Humboldt Approves Multi-Million Dollar Homelessness Help
The new Humboldt County budget will include $4.6 million in state funding to shelter and assist homeless people.
At its June 10 meeting, the county’s Board of Supervisors approved spending the state funds.
Awarded through the state’s Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program, the funding will pay for a variety of services, including preventative services like rental assistance, and support of new and existing housing and sheltering projects.
The state funding is the outcome of collaboration between the county and the Humboldt Housing and Homelessness Coalition.
Most of it will be divided between the Arcata House Partnership, the City of Eureka and the Redwood Community Action Agency.
A small portion will go to the 2-1-1 Humboldt Information and Resource Center for what a written staff report describes as “coordinated entry system services.”
Redwoods Rural Health Center’s request for $367,000 was not recommended for funding and wasn’t approved.
The Southern Humboldt health care facility sought support for a team of specialists and case managers who “together deliver consistent, trauma-informed, Housing First-aligned support,” according to the center’s funding application.
Also approved by supervisors was another $1.1 million of funding from the county’s Social Services Fund for the Redwood Community Action Agency’s Parents and Children in Transition Program.
The program provides housing assistance and support services that “enable eligible families to become stabilized and transition into permanent housing,” according to a written staff report.
Supervisor Rex Bohn noted the spending before it was approved as part of the meeting’s consent agenda of items considered routine.
“So when people come up and ask, what are you doing about the homeless problem or issue or needs, it feels like we’re doing everything we can and I think our staff is doing everything they can,” he said. “We’re trying to utilize as much federal and state monies as we can, I don’t know if we’re making any ground but we certainly give it an effort.”
He added the combined $5.7 million in funding is notable but “it’s a little more than that, it’s giving people opportunities to maybe change the direction of their life.”
The funding will be part of the budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1.
Also during the meeting, supervisors approved a proclamation honoring Juneteenth day, June 19, which commemorates the end of slavery in the United States.
Read aloud by Supervisor Mike Wilson, the proclamation says Juneteenth “stands as a powerful symbol of resilience, liberation, and the ongoing pursuit of justice and equality for black Americans while honoring their strength, contributions and perseverance throughout history.”
As noted in the proclamation, Eureka NAACP will host a Juneteenth Cultural Festival from June 19 to June 22 at Halvorsen Park in Eureka.
It will include “educational workshops, cultural performances and community gatherings,” according to the proclamation.
Also approved was a proclamation commemorating the tenth “splashiversary” of the Golden Rule, a 34-foot wooden “peace boat” described as “a powerful symbol of peace, environmental responsibility and nuclear disarmament.”
Docked at Humboldt Bay, the sailboat is historic for “a daring voyage into the nuclear test zone of the Marshall Islands to protest U.S. atmospheric nuclear weapons testing” and was renovated and re-launched in 2015.
The proclamation says the boat was “rediscovered and rescued from a Humboldt Bay boatyard in 2010” but Wilson, who read the proclamation, corrected that, saying “it was actually on the bottom of the bay.”
Wilson was a Harbor District commissioner at the time and he said the district helped bring the boat up from the bay’s depths.
The June 14 “splashiversary” was supposed to include a launch of the boat but its project manager, who is visiting from Oregon, said the “boatyard got a little backlogged in its haul-out processes” and there was a “pivot scramble.”
The event shifted to the dry land of the Eureka Theater, sans splash.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
$4.6 Million for the Perma-Campers, and nothing for Rural Health…
You have bad, bad Supervisors…
Grant-Funded Agencies are a travesty, and they need to all be held to accounting, especially the “Family Resource Centers”…
Whatever it is, nearly $6,000,000 for “Permanent Housing” that they just don’t have, should be spent to Permanent Camping Sites, where the homeless could be held to honest account for their own needs.
Give a place where these individuals can sit undisturbed while all their needs are met by working citizens…
Many communities lack basic services for Seniors, who will become the new “homeless problem”, mark my words…
Enjoy peacetime while it lasts, folks
I will in 3&3/4 years after the tangerine responsible for the abominations of his administration have ended.
Idiot boy will be dead before then….
Throwing more money at the homeless problem and when it is gone they will still be homeless!
but they’ll have a boat !
You sure nailed that one Mariahgirl!
This article should have been split into two, one for addressing homelessness, and a separate one for the Golden Rule. You really cannot effectively tie them together or relate them. But before some of you get your underwear in too much of a twist over something that doesn’t affect you beyond the internet, providing the services that Redwood Coast does isn’t free. They provide a lot of services for folks from utility assistance, youth services (lots of that), housing, and even JOBS working for them or elsewhere. I mean, what else do you want them to do? They’re doing exactly what some of you keep prattling on about as the ills of society. That “permanent housing” isn’t tent cities. It’s actual places to live. That’s what people want right? For them to be off the street and functioning in society? To take care of their issues keeping them from success? That’s like traumatizing an overweight person in a gym…..doing exactly what gyms exist for; getting healthy.
👍👍👍👍
IMHO: Pile on the PORK Train !
Californika spent $25 Billion over the last 5 years
In the 2021-22 fiscal year, when the homeless population was estimated to be 172,000, California spent $7.2 billion, which equated to nearly $42,000 per individual.
So, where did the money go ?
A guess. Office buildings, staff, computers, and lots of committee meetings.
—
Yee hah !
I imagine it’s rather comforting to have the whole thing all figured out.
We have three supervisors who think they are social justice warriors. And they have your check book to prove it……………….
And we elected them
Unfortunately, that is very true. All they deserve is play money!
Perfect, I decided to become homeless today, where do I go to get some of this money?
Your government won’t be happy until they drag the taxpayers down the same drain as the homeless dope heads.
Instead of wasting unlimited amounts of funding on hopeless causes,
we all should invest in Senior Housing, and, Military Providers, like one of my neighbors who paradoxically invests in Lockheed while simultaneously hating the Government… He also likes Trump…
https://www.usfunds.com/resource/the-top-10-u-s-aerospace-and-defense-contractors/#:~:text=1.,%2464.7%20billion%20in%20defense%20revenue.
Stop wasting public funds on the Homeless and just give them a place to live wild and free, like Northern Nevada BLM Lands…
40% of Californians are receiving benefits…
Let’s put the homeless people and the supervisors on the boat and sail them west. That will solve 2 of our problems and then we can use the 6 million to fix our roads and healthcare. The $ we save on their bloated salaries and pensions could be distributed to the landowners in the form of a voucher that can only be spent within the county.
This isn’t Minnesota.
Homeless is the wrong word created by the left. The correct definition is Vagrant.
The term “vagrant” refers to a person who wanders from place to place without a permanent home or means of livelihood. Specifically, it can describe someone who has no job or home, often relying on begging for support. A vagrant is someone who moves a lot from place to place because they have no permanent home or job, and have to ask for or steal things in order to live.
Vagrant it is. Live better work!!!
Hobo
When the UN needs to house a bunch of people for the long term – ten years, or more – really fast they use what’s called “Refugee Housing Unit”, also known as a flat-pack house. They’re durable, all-weather shelters, intended to last at least a decade.
They house four people each, and cost less than $1,200 apiece. You can get them through IKEA.
For $300 / person, this whole *homeless crisis* can be solved permanently.
Unless the Redwoods Rural Health Center needs to house 100,000 people, they don’t need anything close to $367,000. Ever.
$30 a year, per homeless person, is all that’s needed to house them, if intelligent people were managing the situation. Any more than that is a pure rip off.
Has anyone ever solved a Ponzi scheme with another Ponzi scheme!?
It’s never really been about solving these problems, it’s about expanding the scope and depth of the tax and spend boondoggle.
Hmmm
But the state funds paying for this are being cut…
https://davisvanguard.org/2025/06/california-budget-no-funding-homelessness/
The most cost-effective way to deal with the problem of wildfires originating in homeless camps, and the problems of trash and sanitation, would be to establish camp sites with water and sanitation that are surrounded by a defensible space buffer (an area receiving fuel reduction treatments such as brush cutting, pruning, and chipping flammable debris. These places could include existing camps, public lands, and land leased from private landowners. Paying for hotel rooms and building homes for them is an expense that taxpayers cannot and should not be forced to bear. I do support reaching out with counseling services, but many of them will refuse to be counseled. If campgrounds were available to them, it would justify removing them from places that lack water, sanitation, and defensible space, or where their presence creates a nuisance. I’d also support paying tax money to provide simple and inexpensive food service at the camps. They are our brothers and sisters, no matter what choices they make.
I guess there’s really no hope of addressing the root cause of homelessness, economic inequality.
It is economic hopelessness and medical bankruptcy that leads people to the drug use that we associate with homelessness.
When a person or family transitions who pays the rent???????
Oh that’s wonderful! Those millions will be used paying staff members from various agencies to hold workshops and meetings about such important issues like ” how can we help homeless people?” and “why are they homeless?”. Focus points will be determined and later meetings/workshops can then discuss how maybe actual increase in housing might affect levels of homelessness in real time. The graphs that can be presented as a result of these millions of dollars can lead to understanding and the results might lead to the inevitable conclusion that more groups need to be formed and more staff and directors need to funded proper salaries to move the projects forward. The project of course being….”How do we create and sustain governmental funding for the agencies to discuss and plan resolution of the issue”….
All the money will go to administrative cost im sure