Microstamping Technology Deemed Viable in California DOJ Report, Mandated for New Pistols by 2028

Microstamp on firearmPress release from California Attorney General:

 California Attorney General Rob Bonta today released a report finding that firearm microstamping technology is technologically viable when imprinting a unique microscopic array of characters, referred to as a microstamp, on spent cartridge cases discharged by a firearm into which a microstamped firing pin has been installed. This report follows recent amendments to the Unsafe Handgun Act, including requiring that new semiautomatic pistols must have microstamping capabilities that allow law enforcement to trace a shell casing to the pistol that fired it. The California Department of Justice’s (DOJ) investigation found that microstamping components installed in semiautomatic pistols regularly produce microstamps on spent cartridge cases discharged by these firearms, including after sustained or repeat firing. The investigation was led by DOJ’s Bureau of Forensic Services, performed in consultation with relevant legal and subject matter experts, and included input from stakeholders, who were invited to provide written comments relevant to DOJ’s technological viability investigation.

“My office’s investigation into the technological viability of microstamping components has found that this technology is viable,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Microstamping technology could help law enforcement match cartridges found at crime scenes directly to the firearms they came from. Today, my office released a report outlining the findings of our investigation in an effort to provide appropriate transparency as to the basis of our determination.”

Microstamping technology causes a firearm to imprint a unique microscopic code onto ammunition cartridge cases when a firearm is fired that identifies the firearm’s make, model, and serial number, helping law enforcement match cartridges found at crime scenes directly to the firearms they came from.

In 2023, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 452, authored by Senator Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas), which amended California’s Unsafe Handgun Act and added separate Penal Code provisions that adopted new requirements concerning microstamping components in semiautomatic pistols sold or transferred in the state. California Penal Code section 27532 required DOJ to investigate the technological viability of microstamping components. Beginning January 1st, 2028, the Unsafe Handgun Act will mandate that all semiautomatic handguns sold by licensed dealers must be verified as microstamping enabled.

In the report, DOJ outlines the findings of the investigation, including:

  • Engraved firing pins consistently leave legible microstamps on spent cartridge cases.
  • In many tested firearms and ammunition types, microstamping components can reliably imprint all data needed to identify the firearm.
  • Even incomplete microstamps can yield useful leads for solving and prosecuting gun crimes.
  • Using partial microstamps is equivalent to using partial fingerprints, license plates, or firearm serial numbers as investigative leads.

This fall, DOJ will work to provide written guidance on performance standards for entities engaged in the business of producing microstamping components. Starting early next year, DOJ will start accepting applications for licensure of entities to engage in the business of producing microstamping components that meet these performance standards.

A full copy of the report can be found here.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

29 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Outside Looking In
Guest
Outside Looking In
11 months ago

What’s one of those trick firing pins going to look like after running 1,000 rounds through the gun?
What’s to stop some enterprising gun owner from simply running a file across the tip of one of those trick firing pins? Or simply swapping the pin out for another one?

old guy
Guest
old guy
11 months ago

50 rounds or so would dirty it up enough to be illegible. Ca. floated this about 15 years ago, same b.s. about the tech, won’t work, won’t help solve any crime. It’s just another form of gun control and increasing costs for consumers, and manufacturers. Maybe build in a live stream camera of the user when the trigger is pulled, direct to the le cloud.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
11 months ago
Reply to  old guy

It’s just a newly concocted revenue stream for Bonta’s cronies, the cost of which will be passed on to the consumers…

More suitable for shotguns, to identify cartridges, where barrel/bullet ballistics don’t apply…

Also, spent cartridges are merely fairly useless circumstantial evidence, to whatever degree…

It’s the bullet and it’s ballistics, taken from a victim, or property, that would be ironclad evidence, proving it came from a particular weapon…

Spent cartridges collected anywhere, and then scattered at a crime scene to compromise an investigation, will become commonplace…

A unique firing pin strike, on a found spent cartridge, won’t connect it to the bullet that did the damage, and might provide a lead, but if it came from a stolen gun, that lead quickly dries up and goes cold..

And until the vast majority of the guns in circulation have unique firing pins, this effort will make virtually Zero difference…

But what I do see coming is a point in the near future, where the Democrats will pass a related law, which outlaws possession or ownership of a gun that does not have a unique firing pin…

Call me clairvoyant…

This isn’t so much about solving crime, than it is about creating criminals out of gun owners, just because they already own guns that don’t have the new unique firing pins…

Bonta is not to be trusted…

If the Democrats can’t just take your guns away, constitutionally, they will pass laws that make ALL gun owners criminals, an/or pass laws that make all guns prohibited that are without the new technology…

The Democrat way to boost the economy…???

Outlaw all old shit, while mandating all new shit…

Like the Democrat EV debacle…

Buncha bullshit…!!!

That doesn’t boost the economy, it just totally wrings out the people, financially squeezing them all dry…

The Democrats, like Bonta, don’t represent the PEOPLE, they represent the PEOPLE’s CERTAIN DOWNFALL…

old guy
Guest
old guy
11 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

So true, kind of the ‘biometric safety’ they tried to pass.

Mr. Clark
Member
11 months ago

What about the 35,000,000 million handguns in California right now?

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
11 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

AI response (sorry)

To calculate the number of permutations for an 8-digit numeric and alphanumeric code that includes only numbers and uppercase letters, we need to consider the total number of possible characters. There are 10 digits (0-9) and 26 uppercase letters (A-Z), giving us a total of 36 possible characters.

The number of permutations for an 8-character code is calculated as follows:
368
This results in: 36 to the 8th power r= 2,821,109,907,456

That 35 million is easily covered, but in the data of one of the linked reports, on Page 9 test data shows that only 6 legible numbers are needed of 8 (if that’s what they settle on) to make a positive ID but things like laquer sealant and quality of metal could make some marks marks illegible after only 100 firings and legibility drops considerably. So basically, a couple weekends at a gun range the firing pin stamps are already toast. Attorneys will make their next million in salaries in defending on “Is it a C or a <? Can’t tell, must acquit)

From the link:

Both examiners found that across 1,000 test-fires, all six alphanumeric characters were successfully transferred and legible under the stereomicroscope on a large majority of cartridge cases fired by all three semiautomatic pistol models. Both examiners found some variation in performance depending on the type of firearm and ammunition used, and observed a relationship between the price point of the firearm and microstamp transfer; the higher-priced pistol models more frequently imprinted all six characters in a manner that was clearly legible under a stereomicroscope.32

One ammunition brand using a heavy lacquer sealant covering the primer prevented clear observation of the microstamp characters for cartridge casings ejected from the Taurus and Hi-Point pistols.33 However, across 900 test fires for each firearm model involving nine other ammunition brands, all six alphanumeric characters were rated as successfully transferred and clearly visible under a stereomicroscope by both examiners on 98.1% of cartridge cases fired by the Sig Sauer pistol model, 94.2% fired by the Taurus pistol model, and 73.7% fired by the Hi-Point pistol model.34 Five of the six alphanumeric characters were rated as successfully transferred and clearly visible by both examiners on 99.4% of the 900 cartridge cases fired by the Sig Sauer, 98.8% fired by the Taurus, and 88.6% fired by the Hi-Point.35 Four of the six alphanumeric characters were rated successfully transferred and clearly visible by both examiners on 99.4% of the 900 cartridge cases fired by the Sig Sauer, 99.3% fired by the Taurus, and 94.3% fired by the Hi-Point.36

The lacquer sealant covering the primer on one type of ammunition cartridge prevented clear observation of the characters for cartridge casings ejected from the Taurus and Hi-Point pistols. Across 100 test fires from the Sig Sauer model using this lacquered ammunition, the examiner found all six characters were clearly visible on 61% of cartridge cases and at least five out of six characters were clearly visible on 83%.37 After the lacquer was removed, for this ammunition type, all six alphanumeric characters were rated as clearly legible on 56% of the Taurus and 49% of the Hi-Point fires, and at least five out of six characters were rated as clearly legible on 82% of the Taurus and 64% of the Hi-Point fires.38

These findings do not indicate that 100% of the microstamped characters were clearly decipherable on 100% of fired cartridge cases under stereoscopic examination. As the study authors noted, “the interaction of any particular brand of ammunition with any given firearm is stochastic in nature.

Mr. Clark
Member
11 months ago

Bonta if going to far, by attacking our rights to own firearms. ”Shall not be infringed”.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
11 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Calm down now.
This is not infringing on your rights.

Country Joe
Member
11 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Yes it is.

Mr. Clark
Member
11 months ago

can you get a vanity pin? I want mine to say ”fuckyoubonta”

GrumpyOldGuy
Member
11 months ago

A revolver does not leave spent cartridges behind….

LiberaLunacy
Guest
LiberaLunacy
11 months ago
Reply to  GrumpyOldGuy

This^

Neither do trained and prudent snipers behind enemy lines… but that’s another story, for another day…

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
11 months ago
Reply to  LiberaLunacy

Trained and prudent snipers will get guns that have no micro-stamping and don’t care about brass that identifies an unregistered, probably destroyed, weapon.

Martin
Guest
11 months ago
Reply to  GrumpyOldGuy

A very good point sir.

Ahuka 2400
Member
Ahuka 2400
11 months ago
Reply to  GrumpyOldGuy

Which is maybe why the new law only applies to semi-autos and not revolvers

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
11 months ago
Reply to  GrumpyOldGuy

Good point, unless the shooter speedloads another cylinder-full, dumping the spent brass. This Could be another form of punitive, obstructive regulations. Not sure how it would work with the safety transfer bar in modern pistol triggers. One important note in footage from the Oct 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel is that while the Israelis had nice bomb shelters, they were unprepared for individuals with handguns and rifles. When seconds counted, police and military were minutes, hours, days away. So, while we try to “reason together” and seek the truth, we don’t know if our MAGA brothers and sisters are up to it, given the Jan. 6 evidence. Look for the kindness, we can do it. We have to do it.

Country Joe
Member
11 months ago
Reply to  GrumpyOldGuy

No brass to find and retrieve in the dark.

Dick
Guest
Dick
11 months ago

Preprinted brass for sale. Send your desired message, cart. type $1 per case

LiberaLunacy
Guest
LiberaLunacy
11 months ago

This is a goddamned lie, Junta… i mean Bonta…

 “firearm microstamping technology is technologically viable when imprinting a unique microscopic array of characters, referred to as a microstamp, on spent cartridge cases discharged by a firearm into which a microstamped firing pin has been installed.”

A microstamped firing pin would theoretically leave an imprint on the primer, not the cartridge.



Pissed at growers
Guest
Pissed at growers
11 months ago

So in most cases they will be identifying stolen gun brass ?

Martin
Guest
11 months ago

The idea of microstamping the firing pin on handguns, both semiautomatic, single shot, and revolvers is just plain jackass crazy. The tiny little stampings won’t last very long. People who steal those handguns will surely remove the marks with a file and/or sandpaper or change the firing pin with one with no marks. Then the gun can’t be traced back to them. California is slowly becoming a Nazi Germany state. There are millions of handguns in this state that were purchased before they even thought about microstamping!

Guess
Guest
Guess
11 months ago

We already have this from the actual part that leaves the barrel, lans and groves are unique to each firearm so are breach marks, also changing a firing pin takes very little time, the dumbest criminals are smarter than Bonita.

Martin
Guest
11 months ago
Reply to  Guess

They have used Lans and rifling Groves for many years with a great deal of success. It is time consuming and a delicate process to compare a bullet from the crime scene to one that was fired from the same retrieved gun in the lab. The bullets can be compared side by side under high magnification to see if they do actually match.

ENOUGH ALREADY
Guest
ENOUGH ALREADY
11 months ago

Why bother with technology to solve the crimes if our Soros and liberal DAs don’t prosecute the crimes.

Our state keeps “enacting” gun laws only to practice “inaction” on enforcement. What good does putting more laws on the books if you fon’t use the ones that are thete now?

They use the same thought method to reduce crime stats. If we decriminalize certain felonies, we can claim a reduction in felony crimes. If we don’t prosecute certain crimes we can reduce crime and prison numbers.

Simularities are when a high dollar campaign donor uses sloppy management to maintain equipment and services to customers, so they can provide high profits to their share holders, and then cause whole cities to be destroyed.

And then to present the image that they are protecting the people, they levy high fines against the company only to have a government appointed committee to suspend those fines and increase costs to their customers.

California government proves that saying…” I’m from the government, I am here to help…..you see things my way.”

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
11 months ago
Reply to  ENOUGH ALREADY

I skimmed some of the studies used, and most of them were conducted over a decade ago. But somebody did an awful lot of testing to prove the resilience of these stamps, which one should expect. But even in thousands of firings, with numerous firearm models, it doesn’t take long for things to wear off. And that asks another question about enforcement. Will gun owners now be required to “maintain a legible, functioning pin stamp, verified twice a year by the DOJ with costs assumed by the consumer”? Or something of the sort that now people will have to take apart everything for inspection? Good damn luck enforcing that.

Ullr Rover
Guest
Ullr Rover
11 months ago

Utter nonsense. Its not difficult to change out a firing pin and the pin isn’t a regulated part of a firearm.

Country Joe
Member
11 months ago

I don’t remember voting for this violation of the 2nd Amendment.

SickofSocialists
Guest
SickofSocialists
11 months ago

What a load of bullshit

“Shall not be infringed” could not be any more clear.