JPR Radio Interviewed Eureka Mayor Kim Bergel
Eureka Mayor Kim Bergel recently sat down for an interview with Jefferson Public Radio and talked about her connection to the coastal city she has called home her entire life, along with the experiences that shaped her approach to leadership.
Bergel, a fourth-generation Eureka resident, described growing up surrounded by the natural beauty of Humboldt County. “It was like growing up in paradise,” she said.
Now in her fourth year as mayor after serving eight years on the Eureka City Council, Bergel said her decision to run for office came from dissatisfaction with decisions she observed while attending council meetings. “I ran on a resentment, if I’m being honest,” she said, adding that she chose to get involved rather than remain on the sidelines.
Eureka operates under a council-manager form of government, where the mayor presides over meetings but does not vote. Bergel said her role involves representing the city at various boards and helping guide discussions on local issues.
Outside of City Hall, Bergel works in public education, teaching middle school students. Her background includes involvement in Montessori-style education, which she described as focused on “peace education,” encouraging respectful communication and allowing students to pursue subjects that interest them.”
Bergel encouraged residents to take an active role in their communities. “It’s real easy for us to sit by the sidelines,” she said. “Life is really busy, but a community, you know, a healthy community, we lift each other up.”
*Featured photo from Bergel’s run for Supervisor in 2022.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
I don’t agree with all of Mayor Bergel’s positions or choices for the city. But I do appreciate her enthusiasm and eagerness to get people involved in their city…and her willingness to listen to all sides. I’ve met her a few times and I like and respect her…You can agree to disagree sometimes and still respect and even like people…
People will agree on most issues most of the time, yet we chose to divide ourselves over foolish differences. I refuse to give up on anyone over politics.
Indoctrination is a major factor in politics. Mainstream media is paid to be biased, do your own research!
💯
She begins with stating the county she represents,Humboldt County is the biggest county in California? That’s not close to being true. San Bernardino County is 5 times the size of Humboldt County. And many more that are larger too.
Pretty, ditzy, blonde, and totally misinformed. We’re sure seeing a lot of this in today’s media.
Embarrassingly true. And a red light district monument because prostitution was fined and this was the major source of income for the city a hundred years ago? Despite it being against the law at the time? As if somehow that is an admirable attribute to be recognized in a monument? Because Eureka police ran an extortion racket ? 🤷♂️
I’m not exactly sure why I laughed on reading that; just struck me as funny. 🙂
Maybe I was remembering something about a Big Yellow Taxi LOL
Well it is funny in a weird history, believe- or-not, commercial entertain the tourists sort of way. Just not in an official reflection of government trying to get beyond its awful reputation sort of way.
Memories… from ‘semi long’ ago.
Kid looking in the windows at the ‘Ebony Club’. Had steel cages hanging from the ceiling where the… er… ‘go-go’ girls danced. Across the street was Charlotte’s bar. At that time the Vance Hotel was a ‘happening’ place.
On weekends the loggers/timber/fishermen would come in and get boozed up.
> “Because Eureka police ran an extortion racket ?”
Dunno on that one. Mostly broke up fights and hauled ’em to the ‘drunk tank’.
Literally said that in the video. And this is the memorial that was mentioned. “Police would warn brothel operators about upcoming arrests. The women would then plead guilty and forfeit their bail, sending the money into city accounts.
Between 1900 and 1914, sex workers in the district contributed nearly $14,000 to the city’s general fund — the equivalent of about $500,000 today.”
Seemingly made the national tabloid news. Really upped the reputation of Eureka. Someone is bound to notice the similarity to legal weed too.
BTW looking at the photo in the linked article, it was from well after 1900. At least 1920s so does that mean itbwas a police practice later than expressed?
https://www.ijpr.org/podcast/the-jefferson-exchange/2026-03-11/eureka-red-light-district-monumenthttps://www.ijpr.org/podcast/the-jefferson-exchange/2026-03-11/eureka-red-light-district-monument
Rattles it off like a ditsy contestant in a beauty contest “biggest county” and population is “pretty variety” … 😂
And she is an educator.
We are doomed.
IMHO:
“Quest for Political Power starts with the dogcatcher”.
This is where the Newsomites begin… they start with low level elected bureaucrats, then expand to completely control your lives. California has 50,000 laws. They make taxpayers money disappear. Import and protect illegal aliens… (to insure future Newsomite voters).
Locally —
High rise (hideous) barracks plunked everywhere, Hydrogen Busses (read about Hydrogen fuel), Green no-bike lanes. Closed city streets. Graffiti everywhere. Bus terminals to nowhere (future). Dope bars on every corner. Broadway strip mall still expanding… (until they install the bike and bum lanes).
Go figure.
And here I thought that Murals, Thrift Stores, and Food For People (along with trails and bike lanes) was our city/county’s new economic power engine of income resources!!!
Liquor stores, marijuana dispensaries, and gas stations are also a part of “our city/county’s new economic power engine of income resources.”
Shes pleasant to talk to, but her far left policies are a disaster.
What disastrous policies has she championed?
You really need an explanation of (far-left) disastrous policies she (and the city council that works under her) has championed, or just trolling?
I’d like some actual examples. Considering the collapse of our local economic driver in the last decade it seems like eureka has been on a decent trajectory. What is the disaster?
Define decent trajectory. Because I’d still say your trolling.
Let’s take a look around. 2nd Street collects degenerate fentanyl tribes, businesses are shuttered, LE arrest dozens of people driving drunk or intoxicated in public every week and Broadway has one of the highest fatality risks of any city thoroughfare in the nation. But the 5 member Eureka City council -under the direction of the Mayor – and operating under a lofty self-important and grand delusion, instead busy themselves tackling geopolitical issues like Venezuela and Iran, and create sanctuary for illegal aliens, and the trans medical industry.
It’s a generalized disastrous far-left trajectory.
All those negative things precede her time as mayor by a good bit.
I moved to eureka in 2007, eureka is much nicer today than it was then. It still has many of the same problems it had back then, but they are not worse.
Yes, the performative “resolutions” about federal policy that the city has zero influence on are dumb. But “disastrous”? Hardly.
First elected in 2014 Ms Bergel has a long history with the Eureka City council that predates many of the aforementioned unsolved glaring disasters.
Disasters that they ignore, while they are intentionally wasting resources time and attention on dumb, performative “resolutions” about federal policy that the city has zero influence on…
Claiming that Eureka is “much nicer now” than in ’07 is subjective, and a separate debate that doesn’t take away the folly and ridiculousness of the ECC under the leadership of the current mayor.
I suppose my impression of the city in the time that I’ve known it is no more or less subjective than your impression of it currently. I’m not sure if you have some data you’d point to to support your perspective, I can only speak to how I experienced the city as a resident with no car circa 2007-2009 vs how I have experienced it over the last 15 years as a county resident who regularly drives through eureka and visits it for events and necessary business.
I am generally less tolerant of the kind of grime that characterizes the worst of eureka than I was when I was a poor guy in his early 20s, and I still see Eureka as doing generally better than it was back then in all those areas.
And I still haven’t seen you share any policies that could remotely be characterized as “disastrous”. We can agree that their penchant for the silly resolution is a waste of time and resources, but hardly a disastrous one.
Jefferson actually said “a disaster,” not “disastrous policies.”
And now that this thread has completely derailed I’m being asked to produce a municipal impact report??
Disaster is, in my view, a general opinion, not as specific claim that requires proving exact outcomes.
I also think it was “far-left “ not ” a disaster” that was doing the heavy lifting in Jefferson’s OP. And a concrete example of that is the performative resolutions, which we both already agreed are a waste of time.
Thank you for clarifying. I guess we just have wildly differing thresholds for “disaster”.
Yes, the resolution silliness is a waste of time.
Wasting some time is a pretty normal occurrence in almost every field of human endeavor that I’ve encountered. It’s not a disaster.
It sounds to me like you think Eureka itself is a disaster. Which isn’t all that uncommon. But that’s why I pointed to my experience of Eureka before this lady had anything to do with it. If it’s a disaster today, it was a disaster in 2007 too. So the disaster isn’t the result of the resolutions as far as I can tell.
A simple look at online visitor ratings can provide an objective view point that reflects this duscussion. Maybe those outsider impressions could be the focus of the mayor and city council, instead of worrying about Venezuela 😆
AI GENERATED
But the relevant issue to this discussion is what of Eureka’s problems can be laid at the feet of the current mayor or her policy priorities.
That’s why I asked about any data you had over time. My personal experience is that Eureka had all of it’s current problems fully in effect almost 20 years ago, most of a decade before the current mayor started her municipal political career.
In talking with older locals and folks who moved here before me, I get the impression that the current manifestation of Eureka and it’s problems goes back to at least the early 90s/late 80s.
My closest local friend, born in the early 70s, characterizes Eureka as getting shittier and shittier throughout the late 90s and early 2000s and then sort of stabilizing sometime in the 2000s. He’s a full time resident of Eureka since the late 90s and he thinks the city is on the upswing. I don’t spend that much time in e
Eureka these days, but I’ve certainly noticed that the homeless problem isn’t getting worse than its always been in my time, and they have upgraded some amenities like parks and pedestrian infrastructure that I would have liked when I lived there and walked/biked around.
And their plans to add more housing in old town seems like a solid move for the city and should help housing pressure county wide.
So I’m still left wanting when it comes to you or Jefferson explaining what the city government policies are that are causing a disaster? If you just don’t like Eureka, thats fine, but Eureka isnt the creation of the current mayor and city council
The article title “JPR Radio….” is redundant as the R in JPR is “radio”. Like saying ATM Machine.
Or VIN number.
Or PIN number.