NWF Film Highlights Benefits of Responsible Offshore Wind for Wildlife, People, Habitats

This is a press release from the National Wildlife Federation:

A new short film from the National Wildlife Federation highlights the work being done across the United States to center wildlife, communities, and habitat protection in the responsible development of offshore wind energy.

“Tapping into the abundant wind resources off U.S. coasts will help meet the rising demand for energy, and can be done responsibly by engaging communities, scientists, conservationists, ocean users, and businesses at every step of the process,” said Amber Hewett, senior director of offshore wind energy at the National Wildlife Federation. “This film showcases the broad range of experts, innovators, and community leaders involved in ensuring this American energy source is developed responsibly. At a time when offshore wind is facing fierce political headwinds, we are eager to shine a spotlight on the people forging ahead with the research, monitoring, and outreach that will support the long-term success of offshore wind energy while protecting wildlife, local ecosystems, and coastal communities.”

Featuring:

 

  • Maggie Ostdahl – Director of conservation policy, National Aquarium
  • Eddie Ahn – Executive director, Brightline Defense
  • Erik Johnson – Director of conservation science, Delta, National Audubon Society
  • Alexis Baldera – Senior program manager, National Audubon Society
  • Captain Paul Eidman – Recreational fisherman and light tackle guide
  • Tim Janssen – Co-founder and CEO, Sofar Ocean

The short film can be found on YouTube, or downloaded for distribution HERE.

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
8 months ago

More lying propaganda

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
8 months ago
Reply to  Jeffersonian

With which parts, specifically, do you object?
And, do you have links to credible evidence that supports your objections?

Riparianwally
Guest
Riparianwally
8 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

The huge blades of these windmills are marketed as able to last 25-30 years and in reality they struggle to last 10years. Texas had to create a “bone yard” landfill just for these blades that cannot be recycled because they are a combination of aluminum and fiberglass. As recent as a couple years ago, a cement company in Texas decided to start grinding up these enormous windmill parts and using them as an additive to their concrete. There are plenty of instances that show no longterm return on this type of investment, only federal money grabs and seedy marketing campaigns. Large scale wind farms will be the destruction of our coastlines and the demise of our pristine marine habitat.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
8 months ago
Reply to  Riparianwally

Finding new uses for old blades is one of the challenges the industry has been working on. Grinding up old blades to use in concrete, as you mentioned, is one of the options. New technologies are being developed that make blades almost entirely recyclable. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/carbon-rivers-makes-wind-turbine-blade-recycling-and-upcycling-reality-support

You lost me on that last sentence, though.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
8 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

That’s like not worrying about nuclear waste because someone somewhere will come up with a solution and it’s years away from being needed. Well years later here we are.

The old “we’ll worry about that tomorrow” development. That sort of wishful thinking allied with dangling huge commercial profits to be made that got us landfills of used tires, plastic water bottles, and asbestos. And lots of billionaires.

All it takes to prevent it is making the developers responsible for the future waste before they take their profits and run. They will then build to be recyclable. But then no one takes the contracts because they don’t want the liability for what they know will be a big downstream cost. It is necessary to exempt the builders from them to get anyone to invest in building.

There is hardly a road in humboldt county that is big enough to get a blade from the place its manufactured to the bay anyway. And we already truck most of our waste elsewhere.

Last edited 8 months ago
Mr. Clark
Member
8 months ago

Wow a bunch of sellouts. High paid managers who go by social justice for the environment and sell out for big profit. As Gretta would say,”how dare you?’‘.

Dan
Member
Dan
8 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Mr. Clark, have you ever cleaned an oil-soaked bird?

Last edited 8 months ago
Hick
Guest
Hick
8 months ago

Bring back whale oil, and torches. We could full Amish! Yea, that’s the ticket