Community Rallies in Attempt to Save Mad River Fish Hatchery as Closure Looms

Kids view the fish ladder at the Mad River Hatchery

Kids view the fish ladder at the Mad River Hatchery [Image by CDFW]

A grassroots petition to save the Mad River Fish Hatchery is gaining momentum, with nearly 2,000 signatures collected as of Tuesday afternoon. Launched by local fishing guide Tyler Belvin on Change.org, the petition calls on state officials to reverse the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) decision to shut down the hatchery this summer.

Located just outside of Blue Lake, the Mad River Fish Hatchery has been part of the North Coast community for more than 50 years. Belvin’s petition describes the hatchery as “a cornerstone of our community,” emphasizing its role in steelhead conservation, local recreation, and environmental education. “Its closure would not only disrupt these crucial activities,” the petition reads, “but would also significantly impact recreational fishing and local traditions linked to our river heritage.”

CDFW announced the planned closure in a recent press release, citing the hatchery’s limited fish production, extensive maintenance needs, and increased regulatory burdens as key reasons for the decision. According to CDFW Northern Region Inland Fisheries Program Manager Jason Roberts, Mad River’s steelhead program “is no longer viable,” producing only 150,000 fish per year — a fraction of what larger hatcheries like the Trinity River facility release annually.

Roberts said the facility would require at least $1 million annually just to maintain current operations, and tens of millions more in repairs to modernize infrastructure and comply with federal standards. As California grapples with a statewide budget crisis, CDFW officials seemingly concluded that resources would be better invested elsewhere.

But Belvin and other local supporters argue the hatchery’s value goes far beyond its production numbers. In addition to supporting a harvestable steelhead fishery that draws anglers and revenue to the region, the hatchery has long provided hands-on learning experiences for local youth. “Without these facilities, future generations might not appreciate or continue to prioritize the protection of our natural resources like the Mad River,” the petition warns.

Belvin is calling for “collaborative solutions,” including public-private partnerships, increased public awareness, and potential state or federal funding to keep the hatchery operational. “Let’s act now to guarantee that this indispensable community asset remains a vibrant part of Blue Lake’s present and future,” he writes.

While some biologists argue that hatcheries can negatively impact wild fish populations, others view them as a necessary bridge while native stocks rebound. The steelhead in the Mad River are federally listed as threatened, and CDFW has acknowledged that strict production caps and monitoring requirements have limited the hatchery’s conservation reach.

Still, local fishermen and residents say the loss of hatchery fish — which can be legally harvested — will mean the end of a decades-old winter fishing tradition. Without the hatchery, nearly all steelhead in the Mad River will soon be wild and protected, subject to catch-and-release only rules.

For now, Belvin’s petition continues to gain support, reflecting deep community concern over the closure. Whether it can influence state policy remains to be seen.

To view or sign the petition, visit Change.org and search for “Save Mad River Fish Hatchery,” or click here.

Earlier: CDFW to End Hatchery Operations at Mad River Fish Hatchery in Humboldt County

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

39 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Steven
Guest
Steven
1 year ago

A good thing for the wild steelhead population.
It’s a shame their numbers were so decimated.
Matthews Dam unfortunately was a big reason for that decline.

Last edited 1 year ago
Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Steven

That is not the only consideration. Visiting the Mad River Hatchery was a magical moment. It made a connection for me to a species I never encounter normally. Frankly it was beautiful.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

Well, it did exactly what it was ‘supposed to do’.
Created cherished memories for people, but unfortunately, it was bad for the fish.

Bummer.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

Was it? I can see where hatcheries can negatively impact resources available to wild bred fish, reduce natural selection, even spread disease. But the ultimate question is, if hatcheries cease to exist, does that mean the wild fish will return to their old levels?
The fact that question is not mentioned is as much a bias issue in current wildlife management philosophy as hatcheries were in their time. What it likely to happen is that wild salmon will have better outcomes but will never be able to sustain a fishery. There will be fewer licenses given out, fights over who gets them, shorter fishing seasons, more regulation meaning it becomes all about keeping the wild stocks viable. Not providing food or recreation for humans. At least until some natural or unnatural catastrophe happens and suddenly there will be no fishery at all.
Every generation of science preens itself on how close it is to ultimate theory of everything. Success is right around the corner. Then the small, unnoticed dismissed fact creates another challenge to the whole idea. It part of the arrogance of scientists that they think progress means perfection.

Last edited 1 year ago
Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

>”But the ultimate question is, if hatcheries cease to exist, does that mean the wild fish will return to their old levels?”

Yup. That is (or very recently was) the ‘current philosophy’ of government natural resources management !

>”What it likely to happen is that wild salmon will have better outcomes but will never be able to sustain a fishery. There will be fewer licenses given out, fights over who gets them, shorter fishing seasons, more regulation meaning it becomes all about keeping the wild stocks viable. Not providing food or recreation for humans.”

You’ve pretty much got it figured out.
Keeps the PMFC brass and Sacramento big-whigs… happy !

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

Nonsense. Government just pretends that exploding human populations have no effect for purposes of immigration but then try to regulate for what all those people are going to do once they get here.
I’d like to believe that its just a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing. But it’s not. That would be easier to fix than the stupidity that thinks it can have its cake of wildlands but still wants to pretend it can eat the cake with unchecked immigration. People who want everything usually end up with nothing.
This is not a matter of keeping anyone happy but of the reality that no one can have both ways.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

I’ll give you my house and car if you can point to a single example in this state of wild steelhead returning to their original population size by getting rid of a hatchery.

Last edited 1 year ago
Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago

Eh ?

With hatchery fish… humans have a ‘hand’ in the gene pool.
Once raised in a hatchery… are they wild… or hatchery fish ?
I dunno.
— Only way you can go back to ‘wild’ Steelhead is:
If you close Mad River (or any of the other local rivers) to fishing for say 25 (+-) years, the ‘wild’ Steelhead and Salmon will return to a normal population for that river.
The number of fish in that population depends (mostly) on climate. But there also may be other impacts to the river and ocean, that may be beyond our control.
— Meanwhile
All of the personnel will be gone from F&W except for LEO.
Pretty much a ‘zero expenditure’ approach.

Go figure.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

So you are saying it has never happened and that closing a hatchery doesn’t return wild populations to their original numbers

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

Recent study at Oregon state shows offspring of hatchery steelhead do as well as wild progeny

I wonder
Guest
I wonder
1 year ago

Where has the state removed hatcheries? Or more importantly, where has the state made investment in reconnecting and rehabilitating habitat and then removing hatcheries?

Martin
Guest
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

I agree Yabut. There is something wonderful about watching the fish up close. The times I have had a chance to visit the hatchery it just seems somehow to make a brighter day for me and relieves the stress of everyday life. Watching God’s creatures swim around is a blessing.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
1 year ago
Reply to  Steven

No. Mathews dam was above the reach of anadromous fish due to natural barriers.

local observer
Guest
local observer
1 year ago
Reply to  Steven

the 1968 PCP release into Noisy Creek that killed an estimated 124,000 fish in one day probably didn’t help either.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  local observer

PCP? Those must’ve been some angry fish

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
1 year ago
Reply to  Steven

Mathews dam is above the reach of salmonids. It actually helps the river by sustaining summer flows.

Zach Rotwein
Member
Zach Rotwein
1 year ago

Know if they would only go back to raising king salmon. Those were the days. 30 lb’ers schooled up at the mouth in mid August

Last edited 1 year ago
old guy
Guest
old guy
1 year ago

they can have another hatchery, like a tribal one, raise the fish at a much lower cost. blue lake could buy it, or run it, if it’s that important to the community, but stuff wears out, and is no longer viable at some point.

Watching
Guest
Watching
1 year ago

Where the fuck can cdfw invest resources better than fish and wildlife sounds like a cop out

Trashman
Guest
Trashman
1 year ago
Reply to  Watching

Change it back to fish and game with a different focus

Aaron.
Guest
Aaron.
1 year ago

Great opportunity for a private club.. that’s just no feasible for the state

Two Dogs
Guest
Two Dogs
1 year ago
Reply to  Aaron.

Bulldoze this facility, then figure the best way forward. It’s a blight on the river.
The aged concrete is a sponge harboring disease that has been impossible to eliminate.
Some sources will say the problem has only been around since about 2020, but it goes back to the 90s. The state compiled detailed reports on the problem and it’s dire outlook.
Politics and happy money triumphed over science once again, as the hatchery continued to produce vectors that spread disease to wild fish, so the sports fishing and tourism industries could profit.
I quit fishing that river when I couldn’t land a steelhead that wasn’t diseased, over twenty years ago.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Two Dogs

All the steelhead I’ve ever caught there have been just fine, beautiful chromers.

old guy
Guest
old guy
1 year ago

me too, i actually haven’t caught a hatchery fish in 2 seasons, plenty of beautiful RELEASED natives though.

Two Dogs
Guest
Two Dogs
1 year ago

….If they’re right off the ocean. It’s the river gits ’em.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
1 year ago

The hatchery used to provide fish for eel river. The capacity is way higher than 150000 fish. No interbasin transplant rule caused it to run at a fraction of of its capacity. Total nonsense, since the gene pool is derived from eel river steelhead, and the eel is in serious need of hatchery subsidies to reestablish its runs.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago

That hatchery was a ‘show hatchery’. Easy to get to… lots of P/R opportunities.

It was put in that location to keep the politicos/voters happy. (Which it did.)
But this hatchery is situated way too low in the watershed. Bad for the fish.

I was working for F&G ‘way back’ at the time, people working at the hatchery realized that fact. That is a part of what tarnished my view of of ‘government politics’.
Lots of money spent to keep the ‘voters in line’… but with few practical (or negative) results.

Out on the Mad River this spring… fisheries techs were trying to net ‘wild’ steelhead (with un-clipped adipose fin) to take to the hatchery… but they weren’t having any luck.
This is probably a part of PMFC regulations… that finally doomed the hatchery.
PMFC says… no wild fish = no hatchery.

Want a new hatchery ?
This one should be torn out… and a new one built just below Ruth Lake.
Would probably put fish back in the entire river. Costs money though.

Oh well.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

If you don’t want hatchery and wild steelhead breeding, isn’t it better to have the hatchery low on the river? Just above the hatchery i have only caught wild fish. What’s wrong with that?

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago

Everyone wants to have it all. Nobody wants to pay for it. In an era of decreasing budgets and increasing defective humans it’s going to get tighter and tighter. Get use to having very little and taking care of yourself. Government at all levels need to stop spending money they don’t have. Can hardly wait for 100% tax rate as that appears to be the only solution for our local fearless leaders…

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Zipline

It’s never budgets that are decreasing. When has that happened? It’s more like choosing who gets what and the taxpayer needs are far down on the list of priorities.

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

Good point. Increasing budgets but still no progress.

farfromputin
Member
1 year ago

The Mad River is the best fish hatchery money can buy. And it’s maintenance free. No taxes. MAGA approved.

old guy
Guest
old guy
1 year ago

restoring the fish is easy, no water diversions, no dams. give them a few breeding cycles. if you don’t mess it up, they will come.

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago
Reply to  old guy

No humans….

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  Zipline

Like I said before, you first

Longtime Mendo Local
Guest
Longtime Mendo Local
1 year ago

Sad that they determined to close this hatchery. Hope they reverse course. Now I’m worried about our fish hatchery at Lake Mendocino. Between budget cuts and PG&E decommissioning the hydroelectric plant and removing Scott Dam, the fish and everyone downstream are up shit creek without a paddle!
Stop removing dams! The steelhead manage to get up the fish ladder. The hatcheries are critical and teach kids about the importance of fish and maintaining their numbers.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago

You don’t need a dam to have a fish hatchery

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
1 year ago

There is no fish hatchery on the upper eel or at lake Mendocino

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeffersonian

There is a fish hatchery at Lake Mendocino.