Uncertain Federal and State Education Funding Triggers Layoffs in Southern Humboldt Unified School District

Coins and banknote in a glass jar placed on the textbook. Concept money saving for education.Southern Humboldt Unified School District (SHUSD) is in the same position as many schools across the nation, facing deep financial cuts as state and federal funding uncertainties force tough decisions, including layoffs, reduced hours for staff, and potential program cuts. With a large operating deficit, the district is eliminating multiple classified staff positions and scaling back teachers and possibly having larger class sizes. School budgets rely on a mix of federal, state, and local sources and shifting political priorities have put crucial funding at risk, threatening to impact students, teachers, and classified staff in the coming year. 

A Nationwide Education Funding Crisis

School districts across the country depend on federal education funding for programs such as Title I (assisting low-income schools), special education grants, and school nutrition programs. However, proposed budget reductions at the federal level threaten these essential services. If Congress moves forward with cuts to Title I or Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) funding, schools may have to reduce classroom support, increase class sizes, and scale back specialized programs for students with disabilities.

Additionally, pandemic-era USDA programs that supported free school meals have ended, forcing districts to find new ways to keep students fed. The uncertainty over federal funding has left school boards struggling to finalize their budgets for the 2025-2026 school year, leading to layoffs, program reductions, and difficult cost-cutting measures.

California Schools Face Dual Financial Challenges

In California, public schools rely on a combination of federal, state, and local funding sources, with the majority of money coming from the state budget. Education funding is guaranteed under Proposition 98, which mandates that a minimum percentage of the state budget be allocated to K-12 schools and community colleges. However, when California experiences budget shortfalls—like the current multi-billion-dollar deficit—schools often face delayed or reduced funding allocations.

Beyond state and federal sources, California’s public schools also receive funding from the California Lottery. While lottery funds contribute to education, they are supplemental and do not replace core funding sources. In reality, lottery proceeds make up only a small fraction of a school’s budget and cannot be relied upon to cover major shortfalls.

With federal funding cuts looming and California’s state budget in crisis, many school districts, including Southern Humboldt Unified School District (SHUSD), are taking preemptive measures to stay financially stable.

Layoffs and Reductions at SHUSD

In response to these financial concerns, SHUSD has finalized a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Layoffs and Reductions with the California School Employees Association (CSEA) Chapter #177. The agreement outlines significant staffing cuts for the 2025-2026 school year:

  • Layoffs: The district will eliminate several instructional assistant positions, behavior support aides, special needs aides, health aides, food service staff, and office assistants.
  • Reductions in Hours: Bus drivers, mechanics, custodians, and grounds staff will see reduced work hours or fewer contracted workdays.

The decision, according to district officials, was driven by both a lack of funds and a decline in work availability due to budget uncertainties. Without guarantees of sufficient state and federal funding, SHUSD—like many districts across California—must make these difficult choices now rather than face deeper cuts mid-year.

In addition to classified staff, the equivalent of four teaching positions will also be impacted. According to Southern Humboldt Teachers Association (SHTA) representatives, the district plans to eliminate half-time art, half-time Spanish, and one full-time elective teaching positions at the high school level. A full-time teaching position at Redway Elementary, along with a half-time position at alternative ed, and a half-time position at one of the outlying elementary schools will also be cut.

Rebecca Robles, President of the Southern Humboldt Teachers Association (SHTA) and a teacher at South Fork High School, explained that the district is facing a $1.9 million deficit, a situation made worse by uncertainties in state and federal funding and rising inflationary costs. Over the past few years, the district has significantly reduced its operating budget deficit without making staff cuts, but this year, the funding challenges are proving more difficult to manage. While Robles believes that Superintendent Sarah Purl and the school board have been doing a good job under tough circumstances and that staff understands the hurdles posed by funding cuts, she expressed frustration that administrators, who earn six-figure salaries, haven’t been asked to take pay cuts. Robles feels this lack of sacrifice from administrative staff creates a divide, undermining the district’s morale and fostering a sense of ‘us vs. them,’ rather than reinforcing the ‘we’re all in this together’ mentality that she believes the district should uphold.

The layoffs and reductions will have major impacts on the school. Robles said it will lead to larger class sizes and less access to electives like art and music that students value. She is also concerned about the loss of instructional aides, which will make it harder for teachers to provide individualized support.

Robles expressed deep concerns about the impact on employee morale, stating that some staff at the Miranda campus that received layoff notices were crying and upset. She worries many experienced teachers will leave the district rather than accept reduced hours or positions further away.

Overall, Robles believes the district’s decisions are short-sighted and will significantly harm the quality of education and the school community in the long run. She advocated for a more equitable approach that asks more from higher-paid administrators.

Ripple Effects on Students and Staff

These staffing reductions will likely have a direct impact on student support services, including classroom assistance, behavioral intervention, and health-related programs. Fewer bus driver hours may lead to longer wait times or changes in transportation schedules, while a reduced custodial workforce could affect school maintenance and cleanliness.

For classified staff, the layoffs mark a significant loss of job security. The district has agreed to reemployment rights and substitute opportunities for laid-off employees, but for many, the prospect of finding comparable work remains uncertain.

Robles shared that Mr. Harold, a teacher in the math department, expressed frustration at the board meeting. He pointed out that the district continues to refer to “us as positions instead of people.”

Custodian John Burke stated, “The school district is a tree severing itself from its roots and expecting to stay up right.”

Concerns About the Food Service Program

In addition to the staffing cuts, Julie Lyon, the SHUSD food service director, outlined potential impacts to the food service program. The district is proposing to eliminate a 1-hour food service position at Whitethorn, with the work being redistributed to other employees. This could result in increased workloads and responsibilities for the remaining staff without added time compensation to ensure students are fed.

Lyon explained that roughly 25-30% of students currently receiving free meals could be significantly impacted if the free meal program is cut. These students come from families facing financial hardship, and without access to nutritious meals at school, they may go hungry. Lyon expressed concern that these students may lose access to the fresh, healthy food provided at school, further exacerbating food insecurity.

While the pre-pandemic free and reduced lunch program may be a viable option for some, in the past, the school has faced the challenge of being required to feed students even if they cannot pay. This often leaves the school covering the cost of the meals without receiving the necessary reimbursement

Teacher and Staff Concerns About Job Security

Tami Bighead, Grievance Coordinator for SHTA, explained that this is the first time in eight years that the district has had to issue widespread pink slips to both certified and classified employees. She emphasized that this uncertainty, especially regarding state funding, is not new, but the stakes feel much higher this time due to the financial challenges and ongoing disruption.

Bighead also pointed out that the uncertainty surrounding state funding, which typically isn’t finalized until May or even July, has forced the district to make these preemptive cuts. She voiced concern that the ongoing reductions will result in larger class sizes, especially in upper grades, and a significant decrease in support staff. With no “fat to trim,” the cuts will directly impact student learning and the ability to maintain basic school operations.

“The people that they want to rehire if they do get their money are not going to have just sat here waiting to hear that,” Bighead said. “They’re going to plan for their lives to move forward.”

Where Does California Get Its School Funding?

California’s K-12 education funding primarily comes from state revenues, which are collected through taxes and other sources. The state’s education budget is largely dictated by Proposition 98, a constitutional amendment that guarantees a minimum level of funding for public schools and community colleges.

Below is a breakdown of where California gets the money that funds schools:

Revenue Source Role in School Funding Notes
Personal Income Taxes Largest source of school funding (General Fund) Highly dependent on high earners and economic conditions.
Sales & Use Taxes Secondary source for schools More stable but smaller than income tax.
Corporate Taxes Small contribution to General Fund Depends on business profits and economic growth.
Local Property Taxes Used in combination with state funding (LCFF formula) Proposition 13 limits growth. Some districts (Basic Aid) keep local revenue.
California Lottery Very small contribution (~1-2% of school funding) Restricted use (not for salaries).
Federal Funds 8-10% of education budget Targeted for low-income students, special ed, meals, etc.

Because California’s education funding depends heavily on income taxes, especially from the wealthy, economic downturns can lead to budget shortfalls. If income tax revenue drops (due to job losses or stock market declines), the state has less money to fund schools. School districts often issue layoff notices (pink slips) in anticipation of funding cuts, even if the state budget is later adjusted.

What Comes Next?

With both federal and state education budgets still in flux, SHUSD is not alone in its difficult decision-making. Across the district, the state, and the nation, school districts are weighing similar staffing reductions, program cuts, and spending freezes as they wait for more clarity on available funding.

Tami Bighead described the situation as dire, emphasizing that immediate action is needed. “[People are] going to have to contact their congressman. I don’t know what else to do,” she said. Education advocates are urging lawmakers to prioritize K-12 funding, and Bighead echoed that call, encouraging those who want to support the district to reach out to their representatives.

Beyond advocating for funding, she urged community members to step up in another crucial way: by volunteering. “They’re gonna have to be able to volunteer at a school … and be consistent and get their fingerprints done… because that’s all we got at this point—bodies in a room.” Families and community members who want to help mitigate the impacts of these cuts can consider giving their time at local schools, ensuring students still have support despite reduced resources.

As federal and state budget negotiations continue, SHUSD and other districts will have to remain flexible, adapting their financial plans based on decisions made in Sacramento and Washington, D.C. For now, though, the message is clear: uncertainty in education funding has real and immediate consequences for schools, staff, and students alike.

 

 

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

149 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sohumjoe
Member
sohumjoe
1 year ago

We can thank the Trusk administration for this. It sux

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  sohumjoe

The article refers to proposed federal cuts but is short on specifics — and makes no mention that California is putting all federal education funding at risk by letting biological males compete in girl’s and women’s sports — where is the outrage from those who claim to support women’s rights?

And what a surprise the only thing exempt from cuts are administrative positions and salaries!

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

Is that , like a widespread problem that hasn’t t been handled within their own school districts in the rare case? Seems silly being outraged and trying to rally more from people who claim to support women’s rights. When I was 9 in little league baseball, the coaches daughter was 12 and was a pitcher. I was put in as catcher for one of the very first times. That girl threw fucking heat. If I had been on the other team I surely would have been outraged by that 12 year old girl striking me out 4 times in a game, like she did to a lot of batters. But instead of ridiculing her the players all rallied around her and all the parents and coaches cheered for her, and my hand was sore.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago

Nice deflection! There’s simply no comparison with a girl choosing to play on a boys team and biological males playing on girls teams.

Your other point seems to be it’s ok to violate the rights of women and girls as long as it’s only in a few cases — but it doesn’t just hurt the one girl who may have been cheated out of a medal — it also hurts the girl who was knocked off the team to make room for the guy pretending to be a girl — and it also affects all teams in a league if one team is given an unfair advantage.

It’s just wrong to let men and boys compete in girls and women’s sports — and share bathrooms and locker rooms — a guy may pretend to be a girl but the naked truth is undeniable when he takes a shower.

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

You obviously spend a lot of time fantasizing about how big a problem this is. You kind of unsurprisingly don’t get the morals of the story. That 12 year old girl, as most are, was more developed and stronger than the boys, playing in a boys league. Id love to see all the times this is a problem that wasn’t handled by the school and the people involved directly in the issue, can you tell me about all the times this happens? There are ALOT of issues that happen to very few people that get no attention. No denying , proportionally, this is really a trigger, for some reason?? that deeply needs you to come to the rescue and rally support about. What a righteous savior.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago

Your cute little story is irrelevant to the point I’m making — sorry/not sorry if you’re offended by having the deflection called out.

I’m not fantasizing about anything — anyone paying attention is aware this is a huge problem for the people involved — often including the biological males pretending to be girls — more and more people are unwilling to ignore the injustice this poses for girls and women.

It’s just wrong to force girls and women to compete against males and share bathrooms and locker rooms with them — this isn’t difficult for most people to understand.

Maybe you don’t care if girls are playing on a level playing field —maybe you don’t care about women’s rights — but it doesn’t stop there.

Trump’s most effective ad said: “Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you” — this single issue explains why Trump swept all 7 battleground states.

Gavin Newsom, drive by his presidential ambitions, is the only Democrat willing to say it’s unfair to let males compete against girls and women — unless more Dems wake up this will continue to be a losing issue for them.

yesmeagain
Guest
yesmeagain
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

Whatever arguments are being made in this debate on either side, it seems like a ridiculous over-reaction — and obviously a political gambit on both sides — to cut school funding that will affect every student, every child in California schools, causing huge hardships for every family — simply to make a point about transgender athletes, whether for or against. There are more important things at stake here than athletic competition, believe it or not.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  yesmeagain

Oh, please!

Go tell this to the women and girls who worked their hardest to be the best in their sport and were forced to compete against males — quit pretending it’s ok if only a few girls and women are unfairly cheated out of the fruits of their labors, denied a medal or kicked off the team — tell them it’s an overreaction to care about basic fairness.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago

Then the boys grew up- to have more bone and muscle mass while women developed more fat. You know so men can better kill and women can have the extra fuel to carry babies to term. And that starts six weeks into a human fetus developing.
People may choose to play physiological roulette with their bodies using surgery and hormones, but unless transgender agendas are going to apply them in the womb, the two genders are never going to be the same. You know kinda sciency-like informatiin. This seems to be one of the liberal versions of science denial they complain that anti vaxxers espouse.
Too bad, so sad but reality can not be legislated into existence just because someone wants it to be so.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_differentiation_in_humans

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

But ya, that 12 year old girl more developed than boys same age, playing in the boys league, kicking everybodys ass. Liberal science informatiin denial, eh? You have only 1 biased lens you look through consistently, did you ever notice that
?

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

The treatment that these CHILDREN are being denied includes puberty blocking hormone therapy that PREVENTS the increased muscle mass that so concerns you. Try not being ignornant.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  I am a robot

Read again. It starts before birth. And what sadist thinks a child who, according to you, hasn’t a clue about what hormones do because you want them blocked before they do, and what it means to them for their lives, should have them mechanically stopped based on someone else’s understanding? Children are clueless and we try to keep them unaware of the consequences of bad choices. So you want who ever feels the need to treat a child as a proxy for their own issues should lead their decisions? Really?
Oh, and don’t box above your weight when insulting people.

Doc
Member
Doc
1 year ago
Reply to  I am a robot

Who is being ignorant. It is not uncommon for children and adolescents to be confused about their sexual identity. This changes as they mature hormonally, psychologically, and physically in most instances. For these reasons pursuing sex reassignment through surgery or drugs in minors is dangerous and in my opinion Malpractice. Puberty Blockers have serious side effects and it is a misuse to use them for sex reassignment. Many Psychologists believe sex reassignment should not be pursued before the age of 25.

Never Cry Wolf
Guest
Never Cry Wolf
1 year ago
Reply to  I am a robot

So much for sticking to the topic and avoiding personal attacks,.. hypocrite much Kym??? Use your journalistic skills and figure out why MSM really had to disable their comment sections so your site does not suffer the same fate, or at the very least when your resources, and bandwidth become unmanageable you’ll know why it happened.

Doc
Member
Doc
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

This is the undeniable truth. Well said.

Farce
Guest
Farce
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

As always the richest and wealthiest will advise us peasants to ” just eat cake”

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago
Reply to  sohumjoe

Eh ? We can thank Newsom and the California Dems for this.

$4 billion short fall in Cal Medicaid due to funding Illegal Aliens for medical care !
$35 billion for a train to no-where.
$24 billion for Homeless. (They still are there !)

Yee hah ! SF and LA get what they want (I guess).

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

Nobody is overly concerned about who is playing in high school sports—it’s less than a percent of the population. While I believe kids should always be treated kindly, this isn’t really an issue that impacts the greater public. It’s not significant enough to be a hill many progressives are willing to die on.

Healthcare for migrant workers is essential—not just for their well-being but to prevent the spread of communicable diseases, like avian flu among dairy workers. You wouldn’t want someone packing your food while carrying a contagious illness. Think Typhoid Mary. Beyond that, people simply deserve access to healthcare.

Fact: Undocumented immigrants contributed $25.7 billion to Social Security in 2022 and $26 billion in 2024. They can’t collect SS so even with providing healthcare we still have a net profit for the government.

The issue with undocumented workers isn’t the workers themselves—it’s that corporations refuse to pay a living wage. Our food system has relied on cheap labor since the nation’s founding. When we expect low costs for goods that should realistically cost more, we perpetuate wage depression. If your paying $25/hr to pick tomatoes I think you will attract more people

I agree with you on issues like the train system and homelessness. The biggest hurdles have been overregulation. California has too much government interference. We should fast-track these projects and stop overpaying paper-pushers and administrative roles. Pay contractors to self-certify and move forward. Sometimes, you have to say “forget the NIMBYs”—they’ll be upset no matter what. Get people off the streets and mandate treatment. I wouldn’t have supported that in the past, but with the current fentanyl epidemic, it could save lives. Addicts might even appreciate it in the long run. If we were willing to restrict personal freedoms during COVID-19 for the greater good, why not now? It’s a sticky issue, but saving lives sometimes means pushing people toward what’s best for them. Life isn’t always fair or full of rainbows and sunshine. At some point, people need to take accountability for their own mess if it’s affecting those around them.
Undocumented Immigrants’ Payments Into Social Security Detailed in Report – Newsweek

Last edited 1 year ago
Espino
Guest
Espino
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

“Nobody is overly concerned about who is playing in high school sports—it’s less than a percent of the population.”
True, here in Sissyville, but not true for the rest of the nation.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

>”If your paying $25/hr to pick tomatoes I think you will attract more people”
— Eh ?
In California, the average hourly pay for a farm worker is around $17.23, with a range from $14.71 to $18.99, while the average hourly pay for a migrant worker is around $18.48. 
Salary Range: $31,500 (25th percentile) to $44,000 (75th percentile)

>”Nobody is overly concerned about who is playing in high school sports—it’s less than a percent of the population.”
Answered somebody else I reckoned.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

What arrogance. Anyone who plays sports or anyone who has a daughter playing sports or any woman who saw Title IX as a move towards equality cares about sports.
And anyone who pays taxes or can’t find access to a doctor or wants a living wage cares about immigration. At least if they don’t work for a government entity who legally doesn’t hire illegal immigrants or has the ability to get more money out of the public not matter how badly they perform cares.
Pot growers hiring illegal workers and pawning their health care onto the public don’t care.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

If girls in sports don’t want trans kids playing with them, I think women should advocate for themselves. I’m not going to push anything on anyone. All I was saying is that there were only about ten trans people playing in sports, so it’s not actually a huge issue that should be constantly brought up. I feel like it’s so sensationalized, and it doesn’t affect my life or most people’s lives at all. Okay, women don’t want to compete against people born male—sure. But guys, we have bigger issues, like kids going hungry and schools not being funded

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

I agree women should advocate for themselves (along with men who should also stand up for women’s rights) but the radical trans activists and their allies demonize and try to cancel anyone who questions the absurdity of allowing men to invade women’s sports.

It’s an odd argument to say only ten “trans kids” [males] are playing in girls sports so it’s ok — does that also make it ok if only ten girls are sexually abused or raped?

Why is it so hard for some people to say it’s just wrong to force girls to compete against males?

And how is it ok to force girls to share a locker room with a guy just because the guy “feels” like a girl when the naked truth is plain to see?

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

You weren’t complaining about bigger issues before when transgender competition was pushed last year.. Just started when you could use Trump as a whipping boy. And no child has yet starved who wasn’t starving while already while aid went to political agendas like DEI.

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

1 You don’t want aliens going without medical care, have you heard how they abduct people and do but probes?! Maybe lack of medical care is why
2 Holy shit the train to nowhere sounds awesome about now, Im all aboard that.
3 How much you think it costs the rich to make a homeless person?
It aint fucking cheap destroying the middle class.
Just a little Sunday morning clowning bozo

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago

Going further over the cliff of insanity is not a valid response.

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

Another pointless yabut, it’s fucking satire! get it?

Farce
Guest
Farce
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

Don’t forget $8 Billion for medical for illegal immigrants. They really tried to hide that from us all…

Mr. Clark
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  sohumjoe

Federal Funds 8-10% of education budget Targeted for low-income students, special ed, meals, etc.
A small part is affected by the Trump Administration. Most of this disaster is caused by the teachers union and administrators, and the progressive programs of California.

treeman53
Member
treeman53
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

We spend more money on education in America and are in last place as far as children learning what matters.

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  treeman53

That’s incorrect, we spend less than many other countries
https://files.epi.org/page/-/old/briefingpapers/1990_bp_shortchanging.pdf

and we spend much less on helping poor children “Public spending to reduce child poverty is lower in the U.S. than in any other rich nation”https://www.epi.org/explorer/international

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

That’s so off the wall and quite the usual spin of the government labor unions that fund the leftist think tank you cite. In truth, the US spends less than some others on students themselves but spends buckets more on the education bureaucracy and teacher benefits.
Are you disputing the criticism of learning too?

Last edited 1 year ago
Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

Can you cite some sources? And sure, the sources I cited are likely from a leftist think tank. I’ll bet your sources will be conservative think tanks: groups like heritage foundation or tax foundation. Funded by billionaire right wing and Christian donors

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

My sources are like sources from government and news sites. Actually some from your links. But it’s a very hard thing to tease out exactly where education funds go.
This is the best I have time to do now- “U.S. teachers and principals are among the highest paid of all participating countries, the data show. A typical new teacher earns about $40,000 in the United States, about $7,000 more than the global average. Likewise, a 15-year veteran teacher earns a little more than $62,000, compared to just under $46,000 on average across OECD countries.
However, the United States also has one of the largest salary gaps between principals and teachers in the OECD… ” which is money for administration rather than teaching students.
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-countries-around-the-world-spend-on-education-2019-8?op=1
https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/u-s-students-and-teachers-top-global-peers-for-time-spent-in-school-in-oecd-study/2019/09

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

These are about income inequality within the context of the education system. Not overall spending. But I thinks it’s a great point, pay disparity is an issue. Same as we see with extreme wealth, It’s what’s forces people into poverty. Kinda like a big game of monopoly. Which is interesting, maybe I should rethink my position on unions and labor representation they might be a ok things to have around

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

You cited a source from 1990 that used statistics from 40 years ago. Can at least try to use something current?
Also, they ask that you cite them when you do use them:
CitationIf you use the data, please cite it:
Source
Economic Policy Institute. 2025. State of Working America Data Library, Version 1.0.1. https://data.epi.org.

However, you might want to hurry up, National Center for Education statistics are going bye-bye according to them.
Also, if you wish for ALL of their data, get it here. (.zip file download)
[source]Economic Policy Institute. 2025. State of Working America Data Library, Version 1.0.1. via web download from https://data.epi.org. URL=https://github.com/Economic/data/releases/latest/download/epi_swa_data_library.zip

Last edited 1 year ago
Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago

It’s was cited, not sure why you think otherwise. Here’s a more recent article quote
Another way to look at education spending is as a percentage of gross domestic product. By that measure, according to OECD data, the U.S. again is nearly tops for postsecondary education. But at the primary and secondary school levels, U.S. per pupil spending in 2021 was below that of more than a dozen countries, including Israel, Iceland, Norway, the United Kingdom, Belgium and Costa Rica.
https://www.factcheck.org/2025/02/trump-wrong-about-u-s-rank-in-education-spending-and-outcomes/

Two Dogs
Guest
Two Dogs
1 year ago
Reply to  sohumjoe

No Sir. You can thank your Governor and your short sighted, inept, radical representatives for the fix we’re in.
Bragging about being the worlds’ 5th largest economy while begging for pennies to educate our children? Now, just how does that make sense?

Sick of Socialists
Guest
Sick of Socialists
1 year ago
Reply to  Two Dogs

It doesnt.

Without double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

Sick of Socialists
Guest
Sick of Socialists
1 year ago
Reply to  sohumjoe

RIGHT because federal funding bears the entire burden.

Its like you did not even read the article.

I have an idea: Sent the illegals back to their countries. ESL programs will vanish, class sizes shrink food budgets for low/no income people decrease, and the problem is solved!!
Its like democrats caused the problem, but want to blame someone else for it!!

TDS is funny
Guest
TDS is funny
1 year ago
Reply to  sohumjoe

Reading comprehension is everything. Please go back and try again. (I’ll give you a hint: Fed funds accounts for less than 10%.)
Our district is facing a $1.9 million deficit! That’s an us problem, not something you can blame on Trusk. ?
I noticed they didn’t mention any cuts to the administrative and upper leadership that bring home 6 figure incomes every year. But lunch lady gets a pink slip. ?

TDS is funny
Guest
TDS is funny
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa Music

It was tongue in cheek remark loosely based off the article which claimed
Layoffs: The district will eliminate several instructional assistant positions, behavior support aides, special needs aides, health aides, FOOD SERVICE STAFF, and office assistants.”
Your further explanation that “the one-hour food services position at Whitethorn was eliminated but that staff will manage to do their current job, and fill the one-hour slot, in the time they are allotted within their other titles” in my view just serves to further highlights the gross disparity! And craziness. Big wig admins with zero classroom involvement continuing to collect six figure salaries, and the educators and “staff” at the bottom, forced to do extra work for no extra pay.

Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa Music

Maybe teaching people not to be reliant on government might go a long way to solve those problems that hunger is supposed to solve?
i

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  TDS is funny

I think the whole point is that we do need better reading comprehension , and probably better math skills. It seems like it’s possible that our particular schools rely more heavily on Title I funding. Which means we have a lot of special needs kids.
”If Congress moves forward with cuts to Title I or Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) funding, schools may have to reduce classroom support, increase class sizes, and scale back specialized programs for students with disabilities”

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

“About One in Eight California Students Receives Special Education Services. In 2017‑18, 12.5 percent of California public school students received special education—an increase from 10.8 percent in the early 2000s. Compared to other California students, students with disabilities are disproportionately low income. They also are disproportionately African American, with African American students representing 6 percent of the overall student population but 9 percent of students with disabilities. The majority of students with disabilities have relatively mild conditions such as speech impairments and specific learning disorders (such as dyslexia). The number of students with relatively severe disabilities, however, has been increasing—doubling since 2000‑01. The most notable rise is in autism, which affected 1 in 600 students in 1997‑98 compared to 1 in 50 students in 2017‑18.”
Yet there is this complaint about bias in improperly assigning Latino students – “The report suggested that Latino students may be placed in special education classes accidentally.
This may be due to teachers and administrators’ failure to determine if a student has a learning disability or is falling behind because of issues with English language learning.”
https://salud-america.org/latino-students-misdiagnosed-with-learning-disabilities-raises-questions-about-discrimination-bias/
Frankly a diagnosis of autism means more money for school district. And such diagnoses have increased by leaps and bounds. It can mean a serious issue or a minir issue. There is little incentive for districts to question it if it gets more assistance for a child, more funding for the school. It’s a win, win.
It comes down to whether the extra money given an iep student is all needed and appropriately used for that child. And darned if that information is made public. Having changed school district a lot in my youth and having been in a class for slow learns in one year and in an advanced class in the next after moving to a new district, I have a pretty jaundiced view of the Integrity of the idea.
“While schools do receive more money for IEP students, the allocation process is complex and influenced by various factors. Schools must navigate these factors to ensure that IEP students receive the services and support they need to succeed. As educators and policymakers work to improve the IEP process, it’s essential to consider the implications of funding allocation models and develop solutions that prioritize equity and efficiency.”
https://www.clrn.org/do-schools-get-more-money-for-iep-students/
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4110

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

You’re implying something here, it’s hard to say , but maybe you are saying these kids are not truly autistic or deserving of special services? And that schools are a tad heavy handed in diagnosing to secure funding? but my point was that our schools are possibly positioned to lose more money than others, because perhaps there are more needs in our area. I’m certainly not advocating for waste, but the data you shared seems to point to needs that are being addressed, and possibly underfunding issues as well as concerns about diagnosing. I’d like to see teachers and staff be able to address these concerns and not make it harder for kids to access care. So we risk a few misdiagnoses, the other odds of not helping those in need are worse right? It seems that there’s a lot of distrust in the institutions and our fellow Americans. Why?

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago

I don’t think people fully grasp the vital support behavioral aids provide to these kids. Many children lack stable homes or parents and desperately need at least one person to guide them through real-life challenges. Some of the shit these kids have gone through is gut wrenching drugs are a terrible thing and in our rural schools it has a heavy toll on students. On top of that, the need for proper nutrition is undeniable—kids can’t learn if they’re hungry. It’s baffling to see support for cutting school lunch programs. Those funds not only ensure children are fed but also directly benefit small, local farmers and ranchers. Providing kids with locally grown beef and produce is a win-win for communities. Why would anyone want to take that away? Trump supporters please call your representatives and the USDA and tell them you want to feed hungry kids there is enough food in this world to feed kids.
I’m not a Christian but I believe in feeding poor and hungry kid. Is a basic human instinct to feed hungry babies.

Last edited 1 year ago
Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

“I don’t think people fully grasp the vital support behavioral aids provide to these kids.”

They’re also cutting instructional aides — this means the kids who already struggle to keep up will fall even farther behind — if they cut one or two administrators they could probably keep all the classroom aides.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

I agree with you. Reduce salaries at the top and make more room for the people doing the actual work.

Two Dogs
Guest
Two Dogs
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

Starving children are a necessity to the lefts’ agenda.

Last edited 1 year ago
Festus Haggins
Member
Festus Haggins
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

Yes, there should be no such thing as a hungry kid in America, There is plenty of jobs for the parents to do in order to feed their children.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Festus Haggins

Some parents are pieces of shit, sir and that isn’t the kid’s fault.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer
Farce
Guest
Farce
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

True. And those parents should be forcibly sterilized. Or induced to voluntarily sterilize with a cash bonus to go buy drugs. We have too many people and we are enabling the stupidest and most selfish to reproduce at high rates. Premise of the movie ” Idiocracy” and completely true….

Farce
Guest
Farce
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

Right on- Talk about basics! And local farmers and ranchers are the backbone of a community. That should transcend political lines…if anything it’s a conservative value. Trump is no conservative. He pretends to be and has a few things appearing conservative but he’s a radical…I hope people can see through the bullshit. I still think most Americans agree on core values, across party lines

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Farce

I sincerely hope so. Feeding children and supporting small farmers seem like causes we can all stand behind.

Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

Maybe the APEX PRIORITY from which all others should stem from. The solution to our toxic relationship with our own expectations can be directly linked to our disconnect from what actually provides the ability to learn and teach.
the idea that hungry children can’t learn might also be expanded to include hungry children can’t learn ideological bullsh*t, but the hunger might get them to recognize where the hunger comes from, and the longer we continue to feed them unhealthy calories, mind body spirit, we are doomed to keep putting ourselves into danger by the curriculum that has manifested into a society that turns its noses up to the idea of being somewhat self sufficient and self aware of who we are relying on so that grown adults can grow morbidly obese without the necessary shame that our ancestors would have inflicted.
modern life is a gift
modern warfare is polluting our food air and water while social media completely fails to address in any meaningful changes needed to hold ourselves accountable for the downgrade in our ability to take responsibility for our dependency fantasy and illusion.
I don’t think spoiled distracted unhealthy people have anything to offer but lessons on what not to do.
The revolutionary mindset will be when we embrace local farmers and local producers of calories.
I fear many people are too lazy to make the change needed to make the paradigm shift.
if you know….

YOU KNOW!

Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Dustin Thewind

If all else fails, Bill Gates and the oligarchs have a great plan for your problems, just keep downvoting your inability to deal with your own mistakes.

tough love is what’s needed.

Savage Pete
Guest
Savage Pete
1 year ago
Reply to  Dustin Thewind

Being a thinker, standing up for what is right in a non-contradictory sense, and forming independent ideas and opinions will make people shun you. Be careful. It will be a lonely life. Come on down. Join us. It’s fun down here. The game is on right now and we still have some bags of chips and a bunch of 2-liters of pepsi. What team are you going for?

Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Savage Pete

…..Pennsylvania Dutch……
might hold a clue.
people just don’t understand the importance of root cause.
it’s more than brutal
its SAVAGE.

Savage Pete
Guest
Savage Pete
1 year ago
Reply to  Dustin Thewind

Okay then, I think I understand, at least some of what that’s about. Is Deutsch also a correct term? So maybe Amish (Anabaptist) influence too possibly? Then it would make even more sense. I have massive admiration for the Amish and Mennonite in various aspects, from the general to the very specific. I don’t want to idealize them too much because that’s usually not the best to do with any people but it’s somewhat hard not to from an outside surface level perspective, for me at least. Too much of it just makes sense to me.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Dustin Thewind

So, when we subsidize an entire nation of farmers for overproducing monocropped wheat, corn, soy, dairy, and now eggs (with the avian flu), we create industries that are essentially on welfare. These industries have no incentive to change poor practices because doing so would mean losing their subsidies. (think PepsiCo, Tyson Foods, Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), and Nestlé USA) We push unhealthy, highly processed products into the market at artificially low prices because of these subsidies. Poor people can afford more of these filler, sugary, unhealthy foods as a result.
Schools, prior to the USDA grants that they have just lost, were pretty much forced to purchase these unhealthy, low-quality foods to feed school children. The grants we just lost provided schools with a way to purchase locally grown food like vegetables, fruits, and meats. It was embracing local farmers and local calories! We literally just canceled one of the biggest ways we were supporting local food systems—something we haven’t seen since the 20th century.
Our food security depends on moving away from large-scale producers and the globalization of farmland. Our earth simply cannot continue to support the aggressive and extractive methods used at those scales. (Please educate yourselves before commenting back because what I am saying is actually very valid and revolutionary) You want to take back our nation support small farmers and support the peoples’ dollars going to healthy food so we can build healthy people and a healthy future.
Essentially, we just lost the ability to provide whole, unprocessed foods, which, until now, wasn’t even an option. Uggggg why. I don’t think local farmers are lazy. I don’t think school teachers are entitled either. And I certainly don’t think starving kids is a good way to teach a lesson—that’s just evil.
Let’s regroup and call our representatives, whether we’re Democrats or Republicans, because feeding our kids healthy food is something we can all agree is a good thing.
Remember in any industry CONSOLIDATION takes the power away from the people. Many people succeeding is always better than a few. You want to talk about entitlement look at any of our local industries and what has happened due to government greed logging, fishing, cannabis, now tourism. And it includes both parties because our local leader’s greed and entitlement is the worst of the worst.
“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s needs, but not every man’s greed”.-Ghandi
USDA funding cuts leave schools, farmers, food banks scrambling – Marketplace
US Agriculture Statistics and Data Trends: subsidies, food prices, and more | USAFacts
Ag and Food Statistics: Charting the Essentials – Farming and Farm Income | Economic Research Service

Last edited 1 year ago
Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

when I speak to sending kids to bed hungry, what I speak to , is how the f*ck do you motivate the next generation to keep pushing ahead instead the computer and video games that inevitably leads to dopamine addiction and quite possibly neurological damage to the developing mind. I’m all for the small local regenerative model, but you have no incentive to work in many of these young kids, who think about get Rich schemes and day trading meme coins cause real property ownership is a fantasy.

So how do you inspire?!?!?

I heard a commenter says Governing is a bitch a while back, and I have to agree.
manufacturing consent isn’t just for independent families and communities.
the commercial corporate model is ruthless in how it controls markets and price. You just can’t compete with the Walmart model without using the same mindset.
the trouble is Gen Pop, and impulsive , reflexive and addictive habits that have been studied and manipulated since Bernays.
ive been meditating on the cost of energy,listening to educated talking heads discuss about what spurs people to innovate and believe they are capable of producing goods in services in this competitive market.
the obvious controlled demolition of our economy is easy to feel but hard to understand, but cheap energy would help many local and regional business minded people be encouraged to engage, but it’s challenging to find those alliances when bureaucratic systems are run like the mafia. Im not saying it’s a cartel, but it’s got all the hallmarks of one.
At this point, I honestly think it’s our moral duty to question the jurisdiction of a government that can legally take control of private property through forfeiture.
the more I know, the more I understand why running an honest business in todays society is probably the worst thing for long term success.
The outlaw culture benefits from its ability to work in the grey, because the people who have created the system understand the only way to get ahead is to use the tracks that were laid long before we arrived.

at this point, you gotta do a little dirt, To make things work.
I hope we can take back control, but I just don’t think we have the stomach for what’s needed to make that happen on a large scale….maybe local guerilla tactics,
entrenched interests aren’t entrenched by accident.
we have to change the way we think about food…and that is the most dangerous act a free person can undertake

Last edited 1 year ago
Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Dustin Thewind

we have to change the way we think about food…and that is the most dangerous act a free person can undertake.
it’s not about supporting small farmers, it’s the participation and education of our next generation to focus on breaking the cycle of dependence on Multinational companies to corporations to fill dem youngins bellies.
so yeah, learning children about the power of hunger isn’t evil, it’s the revolution we need.., to help them understand how powerful hunger is to harnessing change

Sigh
Guest
Sigh
1 year ago

Here come the denial and fear mongering accusation comments!?

Mr. Clark
Member
1 year ago

Proposition 13 limits growth. Some districts (Basic Aid) keep local revenue.

Stop messing with Prop 13. It is there for a reason. Keep your greedy hands off.
Every year there are special assessments added to my property tax. Seven in Eureka, and four in the county. Most for schools. I pass these costs on to the renters, and make sure they know the added cost to their rent. They know it is not my profit. They agree these taxes are unfair. They know these taxes are on top of the fixed rate.

Mr. Clark
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Sales tax is not collected in Humboldt is they purchase is on line, like Amazon. It all goes to Sacramento, to piss away on social justice programs. When will the failed county boards fight this?

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Yeah, damn social justice. We sure don’t need any more of that !!!
(sarcasm)

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Prop 13 has some pretty racist background, do a little research and you will find out it came about when Christian and other white people found it unpleasant to have to see their tax dollars go to supporting integrated schools. There was a pretty major anti tax movement that started as a result of backlash to the equal rights movement. People don’t like their tax dollars going to non white, poor, immigrants or women’s issues. Prop 13 seems like a good idea but it’s also very harmful

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

Prop. 13 came about because people on fixed incomes were literally being taxed out of their homes — before Prop.13 a City or County decided how much money they wanted to spend and then raised the property tax to pay for it — it was a real problem the legislature was ignoring — Prop. 13 was the result.

PS: Do you have any sources that support your revisionist theories?

Last edited 1 year ago
Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

it is true that many middle class where being taxed out of their homes. But for others it has been a lucrative wealth building tax benefit at the cost of our public schools. many potential amendments have been suggested but never passed because of the anti tax attitudes we all support yet we often end up advocating for wealthy peoples causes not working class or poor.
The report cited here “concluded it has contributed to a widening wealth gap, a severe housing shortage for decades, inadequate funding for public schools” and “Proposition 13 was also just one in a contemporaneous wave of state referendums that had xenophobic and racist overtones,”
https://edsource.org/2022/californias-prop-13s-unjust-legacy-detailed-in-critical-study/674412?amp=1

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

Well that’s a might big and biased filter you just applied to the issue. The reality was that people were being taxed out of their homes. That they might have a jaundiced view of where California spent the money was certainly not the central issue. That you apply such a racist meaning to that is on you.
California has a hugely disproportionately high valued housing market. Yet if you bothered to look, the percentage rate is only slightly below average. “As shown above, California home prices have long been—and continue to be—much more expensive than the rest of the US. Prices for mid-tier homes are more than twice as expensive as the typical mid-tier US home. (Mid-tier homes reflect home values in the 35th to 65th percentile range.) Perhaps even more importantly for a first-time home buyer, a bottom-tier home in California is now about 33 percent more expensive than a mid-tier home in the rest of the U.S.—a gap that has widened over the last decade. (Bottom-tier homes are those with values in the 5th to 35th percentile range.)”
If not for Prop 13 limiting the constant upward reevaluation of the value, many people would be priced out of owning the home they already paid off. California has a long history of being one of the most tax burdened State in the country. Government has no limit to their greed but at least my home is safer. Except for the six school bonds, special assessments, etc that are attached. You may look at Prop 13 as a racist attempt to suppress minorities but I look at it as the only reason I can still afford to live here.
http://www.tax-rates.org/california/property-tax
https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/793

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

I see how prop 13 it is important to keep people in their homes. And Californias housing and real estate market is ridiculously expensive. New home owners and retirees need help affording their homes. But many businesses and super wealthy people are gaming the system through prop 13z Disneyland and PGE are well known examples. The history around how prop 13 came about is pretty clear, it’s just not pleasant because it points a finger at wealthy white people. Howard Jarvis knew what he was doing and the impact on Californias budget was immense, most notably in education

prop 13 needs to be amended to be more fair.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

Government by lobbyist- including teacher’s unions- can not safety be allowed to determine what is fair. Not that fair has some sort of scientific measurement anyway. And damning white people who are rich to tar the whole idea as racist unequivocally racist itself and only confirms that one person’s idea of fairness is not everyone’s.
Making a system a proxy wealth redistribution guarantees people will take advantage of it. And your example is prove that point, not that it’s racist.

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

Your exaggeration of my assertion related to racism and the negative impact of prop 13 makes this a tough conversation. I doubt that you read the links, they do share some interesting points. I think we agree on this: Property Taxes are wealth redistribution, and people are taking advantage of them.

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago

Reality’s a bitch isn’t it? Growing food and shooting straight is the only education anyone needs.

Ahuka of the Hashishim
Guest
Ahuka of the Hashishim
1 year ago
Reply to  Zipline

That sounds about right. For the 1600’s

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago

1600’s are back. Be ready. Or not.

Thanks for proving our point!
Member
Thanks for proving our point!
1 year ago

Make merikkka great again, amirite?

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago

No. Poison is never right.

Giant Squirrel
Guest
Giant Squirrel
1 year ago

Demand the Dems account for the $20B homeless funding routed to crony “non profits” paying huge salaries and kickbacks to corrupt politicians or the $10B/yr Californians pay for criminal alien Healthcare rather than public education. Any school with unconstitutional discrimination or racist policies should certainly lose all taxpayer funding

Ahuka of the Hashishim
Guest
Ahuka of the Hashishim
1 year ago
Reply to  Giant Squirrel

Better it lose the people responsible for those decisions, and spare the students

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago

First of all, thank the pos governor for destroying the California budget. Second, there’s absolutely no reason any school needs to be a provider of welfare services. The sole purpose of schools is to provide education of core subjects to children. They aren’t a babysitter. They shouldn’t be a cafeteria service. They shouldn’t be an indoctrination center. They are to teach, period. If the schools are fortunate enough to have extra funds for sports, food service and electives, great! However, thanks to the leftist policies that think the schools should provide everything at no cost to the students, there’s the current deficit problem. Classroom instruction is the only thing that should be free. The rest is the responsibility of parents, like it or not. If parents are failing, that’s not the school’s problem. I challenge school leaders to, for once, spend my tax dollars on what they were intended for instead of all the woke useless crap you’ve been washing it on.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

As a teacher I can say…there is not much learning when kids have empty stomachs. It is in society’s interest to raise educated people and schools are the best way to ensure that kids are fed enough to learn. I really hope you are just caught up in rhetoric and not actually uncaring that kids go hungry.

Zipline
Guest
Zipline
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Maybe humans shouldn’t have children if they can’t provide for them? Maybe humans should be responsible? Maybe life should be fair? It’s not and they don’t.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago
Reply to  Zipline

I think poor people having children isn’t going to go away with the just-say-no mentality. Education, a possibility of a better life, birth control, freedom to choose abortion are all ways to reduce poor people having children.

Let’s hope letting live children starve to death or have such malnutrition that they can’t learn isn’t really your solution for kids who can’t help who they were born to.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

The same people advocating to stop sex education, restrict birth control, and oppose abortion even in cases of rape or incest are now saying we shouldn’t feed kids because poor people shouldn’t have them. You all care more about trans kids playing at high school sports games than kids starving! We are not even on the same level of humanity anymore.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

The “right-to-lifers” are really just “right-to-birthers” (forced if necessary) and could care less about the well being the kids after they’re born.

But supporting males (in any number) invading girls and women’s sports and locker rooms is just wrong!!

You choosing to die on that hill distracts from your valid arguments in favor of adequate nutrition, healthcare and education for all children.

Farmer
Guest
Farmer
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

I’m still deciding on this topic. It’s not my highest priority, my hill to die on, or even a priority in my life at all. I don’t really know any trans people, but I don’t want them to get hurt and they have existed in society for thousands of years, so we have to learn to let people live in their authenticity. I also don’t have a kid in sports so it’s just not an issue on my radar.
I think women, in general, always get the short end of the stick. Even Mexico is giving women over 65 pensions for being stay-at-home moms because they recognize that raising kids is valuable and a job. Why aren’t we doing things like that? If we really care about women we should be advocating for equality in pay and stay at home options for nursing moms or moms with young kids.
I wish people would fight for that as passionately as they are for women’s sports right now. And if you want an answer no I don’t think anyone should be forced to share a locker room with anyone who makes them feel uncomfortable especially teens.
Men entering safe spaces in any capacity irritates me because I know how hard it is for women to make something of themselves without having to work extra hard at it.
That said, I don’t like your comparison of trans people to sexual predators in your previous statement, which I know isn’t true and it creates a dangerous narrative. My kids nurse was trans who did her bloodwork, our server in Arcata was trans they are just people living life.

Last edited 1 year ago
Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Farmer

You have decided on the topic.

You said:
“Men entering [women’s] safe spaces in any capacity irritates me because I know how hard it is for women to make something of themselves without having to work extra hard at it.”

So thanks to a “trans woman” — who was not competitive as a male athlete — a girl or woman is denied her rightful place on the podium — and another girl or woman — who was not the best but worked hard to be her best — is bumped off the team!!

That is just not right!!

Also, it’s projection on your part to say I was comparing trans people to sexual predators — I was countering your claim that trans people invading women’s sports wasn’t an issue because they were so few — following that logic only a few cases of sexual assault and rape shouldn’t be an issue, right?

But AAMOF trans woman have assaulted girls in women’s bathrooms — “Hannah” Tubbs, a violent criminal offender who sexually assaulted a 10 year old girl comes to mind.

A 10 year old girl should be able to use the women’s bathroom without a biological male thinking they have the “right” to follow her in — and girls and women should not be exposed to naked men and boys in the girls locker room.

These should not be difficult concepts to understand!

But the Dems not understanding this issue — and not supporting women’s rights — was a decisive factor in Trump sweeping all 7 battleground states.

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
1 year ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

Hrmm , it seems i am to logical for most around these parts , but it seems to me women have been fighting to be treated equal to males for decades. Fighting to prove they are just as brave just as smart just as hard working just as worthy as any man , so what i do not understand is why are these same women upset when something takes their special sports or female only anything away from them? Either they are equal or not ? If they are saying they are equal but different then i dont understand why they get upset when they are treated differently . Maybe it is not equality they seek but special privileges which i am not opposed to but lets not confuse matters and attempt to convince people that it is equality they are seeking .
here is a thought , why not have single stall showers single stall toilets single stall changing areas sort of like the changing rooms at stores ? It seems that would put a stop to all of this nonsense . Personally it should not matter to anyone what someone wishes to be or what they think they are , wasting so much time and resources to stick noses into bedrooms and other peoples lives when we have much larger things to concern ourselves with . Such as why anyone thinks we should borrow money to give away to other countries when we do not have enough ourselves ? Let these other countries borrow their own money . You take your company off shore to skirt epa and labor laws here in our country then wish to ship your product to us and sell it to us under cutting the price points that those who stay here and follow the rules can bring to market guess what ? Tariffs it is what is needed and what these companies deserve . The fact that the same people complaining about environmental damage here done by steel mills or industries in general seem to also have issues with tariffs which are designed to bring that stuff back here where it is done cleaner and safer for all. What is the point they are trying to make ? That it is only bad if it is where they can witness it happening but if it is happening in some country halfway around the world it is ok and we should welcome the goods that are made that way here with open arms ? And maybe when they need a job they can go there and compete against 6 year olds to work 12 plus hour days for a dollar a day

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Antichrist

Your comments on women’s rights miss the mark — women have fought for decades for equal rights and equal opportunity — but they’ve never said they are the physical equal of men — it’s a gross violation of women’s rights to allow males to compete in girls and women’s sports.

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I’m definitely serious. I also was a teacher. The biggest block to learning in Southern California wasn’t lack of food. It was the constant interruption of the class with extracurricular nonsense, which took kids out of the classroom for hours, thus making them miss valuable instruction time. No, I don’t want kids to go hungry. However, I stand by school not being a welfare institution. I believe personal responsibility of parents is important. The leftist “entitlement” mentality is sickening. The attitude of “I’ll just send my child to school for food” is irresponsible and immoral. It’s a fact that school cafeteria programs are extremely expensive and inefficient. Also, it’s a fact that school meals do not put a priority on real nutrition. The meals may fill the stomach, but are not nutrition friendly at all. It would be exponentially cheaper to double up food stamps than to keep the school lunch programs, and the complaint about having to feed those that aren’t qualified would go away.

I don’t confuse the issues. Schools are for education. Social Services is for social issues. They should have very little overlap. Mixing the two takes away from effectiveness.

ABA
Guest
ABA
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

You were never a teacher.

Thanks for proving our point!
Member
Thanks for proving our point!
1 year ago
Reply to  ABA

Sincerely hope educators would’ve learned to spell ,if that was the case

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

This major recipients of our tax dollars and government subsidies are not poor kids, it’s wealthy corporations and billionaires. These current tax cuts are not going to the low income. They are going to the real “welfare” recipients like musk. It’s sad how so many people think it’s ok to sacrifice our children’s lives just to help fund tax cuts for the rich. Reducing child poverty has major benefits for all of us and it’s just common sense. USA has more poor people than most of us want to believe, and Christian nationalism as well as the republican administration has no mercy on children. Probably because they think the kids are all brown, but they’re not. They are white too. this is not to time to be cutting funding for poor kids. “Public spending to reduce child poverty is lower in the U.S. than in any other rich nation”https://www.epi.org/explorer/international

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

Where is the 25 billion dollars the governor wasted on “homelessness” with not one dime accounted for? Are they not the poor you speak of? Have you actually heard from a single person he helped? That much waste is why cuts are being made in the first place. I still think schools and teachers are there to educate. They aren’t there to be parents, social workers or anything else. No amount of money appears to have raised the success of California education which is abysmal. No amount of meal programs has either. If parents parent and teachers teach the success is greater every time.

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

not about to try and defend the money spent on homeless people since I really don’t know, I could research it, and yes of course wasteful spending should be stopped and should not happen in the first place.
But this particular topic , funding for kids needs at school . I don’t see anything remotely reasonable about cutting those programs. I believe the government should operate in areas where its population has the greatest need. Kids need access to education and the best place to get them food is through school. The only a place these kids have a chance to get help is at school. And if our tax dollars are going to that I support it. These programs are quite literally examples of our tax dollars being spent in the right place at the right time. I do know kids who receive these benefits.

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
1 year ago
Reply to  Human123

Tax cuts for the rich ? Please spare me . Why are you or anyone so entitled to something you did not earn ? Because you were born ? So because your parents decided to birth you , you demand that money someone else makes that doesnt even know you be taxed over 20 million dollars a year for things you want ? Please wealthy people might pay a lower percentage of tax but trust me their 10 to 15 percent of their 100 million is more than your 30 percent of 200 k if you even pay that .
why should people pay higher percentages the more they make ? That policy is flawed as it becomes a distractor to earn more of make something of ones self . Our policies should encourage people to make more earn more build wealth i stead of punishing them for it . If the tax rate goes down the more you make , the amount of taxes stays equal as long as there is a basis where regardless how much you make you will be paying say 10 percent . But those who do not make should be spending more on taxes because they are attempting to rely on public funds there by increasing the need for more public funds ,

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago
Reply to  Antichrist

I’m sure I’ve contributed a lot more in taxes than I want to admit. So when I talk about tax spending, it’s my money on the table too, not just “theirs.”
Meanwhile, the ultra-wealthy have endless ways to sidestep taxes—stock trading, estate loopholes, and depreciation, to name a few. I have no issue with people being rich,I’d love to be wealthy myself. Good for them.
But our government has increased the deficit repeatedly, most often under Republican leadership, to fund giveaways (tax cuts) for those who need them least. It’s not about punishing success, it’s about fiscal responsibility and fairness.

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

LoL, KOOL , hmmm, how about if they cut food stamps and other programs from the federal government that fill that gap for kids not lucky enough to have productive parents? You being the judge of what’s irresponsible, and immoral. And what the facts are, seriously?

Tiredofthisweathertoo
Guest
Tiredofthisweathertoo
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Well said Kym. As a teacher I saw many kids of all ages who relied on the stability and positive socialization of going to school. Too many counted on the meals provided as the best and only real meal of the day. They have no control of their often ghastly home lives. The disabled children, especially with the uptick of autism, require expert teachers and smaller classroom sizes to have a chance for a positive outcome. There are many excellent parents who struggle to provide, including the working poor. What happened to no child left behind? The heartlessness, callousness and lack of compassion regarding our nation’s children and families is appalling and does not speak well of what truly makes America great.

steven
Guest
steven
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp
Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago
Reply to  steven

That is why I was and am a never Trumper

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  steven

Food For People might be one of them. They’re tied with USDA funding.

Navy Veteran/Retired Engineer & Teacher
Guest
Navy Veteran/Retired Engineer & Teacher
1 year ago
Reply to  steven

I know of 5 districts in Humboldt, including our largest district Eureka City Schools, that use that USDA program to buy local beef and produce. This tRump budget cut has a direct negative impact on both the schools AND our local ranchers. Not sure how it falls under the WASTE or FRAUD category, but those “fine young men” at DOGE or the tRump political appointees probably don’t know and don’t care.

Eyeball Kid
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

How do you know if someone is a teacher or a nurse? They tell you.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago
Reply to  Eyeball Kid

When you love and are proud of what you do why wouldn’t you say?

I once went on a cruise hanging out with people from a different culture than what I normally did. The banality of people asking what car do you drive repeatedly (Like wtf??? who cares what someone drives.) about drove me insane. The people that I wanted to talk to talked about what they did with their lives not tried to impress with how much money they made.

Ernie Branscomb
Guest
Ernie Branscomb
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I agree with Kym, no kid is going to learn anything while hungry. However, when the main plank in the platform of the Democrat party is to, quote: “Fuck Trump”, things don’t seem very likely to improve.

The fact is that the federal Department of Education is mostly unnecessary, overstaffed, overpaid and top-heavy. If the Democrats were wise, they would be fighting to move that money to the states, then make sure it was spent wisely. TDS seems to have thrown reason out the window.

The Democrats are doing a good job of destroying themselves. They don’t need any help from Trump or Musk.

Trump has two years to bring the economy back or he is screwed. I’m a Liberal in philosophy, but  I am not stupid enough to think pissing away funding, then printing more, and increasing the national debt beyond what can ever be repaid is good for anything is going to be fruitful.

As a business person I have to operate on a balanced budget. Losing 20% of my banked money to inflation is just plain disgusting.

Getting to poor parents, Humboldt County ranks poorly in parenting. We see locals bring their children into our retail store where they are allowed to run amuck. Occasionally a parent comes into the store with well-behaved children that stand by their side and be cheerful and happy without destroying everything on our shelves. Rare.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago

Am I impressed with the Democrats response to the horrific things Trump is doing? Nope.

But its hard not to be dumbstruck that people I thought had hearts actually are perfectly fine with children losing food programs and teachers and happy about tax cuts that mostly benefit the top income earners.

Ernie Branscomb
Guest
Ernie Branscomb
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I try to look at thing as an independent thinker, and analyze situations without politics. I know that people can’t stand people that are neutral, but here is how I see politics lately.

The Federal Government, the California Government, and to a lesser degree Humboldt County has horribly mismanaged spending.

Now that a politician has determined to balance the budget, everybody is in a panic, fearing that their favorite issue will lose funding. It seems to me that balancing the budget can only be painful. Can anyone reasonably see any painless way to bring the country back away from bankruptcy? Does anyone understand the ramifications of a bankrupt America?

I see a lot of good moves by bringing industry and jobs back to American, getting rid of wasteful departments and utilizing our natural resources responsibly. And, demanding fair trade with other countries.

I especially agree with keeping criminals from crossing into our country. Yes, I am distressed that they may remove good people that made the only decisions that they could by sneaking into our country illegally. With no criminal record besides illegal immigration, they should be given a path to citizenship. Instead of “self deporting” and starting over, they should be able to apply for citizenship without leaving. They should have to show that they have no violent criminal record. otherwise… goodbye.

I do not agree with “Sanctuary Cities and states”. They should cooperate with removing the bad guys.

With apologies to my wiser friends.
Ernie

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago

Ernie,
I appreciate having an independent approach to thinking about these issues. Hopefully, we can all try to see the big picture and not be narrowly partisan. Budgeting is complex, and I agree that mismanagement of funds is a problem with government across the board.

However, the idea that slashing the federal budget will somehow magically “balance” it doesn’t hold up well when looking at past attempts.

The issue for me isn’t that cuts were/are being made, but rather that they were applied without thought—like using a chainsaw to hack off limbs instead of surgically trimming fat.

Remember when Secretary Rex Tillerson laid off a bunch of folks at the State Department back in Trump’s first term? The U.S. lost a huge amount of institutional knowledge. By the time the administration realized the problem, they had to scramble to rehire and retrain new personnel, an inefficient and costly process.

That’s already happening with cuts made just these few months since Trump has been in office. Already thousands of skilled workers were/are being laid off, only for many of them to be rehired later when it became clear that those jobs were essential. Remember the bird flu experts that were fired and rehired? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/usda-accidentally-fired-bird-flu-experts-rehire/

Not to mention the costs as law suits are filed and fought in these cases. Unless the Supreme Court reverses recent rulings possibly tens of thousands of workers will have to be rehired. https://apnews.com/article/mass-firings-federal-workers-trump-administration-7cc7320f469cc65529367aaea2fd9dcb

Not to mention unemployment payouts to those workers not rehired.

Don’t forget the very real drops in morale and subsequent possible loss in productivity of those not fired.

Perhaps closing corporate tax loopholes, and carefully evaluating necessary versus wasteful spending might be a good start?

I don’t think people oppose responsible budgeting—I think they oppose wasteful and thoughtless cuts that ultimately create more problems than they solve. If a business operated this way—randomly cutting expenses without considering long-term consequences—it wouldn’t last long. Why should we treat the federal government any differently?

Just my two cents.

Last edited 1 year ago
Ernie Branscomb
Guest
Ernie Branscomb
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I appreciate your two cents… Can I add a penny?
I find it kind of amusing that the mismanagement that has happened continually in the past is now focused on trump, making him the fall guy, when it was their fault all along. That is true in California government in particular.

However, we are all in the same basket now. It seems best to help it work. We have a magnificent opportunity to force government to work for us, The People.

Force the federal money saved by eliminating the Department of Education to the states, and dump useless bureaucracy. Feed kids and teach them the Three “Rs”.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago

An honest discussion is worth at least a quarter or two…

If the goal is to “feed kids and teach them the Three Rs,” then cutting federal oversight without a clear plan to maintain or improve funding streams could actually undermine that goal. Many school meal programs rely on federal support through the USDA, and some states (especially those with tighter budgets) would likely redirect education funds elsewhere. So the question is not just whether cuts are possible, but whether they actually achieve the intended results.

I’m all for government working for the people—but forcing cuts without ensuring a better system replaces them is a gamble that history shows doesn’t always pay off.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago

Ernie, I doubt you are going to see this since it is from so long ago. But I thought the following is an important development.

From the USDA website,

As part of a phased plan for the terminated probationary employees to return-to-duty, they have temporarily been placed on paid administrative leave. The probationary employees have been restored to the respective employment status they each held prior to their termination. USDA is paying each probationary employee any commensurate back pay, from the respective date of termination. “
That means that because of DOGE, a number of employees just got a paid (albeit stressful) vacation. This is not the kind of cost cutting measures that are effective to my mind. I’d prefer a more thoughtful decision making process that doesn’t cost more money than it saves.
https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2025/03/11/usda-status-update-probationary-employees

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

Feeding hungry children is definitely one of the places we should be spending money. Julie Lyon and her crews do a good job of that locally. Some school staff also feed students at their own expense.

Kym Kemp
Admin
1 year ago
Reply to  I like stars

Teachers and staff often step in. I can remember my mom, who was secretary at Redway School for decades providing warm clothes and food to some kids.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

That is hyperbolic nonsense. All Trump can do is cut funds where he can and hopefully redirect them in a more fruitful way. Sorry be funding plays to reduce hostility against homosexuality and such are not children starving.
This article supposedly “rebuts” the Trump Administration’s characterization of waste but it doesn’t say money wasn’t spent on such things. It just says they were important. Well they were important for a DEI political agenda but certainly not equivalent to children starving.
If they could have been surgically cut, maybe that would have been an option. But the court cases for that equity issue would have gone on for years without a cut being made. Since there was no practical legal way to do this with the political agendas in operation, all that could be done, if you want to get rid of the dirty bath water, is to throw it out, baby and all. If liberals legally bound the baby to the bathwater, this could only be the result. Too bad but it was their choice. Too bad they weren’t “dumstruck” before they did that self righteous Trump proofing.
https://www.factcheck.org/2025/02/sorting-out-the-facts-on-waste-and-abuse-at-usaid/

Never Cry Wolf
Guest
Never Cry Wolf
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

You clearly have not read “Chicken Little” or “Who moved my cheese”.

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
1 year ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

I think what he was saying is that the money to feed to hungry students should not come from school funds but from welfare funds . School funds are to pay for teaching students to read to write and to add and subtract . School funding is not to teach kids how to feel how to think how to express themselves or what is right and wrong , that is what parents are for. My grandmother was a retired 3 grade teacher she loved every child she taught every holiday we would bring extra gifts because we never knew how many students and their families either past or present would show up , because they all knew they were welcome , when the school replaced its playground she bought the old swings and merry-go- round and my grandfather installed them out past the barn they grew a garden and provided for friends neighbors students and the students families , they did it out of love they did it out of respect and gratitude . Because they both were not born here , they came here from Germany just before the US got bombed . It was not friendly here in this country for Germans most people do not think about that and because there are not people crying about the way Germans were treated it isnt something that gets acknowledged much at all . Anyways my grandmother used to complain that they were forcing teachers to reduce time spent on reading writing and math for all sorts of other things . She said if they can not read if they can not write if they can not ad and subtract they will never be able to look out for themselves . To be able to read means that the entire worlds knowledge is at your finger tips for the taking . To be able to write means that you can question that knowledge and pass on to others what you have learned . To be able to add and subtract enables a person to manage their budgets properly . That is what schools are for anything beyond that in grade schools is fat that needs to be cut because it gets into morals values and the sort of things that most people do not want governments teaching their kids . I do not want any government teaching my child right from wrong , how to act and what to think . If as a teacher you do not realize that you are a government agent if you are working for a public school then you really shouldnt be teaching kids

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  Antichrist

Just to hit on one of your points, school lunches aren’t “welfare” in the way you might think. That’s DHHS. Lunches are the realm of the US Dept of Agriculture

Antichrist
Guest
Antichrist
1 year ago

Either way should not be coming from school dollars is my point

Martin
Guest
Martin
1 year ago

Federal and State education funding should NEVER be cut from school’s period. By laying off teachers and aides the students attending these schools will not get a proper and complete education. This makes it tuff if a student(s) want to continue on the college.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin

I agree except it also makes it tough for average students to even learn the basics — let alone prepare for college — unhappy with government waste? — me too — but don’t take it out on the kids.

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin

It’s not the funding that’s to blame. It’s the waste on unnecessary programs. It’s like the state going from surplus to billions of deficit because of waste on homeless, the high speed railway and supporting illegal immigrants, etc. with nothing to show for it and no receipts for where it actually went. There’s more than enough money in all school districts for teaching kids. There’s not enough for indoctrination and wasteful social programs.

Martin
Guest
Martin
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

Agreed Alf!

Dumboldt
Guest
Dumboldt
1 year ago

The U.S. Department of Education today announced it has terminated over $600 million in grants to institutions and nonprofits that were using taxpayer funds to train teachers and education agencies on divisive ideologies. Training materials included inappropriate and unnecessary topics such as Critical Race Theory; Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI); social justice activism; “anti-racism”; and instruction on white privilege and white supremacy. Additionally, many of these grants included teacher and staff recruiting strategies implicitly and explicitly based on race. OK with me.

Dumboldt
Guest
Dumboldt
1 year ago

If you claim 7 or 9 dependents’ forget which you pay no taxes out of your paycheck. Every time one of the guys we hired did this our company would question it but could not stop it. I don’t believe the # submitted as paid tax by Illegals. Pure BS

treeman53
Member
treeman53
1 year ago
Reply to  Dumboldt

Many times, people claim high dependents so the Government will not withhold anything except on overtime, and others claim zero and the Gov takes out max because they would rather get a check back at the end of the year. I always claimed six, but I was married with four children, and I would rather have my money on payday and send in my 1040 and pay them in April

Apopa
Guest
Apopa
1 year ago

I located the billion dollar shortage. Just stop dumping billions down the black hole of the high speed rail. And dump the governor with it.

Sick of Socialists
Guest
Sick of Socialists
1 year ago

Oh look, “tax and spend” democrats are upset because they cannot spend other people’s money!!

Also water is wet.

I would LOVE to see these people’s personal finances. I bet they are all redlining that credit.

Try working within your means. YES education should have consistent funding, but you know what? The education system has betrayed parents trust by pushing DEI bullshit and putting illegals above citizens.

We voted for an end to this shit, and here it is. Get used to it.

Human123
Guest
Human123
1 year ago

This seems like fear based reasoning , it seems shortsighted and uneducated.
undocumented immigrants pay taxes by the way. and often they don’t access the care of benefits for the programs they are paying into.

USA has some of the lower taxes per GDP compared to most other developed countries.

We can afford to eliminate poverty, and everyone, even the poor, deserve care and compassion. That’s what makes our country great right? We provide and allow chance for others to succeed?
The deficit continues to grow under both administrations , and it grew more under Trumps first presidency then under other dems. do some research and you will see that republicans cut taxes and increase the deficit rather consistently.

LoL KOOL and the j
Guest
LoL KOOL and the j
1 year ago

Oh, trump did say it was about a simple word, groceries. And he would bring the prices of everything down on day 1. He repeated it ad nauseam so the maga could understand, then does the opposite. Had he told people he was going to try to destroy the economy and drive prices up on purpose for billionaires tax cuts, how many votes would he have lost? Still think he would have won? Definitely some blindly loyal cult daddy worshippers here would have still voted for him [edit Kym] seems impossible, but here you are.

Farce
Guest
Farce
1 year ago

Good article. I was glad to see brought up for attention the “6 figure salaries” paid to administrators. I’m sure there are a couple good apples but mostly it is parasitic of these overpaid suits to take all that money away from our children. Yes- it definitely sets up an us vs. them vision because…well ..that the reality! The wealthy don’t care. Get that through your heads. The cuts should also take place at the top!!

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago
Reply to  Farce

Yup. Growth in ‘Admins’ in Red. Teachers/Students… way down at the bottom.

Go figure.

Capture466346436
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  Bozo

That 8% is a joke in itself. It’s mainly a COL adjustment. Certainly not something new millionaires are minted from. That’s the other 88%.

Humboldt
Member
Humboldt
1 year ago

This is not good news.

Education is the foundation of our country and world.

I took elementary education for granted. Literally and figuratively.

We traveled, constantly, internationally, and private schools best accommodated students enrolling mid year. My parents scrimped and saved and managed to pay for us to go to good schools.

When my father retired and I went to public high school, I found that I was several years ahead, even into college.

Now, having raised foster children in Humboldt County, I’ve been constantly surprised at how lacking their education is.

I teach them history and other subjects that I learned in elementary school that they never learned and graduated from high school.

My background propelled me into a lucrative, white collar career that I could not see them naturally doing.

Our students need much more focus and attention and we need to expect more from them. This goes hand in hand with adequate funding.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Humboldt

But where should the financing go? That is the detail of importance.

TeddyX
Guest
TeddyX
1 year ago

No more Spanish language origami classes? I weep. No more radical union than teachers. Time for traditional America to cut the fat.

Chelsea Dove
Guest
Chelsea Dove
1 year ago

Besides volunteering and writing your government representatives, encouraging district consolidation would also help. Humboldt county has 33 districts for only 88 schools. That means 33 different superintendent salaries. Many districts only consist of one or two schools. This is kind of ridiculous. If more districts would consolidate, resources can be better distributed and staff will get better pay and more support.
It is very important that teachers are well paid and valued. Teaching is an extremely difficult job to do well, and the only way to get good at teaching is by experience. If teachers are not paid fairly for the work they do, they leave the profession. A high turnover in teachers leads to poor quality of education for our kids, and poor education leads to many of the societal problems people complain about in these discussion posts.

Marcia
Guest
Marcia
1 year ago

If the federal government cuts the money for the lunch program, are local citizens allowed to donate money so that all of the kids get lunch?

Martin
Guest
Martin
1 year ago
Reply to  Marcia

If the lunch money is included in the Federal and State funding it should NOT be stopped. Marcia, it would be wonderful if the local citizens stepped up to donate enough money so the kids will at least get a full lunch and maybe a break time snack. You sound like a kind and caring woman (wife?).

Kicking Bull
Guest
Kicking Bull
1 year ago

Ever see petals fall from a flower?

Ever rush to reaffix them?

Martin
Guest
Martin
1 year ago
Reply to  Kicking Bull

I am really confused about your comment. Can you please tell me what you are saying?

Dustin Thewind
Guest
Dustin Thewind
1 year ago
Reply to  Kicking Bull

Going Hungry is the Solution to the Problem.
*probably the most underrated lesson in life*

Never Cry Wolf
Guest
Never Cry Wolf
1 year ago

Oh gasp, what ever shall we do?!?
Always with the sky is falling, the sky is falling” routine. We know how the ladies of SoHum love them some drama, but y’all gotta stop with hollering fire!!! where there isn’t really a fire. If we give you lefties Commufornia , will you please leave the rest of the U.S. alone?!?

Doc
Member
Doc
1 year ago

Your County Board of Supervisors has voluntarily sacrificed Federal Funds by declaring Sanctuary Status. I guess they have determined these funds are not necessary.