Humboldt Approves Agreement as End of Potter Valley Project Nears

Cape Horn Dam [Photo from waterboards.ca.gov]
After decades of contention, PG&E’s Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project is being decommissioned and removal of Eel River dams will be done in accord with an agreement that Humboldt County supervisors – in some cases reluctantly – have approved.
The end phase of the Potter Valley Project is proceeding and Humboldt’s Board of Supervisors signed on to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between involved agencies, counties, tribes and environmental non-profits at the Feb. 11 Board of Supervisors meeting.
Also part of the pact is a new joint powers authority, the Eel-Russian Project Authority (ERPA), which will build, operate and maintain a new facility diverting Eel River water to Mendocino and Sonoma Counties.
Hank Seemann. Humboldt’s deputy director of public works, summarized what’s happening.
He said PG&E is decommissioning the Potter Valley project and released a draft plan for public comment on it earlier this month.
A “final surrender application” will be submitted along with a decommissioning plan to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in July.
The plan’s most notable elements will take time to complete.
“There’s still significant engineering consultation and permitting before dam removal will start,” Seemann said. “So that’s still a few years out.”
It’s a historic change but some contentious aspects – like water diversion – will continue.
“This hydroelectric project has diverted water from the Eel River to the Russian River for over 100 years,” said Seemann. “And water diversions are an important component of the water supply in the Russian River basin.”
The Sonoma County Water Agency and the Mendocino Inland Water and Power Commission are proposing to “continue water diversions through the tunnel of the project” but it will be done “in a way that is compatible with protection of the river and recovery of fisheries,” Seemann told supervisors.
Over the last year-and-a-half, involved parties have been in negotiations on how diversion will be managed, leading to the MOU.
Signing onto the pact are Humboldt County, the ERPA, Sonoma and Mendocino water agencies, the Round Valley tribes, CalTrout, Trout Unlimited and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
During a public comment period, representatives of environmental groups, tribes, Congressman Jared Huffman and the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations voiced support for the agreement.
“In large part, thanks to your effort, the conversation shifted from negotiating for a deal that would do no harm to the Eel, to one that seeks to generate real benefits for the river and secures long-term investment in restoration,” said Alicia Hamann, executive director of Friends of the Eel River. “We appreciate that this deal disarms opponents of dam removal and commits critical stakeholders to supporting dam removal in a timely fashion.”
She also emphasized “the significant step forward toward restorative justice that this deal presents,” with its assurance that the Round Valley Tribes will have “controlling interest in the future of the river.”
Under the MOU, the tribes will be paid $1 million a year for water rights and up to $1 million annually for river restoration.
The water diversion has numerous conditions, including reduction or forbearance during spring and summer months in dry years.
The public comment period also included some skepticism and outright opposition to the plan. There are fears that political tides will turn and the scale of water diversion will increase.
Supervisors share the doubts to some degree.
“The ecologically-informed diversion that we’ve been hearing about that is informed by the hydrologic study and modeling could be trumped by other possible outcomes and I’m really fundamentally concerned about that,” said Supervisor Natalie Arroyo.
But she added the MOU is “our best shot at having a say in steering the restoration funding” and is “a way of mitigating some of the harms.”
Arroyo wants to see “an intent expressed very clearly to work towards self-sufficiency within each watershed.”
Supervisor Mike Wilson agreed and emphasized that Humboldt’s position is and always has been that the Eel River dams should be removed and there should be no water diversion.
Before the Board’s unanimous approval of the MOU, Board Chair Michelle Bushnell agreed with those who have concerns but described the planned river restoration as “a starting point.”
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
They’ll take even more water from us for the Russian River basin.
You’re aware the 120 year old tunnel is a limiting factor?
In what way? Volume?
Volume and also the condition of the tunnel — there’s no plan to increase capacity of the tunnel.
now why does the tribe get $2million and humboldt get nothing? what’s up with that? an who is paying the money? and how does it get into the tribe’s hands?
how long is the contract with the tribe for their water rights? can they stop it at the end of the contract?
what happens to the farmers in potter valley? wheres there water going to come from? are they paying part of these 2million dlollars?
All good questions, here is the draft MOU:
https://humboldt.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=13748993&GUID=2266CAA2-0F9F-47B2-B20E-A33EE0AB82B8
Here is the staff report:
https://humboldt.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=13749011&GUID=C8BDE210-7AB6-4C76-836F-4FCE1C474C6C
Eh ?
—
I wonder why they are expanding Lake Mendocino (which holds the stolen Eel River water). In 20 years we will be likely seeing an expansion of the tunnel (or a new one).
In the future… they will do whatever they want with the Eel River water.
—
Kinda weird. Hmm… I wonder where ‘EPIC’ is on this issue ? Filing a lawsuit ?
—
(Go figure.)
Well if the state ever gets the Sites reservoir built, they can steal it from there.
Can you explain how water would get from Sites reservoir to Mendo?
”Don’t know much about geography…”
From Wonderful World by Herb Alpert, Lou Adler and Sam Cooke
I believe this agreement is in place for 30 years, with an option to extend an additional 20
That’s up to the tribe, since they are being transferred the water rights. You think they will give up that money? Dream om.
That depends on the specific language of the MOU. They can be legally binding in some or all of their facets, but they are not always.
I may have missed a link to the text of this MOU but I imagine we could find it if it’s already been signed.
“Stolen” is a loaded word. All of our North Coast communities should be increasing our water storage capacity due to changing weather patterns. Don’t criticize people in Mendocino County for doing that. What is Humboldt County doing to increase their storage capacity?
We have plenty
Where there’s a will there’s a way.
Follow the money down the Russian River.
—
Supervisors sold us out.
Covelo got $ 2 million a year ! (So where does that money come from ??)
CalTrout (what ever that is) sold us out.
Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission sold us out.
Huffman sold us out… of course he was never ‘for us’ anyway.
—
Go figure.
Even FOER sold us out!!
Now we know where the $2 million is going — BRIBES to tribes, agency reps, elected officials and environmental groups!!
They’re all crooked and corrupt and this proves it — the only thing we don’t know is how much did each of them get?
See how easy it is to make false claims when you don’t know anything about the issue and don’t read the article before commenting?
Go figure!!
That’s kinda funny…
“Rails to Trails” and “Bribes to Tribes”…
I’m pretty sure the Russian River entities have been paying for Eel River water this whole time. That’s probably a major source
I don’t believe this is correct — after going through the PVP powerhouse I believe the water was deemed waste — Potter Valley water users then paid a small fee to the PV Irrigation District for water they used — the rest flowed into Lake Mendo and some downstream users paid regulatory fees to State agencies — but except for the fees paid to PVID no one ever paid for the water — it’s been a pretty sweet deal for Russian River water interests!
If the diversion continues it’s highly likely downstream users will be required to pay reality based rates for the water they use — but I’m curious to know how much that’s projected to raise and if it’s enough to account for the $2 million mentioned in the deal — and if not, where’s the balance coming from?
Hmm well then I also wonder who pays the million guaranteed.
My assumption remains that it would be the entities in mendo and Sonoma county who are receiving the water, and ultimately their customers, since that’s usually the way water sales work. But I don’t know that.
Is there any word of a more formal document being produced or will it operate entirely under the MOU? I suppose none of this will formally begin for another year or so while pge goes through the decommissioning process.
Correction/Clarification to my previous post: The Russian River Flood Control District has water rights to 8,000 acre feet of water in Lake Mendocino which they sell to water users in their District; there are also several small water districts around Ukiah that sell water. And of course Sonoma County Water Agency (the Big Dog in the fight) sells water all the way into Marin, supposably from their water right from Lakes Mendo and Sonoma.
I think the point I was trying to make earlier is that no one was paying anything to anyone in Humboldt County.
Mendo and Sonoma should pay the real value of the diverted water but IDK if that’s enough to raise the $2million or not.
The MOU is a formal, legally binding agreement so I think that’s all that’s required – I would assume it was an attachment to the BOS agenda item.
Based on the article it’s gonna be a few years before it all plays out:
“There’s still significant engineering consultation and permitting before dam removal will start,” Seemann said. “So that’s still a few years out.”
Yeah, I’m curious if they will formalize the agreement beyond this MOU as it gets closer to being a reality.
Seems like a lot of vaguely left in the pipeline as it is.
“Seems like a lot of vaguely left in the pipeline as it is.”
Exactly!
What is known for certain is the dams are coming down — what the diversion looks like, whether it happens or not, how the restoration money gets spent and a bunch of other stuff are details to be worked out — but anyone who doesn’t see this as a huge win for the Eel is either really misinformed or really stupid.
If restoring the watershed is the goal ….the water is a massive part of obtaining that goal. There should never be the words restoration and diversion in the same project. I’m not religious but many people are, so to those that are I have this to say to you. If god put the water in the eel and told it to flow north….who the fuck are you to tell him he was wrong. If nature had wanted a diversion it would have created one. Redirecting any amount of the eel river is unacceptable
And people actually belive that the government protects wildlife. They are the biggest threat to wildlife. And what is the point? So the Russian river can flow at flood stage year round? It ruins the Russian and the eel.
A number of government initiatives have had a direct and massive positive impact on the well being of wildlife in the last half century.
In general, for profit business is the biggest threat to wild life
Nothing will flow at flood levels year round. That’s not how climate works.
If the diversion is only during times of very high flow, I don’t see a problem with it.
The way this reads, that there may be “reduction or forbearance during spring and summer months in dry years“, does suggest that they may well be diverting water during times when it would best be left in the Eel.
By that same argument, God didn’t tell water to flow into your house either. I don’t think texts from any of the major religions would suggest you shouldn’t divert water…
The Eel River just got Sold Out
Vote out the politicians responsible
Even after reading al the (utterly predictable) comments, I am in support of this.
Then you must not live in Humboldt county.
My understanding is that the new agreement leaves more water in the Eel, in addition to the dam removals, than the prior arrangement did.
Is that not true?
? ?
Lots of commenters seem to be “Stuck on Stupid” and don’t realize it’s a huge victory for the Eel for both dams to be coming down with additional funds being allocated for restoration projects.
No pge would have had to remove the dams without then diversion when they gave up their claim , hence the need to have a decommissioning plan and permit . Fact is mendo county has been bennifiting from this for 100 years , while as humboldt grows and water is becoming less plentiful the eel has become plugged up as a result fish runs are demising and mendo still wants it golden goose to feed their economy of wealthy wine drinkers and vacation homes for the big city folks . Mean while quality of life and reduced chances of growth economic and other wise is all Humboldt gets , but hey lets cheer on the rape of the land for the chosen .
You simply don’t know what you’re talking about — the amount, timing and means of diversion has no significant impact on the Eel which has lots of problems beyond the two antiquated dams.
If you’re going to call others stupid, you should first carefully examine your own stance.
Those dams were/are coming down whether or not a new diversion was/is included in the plan. Continued theft of eel water should not be approved.
Newsom could give less then a crap about fish or wildlife. He is in with all the globalist removing infrastructure and trying force everyone out of rural areas and in to their designated FEMA sector. Let the American Hunger Games begin. Good Ole Agenda 2030 in full effect.
Herd humans into highrises and all other water is diverted to the vineyards of Staglin, Plump Jack and associates
Yup, EXACTLY!!!!
I agree. I am from Del Norte county, and the state parks have been removing natural resources like hog (in the 80’s) to stop us from going into the back roads, then shutting those roads down, so root rot wouldn’t (supposedly) be spread by peoples foot traffic (since there’s no hogs to aerate the forest floor). And cut to more recent times, all those washed out and overgrown roads had to be rebuilt and reopened, just so they could get access to the forest fires, that were allowed to do so much damage to this land in our community (and our trees and animals) removing our local resources by means of neglect. And on top of that, the defunding of the brush maintenance (whatever its called) not allowing people to clear the roads and source their wood locally, and keep it clear in the deep wooded areas (as we have done since the beginning). So much damage has been caused to our resources being systematically removed.
Absolutely infuriating. I hope this inspires the dawn of a new era of ecoterrorism.
Whiskey is for drinking
Water is for fighting
“Humboldt” didn’t approve this…
“Humboldt County Supervisors” approved this…
Big difference…
…
Do the Humboldt County BOS members realize they are supposed to advocate for the best interests of Humboldt County and its citizens?
I was baptized in the middle fork of the eel river. To me that water is sacred.
Well this isnt the middle fork.
Right you are. I miss spoke. It was the main stem of the eel near eel rock.
For your information the tribes own all that land they had this land before the white and all of those government asshats
*had
Its a cop out . Slickly engineered by southern interests to throw the indians a bone and continue their diversions. Fifty million taxpayer dollars for a new diversion works, when they could just raise the level of lake mendocino or build additional reservoirs on the russian, which they state is their ultimate intention so they wont have to take eel water. Why then do they get a thirty year diversion lease, with the possibility of a twenty year extension? And they still get 20 to 30 percent of the eel water for only 1.75 million a year. The whole deal stinks. Just knock the dams down and let them build improved storage in their own watershed.
I agree.
Among your other misinformation where do you get the idea that 20-30% of the Eel is diverted? More like 2% if memory serves.
I am talking about that portion of the eel above the diversion. Its right in the hydrologic study paid for by diversion interests. You are talking about at scotia, but thats irrelevant to the health of the upper main eel.
Well, it’s not a perfect plan by any means, but it’s a helluva lot better than what we have now.
So, the jist of this article is that the water diversions will continue and the tribes will be paid $2 million annually for their input water quality or something?
I appreciate Arroyo’s and Wilson’s unequivocal statements for removing the dams with no water diversion option.
But they flaked and agreed with the diversions.