Odd, Old News: When U.S. Grant Was Stationed at Old Fort Humboldt

Crop of Cora Deering painting of Ft. Humboldt, circa 1858 [Photo courtesy of HSU Library Humboldt Room Special Collections, Palmquist Collection]
When Lt. Ulysses Simpson Grant, the future 18th President of the United States, sailed into Humboldt Bay on January 5th, 1854 to serve at the newly built Fort Humboldt, it was his second assignment to a frontier military post. He cared for neither assignment. While biographies have focused on his alcohol habit during this period, there is an interesting back story of his conflict with Lt. Colonel Robert C. Buchanan, the officer in charge of the 4th US Infantry under which he served at the fort.
Local historian Chad Hoopes use of NARA documents enabled him write the “Lure of Humboldt Bay” an authoritative study of the early history of Humboldt Bay, Fort Humboldt and Grant’s time in our area. The book is highly recommended.
A brief history of Grant’s activities preceding and during his time at Fort Humboldt will set the table for this week’s article.
In May of 1852, the 4th regiment US Infantry was ordered to leave their post at the Pittsburg Barracks on Lake Erie, travel down the Erie Canal and board ship to sail west to the military barracks at Benicia, California. After landing on the east coast of Panama, the party of 700 soldiers and their families marched across the isthmus to Panama City on the west coast. Brevet Lt. Commander Buchanan was not with the 4th Infantry on this trek. Lt. Grant served as quartermaster on the journey and his efforts to keep the force supplied earned him praise from the troops. Though Lt. Grant was spared, an Asiatic cholera outbreak took a huge toll on the unit, at least 100 died, and hundreds had to convalesce and recover aboard ship on their sail north, and once at Benicia.
Back in Washington, after much politicking, new California Superintendent of Indian Affairs Edward Beale’s proposal to create military posts on reservations for Native Americans was endorsed by President Fillmore. In December, Lt. Colonel Buchanan arrived at Benicia, and on January 20th, 1853, he was ordered north to Humboldt Bay with troops from the decimated B and F Companies, 4th Infantry, with instructions to choose the best location for a new military fort. After their steamer Goliah survived a harrowing passage over the bar at the entrance to Humboldt Bay, a high bluff to the east caught Buchanan’s attention before the Goliah landed at Bucksport. He declined entreaties from Humboldt City and Eureka to establish the fort near their communities, and chose the flat prairie tableland on a high bluff south of Eureka on February 9th. Clearing of the plateau and construction of Fort Humboldt commenced, made harder by Lt. Colonel Buchanan’s decision to not bring adequate blankets and coats north. The men of the 4th suffered greatly working in the bay’s February weather. A hole was dug for a redwood post that would soon fly the United States flag over the post, as seen in the painting above. By the middle of June, the soldiers, with the help of local workmen had finished building six of the ten buildings that Buchanan had staked out around a parade ground.
Lt. Grant was not at Fort Humboldt at this time, in September of 1852 he had been assigned to the Columbia Barracks at Fort Vancouver on the Columbia River. Here he suffered from depression, avoided military duties, desired to return to his family back east, and succumbed to seeking solace in alcohol. When the officer in charge of Company F at Fort Humboldt died, Lt. Grant was promoted to Captain on August 9th, 1853, and ordered to sail south as his replacement. Once again, he was forced to serve under his “arch-enemy” Lt. Colonel Buchanan, an officer with a reputation as an insensitive tyrant. The two men had a history of not getting along stemming from a post-Mexican war incident at the Jefferson Barracks at St. Louis where Lt. Grant’s romantic proclivities caused him to be late to report for duty. Buchanan’s “fine” of another bottle of wine, Grant’s fourth in a few weeks, rankled him and he bore a grudge for decades.
Unable to book ship passage, Grant’s delayed arrival at Fort Humboldt on January 5th, 1854 immediately created friction with Lt. Colonel Buchanan at the beginning of his five month post at the fort. According to Hoopes, Grant’s time at Fort Humboldt was something he wished to forget, and was largely left out of his memoire and most written biographies. At the fort, he served as officer of the day, quartermaster, and ran the troops through their drills. Like the author of the article below, Hoopes felt there was a “cloud” of rumors that had exaggerated Grant’s drinking at Fort Humboldt.
Captain Grant continued to have difficulties with Buchanan, which reached a pitch in the spring of 1854. After one alcohol induced incident, he was forewarned that “Old Buch” was going to arrest him for dereliction of duty, Grant responded that “he had decided to resign”. On April 11th, Grant wrote two letters to the Adjutant General in Washington, D.C., one in confirmation of his receipt of his delayed appointment to the rank of Captain, and another resigning his commission in order to leave the army. On May 5th, he left the fort for San Francisco and legend has it that he said “whoever hears of me in ten years, will hear of a well-to-do old Missouri farmer”(Hoopes:128). Little did he know what was in store for his future, and the country’s.
This week Odd Old News will share a 1907 article from the Humboldt Times that is a portrayal of Grant and how he spent his time during his four month stay at Fort Humboldt.
(The article’s dates for Grant’s time at the fort is erroneous, Hoopes’ dates used above are the correct ones).
WHEN GENERAL U. S. GRANT WAS STATIONED AT OLD FORT HUMBOLDT
INTERESTING FACTS, MANY OF WHICH HAVE NEVER BEEN PUBLISHED, CONCERNING THE DREARY OLD DAYS WHEN THE WARRIOR-STATESMAN WAS ON DUTY AT THE LOCAL ARMY POST
By D. L. ThornburyNote—As per previous announcement, The Times this morning presents an interesting article relating to General V .S. Grant, and his life during the time he spent at Fort Humboldt. D.L. Thornbury, the writer, has spent considerable time in gathering the facts presented in this article. We believe that what he has written is well worth preserving, for it deals with a critical period in the career of one of our nation’s greatest hero-statesmen. During the fall of 1853 the war department promoted Lieutenant Ulysses S. Grant to the grade of captain as a recognition of excellent service In the Mexican war, and assigned him to the station at Fort Humboldt, in California. He arrived about the end of October, 1853, and remained only five months. During his stay, there was a great deal of rainy weather which made him despondent; he was unable to agree with his superior officer at the Fort, and his wife and children were in the east. He left the county in March, 1854, and resigned from the army shortly after.
A great deal of tradition has naturally grown up about his stay, since he afterwards achieved so great fame, both as soldier and President of the United States. Most of it is absolute fiction, as no one man could possibly have done all attributed to him in the short space of five months. The historical facts are given in the first three paragraphs above, the tradition follows. It must be remembered that the Grant in Humboldt during 1853 was not the same Grant who fought the battles of Shiloh and Vicksburg, and triumphed at Appomatox, for during the ten years which elapsed he had been tried in the fires of failure in business and taught the lessons of war.
Grant at the time he lived in this county, was a stout, rugged young man about five feet eight or nine inches tall. His nose was large and straight, his eyes firm and steady, and he wore a short, rough, sandy hard beard. His face was ruddy and he looked rougher than the common West Point graduate of the time. When he had duty at the Fort as officer of the day or conducting the drills, he wore the regulation officer’s uniform and performed his duty as a soldier should. When off duty he usually wore the private’s clothes consisting of canvas pants, canvas coat and an old straw hat. Socially he was sometimes a hail fellow well met, but he was a better listener than a talker, and generally he was a man of reserved habits and was not given to talking when there was no need.Grant belonged to Company F of the Fourth United States Infantry. Fort Humboldt was established in the winter of 1852-53 as a military post for the protection of the people of the county from the Indians. As Eureka was small in size and its location then wet and swampy, the fort was located back of the town of Bucksport, which seemed to give promise of becoming the largest town on the bay.Fort Humboldt Heights, as the location is called in 1907, is now within the city limits of Eureka. The street cars now run past the spot, which enables one to easily visit the historic place. The position of the post is a sightly one, on a plateau thirty or forty feet above the sandy beach of Humboldt Bay. It is naturally intended for a fortification and gives plenty of ground for parade and drill. The barracks and the officers’ quarters were erected in 1852 in the usual quadrangular form around three sides of the parade grounds, leaving the west side open, and looking out towards the Pacific Ocean and upon the bay.There were at least a dozen buildings comprising the fort. Three of them were large, two storied and used as barracks. The other smaller buildings were of one story with porches In front. Grant’s headquarters was the second on the left or north side, and it was one of the smallest houses. The forests of redwood and fir in the rear made a background to the picture and furnished abundance of timber. The buildings were put up by the work of the soldiers in the command. Their plan was to put up a frame, fill in with logs, then weatherboard and plaster inside. The first house was built in this manner, but it was found expensive and unnecessary in this climate. A good weatherboard house, plastered inside, was sufficient protection for the coldest weather on the bay. Buildings of the latter type were easily worn out and blown down. Time and wind have almost demolished the buildings. The reconstruction of one used as a storeroom still stands, while boards and shingles of another lie upon the ground, a monument to the neglect of Eureka for one of its places of interest.The commanding officer was Col. Buchanan, who was about the only cultivated and refined man there. Most of the soldiers located at Fort Humboldt were a rough looking set, and were not respected by the settlers.Captain Grant, reported for duty in October, 1853, and this post thus became the scene of one of the early military services of a man who was later to become a famous general and a nation’s hero.Colonel Buchanan and Captain Grant did not get along very well, and there was a great deal of friction between them. This grew greatly as time went on, and almost led to a court martial, and is probably one of the reasons that induced Grant to resign from the army service. It is only fair to state that the salary of a captain was low at a time when the gold excitement was at its height, wages of the ordinary laborer were large and the price of foods was very great. The pay of the officer, while perhaps good in the east, on the Pacific coast was ridiculously small in comparison.
Tradition states that when he was leaving the county to avoid further trouble with the commanding officer, he said that they would hear from him afterwards. During the civil war, Grant as superior officer met Buchanan as inferior, who was assigned some rather hard work to do, In order to even up the scores contracted at old Fort Humboldt. The Indians gave no trouble. In fact were very friendly visiting the garrison and exchanging meat and fruits for flour and hard tack.
No military expeditions away from Humboldt were undertaken while he was here. There were practically no roads and when the soldiers did go out, they had to cut their own trails. The privates didn’t have much to do and the life there was rather monotonous. As Grant was an officer, his hours of duty were not as long drawn out as those of his subordinates. He made many trips to Eureka.
In those early days, only a mule trail led from Fort Humboldt to Eureka, passing close to the marsh, which was then subject to tidal overflow, and along under the bluff to what is now South Park. From that place it became a partial road to the waterfront. Broadway and Summer Streets are the modern representatives of this old mad.
Eureka in 1854 experienced a depression in the lumbering and other lines of business and the population was considerably diminished. In all Eureka there were not more than 400 people. The only streets were First, called Front, and Second, and these were but three or four blocks in length. The timber came down to the very edge of the water, but the trees near the shore were scraggly and windblown. There were but two wharves and three saw mills. The spruce and fir were the only kinds cut as the redwoods were too large to handle and its wood was not considered worth much. The people were engaged in lumbering and there were few women, hence no society to serve as a counteracting attraction to the saloons. Of these there were three or four, the principal one being conducted by R. W. Brett, who started one on the bank of a little stream that flowed into the bay below the corner of First and F streets. There was but one church and one general store. Grant usually hung around the saloons, and he is not to be blamed much for this, because they were practically the only places to go. Here he would meet friends, sailors, and new arrivals. There were some billiard tables and he sometimes amused himself playing at that game. He cared nothing for the lower class of women; the saloon and a game of cards with boon companions being seemingly his first and greatest love.
One evening Grant walked to Eureka and at one place the road crossed a slough which used to run about where Fourth and E streets now are. A large log served as a bridge. A drizzling rain was falling and as the log was slippery, he fell into the slough. He came to Brett’s place and stepping up to the bar, ordered a drink, went over to the stove and dried himself.
He was accustomed to ride a mule to Eureka and one night he failed to return to the Fort and a party went in search of him. They found him asleep in a thicket about where the alley alongside Christ church is now located. His favorite mule was browsing close at hand. These incidents, together with the fact that he frequented the saloons have given rise to many false stories concerning Grant’s drinking. In order to have actually committed all the breaches of sobriety credited to him by the stories I have personally heard, he would have had to live here four years and do nothing else.
He was a frequent guest at the homes of Dr. Jonathan Clark, James T. Ryan, Captain Moloney and the Duffs. He made Duff’s place a secondary headquarters, where he often slept. He borrowed their big roan horse to ride. This animal would just as soon run away as not, and that suited Grant. He would ride out into the woods and jump the horse over logs and obstructions. The usual course he took was along a corduroy road, which led to a charcoal making camp. This was located at about Seventh and G streets, and the charcoal was for the use of the blacksmith shops.
Grant also visited the points of interest in and near Bucksport. No doubt he went boat riding on the bay, for we are informed that all the officers had boats. At one time they took a walk to Buhne’s point and from there looked upon the beautiful scene spread out before them. To the north was the expanse of the main bay, shut off from the ocean by the low sand dunes of the North peninsula, which at that time did not extend so far south, thus leaving a wider entrance. To the south lay the lower bay, which is really a big lagoon almost entirely enclosed by the sand pits. Beyond the region five miles away was Table Bluff. To the rear and east were the spurs of the coast range covered with redwood, of which Grant sneaks in his memoirs as a “species of red cedar of immense size.” Spread out in front to the west and northwest lay the beautiful blue expanse of the Pacific, which laps the shores of the peninsulas with is combers and white foam. Directly in front was the bar and entrance of Humboldt Bay, marked by the long swelling breakers coming from two directions —over the south shoals and from the northwest.
The exact spot upon which Grant stood while gazing upon this scene is not now in existence. The ceaseless lap of the tide and wave has worn Buhne’s Point back for a distance of over two hundred feet. The hero worshipper can only content himself by viewing the same scene. On a hill back of Bucksport still stands a low one-story house formerly occupied by the Heustis family. Captain Grant was a guest in this house and slept one night in this south room. A visit can be paid to it. The room is 12 feet long, 10 feet wide and about 8 feet high. The window to the south faces the Elk River Valley. The window on the most overlooks the bay. There is the little closet where he may have hung his clothes. Shall greater men stand in that room?

Old Ft. Humboldt Photo [Crop of Photo courtesy of HSU Library Humboldt Room Special Collections, Swanlund-Baker Collection]
AT FORT HUMBOLDT
Daily Humboldt Standard
September 7, 1898
In the Company with Major W.W. Heuer, U.S. C.E. and J.C. Bull, U.S. Grant was driven out to old Fort Humboldt in his southern part of this city, this afternoon, where his illustrious father was stationed nearly half a century ago, when the present U.S. Grant had scarcely opened his eyes on this world. There is little left now of the military buildings that occupied the site in those days except the old assembly hall, but the son was at last enabled to tread the same round that once was pressed by the feet of his sire & look out over the broad Pacific as perchance his father did in the days when this was little more than a wilderness.
Earlier Odd and Old News:
There are many, but here are the most recent:
- A Real Fight With a Bear Up Mad River
- A Carriage Ride Down the Coast in 1892
- Lively Times At Klondike
- Drinking And Gambling Didn’t Mix
- The Round Valley Coal Fields
- ‘The Gypsies Are Coming!’
- Who Were the Romani?
- Anti-Gypsyism in 1897 Humboldt County
- Lost At Sea — The 1867 Wreck Of The Kaluna
- When Wolves Made the News

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
He deserves his likeness on the fifty.
To bad the old buzzard didn’t drown when he fell into the slough. As president he launched an illegal war against the Lakota Sioux. He personally approved the mission to send Col. Custer into the Black Hills of what is now South Dakota. All this was over gold.
“All this was over gold.”
Nowadays it would be all about cannabis.
He sent Custer into the Black Hills and he lost the battle with the Lakota Sioux. What would have happened to history if he had sent someone that would have won the battle? Someone once said “Don’t mess with history.”
If the “Old Buzzard” had drowned, the union may have lost the civil war and slavery would have been much harder to eliminate. Don’t mess with history, learn from it.
I agree, Ernie. It is what it is. We can, hopefully, learn from history and change, but what happened is just that. It happened, it can’t be changed.
But you are especially correct about Grant and the Civil War.
“Fun” aside…my great-great-great grandfather was in Humboldt in the 1850s, logging. I have often wondered if he met Grant there. We know “grandpa” was in Bucksport.
Then a decade or so later his own father would die at Vicksburg, fighting, under Grant.
Some of the contributing key factors leading the north to victory: superior industrial capabilities, better logistical support, greater naval power, and a population in favor of the union. Sherman was just as capable as Grant. To know history you have to read it.
When Grant became president of the United States in March 1869, Sherman succeeded him as Commanding General of the Army. God I love GOOGLE, don’t you?
…
I love my university degree in History, too. 🙂
Sherman coulda, woulda, shoulda. It is what it is. Grant was indeed the man in charge. Shrugs.
Really? And here I thought Lincoln was Commander in Chief. And Sherman dida. Ever hear of his March to the Sea? How well would Grant have done without all the resources available to him. Grant was forced to resign from army in the 1850s after caught drunk on duty. He swore off alcohol, only to fall off the wagon during the Civil War. Grants presidency was marred by political scandal, clashes with Native Americans, and continued violence thruout the reconstruction south
Right on Ernie. The trend today is to define a person by their worst moment and ignore any good they may have done.
It’s Trump’s fault.
civil war had basically 3 drivers: institution of slavery, states rights, and …. the actually big reason..was the north’s desire to control the cotton industry…and in particular…cotton sales over seas.If the war were to happen today… post industrial…. no slavery….
……. the civil war would of just been states rights…and money. Good old money. The industrial north held all the cards… they had the economy…they had the population… and..they won.
You have any reference for the north wanting to control cotten shipments pre war? The north used southern cotton consistently before the war. There was certainly competition with Europe with all the normal wjpheeling and dealing but it seems pretty far fetched to call it a cause of the war.
I do… I’ll try to dig it out for you… I read it on some university blog… years back. Economics…and the desire of the north to dominate the southern confederacy states … strength of the federal govt… and control of states…. which considered themselves sovereign.
It wasn’t so much slave labor…as it was state rights..and economics. Different time… different perspective. Many slave traders..were… blacks. Just like the traffic – ing of the illegals at the southern border today…. they sell their own into pedophilla… sex trade. Same happens in Nor Cal..and now So Or with the drug cartels. The agencies are working on the problem…and making some gains.
Who…taxes… whom… as always….. north was destined to win per the strength of the industrial base economy… the wealth..the ability to conscript soldiers…equip and pay same. Enter the “Confederate Dollar”…and fiat money banking… neither side was paying soldiers in gold.
Lynyrd Skynyrd “Sweet Home Alabama” (Live In Atlantic City) – Album OUT NOW! – YouTube
Lincoln’s great debt to Manchester | American civil war | The Guardian
Tariffs and the American Civil War – Essential Civil War Curriculum
Impact on the British Cotton Trade · Liverpool’s Abercromby Square and the Confederacy During the U.S. Civil War · Lowcountry Digital History Initiative
Cotton – Essential Civil War Curriculum
The American Civil War and the Lancashire cotton famine | Revealing Histories
Cotton Is King: The Role of Cotton in the Civil War
Cotton and the Civil War | Mississippi History Now
…they still hold the pride of the resistance.
Waylon Jennings – An Old Unreconstructed – YouTube
With the Lakota refusing to sell their ancestral sacred homeland, the US government ordered the military to force them out. While Little Bighorn was a major victory for the Lakota and Cheyenne, a year later the full US Army would take control of the Black Hills for good. To know history you have to read it
Except their ancestral sacred land was not in the Black Hills. ” The Lakota Sioux settled the area in about 1765 after being pushed out of Wisconsin and Minnesota by European settlers and Iroquois tribes. ” After the earlier tribes had decimated by small pox. Not that the Black Hills weren’t sacred to most natives tribes preceding the Lakota influx.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hills_land_claim
Thanks, I didn’t know that.
But my point being to Ernie was that no matter who was sent in, in the end, the outcome for the Sioux was the same.
I may have to change my plans for next week’s article and segue to the story of “Yellowstone Dick”, the nickname of 70 something year old Richard Jones(of Weaverville at the time of his Blue Lake Advocate interview) who, in 1906, told the story that on “the 16th of August Jones was commissioned by Gen. Terry, at that time superior in command, to bear dispatches from that general, stationed at Fort Keogh, to Gen. Custer occupy with his force Bear Mountain, a high plateau at the horseshoe bond of the river, inaccessible on all sides but one, awaiting a centralizing movement by himself(Terry) and Reno”… after a 60 hour dangerous journey he verbally gave Custer General Terry’s orders only to have the autocratic Custer disdain the orders, as if they had come from the the messenger, and not Custer’s commanding officer. Instead Custer was led into a trap that was set for him by the Lakota…
I enjoy your articles. Keep up the good work.
In twenty or thirty years, another generation will be telling this latest one how stupid , mean, ignorant and uneducated they are. Hopefully they will be around to do it.
“You tell ’em, brother!”
-Bob Lee
Grants Pass, Oregon
“Old Ft. Humboldt Photo [Crop of Photo courtesy of HSU Library Humboldt Room Special Collections, Swanlund-Baker Collection]”
I met Sam Swanlund and commissioned him to do a “painting” for me. He would hand paint over an existing photograph. His paintings adorn the walls of Pierson’s. He told me the ones he wasn’t too proud of he would sign Sam Swanlund. And the ones he was particularly proud of would get Samuel Harper Swanlund. If you look on the walls of Pierson’s you’ll see both signatures. He was an avid historian of Humboldt County and a prince of a man. His sparkling blue eyes are still etched in my mind.
I particularly like the part where he eventually outranks Buchanan and gives him all the dirty work. LOL… Payback is a bitch.
I don’t blame Grant for not liking the weather. I feel much the same on some of Humboldt County’s long dreary winters.
I was much surprised to find out from David Heller that Grant probably never used “Grant’s Trail” up Bell Springs Ridge.
The pony soldiers did use Grant’s trail and helped scratch up the rocks up there with their names rank and division number. They are also dated.
Looks muddy. I dont envy that first winter without proper shelter or clothing. I think I’d want a drink or two also to keep warm.
General George Crook, who later gained fame during the Civil War, was stationed at Fort Jones when he first left West Point. It is said that General Ulysses S. Grant and Phillip Sheridan were also assigned duty at Fort Jones but never arrived.
Fort Jones Museum
In 1853, Lt. Crook was one of six officers who directed the construction of Ft. Humboldt, and served as adjutant. He didn’t care for Lt. Colonel Buchanan’s personality either. Private A.P. Marble, future lighthouse keeper at Cape Mendocino, observed this while on post orderly duty:
“One morning Colonel Buchanan was standing in front of his headquarters and, looking across the parade grounds, saw Lieutenant Crook standing in an easy position with his hands in his pockets. The colonel addressed me, “Orderly!” “Yes sir!” “Present my compliments to Lieutenant Crook and tell him to take his hands out of his pockets.” “I approached the lieutenant and, suppressing a smile, delivered the message. Crook was not on duty at the time and with a pleasant smile, he replied, “Orderly, present my compliments to Colonel Buchanan and tell hims that my pockets are my own.” (Hoopes:92-3).
Grant wrote the following in his autobiography.
There was no time during the rebellion when I did not think, and often say, that the South was more to be benefited by its defeat than the North. The latter had the people, the institutions, and the territory to make a great and prosperous nation. The former was burdened with an institution abhorrent to all civilized people not brought up under it, and one which degraded labor, kept it in ignorance, and enervated the governing class. With the outside world at war with this institution, they could not have extended their territory. The labor of the country was not skilled, nor allowed to become so. The whites could not toil without becoming degraded, and those who did were denominated “poor white trash.” The system of labor would have soon exhausted the soil and left the people poor. The non-slaveholders would have left the country, and the small slaveholder must have sold out to his more fortunate neighbor. Soon the slaves would have outnumbered the masters, and, not being in sympathy with them, would have risen in their might and exterminated them. The war was expensive to the South as well as to the North, both in blood and treasure, but it was worth all it cost.
It brings up a possible alternate history. Had he north simply thrown in the towel and allowed the south to succeed, and had Grant’s assumption come to pass, would the Confederate states today be a majority black nation? Black slaves were more than a third of the population of the south at the time of the Civil War.
Thank you, Kym and David Heller for your reporting and scholarship. These historical writings help me understand why I’m in love with this place.
I love these, too! Hooray for David.
If it wasn’t for the US military sub-commanded by Lt. Grant, the Klamath Indians may have never made it as a tribal civilization…? It’s something to digest and think about…?
https://www.complexamerica.org/blog/how-ulysses-s-grant-saved-the-klamath-river-natives
hmmm. I do like it when portrayals of historic figures are nuanced with information that contradicts commonly held views, but this one doesn’t work for me. I looked at the footnote sources, and neither Hittel, nor Bledsoe confirm your comment. The historic record is unanimous that Grant left the Fort in the spring of 1854, not in 1855 when the activities with the Klamath occurred. Footnote 5 is not available on the link, so if there is something I didn’t check, please do share more.
I am the presenter. Your opinion is valid, however not quite accurate. Contact me and I’ll be happy to address your concerns…
Thank you Mr. Smith, I was wrong, partly! I don’t know why I didn’t see the references the first time through. Bledsoe makes the claim for Grant being involved in 1855 in the Klamath conflict on page 168 of his 1885 Indian Wars of the Northwest, and Hittel repeated this on page 915 in his 1897 History of California. Thanks for you gracious correction about my misreading of the sources you used. However, quibbling on for the sake of historical accuracy….I believe that they were both wrong. Usually we give credit to primary sources, but in this case both authors are in complete conflict with Grant’s biographies which place him in Missouri in 1854 on… Although giving a later date for his resignation from the service in July of 1854, perhaps when it was accepted(?), the Wikipedia page shares his timeline, and there is no reference to a military career after 1854 .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_and_career_of_Ulysses_S._Grant
I am no authority on Grant, but I believe that later works have corrected the errors made in earlier sources.