Body Recovered from South Fork of the Eel River, Just South of County Line—Not Connected to Missing ROTR Attendee

two individuals in yellow visible under the tree canopy on rip rap at the waters edge with a red tarp nearby.

CAL FIRE personnel aided in the body recovery efforts from the riprap lined east shore of the Eel River . [All photos by Lisa Music]

A body was recovered from the South Fork of the Eel River yesterday afternoon, just south of the Humboldt–Mendocino County line, in a remote stretch of water about 1.4 miles upstream from the site of the Reggae on the River festival. While initial fears swirled that the deceased might be a woman reported missing earlier in the day from the festival grounds, officials have confirmed the two incidents are not connected.

The deceased was discovered by Ross, a snorkeler working with CalTrout to remove invasive pikeminnow from the scenic and wild-designated South Fork Eel River. Ross told Redheaded Blackbelt he made the grim discovery around noon on Saturday, August 2.

“We do work here on the South Fork Eel River, and this is a spot that we frequent,” Ross said, standing near the edge of the water, visibly shaken. “We were swimming through it this morning [and] discovered a body right up there.” When speaking of the grisly discovery, Ross said, “It was just a moment where I completely panicked.”

The body, described by Mendocino County Sheriff Matt Kendall as that of a Black male in his 40s or 50s with dreadlocks, showed no obvious signs of trauma. He was found wearing Croc-style slip-on shoes. Items recovered with him suggest he may have been from Southern California. No vehicle was located in the vicinity, and the deceased was not wearing a ROTR wristband.

bend of the river echoed in two lane road above it, with mountains in the background

A beautiful day on the river for snorkelers ended in a body recovery effort by law enforcement.

Kendall said investigators believe the death occurred recently—possibly Friday night or early Saturday morning. Sheriff Kendall said the cause of death will remain unknown until the autopsy is conducted. Preliminary findings are expected by Wednesday, though full results may take as long as eight weeks.

The recovery effort was a joint response involving Leggett Valley Fire Rescue, Cal Fire, Piercy Volunteer Fire Department, and the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office. The operation, conducted in steep terrain under an 87-degree sun, was both physically demanding and emotionally heavy.

Deputy Jeff Andersen and Sgt. Sergio Ochoa descended the steep riverbank multiple times, relaying updates to command and preparing the body for extraction. Once secured in a Stokes basket, the body was carefully guided up the slope, with teams above assisting in hoisting the remains to the road. Rescuers—faces flushed and soaked with sweat—focused on the somber task.

three people pulling on a cable next to a cal fire truck on the edge of a bank

Rescue personnel at the top of the road aided the body recovery efforts by pulling the Stokes basket using a cable and anchor point.

Meanwhile, the woman reported missing from ROTR remains unaccounted for, and investigations into her disappearance continue separately. Nick Riley, representative for ROTR told Redheaded Blackbelt in an email statement yesterday, “Reggae on the River is assisting the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Department with locating a person reported missing out of Mendocino County whose vehicle was found parked outside of our festival ground gates.”

Redheaded Blackbelt will provide updates as more information becomes available.

Earlier: [UPDATE 5:47 p.m.: MCSO gives details] Body found near Reggae on the River

Update: Missing Woman Reported Near Reggae on the River Located Safe in Willits

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

58 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BVD
Guest
BVD
10 months ago

Let’s try something new and be kind with our comments. I’ll start. Sorry to lose another human being…

Martin
Guest
Martin
10 months ago

Yesterday I thought it might have been a younger woman from ROTR, but thankfully it was not her. Ross who was snorkeling located the body of a colored man deceased. I am not sure why, but I send my most sincere condolences to his family and friends. May he now RIP.

Poking the bear,
Guest
Poking the bear,
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

A county with limited resources, by that I mean half a brain, won’t solve jack shit

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
10 months ago

Please refer to BVD post above: try something new and be kind with comments. It won’t take any extra effort to try. Save the rage for the jail threads.

Sara
Guest
Sara
10 months ago

Bet??

Martin
Guest
Martin
10 months ago

Well Poking the bear, I guess you have a full brain so why are you not out there trying to solve as you say jack shit.

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
10 months ago

Speaking of “half a brain,”; physician heal thyself. (Sorry, I couldn’t help myself)

Sara
Guest
Sara
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

“Colored” is a racist ass term. Do yourself a favor and delete that from your basic vocabulary.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  Sara

I’m not sure why Martin said…

“…I’m not sure why, but…”

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

His exact words were “…I am not sure why, but…”

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Nope.

“His exact words were”…

“I am not sure why, but I send my most sincere condolences to his family and friends.”

I am not sure why Martin said,

“I am not sure why, but I send my most sincere condolences to his family and friends.” 

…instead of just saying…

“I send my most sincere condolences to his family and friends.”

The point is, is that you entirely missed the point…

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

I got your point. I simply corrected your mistake. Not that I haven’t made the same kind of mistake myself. Now whenever I quote somebody I use Copy&Paste technique.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Then, what was my point…???

Why would he not be sure why he was sending his condolences…???

That was my point…

Would he be sure why he was sending his condolences if it was someone else…???

This comment of his may shed some light on why he may have said that……

https://kymkemp.com/2025/08/03/body-recovered-from-south-fork-of-the-eel-river-just-south-of-county-line-not-connected-to-missing-rotr-attendee/#comment-1854604

“Sara, do me a favor and delete yourself from this commenting section. What do you call the man, as black guy a nigger? Colored works for me because we are all different colors!”

___________________________________

It’s pretty iffy…

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

I understand your point, but the answer to your question can only be answered by Martin. I won’t guess.

Last edited 10 months ago
The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

They were rhetorical questions…

They were “the point”…

And no questions were asked by me, to you or anyone else, in my reply to Sarah…

Here is a question, or two, to you…

Why did you elect to correct my grammar…???

You are aware that is against the rules, aren’t you…???

I am not so sure that me using the contraction, “I’m”, in place of “I am” within a quote, is technically a “mistake”…

So, you dubiously calling it out, isn’t necessarily a “correction”…

If you were “correcting a misquote”, that would be one thing, but you have characterized what you have done as “correcting a mistake”, (my grammar), which is entirely another thing, and is one which is explicitly prohibited here…

Furthermore…

If you think that my “question can only be answered by Martin”, why are you doing answering any of them, at all…???

You contradict, and, therefore, also discredit yourself…

For whatever unknown reason…

🤷‍♂️

Maybe you should have just let Martin reply to a question that you claim only Martin can answer…

Because you, melanopsin, have chosen to have replied to a question that you have also claimed only Martin can answer…

Also, for whatever unknown reason…

🤷‍♂️

Go figure…

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

“correcting a misquote” is a better choice of word — thanks.

“Why would he not be sure why he was sending his condolences…???” — can only be answered by Martin.

You can’t figure a reason because I didn’t “reply to a question that you claim only Martin can answer…” 🙂

I figure, again, that you are reading too much into my comments, and, manufacturing assumptions based on your paranoia.

Last edited 10 months ago
The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Using a contraction is essentially saying the exact same thing…

It’s not really a misquote…

More like an abbreviation…

So, correcting a misquote is not what you did…

You were correcting my grammar…

That’s where YOU erred…

That’s where you broke the rules…

And you keep circling back, projecting over and over, reflexively and repetitively, with your denial and misperception of whose paranoia it really is, every time you get out debated…

As in, if all else fails, allege paranoia, as a last ditch resort…

It’s a flimsy trope that is getting old and tired…

Same old song and dance…

Same old shuck and jive…

You are wearing it out…

Just because you think that it’s true, melanopsin, doesn’t mean it’s actually true…

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

We disagree then on what is a misquote.

Suppose, for example, the Editor of a very popular local new website used a contraction in a headline underneath the AG Seal, in quoting the AG. Would that be a misquote? Not a rhetorical question.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

You are further deviating deflecting from what was your grammar correction…

RHBB Commenting Rule #6:

“Also, grammar, punctuation, spelling criticisms should come from parents, teachers, and bosses not anonymous people on the internet. If you can understand what someone says, refrain from telling them how to edit their comments. The one exception to this is me. If I make an error, politely pointing it out is fine.”

__________________________________

To further answer your question, make a mental note of the last sentence in rule #6…

Preferably, that will conclude this discussion…

Carry on by yourself, if you so choose…

Last edited 10 months ago
melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

Gee that sounds like an ultimatum. 🙂

I simply tried to help by showing Martin’s exact words.

Your emotional reactions then followed — which I have attempted to assuage as being completely imagined and uncalled for.

Iirc (If I Recall Correctly), your paranoia stems from your past experience when another commenter was trying to get you to make a comment that would get you banned. Now what are you attempting with me? Not a rhetorical question.

Maybe Kym will agree with you and choose to delete this entire thread beginning https://kymkemp.com/2025/08/03/body-recovered-from-south-fork-of-the-eel-river-just-south-of-county-line-not-connected-to-missing-rotr-attendee/#comment-1854575

Last edited 10 months ago
Jacoby Creek Beauty
Guest
Jacoby Creek Beauty
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

What color was he? Evolve from the 1900’s, he was a black man.

Martin
Guest
Martin
10 months ago

I prefer the term colored. If you chose to call him a black man that is your problem. I find the word colored not to be so offensive.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

“Colored works for me because we are all different colors!”

-Martin-
________________________________

That would mean that you are “colored”, too, Martin, by you’re definition, that is…

So why not just simply call him a “man”…???

Would the, “young woman from ROTR” also have been “colored” in your mind…???

Because that is NOT how you also described HER…

Are you also, in fact, “colored”, Martin, in your mind…???

Because that is what you are, also, in fact, suggesting…

___________________________________

“I prefer the term colored. If you chose to call him a black man that is your problem. I find the word colored not to be so offensive.

-Martin-

____________________________

When you say, ” I prefer the term colored.”, do you mean that you prefer to be referred to as being “colored”, or that you prefer to refer to a black man as being “colored”…???

Or, are you saying that you mean it both ways…???

As in, you mean you prefer to be referred to as being ‘colored”, yourself, AND, you prefer to refer to a black man as being “colored” …???

Would you find it “so offensive” if someone was to “call” you “colored”, like you are calling some others…???

Do you prefer to call them colored, because they are the same as you, in your mind…???

Or, do you prefer to call them colored, because, on your mind, they are different than you…???

I guess it begs to repeat the question, Martin, whether or not, in your mind, you ALSO consider yourself to be, in fact, “colored”, just like everyone/anyone else…

ABA
Guest
ABA
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Martin, your preference and you not finding the word offensive doesn’t mean a damn thing. It is racist, and that’s 100% YOUR problem.

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago
Reply to  ABA

I think I will start back using the word ” colored” for anybody not white. It kinda works good as a descriptor. And it sure pisses off small- minded self-righteous woke warriors types! Yup- gonna bring it back. Thanks!!

Miggs
Guest
Miggs
10 months ago
Reply to  Farce

Try that shit with a black person, in person. Better yet a black man. Better yet a black man bigger than you. I bet you don’t. I bet you stfu real quick honkey ass cracker peckerwood. See good descriptors?

Miggs
Guest
Miggs
10 months ago
Reply to  ABA

Again, try that shit w a black guy. One you don’t know. And make sure you keep that attitude all the while. In person. Comment back when you do. Or when you heal : )

Huh?
Guest
Huh?
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Martin isn’t racist, he’s has a “color” TV!

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago

But…maybe he was brown? Or brownish? I mean was he blackety- black? Coal black like the fine women working the ovens at Flints Barbeque in Oakland in the 80’s? Then women was BLACK! Every other ” black” person since them has looked more brown to me. So many shades. You should get down to Venezuela- I never saw so many shades before…everything from whitey-white to blackety- black w everything in between. Beautiful diversity of color. I would never call them all “black”. Really- you should get out in the world and see some stuff. You sound very…parochial and small town. And judgey AF…

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  Farce

Flints made the best BBQ ribs from mid-1970s – 1980s. I used to live down the street then.

Jen
Member
Jen
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Colored man? 1956 much? This was a human being who lost his life, and it’s very sad, regardless of what ‘color’ he was. Personally, I’m kind of a light toast color myself.

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago
Reply to  Jen

Oh yeah Martin is terrible! He’s always on here saying the nicest things about everybody- no matter who they are. But boy oh boy he didn’t use your special current vocabulary…How dare he!!! He must be racist evil white man!!! I think YOU are the hater here….grow up

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Actually…from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colored

Colored (or coloured) is a racial descriptor historically used in the United States during the Jim Crow era to refer to an African American. In many places, it may be considered a slur.

Dictionary definitions

The word colored (Middle English icoloured)[dubious – discuss] was first used in the 14th century but with a meaning other than race or ethnicity.[2][3] The earliest uses of the term to denote a member of dark-skinned groups of peoples occurred in the second part of the 18th century in reference to South America. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, “colored” was first used in this context in 1758 to translate the Spanish term mujeres de color (‘colored women’) in Antonio de Ulloa’s A voyage to South America.

The term came in use in the United States during the early 19th century, and it then was adopted by emancipated slaves as a term of racial pride after the end of the American Civil War until it was replaced as a self-designation by Black or African-American during the second part of the 20th century. Due to its use in the Jim Crow era to designate items or places restricted to African Americans, the word colored is now usually considered to be offensive.

The term has historically had multiple connotations. In British usage, the term refers to “a person who is wholly or partly of non-white descent,” and its use is generally regarded as antiquated or offensive.[4][5] Other terms are preferable, particularly when referring to a single ethnicity.

United States

In the United States, colored was the predominant and preferred term for African Americans in the mid- to late nineteenth century in part because it was accepted by both white and black Americans as more inclusive, covering those of mixed-race ancestry (and, less commonly, Asian Americans and other racial minorities), as well as those who were considered to have “complete Black ancestry”.[6] They did not think of themselves as or accept the label African, did not want whites pressuring them to relocate to a colony in Africa, and said they were no more African than white Americans were European. In place of “African” they preferred the term colored, or the more learned and precise Negro.[7] However, the term Negro later fell from favor following the Civil Rights Movement as it was seen as imposed upon the community it described by white people during slavery, and carried connotations of subservience. The term black was preferred during the 1960s by the Black Power movement, as well as radical black nationalists (the Black Muslims and the Black Panthers), pan-Africanists (Stokely Carmichael, leader of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) and political progressives. “Negro” was still favored as self-descriptive racial term over “black” by a plurality in the late 1960s; however, by the late 1970s and early 1980s, “black” was strongly favored.[6] 

Last edited 10 months ago
Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

“Black” became capitalized at some recent point. I’ll go along with the majority wishes of the aggrieved community, they’ve certainly suffered enough. “White” is still only “white”; I accept the punishment. White nationalities can still be capitalized like Spanish, French, etc. Weird. I still capitalize “Slavic” as representing the Slavic peoples such as White Russians, Croats, Serbs, Poles, Czechs, etc, , ad nauseam. Interesting that slave and Slavic are said to have the same root since the Slavic tribes were a favorite source of captive household assistance and genetic enhancement, just like slaves everywhere. Blacks could be considered a nationality regardless of which African nation from which they descend.
I’m sorry for the death of this gentleman, condolences to family and friends. Thank you to the pike-minnow worker and and all assistants.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago

Not me…

Either it’s Black, White, or it’s, black, white.

Capitalize them both, or don’t capitalize either one…

Period.

True Equality is not a difficult concept…
Either all people are treated exactly the same, or they are being treated unequally…

It ain’t rocket science…

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Thanks but yeah- if you don’t keep up with the most current lingo then you’re ” racist” Ha ha ha! It doesn’t matter how you treat people lol. It’s all about the words on Facebook and such LO friggin L!! People are pretty much deranged by now it’s a problem…

farfromputin
Member
10 months ago

Thank you, Ross for the pike-minnow work you do in our watershed. I’m sorry you had to go through this experience. Don’t hesitate to seek counseling if life gets overwhelming. We all understand. Thank you again. Time heals.

707
Guest
707
10 months ago

Condolences to the family 🙏
All life matters.

Prays for the missing girl is found safe.

This makes it two snorkelers that have found a body in the river
The first one was June 25th young man snorkeler working with the water shed program found human skeleton remains south fork river by Williams Grove ave of the giants.
Has the skeleton remains of the person been identified yet ?

Last edited 10 months ago
hillman
Guest
hillman
10 months ago
Reply to  707

there was also a Bigfoot bone found a couple summers ago in the eel near redway … after forensics the Bigfoot bone was identified as having belonged to Mark Burleigh 🙁 rip

Jacoby Creek Beauty
Guest
Jacoby Creek Beauty
10 months ago
Reply to  707

All lives can’t matter until Back Lives Matter.

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago

Whatever. They matter no more than anybody else

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  Farce

That’s exactly what they’ve been saying all along.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Not exactly…

I think the point is , is that they matter just as much as anybody else…

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Yeah that’s what I said. Get over yourself….

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
10 months ago
Reply to  Farce

White Lies Matter. Been waiting so long for the opportunity for that line. Thanks, bro’. This nice guy row is tough to hoe! Take it easy, take it slow. Or the whole world’s gonna blow. It’s too easy to be mean if the person is not in front of us.
Historically in America, Black lives have NOT mattered as much as white. You can look it up, as Casey Stengel said. I think you are old enough to remember the Civil Rights Era of violence against Blacks at lunch counters or trying to go to school or just live. Your toss-off, hmmmmph line is sad and I think, in your heart, you know better. Anyway, I’m gaining on ya!

Farce
Guest
Farce
10 months ago

Ha! Casey Stengel was a hero of mine- those ’62 Mets Oof! But Yogi Berra had the words of wisdom. Yeah- I just said that everybody matters whatever your skin color. But I said it differently. Six of one half dozen another…same difference. But the triggered woke warriors sure get bent- always looking for that evil commenter to correct. There is serious racism going on right now in real life. Evil shit. I sure wish these self-appointed woke warriors would actually get up and do something about it. Children are starving to death in Gaza- and elsewhere. Rich people are buying new yachts. But yeah- let’s correct grammar on RHB and throw insults? Back to the real story- it’s sad that a man lost his life in our beautiful river. My sympathy goes out to his family and friends. Everybody does matter…

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
10 months ago

Or how about a statement that is closer to the truth. “No lives matter”.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  707

I think that the she skeletal remains that were found recently have not yet been identified…

Zoe Penrod previously disappeared in the area…

Also…

There was a missing man’s vehicle that was found in that area, in 2019…

Ryan Grater

He has not been located, either…

https://kymkemp.com/2019/02/18/missing-mans-vehicle-located-near-weott/

Piercy1988local
Guest
Piercy1988local
10 months ago

Maybe if they told us in the article who the woman is thats missing we could help find her.. lol.. sorry but this is dumb.
Tell the woman’s name we can all help locate her. It’s a small community.

Tiredofthisweathertohe
Guest
Tiredofthisweathertohe
10 months ago

Our government has been susurped. This site has been compromised. Too bad Kym. You were our rock.

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago

Not to worry — the situations are only temporary.

Kym Kemp
Admin
10 months ago

What?

Bill Hogoboom
Member
10 months ago

What the hell does susurped mean?

FORMER MRS. WILLBURN
Guest
FORMER MRS. WILLBURN
10 months ago

Im sorry I gotta now reply to the multiple people misunderstanding the statement made by martin I believe, I think he meant it as either he’s not sure why the man became deceased or he wasn’t sure why he was sending condolences because he didn’t know the man or his family or he wasn’t sure if it was appropriate to send his condolences because he didn’t know the circumstances of the man’s death. Anyway only martin knows how he meant the statement he made. However who cares what color or race theman was , first and foremost he was a human being, a male/man human being, someone’s son, possibly someone’s father, possibly someone’s brother, someone’s uncle, possibly someone’s significant other, or husband and someone’s friend. It was a life a human life that someone or many people are mourning right now, missing right now and possibly even brokenhearted because a life was lost and can never be brought back to heal those that are hurting over the loss of him. Maybe we should consider that he was a human life lost not an object. Sorry just my opinion.

FORMER MRS. WILLBURN
Guest
FORMER MRS. WILLBURN
10 months ago

I’d just like to reply one last time, I am a 51 yr old woman of mixed racial background, black, white, Mexican, and four different native American tribes, and as for myself I’d like to not be considered as a race or color at all, I’d like to be referred to as simply human, a human being from the human race if any race at all from the planet earth, plain and simple, cut and dry, directly to the point, a human being, a wonman/female/lady human being. And this has turned from a body found to a racial debate of the body found. It seems that the purpose of the article was about a deceased persons body was found not an ethical debate on how we should refer to the irrelevant race of the deceased body found. I think that the whole purpose of the article in the first place has completely been lost due to a bit of misconstrued ignorance in a comment that should have just been ignored due to the attention it’s completely taken over from this article this emotionally moving article of a life lost.

Casual Observer
Guest
Casual Observer
10 months ago

Used to be you could look in the comment section here for clues to the crime. But it seems the comments have been hijacked by vocabulary warriors. Was this foul play or an accident?

Kym Kemp
Admin
10 months ago

We don’t know yet. Though we were told there was no sign of trauma on the body.