Cal Poly Humboldt Responds After Yesterday’s Occupation of Siemens Hall by Protestors

Stock photo of Cal Poly Humboldt
Cal Poly Humboldt officials say approximately 30 students participated in Friday afternoon’s brief occupation of Siemens Hall and confirmed that no arrests were made.
Protestors marched onto campus in the afternoon, where students entered Siemens Hall and presented three demands to administrators: adoption of a sanctuary campus policy, divestment from Israel-related investments, and support for Teamsters workers.
Melissa L. Hutsell, speaking on behalf of the university, provided written responses to questions from Redheaded Blackbelt late Friday.
Hutsell said classes that were in session “did finish,” and clarified that while “nobody was prevented from leaving,” access to enter the building “was limited.”
Members of the university’s Free Speech Support and Response Team were present and “were engaging with the protestors,” according to Hutsell.
When asked whether negotiations are ongoing, Hutsell said, “Campus representatives were in communication with the protestors and we’ve committed to continuing conversations.”
The university confirmed it has received the written list of demands circulated by demonstrators.
Regarding the protesters’ call to support Teamsters Local 2010 workers, Hutsell said bargaining does not occur at the campus level. “It’s important to note that bargaining negotiations—including decisions about funding and salary increases—happen at a CSU system level, not with the individual campuses,” she wrote.
She added, “Skilled trades employees are important members of the campus community. We all share a commitment to providing a positive educational experience for our students, and Cal Poly Humboldt values the important work our employees do every day to make this possible.”
In response to calls for divestment from Israel-related investments, Hutsell outlined the university foundation’s current investment structure.
“The Cal Poly Humboldt Foundation’s allocation to dedicated Environmentally & Socially Responsible (ESR) investing has significantly increased since 2023,” she wrote, noting that ESR-qualified funds increased from 33% on June 30, 2023, to 73% as of June 30, 2025.
She explained that the maximum achievable ESR allocation is 82% because real estate funds and local property holdings are not categorized as ESR.
Hutsell stated that the university’s endowment does not include direct investments in defense companies or Israeli-issued securities.
“The investments in the University’s endowment do not include any direct investment in defense companies or any securities issued by Israeli companies or organizations, or to defense firms,” she wrote.
Instead, she said the university invests through mutual funds rather than purchasing individual company stocks or bonds directly.
“Our estimates put the potential indirect investment in the areas that are asked about at less than 1% of the investment portfolio of more than $54 million,” she wrote.
According to Hutsell, potential indirect defense-related investments account for “less than 0.7% of the entire portfolio,” while indirect investment tied to Israeli organizations is “less than 0.1%,” both of which can fluctuate over time.
She noted that those securities are bundled within mutual funds and “could be sold by the fund manager at any time.”
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
So basically “much ado about nothing” Everyone gets to pat themselves on the back, as life goes on.
All respect to Cal Poly student demonstrators-your voice is so important. My generation of Vietnamese war protest saved a lot of lives by cutting short that war. Respect to CalPoly Humboldt for skillfully accommodating your protest-they should be proud of their ethical and courageous students!
Absolutely!
If the protesters really feel that strongly about it they should quit paying their own taxes or they are doing exactly what they are protesting against. They are contributing to state and federal government funds themselves.They are demanding something from someone else that they aren’t willing to do themselves.
Cal Poly is a university for higher education not for protesting anything. They should be identified and asked to leave the school and continue their education elsewhere.
It’s a government funded institution, you have the constitutionally protected right to assemble and petition government institutions.
As long as they don’t go beyond that (damaging property, harming and threatening individuals) I see no problem with a student protest.
I’m glad UC Berkeley didn’t do that when I marched to protest the Rodney King beating. The education I got there helps me run this news site. And the passion I felt at seeing injustice is also what helps me work long hours for low pay to run this site.
Beat me to it.
I’ll still post this here anyway. It’s an interesting read.
https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/history-student-activism-in-college/
Though I’m not sure any modern day chant could hold a candle to Harvard’s 1766 cry of, “Behold, our butter stinketh! Give us, therefore, butter that stinketh not.”
Good lord. Best colleges on a commercial site making money off any college willing to pay them so potential students can choose them? And you take it seriously?
Can it be that there’s a degree that leads to a low paying employment in the profession of protesting?
Sure looks like it Yabut.
Kim, my comment was just my thoughts on protesting on university campuses. I guess back then things were done differently as far as protests go. Freedom of speech thankfully is still in effect, hence my comment and yours.
What did US Berkeley have to do with the Rodney King beating? Why wouldn’t you go to LAPD headquarters to protest? That’s like taking over the Humboldt State campus to protest the war in Gaza, as if anybody from Humboldt State is fighting in Gaza or has anything to do with it. I really don’t think upsetting people’s education that have nothing to do with what your protesting on a campus that has no involvement in the situation that you’re protesting does any good for anybody.
THC, the protests after the Rodney King beating weren’t just about one incident or one police department building. They were about what that video came to symbolize — a broader pattern of unequal treatment and accountability. Universities have historically been places where national issues get debated, challenged, and protested.
Of course, Berkeley didn’t cause the Rodney King beating. But students there, like students across the country, reacted to what they saw as a failure of justice. The same way campuses protested Vietnam, apartheid, Iraq, tuition hikes, sexual assault policies, or any number of national issues that extended far beyond their quads.
You don’t have to agree with the tactic. But the idea that students should only protest something if their campus administration personally committed it would shrink public discourse down to almost nothing.
That was most of the student body though, not 0.5% of them holding the other 99.5% hostage
I think you’d be better off living in Iran or North Korea. You sure don’t belong in America–you can try to silence free speech elsewhere.
Let me get this straight. Demands include support for illegals (criminals), and support for the Teamsters (criminals).
Checks out.
Not this shit again. Arrest them all. Set an example. Protesting doesn’t require laws to be broken!
So basically it was a waste of time 😑