‘Far From Over’: Sheriff Says Miranda’s Rescue Investigation Enters New Phase as Investigators Process Recovered Microchips

Remains of an animal are removed from the mass grave for inspection.

Remains of an animal are removed from the mass grave for inspection on Wednesday. [Photo by Mark McKenna]

Although investigators have finished excavating the Miranda’s Rescue property for now, Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal said today that the investigation is “far from over.” He announced at an end of the day press conference held at the scene that investigators are now processing information from recovered microchips and working through a large number of inquiries from people who surrendered animals to the rescue.

In a brief statement lasting less than three minutes, Honsal said the Sheriff’s Office intends to get back to those who have submitted inquiries as investigators continue their work processing the information gathered so far.

Sheriff Honsal addresses members of the media and community outside of Miranda’s Rescue in Fortuna.

Sheriff Honsal addresses members of the media and community outside of Miranda’s Rescue in Fortuna on Wednesday. [Photo by Mark McKenna]

Honsal did not take questions following the statement, leaving unanswered how many microchips have been recovered, whether any animals have been positively identified, or whether investigators expect to return to excavate additional areas of the property.

The update comes hours after investigators concluded a three-day excavation at the Sandy Prairie Road property near Fortuna. Earlier today, sources told Redheaded Blackbelt that the number of animal remains recovered had climbed above 50, with at least one source placing the total above 70. The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office has confirmed only that investigators recovered “dozens” of remains and has not released an official count.

The press conference came after a reported altercation from an anonymous source between Sacramento Animal Control Officers and Shannon Miranda. We reached out to the Sacramento Animal Care Services and received this reply:

Sacramento County Animal Care Services (Bradshaw Animal Shelter) can confirm that our officers are in Humboldt County serving a legal demand, on behalf of Sacramento County Counsel, for the return of animals wrongfully transferred from Bradshaw Animal Shelter to Miranda’s Rescue, the preservation of evidence, and notice of intended legal action.

Bradshaw Animal Shelter has been actively working to recover dogs connected to our shelter that were transferred to Miranda’s Rescue through unauthorized third-party rescue transfers.

Our priority has always been the welfare of these dogs. We have successfully secured the return of one dog and continue working to bring the remaining two dogs home. We remain committed to pursuing the best possible outcome for the animals while cooperating with the appropriate agencies.

The excavation covered only portions of the approximately 50-acre property, according to sources familiar with the operation. The Sheriff’s Office has not said whether every area identified during the investigation was excavated before crews left the scene.

Patty Campbell observes the excavation of Miranda’s Rescue on Tuesday.

Patty Campbell observes the excavation of Miranda’s Rescue on Tuesday. [Photo by Mark McKenna]

The investigation has drawn intense public attention from across the state and even nationally as crews from multiple agencies spent three days excavating several locations on the property while investigators documented and recovered animal remains.

A Sheriff’s Deputy and others on the scene of a search at Miranda’s Rescue in Fortuna inspect dogs in a kennel on the property.

A Sheriff’s Deputy and others on the scene of a search Tuesday at Miranda’s Rescue in Fortuna inspect dogs in a kennel on the property. [Photo by Mark McKenna]

Tuesday, a press release from the Sheriff’s Office stated that they

…have been working collaboratively with the FBI, California Department of Justice, United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, California Attorney General’s Office, and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California.   This is an active animal cruelty, fraud, and theft investigation.

Recently, animal rescuer Jenna Moore told the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors that residents had been raising concerns about Miranda’s Rescue for more than two decades. She said complaints were also made to the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office in 2023 and again in 2025.

As more remains have been uncovered, animal advocates have questioned on social media how the privately operated rescue continued operating despite these years of complaints. However, California does not require private animal rescues to be licensed, and no state agency is tasked with routinely verifying that a rescue’s reported outcomes match its public claims.

No criminal charges have been filed. As with anyone under investigation, Shannon Miranda is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

Earlier:

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
The Marginalized Citizen
Guest
The Marginalized Citizen
3 hours ago

For more than 30 years, I have dedicated my life to rescuing, rehabilitating, and caring for animals. Recent allegations regarding my rescue and sanctuary are serious, and I understand the concern they have generated within the community.
Until now, I have limited my public comments out of respect for the ongoing legal and investigative processes. However, because significant misinformation has circulated online, I believe it is important to clarify several facts.
Our rescue has always operated as a no-kill facility. We do not euthanize animals to create space.

https://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2026/06/shannon-miranda-provides-me-exclusive.html?m=1

Kris
Guest
Kris
3 hours ago

As the plot thickens. Wonder what the scrap was about between Miranda and SACO?

Last edited 3 hours ago
Lisa Music
Admin
1 hour ago
Reply to  Kris

It is our understanding they left the property without retrieving the dogs they came for after Miranda refused to let them take the dogs, according to an anonymous source. However, I don’t think they have left the county yet, and the authority for them to take the dogs is being worked out. Law enforcement officers and at least one lawyer were present at the scene this afternoon, but it is unclear if that was in specific relation to the conflict between Miranda and SC ACO, or the ongoing investigation.

Kris
Guest
Kris
54 minutes ago
Reply to  Lisa Music

Thanks for the info, interesting. Good job on the coverage from both you and Kym.

Jerilyn
Guest
Jerilyn
3 hours ago

Look up the Hayden Act, it governs both private and public. But when you have a state bill that is not funded then how can there be any oversight? Ultimately it all falls back onto Shannon Miranda and what he’s done in the atrocities that he has committed, but there’s also blame to be placed on the sheriffs department, animal control building and planning and state and federal level. Had all these departments done their job. This would’ve never gotten as far as it has.

Last edited 3 hours ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 minutes ago
Reply to  Jerilyn

I think your list should include some of the shelters that regularly send Miranda’s R. dogs & people breeding dogs.

Joanne McGarry
Guest
Joanne McGarry
32 minutes ago

I await the Friday press release from the Humboldt County Sheriff’s office. Meanwhile I am re-reading Jennifer Fumiko Cahill’s Part 2 in the North Coast Journal.

Guest
Guest
Guest
2 minutes ago
Reply to  Joanne McGarry

Can we get the link?