MCHD Board Faces Accountability Questions as CEO Review Comes Due

When the Mountain Communities Healthcare District board convenes Wednesday morning at 8:30 a.m., it will do so under the same scrutiny that has shadowed its monthly meetings since February when the removal of Dr. Chad Smith over a private Facebook post first ignited a community discussion over the culture at Trinity Hospital.

Smith has since landed at the Redding Rancheria in Weaverville, where he began seeing patients at the beginning of March. In a statement, he said: “I’m really happy to have the opportunity to practice medicine in Trinity County at the Redding Rancheria. It’s going to be a very good relationship. Regarding the hospital work environment, I am hopeful there is enough interest and awareness in the community to help enact needed change in the way some employees are treated. I will avoid the specifics, but it’s actually an easy solution.”

His departure has proven to be less of an ending than an opening. Since February, a growing number of current and former hospital employees have come forward — at board meetings, in letters, and in interviews — describing what they call a pattern of intimidation, poor management, and retaliation under CEO Aaron Rogers and Vice Chief of Staff Dr. Patrick Shipsey.

More Voices, More Letters

At the March 4 board meeting, roughly 50 community members and hospital staff packed the room. Family nurse practitioner Heidi Johnson, who has worked at MCHD for four years and serves both the Weaverville and Hayfork clinics, addressed CEO Rogers directly. She told the board she had brought staffing and safety concerns to administration repeatedly over several years and said her concerns had been dismissed. She raised nursing staffing patterns as a particular problem, including what she described as unsustainable shift lengths, and said her proposals for solutions had not been taken seriously.

She was not alone. A former director of the skilled nursing facility, a nursing assistant, unit secretary, front desk registrar, and a community physician also spoke. About 20 letters from current and former staff were submitted to the board.

Johnson made a point of acknowledging what Rogers has accomplished financially. The hospital was nearly bankrupt when he arrived, she said, and under his tenure it has grown significantly — a fact that even his critics don’t dispute. Their argument is not that the hospital’s finances are broken, but that its culture is.

Not everyone shares that view. Some current and former employees told the Trinity Journal that complaints of a toxic culture are overblown, and clinic manager Mary Cole wrote in a letter to the editor that during her 13 years at MCHD she was always respected for speaking her mind and never felt she would be terminated for her opinions.

Johnson, however, says that some of those same staff members have privately expressed the same concerns to her that she has been raising publicly.

That same week, a lengthy letter from Dr. Kathleen Williams — a board-certified internist, pulmonologist, and critical care physician who worked at MCHD beginning in 2020 — was submitted to the board. Williams, who grew up in Hyampom and returned to Trinity County specifically to care for the community she was raised in, described years of scheduling irregularities, contract disputes, and what she characterized as a fundamental breakdown in the physician-administrator relationship at MCHD. She wrote of being pushed to practice outside her specialty, having her clinical expertise sidelined, and watching a steady stream of providers come and go — in a county she noted is consistently ranked 58th out of 58 in California for population health. “Behind closed doors,” she wrote, “the disrespect shown by [administration] toward others has radiated out to the entire MCHD, resulting in the constant turnover of providers.” She closed with a call for collaboration, citing the Mayo Clinic model of joint physician-administrator leadership and urging all parties to “work together to create and support a healthy, prosperous, and happy community.”

Other anonymous current and former providers have also come forward, with at least one former nurse practitioner telling the Trinity Journal they left after raising patient safety concerns and being told to stay quiet.

Staff who have continued speaking out say they hope that now that these issues have come to light publicly, there is enough momentum to ensure they are genuinely addressed and that the conversation doesn’t simply fade without meaningful change.

Also on Wednesday’s agenda is the formal resignation of Dr. Samuel Grossman from the medical staff. Grossman made his support for Smith known publicly when the controversy first broke, his departure comes as the board meets again amid ongoing scrutiny.

What the Community Is Watching For

For Johnson and others who have been speaking up, Wednesday’s meeting centers on whether the board will take action. Three board seats are up for election in the fall, and multiple community members say they are now paying close attention to a body they previously knew little about.

Trinity County is consistently ranked last among California’s 58 counties for population health. Recruiting and keeping providers in a community this rural and this small is already challenging. Whether the board treats the concerns raised over the past two months as a governance matter requiring action — or as issues surrounding an otherwise financially healthy institution — may influence how staff who have come forward view their future with the organization.

The MCHD board meets Wednesday, April 1, at 8:30 a.m.

Earlier: Trinity Loses Only Resident ER Doc Over Social Media Post

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Apopa
Guest
Apopa
2 months ago

Of course the hospital bottom line will improve when you eliminate employees at the expense of poor patient outcomes. Patient after care surveys don’t lie. Short staffing, and reduced ancillary service issues don’t go away.
Sounds like it’s time for new hospital leadership before things get third world.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Apopa

There needs to be a balance. Poorer patients are even worse served if the medical providers close and they have no one to see. Maybe this is were employee unions can offer a bridge to fund that balance,

Testy
Guest
Testy
2 months ago

Interesting piece here, and clearly a lot of reporting behind it. Kudos! But a couple things caught my eye. And made me a little sad..

“less of an ending than an opening...”

‘not that the hospital’s finances are broken, but that its culture is…. “

This particular habit of speech is a tell-tale AI red flag. (And the generous peppering of em dashes where commas might work 😆)

I’ve found revising AI copy to create sentences that read in the affirmative (his departure was an opening, or, the hospital culture is broken) states what’s happening, trusts the reader with gutsy prose and can help override the glaring and generic virtual not this but that AI language model.

We are collectively being trained to accept AI-generated copy as bearing a human fingerprint, and it saddens me.

So sad I (ironically) had My bot write poems about it. 😆

There once was a voice smooth as glass,
That polished each clause as it passed.
It balanced each thought,
Said “not this, but that”—
And somehow said nothing at last.

🖤 Short poem (a little darker, a little sharper)

The sentence arrives already agreed with,
its edges filed down before it speaks.

No stumble, no breath,
no wrong turn that reveals a person
thinking in real time.

Just balance.
Just symmetry.
Just the careful avoidance of being human.

It reads clean.

Too clean.

Like a fingerprint
drawn on after the fact.

PS: I do appreciate the depth of reporting refected in this piece and on RHBB very much, it’s what keeps me reading. Rest assured, I respect the work, even if I just dragged your AI revisions across gravel…

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 months ago
Reply to  Testy

The focus of the article was the hospital’s issue, NOT AI writing style. May I recommend a “letter to the editor” RE your AI concerns?

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago
Reply to  Guest

Anything that illuminates the article, whether content or technique, is fair gane for comments. It never occurred to me to think on this issue but due to this comment, I reread it. If xo, would explain some of the lack of bridges between ideas that led to a different idea in my first reading. So being made aware of this was a good thing.

Testy
Guest
Testy
2 months ago
Reply to  Guest

Who is the editor anymore? The editor is literally the chatbot! Talk about irony. 😆

No one can “letter to the editor” the genie back into the bottle. It’s infrastructure now. Like spellcheck was… except spellcheck doesn’t remodel every sentence into a TED Talk.

Editors used to refine and reduce polish. Now AI tools add a telltale polish, and the line between machine and reporter has forever been blurred. Once you learn the cadence and trademark stylist quirks of AI editing it can’t be unseen.

We’re at a dividing line in literary history where, when used unrestrained, we get to witness and are being trained to accept the routine flattening of voice, (the very thing AI tools try so hard to imitate,) and the slow, incremental loss of the guts, and nuance that once defined great writing. 😢

Bill
Guest
Bill
2 months ago
Reply to  Testy

Let’s give the reporter the BOTD! (Benefit Of The Doubt) She writes for a living.
If your knickers are knotted, ask her if she is using AI!
She will surprise you either way.

Testy
Guest
Testy
2 months ago
Reply to  Bill

You are missing the point of my malease. You want this to be a question of honesty when I raised a question of voice.

Those are two completely different conversations. It’s not about catching anyone using AI, because at this point, every writer can, probably should, and absolutely will be using the tools available. The genie has been released!

The issue is when it’s used unrestrained and starts to shape the voice itself. That’s the part that changes how the writing reads.

And you have unintentionally proven my point.

“She writes for a living.”

Exactly. Because if professionals start defaulting to unrestrained AI-smoothed phrasing with its template phrasing, easy to spot em dash sprinkles, and overly-polished structure, then that tone becomes the new normal voice of journalism.

No indictment on Lisa’s use of AI, we know that’s a thing. It was just a melancholy observation of its unrestrained influence and that influence on the reader. The bots were first trained, now they train us, and soon gutsy, raw and nuanced writing becomes a lost unicorn.

Kym Kemp
Admin
2 months ago
Reply to  Bill

We use AI every day as part of our workflow. (I note that not only on our ABOUT page but frequently have done so in the comments.)

It helps speed up organization of interviews and research, but everything is verified, rewritten, and ultimately the responsibility of the reporter—and often me as editor on longer pieces.

Frequently, I use AI in my responses in the comment section.

Permanently on Monitoring
Guest
Permanently on Monitoring
2 months ago

District Hospitals, since COVID Grants and new Federal Funding sources, trend towards much increased salary for Administrators, with continuing low pay for people who work Departments and Floor…

Add the obvious Nepotism, Regional Idiosyncratic Behaviour, and Corruption that these Organizations attract to the Admin Suites, and electronic monitoring of staff by contractors, and you have a recipe for stupid decisions,
wasted resources and short term staffing choices…

Obviously, you need to fire the CEO’s everywhere, but they’re all liars and very selfish, while purporting to be “putting things in the black”…

I worked there for a while, until my Manager said “nothing is going to change here”…

So I changed…

Good workers, bad leadership, but overall, a needed and beloved facility…

Good Luck to MCHD, and all the staff!

Aside to Dr Smith:

Everyone gets a screw loose, from time to time:

It’s just a job, there’s always another one…

Last edited 2 months ago
Apopa
Guest
Apopa
2 months ago

Administrative pay and perks are out of touch with NorCal reality. A corporate bottom line mentality doesn’t mesh well in the healthcare world. Cutbacks and downsizing never hits hospital administration.

Rob Bier
Guest
Rob Bier
2 months ago

This is AI. I don’t know what to make of it.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
2 months ago

I wish there could be more of an explanation as to why medical doctors have been so accepted as being replaceable with nurse practitioners. When a nurse practioner acts a gate keeper, this would seem to be an economic savings that doesn’t compromise patient care. But when they literally are all that are ever available, it is dangerous for patients as the extensive and demanding training medical schools give doctors simply is not there.

It leads to too many nurse practitioners not being as engaged in problem solving, not to mention scheduling them as densely as medical doctors when they haven’t the extensive training that allows doctors to have the prior experience to problem solve faster. It seem that if it is only a triage referring mechanism but there are no doctors to take the referrals, the system has collapsed.

It’s not that nurse practices are bad but, if doctors are really so unnecessary, why bother with them at all? The difference in the intensity of training must mean something. Why has ACA allowed this when it regulates the ceap out of everything else?