Supervisors Approve 3,000-Acre Timber Rezoning Near Bridgeville Amid Questions Over Tax Breaks

Humboldt weighs the costs of rezoning Ranchland for timberThe costs and benefits of rezoning properties into timber production were explored as Humboldt County’s Board of Supervisors changed the zoning of a 3,000-acre Bridgeville area property.

At their May 13 meeting, supervisors approved rezoning two-thirds of the Buck Mountain Ranch near Bridgeville from agricultural zoning to Timber Production Zone (TPZ).

County Planner Andrew Whitney described the rezone as “a pretty standard” action and the applicant, Cottrell Ranch LLC, has filed several timber harvest plans over the last 20 years.

But the rezone drew some discussion among supervisors, with Supervisor Mike Wilson questioning financial implications.

TPZ property owners get tax breaks in exchange for keeping their lands in timber production. Answering questions from Wilson, Whitney said the county will lose about $12,000 a year in property tax revenue with the rezone, although some of it will be recouped through timber harvest taxes.

I just want to caution us in our enthusiasm for these changes,” Wilson said. “I don’t really see any net benefit to the county, necessarily, other than a landowner of a very large holding getting a tax break.”

Discussing it with Planning Director John Ford, Wilson added, “Maybe you’ve got another viewpoint on that, and I’m happy to hear it.”

Saying “you’re raising a good policy discussion,” Ford said “traditionally” the state and the county have been willing to provide the tax incentives for preserving timber production and supporting “a very important industry within Humboldt County.”

Wilson noted that the county’s General Plan allows residential development on TPZ parcels and protection of timber production is “not quite same” in Humboldt as when state TPZ laws were created.

But Ford said viable timber production still needs to be proven and if properties are subdivided parcel sizes can’t go below 160 acres.

Board Chair Michelle Bushnell vouched for TPZ zoning as a way to keep ranchland properties intact.

When you don’t have a tax break like this, oftentimes, generationally down the road, folks can’t keep their lands and so they end up selling it,” she said, adding that if residences are built, properties are reappraised and “we would see taxation from that.”

She said the Cottrell family has “been there for many, many years and they have logged on this land for years and ran cattle on this land for years. They have put money back into Humboldt County time and time again.”

Supervisor Steve Madrone has long been an advocate of land conservation through providing incentives. He described TPZ zoning as one of the ways to do it and said preventing land conversion saves the county money.

Splitting up large land tracts leads to “more expenses on the roads, from traffic, more expenses for all our public services, with the parcelization that can occur,” he continued. “And there are a lot of negatives that can come from that in terms of our budget, if you add up the whole budget, not just looking at the tax part of it, but the cost of services and everything else. So this is why this type of tax incentive was created several decades ago.”

Similar tax breaks are available for agricultural operations under the Williamson Act program but Madrone said the Cottrell ranch has only “small pockets of ag land within what is mostly timberland so it probably doesn’t quite qualify for Williamson.”

Another change with rezoning from ag to TPZ is that with TPZ, permits for new cannabis farming are not allowed.

Supervisors unanimously approved the zoning change.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

26 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
DELLIB
Guest
DELLIB
1 year ago

Property taxes need to be eliminated altogether. Sippy cup that stupervisors.

Mariahgirl
Guest
1 year ago
Reply to  DELLIB

All they are worried about is the money for the county. I’m sorry but I could care less if I wouldn’t be paying more taxes so they can give themselves another raise.

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago
Reply to  DELLIB

At least on a primary residence/parcel.

Big Rick
Guest
Big Rick
1 year ago

We need to just abolish the Federal reserve and abolish taxes that way nobody cries about tax breaks anymore

Just Saying
Guest
Just Saying
1 year ago
Reply to  Big Rick

Dream on. Like that will fix things. SMH

Big Rick
Guest
Big Rick
1 year ago
Reply to  Just Saying

Repealing all forms of taxation and banker usery worked for Germany until 1945 🤷

moviedad
Member
moviedad
1 year ago
Reply to  Big Rick

No need for taxes when you confiscate the properties.

Espino
Guest
Espino
1 year ago

Property taxes enforced by threat of confiscation is draconian and at its roots institutional theft. For what, to support a gaggle of bureaucrats who produce nothing but hot air and paper. Federic Bastiat, in his treatise The Law, writes a brilliant essay on the immorality of taxation. Private property ownership doesn’t exist when the sword of Damocles is perpetually dangling above your neck. Unlike your trust deed there’s never a paid in full moment.

Al L Ivesmatr
Guest
Al L Ivesmatr
1 year ago
Reply to  Espino

Why would somebody downvote your comment. Answer: they are either a government bureaucrat or a welfare case who thinks the government is their piggy bank. In either case, let’s hope Natural Selection weeds these able bodied culls out of the gene pool. We don’t need them, as they are a drag on society, like ticks. Absolutely useless except sucking life energy from the body politic while moaning about how life is unfair for themselves. Life losers who will never understand they are not special at all to anybody but their mommy. “Our Democracy” babblers who don’t understand we are a Constitutional Republic. Brainwashed fools who believe the “it takes a village” Hillary garbage when it actually takes an individual to change the world, their own world. They are doomed, so lets not let this pack of jackals take all the individual Americans down with them. Freedom from their chains of hate and misery.

Country Bumpkin
Guest
Country Bumpkin
1 year ago
Reply to  Espino

Yes, what you said! Or, to the layman, you never really own anything. You just rent it from the government.

Guess
Guest
Guess
1 year ago

It’s fucked I pay more monthly in property tax than most people pay for rent, I jumped through all the hoops and got it lowered but it’s still ridiculous

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago

You are correct.

Makes Zero ”cents!”
Guest
Makes Zero ”cents!”
1 year ago

Guess what…you’re going to lose a lot more $, T.O.T. $ because folks can’t get the fkn STR permit that own TPZ land…!
Someone explain why you won’t let TPZ owners get STR permits, while sitting there bellyaching about all the STR’s in town. Give the tourists a REAL taste of Humboldt and let them rent in the hills! It’s a win/win for all!

Valerie Elder
Guest
Valerie Elder
1 year ago

Prior to the modified ad valorem tax system created by the TPZ zoning (1976) landowners were forced to harvest timber to pay their taxes because they were taxed by the volume of trees growing on the site. We often blame “the loggers” for destruction of forests but our taxation and regulation of the times contributed to that history. Our community and state get a huge benefit from landowners being able to manage these forests for a variety of benefits like wildlife habitat and clean water, as well as wood products and not just having to decide to harvest because of the tax bill to the county/state.

Onlooker
Guest
Onlooker
1 year ago

Aren’t these properties already tax-protected through Williams Act provisions? Is this a double tax break for big landowners?

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago
Reply to  Onlooker

As far as I know… Williamson applies to AG properties.
This one is now Timberland Production zoned.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

Correct.

The property cannot be zoned both TPZ and Ag.

A key difference is the tax reduction is automatic for property zoned TPZ but not for property zoned Ag. — in order for Ag property to quality for the Williamson Act they have to show they are meeting specified levels of Ag production.

In this case the property was zoned Ag but didn’t meet the Williamson Act requirements for Ag production — which is why the owners sought the rezoning.

Hmmmm…Interesting
Guest
Hmmmm…Interesting
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

I had some family looking at some acreage outside of Blue Lake/Korbel…100+ acres I believe…and it was both TPZ/AG I was told.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago

Yes, there are split zoned properties where a portion is zoned Ag and the other portion is zoned TPZ (to use your example) but the Ag portion would only get a tax break if they apply and are approved for the Williamson Act — so yes, two different land use zones can apply to different parts of a parcel but not to the same part.

Other examples of split zoning occur when a portion is in the Coastal Zone

Dirt Hippy
Guest
Dirt Hippy
1 year ago

All the commenters are just typical modern day conservatives who talk all day about rights but never about responsibilities. How else should we pay for schools, roads, fire departments, hospitals, and all the other things we need? Don’t get me wrong, we should tax super wealthy individuals and large corporations at a much higher rate. But anyone who is fortunate enough to own some real estate should be willing to step up to the plate and pay a little money in taxes to keep society functioning.

That being said I totally agree with supervisors decision. Keeping taxes low on AG and TPZ land is a good thing for many reasons.

Grae Faux
Guest
Grae Faux
1 year ago
Reply to  Dirt Hippy

“How else should we pay for schools, roads, fire departments, hospitals, and all the other things we need? and let’s not forget social security, medicare / medicaid, unemployment insurance, landline subsidies … the list goes on.

Korina42
Member
1 year ago

Looks like the Cottrells are doing well for themselves. https://cottrellhuntingranch.com/

Martin
Guest
Martin
1 year ago

How is rezoning from AG to TPZ going to increase traffic on the roads I far as I can see it won’t and stopping Permitted Pot Farms suits me just fine. Folks with TPZ zoned land take better care of it period.

Country Bumpkin
Guest
Country Bumpkin
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin

There aren’t any new pot farms being permitted in the impacted van duzen watershed. The county keeps finding new ways to loose. Way less tax monies coming from cannabis and give the largest land owners in the county breaks on their taxes by reclassification. Many landowners in that area are savy enough to avoid timber harvest taxes by only doing “salvage” logging and “thinning” diseased trees which exempts them from taxes as well as required road maintenance that is standard with a traditional timber harvest plan.

Country Bumpkin
Guest
Country Bumpkin
1 year ago

correction, salvage logging and other harvesting, aside from standard timber harvest plans does not exempt landowners from timber harvest taxes.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
1 year ago

As timber is harvested, timber taxes are incurred, and the county gets more than the annual reduction back. Plus, no marijuana allowed and restrictions on subdivision size. Its the right thing to do.