‘The whole police department is burning down’: Scandal-Plagued UPD Faces Latest Allegation of Beating an Unarmed Man

Arturo Valdes, his left eye swollen and his nose broken in a booking photo taken at the Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

Arturo Valdes, his left eye swollen and his nose broken in a booking photo taken at the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office

The Ukiah Police Department is going to federal court again, with officers accused of brutalizing yet another unarmed man. The latest allegation involves a beating that took place at a private residence just a few days before officers beat Gerardo Magdaleno, a naked, mentally ill man in a South Ukiah parking lot. The City settled that case for $211,000, plus attorneys’ fees of approximately $92,500, according to Izaak Schwaiger, Magdaleno’s attorney.

The Valdes complaint, filed in the Northern California US District Court two months ago, claims that on March 28 of last year, Officer Eric Rodello held Arturo Valdes while Sergeant Ronald Donahue punched him in the face, causing multiple injuries that continue to interfere with his ability to breathe through his nose. Rodello and Donohue were not among the four officers caught on camera beating Magdaleno.

According to the Ukiah Police email directory, there are currently 28 members of the Ukiah Police force, not counting the dispatch and records manager and the dispatch supervisor. Two officers and a sergeant are listed in the Valdes complaint. Three officers, a lieutenant, and former Chief Justin Wyatt were named in the Magdaleno beating. (Wyatt was not present at the beating, but was faulted for lack of leadership and training.) Former Chief Noble Waidelich is being investigated for an allegation of assault and is facing a domestic violence trial. Former Sergeant Kevin Murray, who recently pled no contest to felony intimidation and misdemeanor false imprisonment, is facing criminal sentencing in August and a civil complaint by former UPD Officer Isabel Siderakis. In all, ten members of the Ukiah Police force have been implicated in violence in the past year and a half.

The fourteen-count complaint also lists Valdes’ wife Elizabeth and the couple’s two small children as plaintiffs, saying Rodello and Donahue and a third officer, Daniel Parker, handcuffed Elizabeth Valdes and placed her in the back of a police car with the windows rolled up. According to the complaint, officers told her she would lose custody of her children if she declined to provide them with information about a ‘fender bender’ that took place earlier that day in the parking lot of the Ross department store.

Richard Middlebrook, a Bakersfield attorney who is representing the Valdes family, says there was no injury or property damage in the minor collision, and that Valdes gave the other party his driver’s license and insurance information. According to Middlebrook, the other person refused to return the license, and Valdes went home. Police officers retrieved the license from the other person, and came to the Valdes residence a little after 7 pm.

In Middlebrook’s account, the officers asked Arturo Valdes if he had been involved in a hit and run, which Valdes denied. “There was no hit and run, because in order to have a hit and run, you have to have damage which you refuse to take responsibility for or leave information about,” Middlebrook argued. He said the officers told Valdes that they could smell alcohol, and that Valdes was on probation for a prior DUI. The complaint states that at the time of the arrest, Valdes was no longer on probation. Middlebrook said officers told him he was required to take a breath test, and Valdes did not argue.

But now, Arturo Valdes is being prosecuted by the Mendocino County District Attorney’s office 

for driving under the influence, child endangerment, and resisting arrest. Middlebrook says it’s impossible to prove whether or not Valdes was under the influence at the time of the collision (when police believe the children were in the car), because officers met him at his home some time afterwards. And he’s skeptical about claims that Valdes was resisting arrest, because he says his client wasn’t being arrested when the beating took place.

“They said, ‘You’re not under arrest,’ multiple times,” Middlebrook reported. “And then said, ‘You’re not entitled to speak to a lawyer, since you’re not under arrest.’ That is a flagrant lie, and a misstatement of almost every bit of case law ever, involving the right to speak to an attorney.”   

Describing the video (which we have not viewed), Middlebrook said Donahue began to walk to the front door of the residence, while Arturo Valdes walked toward the garage. He said then, the officers grabbed Valdes by the arms. “When the officer comes up and grabs him from behind, my client turns around and pulls his arm away and says, ‘What are you doing? Am I under arrest? Am I being detained?’ He said, ‘You’re being detained.’ And he said, ‘Why am I being detained?’ And they grab him, throw him face-first into his own car, then throw him to the ground, hold him down, and beat him.”

Middlebrook says the officers falsified the arrest report, which is easily proven by the fact that their statements are contradicted by Ring cameras at the Valdes residence. “One of my concerns in this case from the beginning,” he said, “is that these officers will testify according to what they wrote in their police report, when we know that their police report is fraudulent.” This, he said, could cause legal problems in court, “if they answered questions that incriminated them criminally, that they could be prosecuted for those answers.” 

He said the officers found a way around that, at a recent preliminary hearing, when he asked Donahue, “‘How many times did you strike my client in my face in order to break five bones in his face?’ At that time, [Donahue] said, ‘I’m going to take the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination, and I refuse to answer the question.’” According to Middlebrook, Rodello likewise stated that he planned to plead the Fifth, which “throws a huge monkey wrench into this whole criminal case,” because if the officers don’t testify under cross-examination, prior testimony is likely to be thrown out. “If you can’t or will not answer questions under cross-examination in the case, and the entire testimony is then removed, there is no evidence against my client whatsoever, and the case will be dismissed,” he predicted.

Deputy District Attorney Heidi Larson did not return an email asking questions about the case, specifically the implications of Middlebrook’s account of the officer’s testimony. 

There will be another hearing in The People vs Valdes on August 19th. Deputy Ukiah City Manager Shannon Riley said she was in meetings all day yesterday and was not able to provide information about the case in time to meet our deadline.

The civil suit that the Valdes family is bringing against the City of Ukiah, the police department and the three officers is just getting started. Charges against the city include willful negligence that allows for multiple instances of expensive police misconduct.

“It’s rampant,” Middlebrook said. “It’s overwhelming. Almost one-third of the officers have had civil rights violations lawsuits filed against them in the last year and a half alone. I’ve never heard of anything like that in any other department…not only when there’s smoke there’s fire. This is when there’s fire there’s fire. You see the whole police department burning down. At some point, it’s systemic. It goes from the top down.”

To see the entire complaint in the Valdes case, please follow this link.

Earlier UPD Stories: Kevin Murray:

Earlier UPD Stories: Gerardo Magdaleno:

Earlier UPD Stories: Chief Noble Waidelich:

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

67 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Corporate Serfdom
Guest
Corporate Serfdom
3 years ago

In this day and age It’s been shown time and time again, regardless of your opinion, that the potential for great bodily injury is real.

The only question you gotta ask yourself is.

Do ya feel lucky?

Well do ya?

Remove qualified immunity from police officers, and mandate all police unions to cover the expense , Not the tax payers.

If the police aren’t inspired to police each other then they are exposed to losing their retirement plans.

They need to be held financially liable for personal bodily injury.

Permanently on Monitoring
Guest
Permanently on Monitoring
3 years ago

I have seen this happen in other organizations, where administrators just fire the entire staff, or someone is hired to come in and play “whack-a-mole”…
Large insurance payouts from cities would be a great reason to go to law school immediately, but the bigger question is, at what point do citizens revolt against government?
The average North Coast resident wouldn’t attend their own HOA meeting, but there is a larger problem even yet: Who hires these people?
Are HR Departments staffed with competent, trained, certificated persons? Are the employees of Mendocino County adequately paid? Do the cops themselves have any idea what to do, or are they just winging it while in possession of dangerous weapons? Do the Leaders, in Ukiah, only have “on the job training” before they occur at random, in offices, in Ukiah, like kittens, weather and universes?
The entire structure and fabric of North Coast Government is entirely, 24/7/365: Out To Lunch… My advice:
Don’t be homeless in a city, don’t be mentally ill out in the street, and, remember to sue the city if the cops rough you up.
Like Jim Morrison said: “They got the guns but we got the numbers”…

thatguyinarcata
Guest
thatguyinarcata
3 years ago

Let’s make individual officers carry liability insurance so that the bigger risk they become of producing expensive lawsuits the more expensive it is for them to stay on the job

Michael M
Guest
Michael M
3 years ago

Yes, Yes. This is a solution.

What!?
Member
What!?
3 years ago

It’s why they become cops. If you’re not a murderous thug, you don’t join a gang of murderous thugs.

Hmmmmm? Who wda thot
Guest
Hmmmmm? Who wda thot
3 years ago
Reply to  What!?

I have been watching the mcso arrest log for Years. There is a very distinct pattern. Of black eyes. And. Forehead abraisions. Particularly on violations of resisting arrest. Or drunken violations. When they cuff a. “ resisting”. Person. They beat the crap out of them. Very obviously. Ukiah pd. And sheriffs. Officers are worst. No doubt they get unruley. Rude. Disrespectful people but. If you cant be professional. Dont take the job. Itsa real tough guy that beats up a handcuffed man / woman

Prometheus
Guest
Prometheus
3 years ago

One guy fell up the stairs…

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  What!?

That’s very true.

And even if you do, somehow, apply for and get hired to join a corrupt department like that, with your good and honorable intentions, you will never fit in, will be mistreated, and ostracized, until you are forced to leave, or really have no other viable option, than to discontinue your association with the scoundrels.

Officer Isabel Siderakis apparently didn’t “fit in”…

Quite possibly, a case in point.

Joshua Woods
Member
3 years ago

Police need body cameras for their own protection against allegations from those that hate them. I have no idea if these officers are innocent but more and more people are hating poliyjust because the hatred being spread by social media and the news.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Woods

Right…

suspence
Guest
suspence
3 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Woods

More likely, I suggest, it that it’s been like this for a very long time: the brotherhood of the badge goes all the way to the bench. Police have acted above the law for…well forever, and now because of iphones and social media their unlawful behavior is being exposed.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

?

Captain 'Murica
Member
Captain 'Murica
3 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Woods

I’m of the opinion that it’s wrong to hate any group of people because of the behavior of some members of that group. It’s the same kind of thinking that underlies racism, sexism, and all kind of other isms.
That said, if these officers are guilty as charged, I certainly hope an example is made of them. These charges would be a betrayal of public trust and detrimental to the work and reputation of good officers everywhere.
Love the avatar, by the way and 100% agree about body cameras for the reason you stated and for accountability to the taxpayers.

Hmmmmm? Who wda thot
Guest
Hmmmmm? Who wda thot
3 years ago

I bet you wd change your opinion after getting yanked around by you arms cuffed behind your back behind a sheriff car becus your significant other pulled a shitty on you and called them to your home

Captain 'Murica
Member
Captain 'Murica
3 years ago

My opinion on hating entire groups of people because of the actions of some members of that group?

Sarah
Guest
Sarah
3 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Woods

Have you seen the mugshot of Mr. Valdes after they were through with him? The camera doesn’t lie. Nobody deserves that. He could have easily died from that beating. And locking a mother of two babies in a squad car in 80 degree heat for close to an hour could also have been fatal. How can you defend this barbaric treatment?

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Woods

It’s the mug shots that are incriminating them. Body cams probably will just further incriminate them.

Melody
Guest
Melody
3 years ago

And they want us to just “respect” the police blindly when they can’t even manage hiring and maintaining officers who are respectful of the public, the law itself, and what the job requires. The whole profession brings out all the men who orgasm off power trips. It’s like a magnet for the racists, the chauvinistic. And again and again cities hush these happenings and attempt to cover them up and the small percentage of the time when they don’t manage to do that through intimidation, lies, cover ups, 5th ammendment pleas, they repeatedly cost tax payers thousands and sometimes millions of dollars in lawsuits and settlements. Accountability for these fools is a pipe dream! And now the damn Supreme Court says officers aren’t even personally accountable if they don’t read you your Miranda rights anymore. Seems obvious why it’s always the mentally ill, minorities, folks who don’t speak English well or might not have legal status who bear the brunt of their brutality. They know they’re not only easy targets, they’re less likely to fight abuse and mistreatment. Ya know, the stuff cop’s orgasms are made of?

In my 1911 I trust
Guest
In my 1911 I trust
3 years ago
Reply to  Melody

If they don’t read you your Miranda rights you can’t be held accountable for anything the cops say you did either. Just sayin. Otherwise most cops are just the bullies from high school that never grew up, or the kids that were so wimpy in high school that they can’t wait to have a gun and badge so they can dish some out. Most cops have a chip on their shoulders

Mendocino Mamma
Guest
Mendocino Mamma
3 years ago

Police fabricating information in reports, being judge ,jury and executioner NO… that never happens!!!

Who are they trying to protect?
Guest
Who are they trying to protect?
3 years ago

There must be better ways to handle mental and all arrestees. A naked man is not carrying weapons so why hold a man down while another officer beats him. In some areas of this Country the police are out of control. In Texas they believe they have right to not even protect children and teachers. I shudder recalling Rodney King and a group of police officers surrounding him and beating him with night sticks. And that was probably 15 years ago. Even here how can it be justified shooting a suspect who is walking away from officers or in Blue Lake a known mental guy threatening Sheriff’s Deputies with a plastic rake or a mental woman with an unloaded flare gun. Not much has changed.

Tim
Guest
Tim
3 years ago

Rodney King beating was 31 yearscago.

Steeze
Guest
Steeze
3 years ago

April 26th, 1992. There was a riot on the streets tell me where were you
You were sittin at home watchin your TV, while I was participating in some anarchy

Original Gringo
Guest
Original Gringo
3 years ago
Reply to  Steeze

Yah! Thanks, Market Street was never the same. “Bad Hippy!” Bling Bling

Krs One
Guest
Krs One
3 years ago
Reply to  Steeze

I participated in the Rodney King riots!
Now I’m in ukiah advocating for change on the Homeless Agenda.
Recently, June 7th 2022 the homeless encampment on the train tracks behind Daniel Steel, was evicted. Crisis county workers are told to show up June 14th, 7 days later.

I was the only advocate fighting for the rights of those unlawfully removed and we’re suffering emotional harm from Ukiah PD.

My fight is from the request of Tina Morse, a direct descendant of the Burke Brothers who married into the tribes. Sherwood is Tina Morse’s Tribe. A civil suit will be filed on UPD for ignoring rights of due process. Intimidation tactics were used to scare displaced encampment. The fear of unnecessary camping tickets, loss of property, and harassment, I helped move campers into remote locations too far for community resources to be equitable. I have walked a mile in your shoes to better understand the deficiencies of established resources listed.
You were warned be ACLU of possible human rights violations. Homeless need a voice. I am here to ensure Tina Morse last dying wish will be granted… #7generations #pathfinder #pathcreators

geezerme
Member
geezerme
3 years ago

“Can’t we all just get along” R.K.

Older hopefully wiser
Guest
Older hopefully wiser
3 years ago

OK so everybody is down on the Ukiah cops … What might be a potential solution?

How about instead of paying millions of dollars in lawsuits for abuse that money is used for Reinstating state run “mental homes”?

That alone would remove a big problem that the cops never should be dealing with anyway

Second thought harder to accomplish especially since 100% of everyone has guns these days it’s to Foster cops with a higher bar morally then society in general leading to community respect for cops -essential for them to do their job!

In an functioning society cops would have the ultimate authority and Law abiding citizens could not fail to cooperate with them/ Yes the cops would need to be decent community minded people which most of them are I believe but a few bad apples are really having a heyday with lawyers and societies money. What good is a police force if Joe citizen has no legal obligation to follow the law?

The answer lies In two points:raise the bar for cops yes, but slso raise the bar for citizens. This potentisl solution includes Consistent and dependable consequences for breaking the law or not yielding to the authority of cops when you are breaking the law –

Complaining is easy and requires not much critical thinking proposing a solution on the other hand might take a shift in mental function

My two cents worth

Xingu
Guest
Xingu
3 years ago

The man in this story was/is not mentally ill, nor did he commit the “crime” that bbrought officers to his home. How could he have hit and run….they had his license which he had provided to the other person involved. You are off on a taangent.

Older hopefully wiser
Guest
Older hopefully wiser
3 years ago
Reply to  Xingu

The article states he was Mentally ill

Bonnie
Member
Bonnie
3 years ago

“The latest allegation involves a beating that took place at a private residence just a few days before officers beat Gerardo Magdaleno, a naked, mentally ill man in a South Ukiah parking lot.”

Nope. Different dude. Different place. Different time. Another needless, vicious beating by brutal Ukiah cops.

Last edited 3 years ago
Xingu
Guest
Xingu
3 years ago
Reply to  Bonnie

Thank you

suspence
Member
suspence
3 years ago

I’m all for government run mental institutions but it’s gonna take a hell of a lot more than a few million bucks. That is naïve at best. And, I think you’re missing the point of the article here: there is a pervasive cultural problem in this particular PD especially.

Dano
Guest
Dano
3 years ago

The few bad apples wouldn’t be an issue if there was no “thin blue line” and qualified immunity. If they will not hold each other accountable then someone must. I will give them respect when they have earned it.

No Joke
Guest
No Joke
3 years ago

The solution is to disband the Ukiah police department. When they disbanded the Blue Lake Police Department, the FBI had to take over all their cases and a decades old murder was finally solved.

The idea of tossing whoever you don’t like into a “mental home” for the rest of their life sounds good until somebody decides they don’t like *you*.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  No Joke

?

geezerme
Member
geezerme
3 years ago

How about instead of paying millions of dollars in lawsuits for abuse that money is used for Reinstating state run “mental homes”? Mental homes for the bad cops?

Pangs
Guest
Pangs
3 years ago

All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible. Such people have a tendency to become drunk on violence, a condition to which they are quickly addicted.

Power attracts the corruptible. Absolute power attracts the absolutely corruptible. This is the danger of entrenched bureaucracy to its subject population.

Power attracts the corruptible. Suspect all who seek it.

–Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse Dune

suspence
Member
suspence
3 years ago
Reply to  Pangs

Does Herbert offer an alternative to governments? Anarchy? No thanks.

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

No but this quote is informing us that we need to have a system that checks on those who seek power positions. It is not anarchy at all but responsible government we are after…Not everybody in power is corrupt- how do we increase employing those types of people and keep in check the corruptible ones? We really need to screen better!

suspence
Member
suspence
3 years ago
Reply to  Farce

I guess I don’t disagree but it seems like you used a lot of words to not really say anything. Was it Aristotle or Socrates that said democracies are destined to fail because societies can’t rely on the masses to make good decisions about who should lead. Case in point: Trump. I don’t think there is an answer to your question.

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

Yes it is true that sometimes I might tend to demonstrate excessive verbosity. Trump was already corrupt but we voted him in anyway. Hilary was also corrupt so maybe you are correct that democracies have a time limit. Somebody else said we need a revolution every 200 years to keep it fresh…

suspence
Member
suspence
3 years ago
Reply to  Farce

Yikes

Xingu
Guest
Xingu
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

Anarchy is simply stated, the absence of one person having power over another. No one is absolved of personal responsibility. It is a word and a concept toosed around far to frequently by people unaware of its meaning.
Anarchy is the epitome of personal responsibility

Entering a world of pain
Guest
Entering a world of pain
3 years ago
Reply to  Xingu

?

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 years ago
Reply to  Xingu

Anarchy sounded good when I was young…until I realized we were not responsible enough to make it work. Anarchy only works when personal responsibility is very strong. Small groups it can work. Bigger groups the sociopaths and assholes weasel their way to the top of the pecking order that they create…

Hmmmmm? Who wda thot
Guest
Hmmmmm? Who wda thot
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

Accountability is the answer Holding them to their oath. Internal investigations. Wont accomplish that. They need oversite. And serious consequences when they get caught.

Dano
Guest
Dano
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

An alternative is an effective system of checks and balances.

izzy
Guest
izzy
3 years ago
Reply to  suspence

Sandworms

Steve Koch
Guest
Steve Koch
3 years ago
Reply to  Pangs

No doubt. If you value your liberty, give govt as little power and $ as possible.

Salin
Member
Salin
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve Koch

You get what you pay for.

Dano
Guest
Dano
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve Koch

Nonsense. An oligarchy is not a suitable replacement.

Pangs
Guest
Pangs
3 years ago
Reply to  Pangs

The Warrior’s Code
Do not hurt where holding is enough;
do not wound where hurting is enough;
do not maim where wounding is enough;
and kill not where maiming is enough;
the greatest warrior is he who does not need to kill.
-Stephen R. Donaldson, Lord Foul’s Bane

Corporate Serfdom
Guest
Corporate Serfdom
3 years ago
Reply to  Pangs

Ask the police why they shoot to kill, when maiming could suffice.

Pangs
Guest
Pangs
3 years ago

Yeah. I understand the reasoning you allude to, and do not disagree.
FWIW, the “Bloodguard” from this fantasy fiction were martial artists who eschewed weaponry.

Cetan Bluesky
Guest
Cetan Bluesky
3 years ago

A bad business. A very bad business. Police Union has a lot to answer for.

Deb
Guest
Deb
3 years ago

Wow maybe something finally will be done about are messed up police department and sheriffs department they’re all bunch of crooks half the time when they go to court they say it wasn’t excessive force my ass watch the videos these guys think they can get away with murder and I’m sick of it I’ve watched when they killed that guy in jail . his name was Stephen it’s bullshit nothing happened to the sheriffs the CEOs nothing !!!!! it’s time for change things need to Been dealt with properly if it was somebody that got pulled over for something they get the book thrown at them but know that last case of the sheriff I will not mention the name he got off with two years probation what the fuck

Older hopefully wiser
Guest
Older hopefully wiser
3 years ago

Here’s an idea: I believe what they do in Japan with rowdy subjects who won’t yield Is to taze them If needed and then wrap them like a burrito in a mattress secure the burrito with belts and carried them off to settle down or get help or whatever just a thought again easy to complain I’d love to see some creative solutions on this thread

Dano
Guest
Dano
3 years ago

How about simply performing the duties in a respectful and lawful manner?

bearjew
Guest
bearjew
3 years ago

thankfully none of these guys will have an easy time getting laid now 🙂

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 years ago
Reply to  bearjew

Umm…but won’t that make them more pissed off and ready to beat up more people?!

Shawnee Sauers
Guest
3 years ago

As well it should …. Mr. Middlebrook as well it should

Dano
Guest
Dano
3 years ago

They need to fire the whole department as it is costing the City way too much money and obviously is in fringing on the Constitutional rights of citizens.

thetallone
Guest
thetallone
3 years ago

The DA’s office has given the signal-if you are a cop, even if you rape, steal and commit violence multiple times, we are gonna go easy on you. The whole thing stinks from top to bottom and a federal investigation might be what is needed.

Jen
Member
Jen
3 years ago
Reply to  thetallone

agreed

Prometheus
Guest
Prometheus
3 years ago

The presumption of innocence is a legal principle that every person accused of any crime is considered innocent until proven guilty. Under the presumption of innocence, the legal burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to the trier of fact. If the prosecution does not prove the charges true, then the person is acquitted of the charges. The prosecution must in most cases prove that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Corporate Serfdom
Guest
Corporate Serfdom
3 years ago
Reply to  Prometheus

Except for the Jan 6 prisoners

Pangs
Guest
Pangs
3 years ago

Ouch!