Students Vacate Nelson Hall Overnight; No Arrests Reported

“Is it reasonable to use the phrase, “…as I and most sane folks would say…”…???”

“Whether it is “reasonable” to use the phrase “as I and most sane folks would say” depends heavily on context, as it is a polarizing, loaded statement rather than a neutral one.

Here is a breakdown of why it is generally considered unreasonable or ineffective in polite or productive discourse:

It is Highly Condescending:

By implying that only “sane” people agree with you, you are implicitly labeling anyone with a differing opinion as “insane” unreasonable, or mentally compromised.

It Shuts Down Debate:

The phrase is a form of fallacious reasoning (specifically, an appeal to common sense or ad hominem). It is designed to silence opposition rather than engage with counter-arguments.

It Creates “Us vs. Them” Divides:

It encourages polarization, often used to frame an issue as a battle between logical, normal people and unreasonable, misguided ones.

It Makes Assumptions:

It assumes a false consensus, asserting that your personal opinion is the widely held, logical default, which is rarely true for complex or subjective issues.

When is it used?

The phrase is often used in emotionally charged, informal arguments—such as in social media comment sections, political debates, or when expressing strong, personal frustration—to assert dominance over a topic.

Better Alternatives

If the goal is to persuade or have a productive conversation, you are better off using phrases that focus on evidence or subjective, shared experience:

“In my experience…”

“Most people I have spoken to seem to think…”

“From a logical standpoint, it seems that…”

Conclusion

While it is not “forbidden” to use, it is generally not a reasonable way to engage in constructive, polite, or persuasive dialogue. It is an argumentative device that often backfires by making the speaker appear condescending or closed-minded.”