‘Unnecessary Tragedies’: Coalition Pushes Caltrans to Fix Deadly Eureka Corridor

Welcome to our letters to the editor/opinion section. To submit yours for consideration, please send to [email protected]. Please consider including an image to be used–either a photograph of you or something applicable to the letter. However, an image is not necessary for publication.
Coalition for Responsible Transportation Priorities CRTPRemember opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect that of Redheaded Blackbelt nor have we checked the letters for accuracy.

The Coalition for Responsible Transportation Priorities (CRTP) today delivered a petition signed by 738 concerned residents asking Caltrans to make immediate safety improvements for people walking, biking, rolling (such as using a wheelchair, skateboard, or stroller), riding the bus, and driving on 4th and 5th Streets (US-101) in Eureka. In addition, the petition asks for already planned safety improvements to be funded and built on Broadway.

People with mobility devices crossing at 5th & C St

People with mobility devices crossing at 5th & C St

The petition notes that there is a traffic safety crisis on Highway 101 in Eureka, including Broadway, 4th Street, and 5th Street. Because of the way these streets are designed, vulnerable people are regularly killed there. In the last decade alone, at least 5 people have been killed and at least 35 people severely injured while walking or biking on 4th and 5th Streets. Pedestrians are severely injured or killed on these streets at 90 times the average rate for streets and roads in Humboldt County.

The petition follows the release by CRTP of a report last fall called “Dangerous Downtown Streets,” which describes the safety crisis on 4th and 5th Streets in detail, and recommends improvements to make things safer. CRTP has also produced point-of-view videos that provide clear perspectives on what it’s like for people of all ages and abilities to walk and bike around 4th & 5th Streets.

In addition to CRTP, the petition is supported by the Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC), Tri-County Independent Living, Area 1 Agency on Aging, California Nurses Association, Caltrans District 1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee, and Ink People Center for the Arts, as well as all current Eureka city councilmembers and Humboldt County Supervisor Natalie Arroyo.

Person with motorized wheelchair crossing at 5th & U

Person with motorized wheelchair crossing at 5th & U

“Older adults and people with disabilities are more likely to be hit and killed while walking or using a wheelchair,” said Area 1 Agency on Aging Executive Director Maggie Kraft. “Our office is on 4th Street, so our clients and staff are at risk from the dangerous conditions in this corridor. But even if our office were somewhere else, older adults and people with disabilities who live, work, shop, and access services in Eureka would still be at risk, and we think that needs to change.”“The injuries people suffer in car crashes can be life-changing,” said local nurse and California Nurses Association member Leah Stamper. “And too often, their lives can’t be saved even with the best care. We know these crashes happen disproportionately on Broadway, 4th and 5th Streets—streets most of us travel on daily—and we know they are preventable with better road design. These are unnecessary tragedies that hurt our community and strain healthcare workers and hospitals.”

“As a long-time supporter of CRTP, Tri-County Independent Living works diligently to partner with them to provide accessible and safe crosswalks, bike lanes, and streets for all that live in Humboldt County, with a particular focus on individuals with disabilities,” said Tri-County Independent Living Systems Change Advocate Jessica Warrick. “Through our street, walk, and bike audits we are able to provide insight and information on how to make the streets safer and more accessible. CRTP has been instrumental through their diligent and hard work within the community, with CalTrans, and through advocacy at HCAOG meetings. We support their efforts to make the streets safer for individuals with disabilities as well as our entire community.”

The organizations supporting the petition also support the incremental safety improvements currently under construction on parts of 4th and 5th Streets, as well as the South Broadway Complete Streets Project. However, they acknowledge the urgent need for much more significant safety improvements throughout the entire US-101 corridor in Eureka. While the most critical cost of the current unsafe conditions in this corridor is the loss of lives, these conditions also impact local quality of life, economic development, and access to environmentally friendly transportation. Immediate action from Caltrans is needed to address the situation.

Caltrans has already responded to the petition by announcing a “feasibility study” of safety improvements for all users of the 4th and 5th Street corridor. “This announcement amounts to an acknowledgement of the need for more safety improvements, which we appreciate,” said CRTP Executive Director Colin Fiske. “However, this ‘feasibility study’ must not result in just more study and delay. We already know that major safety upgrades are feasible. And every year we put off making those improvements, more people are injured and killed. We need change now.”

Bicyclist Crossing at 4th and C

Bicyclist Crossing at 4th and C

The petition calls for several specific, evidence-based safety improvements, including:

1. Fully fund and construct planned safety improvements throughout the Broadway corridor.

2. Convert one lane on 4th Street and one lane on 5th Street to protected bike lanes, so that Highway 101 consists of 2 vehicle lanes and 1 protected bike lane in each direction throughout Eureka.

3. Add traffic signals and other safety improvements to key intersections on 4th and 5th Streets.

4. Improve visibility at intersections.

5. Slow car and truck traffic for everyone’s safety.

6. Consider all safety upgrades recommended in the “Dangerous Downtown Streets” report.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

41 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
John
Guest
John
18 days ago

People should really consider going to a light and crosswalk to cross the highway 101,the lights and crosswalks were put there for this reason.Putting bicycles and pedestrian in a even more shared and direct space with highway vehicles and expecting a better outcome is absurd..

ABA
Guest
ABA
18 days ago
Reply to  John

“Putting bicycles and pedestrian in a even more shared and direct space with highway vehicles and expecting a better outcome is absurd..”

Bicycles and pedestrians are normal, should be expected, and have every right to be in a downtown business district. Running a major highway directly through downtown and expecting a better outcome is absurd.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
18 days ago
Reply to  ABA

Consider the source. That group is more aligned to a car-free society than just safer passage. Reality says that having a US highway bisect your city is always going to be problematic. The data is right in front of them, and sometimes literally on the street.

I’m a lifelong cyclist. I also use public transportation to work 3 days a week because it’s cheaper than gas and I can be lazy for an hour and just read. But there are numerous times where somebody doesn’t want to use a crosswalk and thinks an oncoming bus is something to play chicken with, and that disturbs everyone on the bus, and anything they had sitting next to them. Happens almost every day when I ride.

So I’m not against other modes at all. I use them. But Thinking more paint and lights is going to save lives, they’re out of their minds. As it is, you can’t pay me to ride along the 101 corridor anywhere. I don’t even use C St. It’s confusing to everyone and I don’t need that extra anxiety. I use J St. or the Hikshar’i like normal people.

justsayin
Guest
justsayin
18 days ago

Good point. This is just another group of the “car free” folks like the ones proposing to turn downtown McKinleyville back to the 60’s in the name of progress.

Korina42
Member
18 days ago

They’re not advocating for “car free,” that’s not practical; they’re advocating for being able to leave the car at home for shorter trips and having a reasonable expectation of arriving back home safely.

So I’m not against other modes at all. I use them. But Thinking more paint and lights is going to save lives, they’re out of their minds. As it is, you can’t pay me to ride along the 101 corridor anywhere. I don’t even use C St. It’s confusing to everyone and I don’t need that extra anxiety. I use J St. or the Hikshar’i like normal people.

I rode on C St. a couple of weeks ago and didn’t find it at all confusing; I just rode my bike, stopping at the stop signs and looking out for vehicles, until I got to my destination. Later I did the same thing in the other direction. It was a Saturday in mid-May, so not a lot of traffic; in fact, it was a very quiet, pleasant ride. There isn’t a lot of access on the Hikshar’i, it’s more of a recreational trail; great ride, though.

old guy
Guest
old guy
18 days ago
Reply to  ABA

Overhead walkways for pedestrians, dump the bike lanes on 4th & 5th, they can go through ‘old town’, and use the bike trail North. open up the road for traffic, or divert around town totally, like the old Bayside proposal.

Korina42
Member
18 days ago
Reply to  old guy

The road is already open for traffic; in downtown it’s six lanes of fast-moving traffic and you want more? What you’re proposing would be death for Eureka’s downtown; the businesses still there are already struggling, and your idea would kill them off altogether, leaving blocks of empty storefronts facing an actual highway; imagine what it would do for Eureka’s tax base!

Bill Hogoboom
Member
17 days ago
Reply to  old guy

Overheard walkways?? No way.
Much too expensive.
Virtually impossible to make ADA complient.
And do you really think that the Kamikaze jaywalkers who can’t be bothered to walk a half block to a crosswalk will walk even farther to climb stairs?

Mariahgirl
Guest
Mariahgirl
18 days ago

They should consider 6th&7th for adding bike lanes instead of 4th&5th.

Mr. Clark
Member
18 days ago

Why are they directing bikes to 4th and 5th. More stupidity from the state. And the failed eureka city council will go along with it.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago

IMHO:

>”Fully fund and construct planned safety improvements throughout the Broadway corridor.”

Yeah…. sure make it a 2 lane road. Trees planted. Flowering shrubs. Flowers (consultants favorite…people picking flowers) on the way to the ‘bistros’. Grass Planted. 12′ wide ‘bike and pedestrian lane’. There will be mega pedestrians on Broadway. Packed with bicycles ! Packed with skateboards !
Traffic will be backed up to King Salmon and Brainard !
Yee hah !

>”Convert one lane on 4th Street and one lane on 5th Street to protected bike lanes, so that Highway 101 consists of 2 vehicle lanes and 1 protected bike lane in each direction throughout Eureka.”

Oh my gawd… another no-bike lane. Green paint bonanza. Curb fart-out bonanza ! People turning across the no-bike lanes. Rear end collisions. Side collisions. Pedestrians will be milling about. Picking consultant flowers. Lots of ‘bistros’. Lots of skateboarders. Traffic backed up. Going to create another downtown (as it used to be) Willits where it took 45 minutes to get through the town ! Yee hah !

>”Add traffic signals and other safety improvements to key intersections on 4th and 5th Streets.”

More bum crossings. Never seen the one by the broadway ‘theaters’ used. Bums cross where they want. Stand in the middle of the street (mall) begging alms. Cops ignore.
Yee hah !

>”Improve visibility at intersections.”

Yes. Level all the downtown corner businesses ! Might as well install traffic circles.
(2 lane traffic circle occupies a block). Backup the traffic. Yee hah!

>”Slow car and truck traffic for everyone’s safety.”

Heck. Why have them at all ?
Brave the fog. Brave the rain. Brave the cold. Brave the wind. Brave the dark !
Catch Pneumonia and die !
Skateboards are the answer ! Bicycles are the answer !
Yee hah !

Hint: Go watch some Colin Fiske’s old YT posts. Skateboarder jumping over pedestrian benches. Sliding down pedestrian staircases. Sliding down pedestrian handrails.
Link below.

(https://youtu.be/PoMFcGm4bOo)

Go figure.

Captures3242s
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Have you seen the new shrubbery along 101? Some of it has been replaced twice in 6 months already because homeless people keep cutting them down for fire wood. I know this from watching one of them drag one across Broadway one night by the cemeteries. Those trees are $100 each at Costco.

Last edited 18 days ago
Farce
Guest
Farce
18 days ago

No worries! That’s just OUR tax money being burnt up so just be grateful WE are supporting the homeless in these worthwhile endeavors….and please support raising the sales tax so we can all do more to support the homeless!

Tangled Massocells
Guest
Tangled Massocells
17 days ago

People that work and pay taxes should be forced to donate higher taxes to support the homeless! The taxes will be used to buy cords of firewood and delivery to the homeless encampments. Staying warm and cook-fires are a basic right!

Korina42
Member
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Google seems to indicate that it’s a different Colin Fiske; that one’s a skateboarder and filmmaker. https://www.jenkemmag.com/home/2016/05/25/in-praise-of-the-proudly-bald-skateboarder/

As for the rest, slowing down traffic would make drivers safer too; there are so many bad car-on-car crashes on Broadway/4th & 5th, mainly caused by speed. I hope it would help downtown businesses too; it’s such a sewer now, being loud, filthy, and dangerous.

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
18 days ago

The ONLY worthwhile response to this debacle is a bypass.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago
Reply to  I am a robot

IMHO:

The bypass won’t be allowed due to the greenies.
Any movement on the bypass will be tied up in court for decades.
They will find a new ‘endangered’ species. Spotted newt-toad or something.

Best route is to break away from 101 just south of Mck.
Go across the Mad River, through the pastures to Manila.
Down the Samoa peninsula, then cross the bay by Elk River, and re-join the freeway.

Won’t be allowed.

Go figure.

Thatguyinarcata
Guest
Thatguyinarcata
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

You think they should build a bridge just north of the mouth of the bay? Cutting right across the primary boat traffic lane?

Is that just so you can have something else to complain about when your proposed bridge costs hundreds of millions of dollars cause they need to build it to accommodate the coast guard vessels, research ships, fuel barge, and also leave open the possibility of future freight hauling ships?

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago

Bridge over the bay ? Sure. No issues. Why does that trouble you ?
Coos Bay has one. High clearance coastal bridges are found up the Oregon/Washington coast. Take a drive up there if you haven’t.

BTW Aside: Coos Bay is kind of a partner to Eureka… lost jobs, empty downtown. Only thing keeping it alive is the sport salmon, dune buggy activity and the Casino. Big drug problem up there. ‘Fentanyl Crisis’ declared. Huge Meth population. Just a look at the future of Eureka.

Any rate, entire cost of the ‘bypass’… dunno a billion dollars ?
Haven’t seen any ‘guesstimate’ on it.

Will be that way no matter what ‘direction’ it takes.
My guess is that it probably ain’t going to happen.

Yee hah. (Have just about run out of them now.)

Ahuka 2400
Member
Ahuka 2400
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

 Big drug problem up there. ‘Fentanyl Crisis’ declared. Huge Meth population. Just a look at the future of Eureka.”

Sounds like the TODAY of Eureka to me

Korina42
Member
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Coos Bay probably has bedrock, not just miles of sand.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago
Reply to  Korina42

Really ???

Wow… maybe you should read the geological report on Coos Bay ????
All built on sand, sandstone, silt, clay and marine deposits.

(https://www.oregon.gov/dsl/ss/Documents/FINAL%20Geology%20Data%20Summary.pdf)

Go figure.

Korina42
Member
17 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Fair; I was just guessing.

Thatguyinarcata
Guest
Thatguyinarcata
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Cool Bays bridges are built relatively deep on the bay from stable ground, not right over the entrance to the bay from a sandbar to a tidal marsh. Have you actually been to Coos Bay?

But sure, theyre totally the same. Surprised you didn’t cite the Golden Gate Bridge, after all it goes right across the mouth of the bay!

I do appreciate that you regularly remind readers here why we shouldn’t be taking your comments seriously, routinely.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago

Really ??? (Duplicate of above post).

Wow… maybe you should read the geological report on Coos Bay ????
Coos Bay is built on sand, sandstone, silt, clay and marine deposits.

(https://www.oregon.gov/dsl/ss/Documents/FINAL%20Geology%20Data%20Summary.pdf)

Dunno how you manage to sling this bullshit.

Thatguyinarcata
Guest
Thatguyinarcata
17 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Looking at the linked reports, both bridges in Coos Bay terminate on sandstone bedrock at both ends. The bridges are built in specific spots, they’re not built in every single type of geology that’s found around coos bay.

How deep is the sandstone bedrock at the south end of the Samoa peninsula?

Korina42
Member
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Put a major freeway on a glorified sandbar, around an estuary experiencing high levels of subsidence, on the leading edge of the tsunami zone, in a very seismically active area, just so drivers don’t have to slow down?

What could possibly go wrong?

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago
Reply to  Korina42

Gee whiz…

>”What could possibly go wrong?”

Heck, I’m not saying that you ‘should’ build it.

Probably best place… but something in the ‘near future’ is going to go verrrry wrong along the north coast of the USA. Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake is going to hit.

Full zone. Magnitude 9+. Shaking for 3 minutes.
Partial Zone. Magnitude 8+. Shaking for 2 minutes.
Land subsidence. Land elevation. Tsunamis. Most of the immediate coastal area is going to be in ruins for say…100 years. Going to be the biggest modern day disaster. Unimaginable destruction.

Why I don’t want to put ANYTHING along the coastline. Going to be a goner.

Otherwise: Building the bridge is no issue.

In the past they built sawmills and pulp mills in Samoa.
Old Hammond sawmill had a 180′ concrete stack. Didn’t fall down.
Taken down in the late 70’s.

Aside:
I was there when an old guy out of Chicago took it down. He was like a character out of movie. Cranky guy, chewing on a cigar while he and two of his crew were jack hammering concrete out of the bottom of the stack. (That broke the surface tension in the concrete.)

Any rate.

Pulp mills had 300′ stacks… two of ’em. Didn’t fall down.
Simpson Mill had it blasted down in…2000 or so. (Yeah, was there).
3 Power boilers.
2 Huge chemical Boilers (One is still there).
90′ tall chip feeder. Still there.
Massive industrial tanks,
Huge pulp machine rooms. Still there.

You guys are too funny.

Thatguyinarcata
Guest
Thatguyinarcata
17 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

Ah yes, a smokestack is exactly like a highway bridge. More flawless engineering insights from Bozo

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
18 days ago
Reply to  Korina42

Outer Banks highway in NC comes to mind. Just replace tsunamis with yearly risk of hurricanes and being up to 30 miles out in the ocean.

Thatguyinarcata
Guest
Thatguyinarcata
18 days ago
Reply to  I am a robot

Saying it is simple, doing it is another thing altogether.

What route should it take? Who’s land should the state take to build it? How many millions should we spend on it?

Ginger
Member
Ginger
18 days ago

They should not have killed the by-pass.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago
Reply to  Ginger

Dunno.

Arcata wants to spend millions (billions?)’ to ‘underground’ the freeway.
Says that it ‘divides’ the city. Spending $700k on the plans right now !

Korina42
Member
18 days ago
Reply to  Bozo

I’m hoping they take the “more bike and ped bridges” option more seriously.

And by the way, the freeway didn’t ‘divide’ the city, it actually divided the city. You can see it.

Thatguyinarcata
Guest
Thatguyinarcata
18 days ago
Reply to  Korina42

That seems to be what theyre actually talking about. The whole “underground the freeway” thing was a kind of “imagining” exercise that some city council member offered up but the actual project is just starting and is primarily focused on connecting the outer neighborhoods to the main part of arcata.

Korina42
Member
18 days ago

I think it was also used to get grant money.

justsayin
Guest
justsayin
18 days ago

Too bad a little bit of the 136 Billion $ invested in the high speed railroad wasn’t invested in something like this that actually might get results.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
18 days ago
Reply to  justsayin

Newest estimate… $231 billion.

Rick
Guest
Rick
17 days ago

Usually from what I have seen, this Eureka meat grinder is mostly the result of self entitled asshole drivers, going too fast and not paying attention, while disregarding existing traffic controls or nieve pedestrians and cyclists who think the laws of physics do not apply to their self entitled butts while they disregard existing traffic controls. Or a combination of both. So the question is how are more traffic controls going to reduce the meat grinder that is Eureka? Given the problematic nature of the target class, which are self entitled people who do not pay attention and ignore traffic laws.

Tangled Massocells
Guest
Tangled Massocells
17 days ago
Reply to  Rick

I’m surprised nobody mentioned the obvious: More Marijuana Dispensaries along that highway corridor through Eureka. That will keep unimpaired pedestrians and drivers focused!

Korina42
Member
17 days ago
Reply to  Rick

People are doing what the street tells them to; three wide lanes say “highway” so they do. The saying goes, “design the street for the behavior you want.” Caltrans has designed the Broadway/4th & 5th corridor to be a highway to be driven through quickly, not the downtown Main Street it should be.

As an occasional pedestrian in Eureka, I really don’t want to have to walk 1/4 mile or more out of my way just to get to my destination across the street; usually, the nearest corner is as far as I want to go, remembering that legally every corner is a crosswalk even if it’s not marked.

If you read the article you’ll see that CRTP has some pretty solid ideas about how to fix the corridor, including bringing the corridor to a more sensible four lanes, better lighting, more crosswalks, etc. I don’t agree with all of them, but on the whole they’re good suggestions to make everyone safer, including drivers.