Trump Administration Enters Fight Over Potter Valley Project, Eel River Water

Cape Horn Dam in Potter Valley long

Cape Horn Dam in Potter Valley [Photo by Sarah Reith]

Press release from the USDA:

Today, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins filed a notice to intervene in the Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project proceedings currently being considered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). This action will allow USDA to ensure that the interests of the National Forest Service, local farmers, ranchers, agricultural producers, communities, and other stakeholders are represented.

“If this plan goes through as proposed, it will devastate hundreds of family farms and wipe out more than a century of agricultural tradition in Potter Valley,” said Secretary Rollins. “Water is the lifeblood of farming. Without it, crops fail, businesses close, and rural communities crumble. For generations, farmers here have put this water to good, productive use. But under California’s radical leadership, the needs of hardworking families are being ignored while the needs of fish are treated as more important. That’s simply wrong. This plan would put countless USDA investments at risk and leave families even more vulnerable to drought and wildfire. This is why I’m intervening in the FERC proceedings and urging them to reject the pending application.”

Secretary Rollins also filed comments urging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reject Pacific Gas and Electric’s (PG&E) current application to surrender its FERC license for Potter Valley Project Hydroelectric Project. Secretary Rollins’ comments urge FERC to reject PG&E’s application unless significant deficiencies are addressed. Her notice of intervention guarantees USDA’s ability to actively participate in the proceedings, protect its programs, and advocate for the farmers and communities who depend on the project’s reliable water flows. You may read the full comments (PDF, 610 KB).

Background:

The Department has serious concerns with Pacific Gas and Electric’s (PG&E) current application to surrender its FERC license for Potter Valley Project Hydroelectric Project because of the profoundly negative and irreversible impact on local farmers, ranchers, agricultural producers, communities, and USDA equities. USDA maintains a large number of programs across different mission areas that will be negatively impacted; namely, the National Forest System (NFS), the Risk Management Agency, the Farm Service Agency (FSA), Rural Development, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS).

For perspective, according to the last census of agriculture the counties of Lake, Mendocino, Sonoma, Humboldt, and Marin have a combined total of over $1.4 billion in sales of agricultural products. That’s well over $4.2 billion in extra economic activity due to agriculture if you assume a standard multiplier of $3 to $1 which is standard in the nearby Central Valley.

Recently the Secretary received a letter (PDF, 1.9 MB) from over 920 residents with grave concerns about the proposed surrender and decommissioning plan for the Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project.

The Secretary also penned an op-ed, highlighting concerns.

Earlier:

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

30 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
local observer
Guest
local observer
5 months ago

are there even a hundred farms in Potter Valley? it looks more like 50 with a rough count and most of their farm ponds are tied to the creek drainages from the surrounding hills and not the Russia River or the Eel diversion. typical BS from the most inept admin in history.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
5 months ago
Reply to  local observer

Yes its a small place.

Jack Durnford
Guest
Jack Durnford
5 months ago
Reply to  local observer

Inept? Boy you certainly have your wires crossed or you’re talking about the last administration. This administration is unwinding all the damage that was done by the previous administration. To put even 50 farmers out of business and ruin their property values is despicable. Hopefully the new administration puts a hard stop to anymore damage Democrats can do to any part of this country.

lol
Guest
lol
5 months ago
Reply to  Jack Durnford

How many families of fishermen do you think are out of business because of the way these waters have been handled?

Your preference for robbing generations to come for the sake of profit today is absolutely disgusting.

lol
Guest
lol
5 months ago
Reply to  local observer

From a conservative perspective it doesn’t matter. It’s simply about economics over environment, every single fucking time.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
5 months ago

Fish needs Trump interbasin water diversion.

FB native
Guest
5 months ago

Yeah you wouldn’t want to see the millionaire wine g rowers go without

Kris
Guest
Kris
5 months ago

This is why critics are concerned about federal intervention to keep the project operating while also cutting or freezing infrastructure and environmental funding.

Lone ranger
Guest
Lone ranger
5 months ago

The king has spoken, crack me up. I see fuel here in California is dropping , haven’t seen that in awhile. No green policy equals cheap fuel.

KatyDoes
Guest
KatyDoes
5 months ago
Reply to  Lone ranger

Yep. $2.99 per gallon at one station near here and $3.45 at another.

skitty
Guest
skitty
5 months ago
Reply to  KatyDoes

In CA ? I highly doubt it, but go ahead Miss Katy where is near here ?

Pharmstheproblem
Member
Pharmstheproblem
5 months ago
Reply to  skitty

Just got gas in redding ca $3.19

KatyDoes
Guest
KatyDoes
5 months ago
Reply to  skitty

Here you go, Skitty! OLDsters really should get out of their self imposed exile behind the second growth curtain! 🤡

IMG_1488
Smoky OG again
Guest
Smoky OG again
5 months ago
Reply to  KatyDoes

Katy you are from Effn Texas please post your BS on a texas website. $4,36 reg unleaded @ bear river. Like right now 11pm fri dec 19. If anyone knows if indianola is cheaper I maybe could plan a trip to the cash n carry!

Pharmstheproblem
Member
Pharmstheproblem
5 months ago
Reply to  Smoky OG again

$3.19 in redding ca

KatyDoes
Guest
KatyDoes
5 months ago
Reply to  Smoky OG again

Ain’t from Texas, but been there, and God DID bless Texas. You get 100 miles north, south or east of the second growth curtain, and you can afford to go even farther. Where the smoke is just as good, if not better, than old Humboldt ragweed. We got world class bass fishing, affordable housing and a positive business environment in the area near the gas station in the image below and the image slapped on Skitty, above.

Can I get an effin apology?

IMG_1489
Devilsadvocate
Guest
Devilsadvocate
5 months ago
Reply to  Smoky OG again

gas is $2.17 in Texas as of last week.

Pharmstheproblem
Guest
Pharmstheproblem
5 months ago
Reply to  KatyDoes

Yep 3.19 in redding this evening.

Permanently on Monitoring
Guest
Permanently on Monitoring
5 months ago

$2.99 at Big Valley in Lakeport yesterday…

Typical, wave the left hand and pick your pocket with the right…

See’s Candy, $33/lb? Thanks Warren Buffett…

Kill the tariffs, Trump you asshole, you are not from CA…

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
5 months ago

How unlike the Trump administration to butt in on something without actually understanding what it is they’re butting in on.

Angela Robinson
Member
Angela Robinson
5 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

He only knows about it because some crony whispered in is ear. Without actually understanding what he even is interfering with.

Same with Rollins…who complained to them? With enough money for them to pay attention to it.

KatyDoes
Guest
KatyDoes
5 months ago

Did you read the article that states who complained to Rollins? 920 residents who’s way of life and livelihoods will be impacted if the dams come down. There’s a link to the letter they wrote in the article. Would you like me to provide the link in another post?

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
5 months ago

I’d like to see the dams removed and not replaced.

Dan Noar
Guest
Dan Noar
5 months ago

Environmental extremists rub thier hands in maniacal glee as they destroy critical infrastructure.
#savelakepillsbury

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
5 months ago
Reply to  Dan Noar

Fiscal pragmatists rub their hands in glee as outdated money pits are slated to be torn down.
Environmentalists are pretty happy about the reopening of hundreds of miles of salmon habitat.
Tribes are excited about the restoration of thousands of acres and the return of traditional food sources.
And local communities are excited at the prospects of hundreds of millions of dollars in economic output from the dams’ removal.

Poor Trump– once again on the wrong side of… well, pretty much everything.

KatyDoes
Guest
KatyDoes
5 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Pragmatists, environmentalists, tribes and communities outside of Lake Pillsbury and Potter Valley had best curb their enthusiasm. I think someone told the President that Newsom’s vineyards will benefit if the dams come down. Wrong watershed, I know that and you know that… but Mr. Trump doesn’t need to know that!

Being on the wrong side of some things isn’t that big of a deal when one can force others to accept one’s side… in one way or another.

lost croat outburst
Member
lost croat outburst
5 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

It’s tragically amazing. Republicans gave us our greatest president, Lincoln, to save us and end slavery, and now the absolute worst possible reprobate to destroy American Democracy, Donald Trump, just in time for our 250th birthday. Wow. Proud, so proud. Nice try, America. Participation trophy. Flash in the pan. DREAMERS, LMAO! (Actually weeping)

Mike
Guest
Mike
5 months ago

The “needs” of those fish are directly connected to human beings. Whone somewhere else.

Captain Gort
Guest
Captain Gort
5 months ago

Thank GOD for the intervention of the TRUMP administration. When those dams were built 100 years ago, maybe it was indeed a mistake. But you CANNOT put the genie back in the bottle now. 600,000 people and countless industries have ARRIVED in those 100 years and now DEPEND on that reliable source of water Its COMMON SENSE. Removing the dams would be like removing Highway 101 “for environmental reasons”. Jarod Huffman should pay the penalty at the polls for his foolish support of this stupid and asinine venture.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
5 months ago
Reply to  Captain Gort

Except that 600,000 people don’t rely upon those dams.

Other water supplies- especially if supplemented with the proposed diversion, will provide ample water for the people of Sonoma and Southern Mendocino.

And the successes of the removal of the Klamath River dams do show that damage can be reversed.

Your common sense (no need to shout) really doesn’t make much sense at all.