts as for faster action. There are large cuts being proposed but they are to research, assistance to private and state entities and trails. You may disagree with them, the state certainly object to the loss of funding, but it is not what Newsom says either.

Who is lying the most, IDK. But I suspect both are. But the CalFire fees are likely to replace some current finding the state no longer has the funds to pay out.

https://www.firerescue1.com/wildfire-and-wildland-urban-interface/president-trump-consolidates-federal-wildland-firefighting-under-the-interior-department
https://www.taxpayer.net/energy-natural-resources/president-trumps-fy2027-forest-service-budget-request/

Last edited 2 months ago
Eli Cash
Guest
Eli Cash
2 months ago

This will work as well as the multi-billion dollar “War on Homelessness”. Tax raises soon to follow.

Reality Cheque
Guest
Reality Cheque
2 months ago

Firefighting is the new growth industry. Funny, the more money we throw at it, the more destruction we get. McGuire gets his fear stunt publicity, public employee unions and other unions get pockets full of cash. This strategy of throwing money at a problem is par for the course for McGuire, but it clearly is not working. You could triple CalFire and the Palisades still would have happened. At best the strategy seems to only temporarily slow wildfires. Every resource was put into stopping the Caldor fire, but it simply only stopped because it burned through the available fuel, and was slowed with the aide of a federal (not state of California) thinning project. The reality is California continues to build and rebuild homes that are very vulnerable to wildfire, whether by design or location. That is actually the State’s area of responsibility – in those codes and the enforcement of those codes. But that’s not flashy and sexy for ladder climbing politicians. Democrats and Republicans love fear, nurture it, and then prescribe their own expensive and ineffective solutions. Just like the character of Jack Merridew from the Lord of the Flies, our political leaders would rather live in a fantasy world of problems and fantasy solutions than deal with the boring reality that we actually have to change our way of life, our way of building, our way of interacting with nature. Nope, we get McGuire. We get an army and an air force to battle nature, a war we will always lose in the end.

Apopa
Guest
Apopa
2 months ago
Reply to  Reality Cheque

Most rural socal home owners purposely plant flamable vegetation around their property, (for privacy) with little concern about the fire danger. And then they are dumbfounded when the place burns down.
Those are the ones who should have their insurance cancelled or forced to eliminate the danger.

Reality Cheque
Guest
Reality Cheque
2 months ago
Reply to  Apopa

I agree. But it isn’t just SoCal. Look a the photo on the top of the article. The method, manner and location of where we build houses is problematic everywhere. There are also relatively easy solutions, that private property owners should be implementing and forced to implement by the State. Instead we have McGuire throwing money mostly derived from income tax and sales taxes to protect and subsidize private property owners, most of whom are very wealthy and have an interest in protecting their own assets. We spend more money and get more and more dubious results. And look, if the Republicans were in power in California, they would be doing the exact same thing, treating the symptoms and not the actual problem. Our problem is really ultimately the dumb foul mouthed politicians like McGuire who love fear p*rn and are really just covering their ass so they can climb the ladder. We should hold ourselves more accountable for who we vote for and not believe the lies that dollars spent equal progress made.

Apopa
Guest
Apopa
2 months ago
Reply to  Reality Cheque

He is, they are, and it’ll cost more.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Reality Cheque

People would not be so eager to live in wild areas if government made it safe for them to live closer together. But government doesn’t. It supports policies that make crime and regulation more burdensome and ignores the many small issues that make living in more dense places hard. This state especially regulates the crap out of those seeking peace and quiet but gives pass on those destroying peace and quiet. After all the law abiding are easy targets of government whole the not law abiding are much more costly.

Farce
Guest
Farce
2 months ago
Reply to  Reality Cheque

I’ve been amazed and then disgusted at the mentality of some folks…They build wooden houses in areas that have historically burned from natural fire events-and then they fill these wooden fire boxes with their most expensive and precious possessions! And then they claim to be victims when it inevitably burns!! Insurance covers those expensive losses and then I get my insurance jacked up again!!! Dude- if you build in a historic fire zone then just expect your house and possessions to be temporary. Maybe live simpler and cheaper and don’t get attached to material crap so much? Otherwise just stay out of the fire zones…

Reality Cheque
Guest
Reality Cheque
2 months ago
Reply to  Farce

Yes, and meanwhile homeowners are being kicked off their home insurance in Eureka of all places. But, lets make sure we buy the latest military helicopter that has to be hangered and has difficulty intaking smoky air. They left the old Huey’s outside for years in all kinds of weather and never had to build special AC’d hangers or special air filters that reduce the helicopter’s advertised performance that taxpayers were sold on when these things came out.

Starryess
Guest
Starryess
2 months ago

Mendocino Firesafe Council has great how to videos on hardening your home.

https://www.firesafemendocino.org/homehardening

A friend had fire come within 100 ft of home&it didnt burn. They did all the home hardening and their vfd helped put sprinklers on their roof.
There was one old metal watertank that didnt burn. The plastic ones melt fast.

crap
Guest
crap
2 months ago

Here is an idea Open logging back up and they can not only generate jobs but get more tax revnue from the jobs and timber insted of spending tax dollars and killing the budget.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
2 months ago
Reply to  crap

If you’re going that route, get rid of a lot of the Douglas firs that grew when tanbark was all but gone. They grew like weeds where Oaks and madrones used to be the dominant flora.

melanopsin
Member
2 months ago

Exactly what my plan has been here in a former tanbark harvested area. Acorns feed a lot of critters. More critters attract bigger predators higher up the food chain. Already I’m seeing the effects of thinning firs, with more and more oak and madrone seedlings getting more sun off to a good start and growing fast. Fir trees also suck up a lot of water depriving other species.

willow creeker
Member
2 months ago

I’ve been watching some AI startups focusing on wildfire detection. It’s common sense and gives me some hope that we can stay on top of these flare ups before they turn into huge mega fires. Fingers crossed