Assemblymember Chris Rogers Introduces Legislation to Support Rural Healthcare Access

man in dark blue suit, white shirt, close cut hair, clean shaven, standing on storefront sidewalk, smiling at camera, hands in his pockets.

Chris Rogers 

Press release from the Office of Assemblymember Chris Rogers:

 Last week, Assemblymember Chris Rogers (D-Santa Rosa) introduced AB 1460, a bill to prohibit pharmaceutical manufacturers from placing contract pharmacy restrictions on health care providers that utilize the federal 340B discount drug program to serve low-income communities. This legislation is sponsored by the California Partnership for Health and California Primary Care Association Advocates.

“At a time when clinics and hospitals are struggling to provide care to low-income patients, pharmaceutical companies are making it even harder for them to access the benefits of the federal 340B program,” said Assemblymember Rogers. “We should be supporting our health care providers, not tying their hands. This bill will eliminate restrictions to accessing critical medications in underserved communities through the 340B program.”

The federal 340B Program, established in 1992, requires drug manufacturers to provide discounts on the outpatient prescription drugs they sell to certain eligible health care providers, referred to as “covered entities.” Since 2020, many drug manufacturers have introduced restrictions that diminish the ability of covered entities, such as Federally Qualified Health Clinics (FQHCs), to use 340B contract pharmacies to dispense medications to their patients.  These restrictions often limit covered entities to one contract pharmacy location per clinic system, not per clinic location. This limits access for patients, specifically uninsured patients that are directly given the 340B program discounted drug price, and covered entities that rely on the pass-through savings to help fund their operations.

“Contract pharmacies are a critical partner in our efforts to ensure patients in underserved and remote communities, can have access to affordable prescription medication, through the federal drug discount program,” said Tory Starr, CEO Open Door Community Health Center. “However, placing unnecessary restrictions on how many pharmacies a local not-for-profit community health center, such as ours, can contract with is devastating to our ability to help ensure access to care and health equity in our communities.”

AB 1460 ensures that covered entities can use as many contract pharmacies necessary to serve their patients and receive the passed-through benefits of the 340B savings for ongoing patient care and expanded services for patients. The bill prohibits discriminatory practices that would impose additional conditions that would prohibit, restrict, deny, or interfere with a covered entity’s purchase, or delivery, of a drug eligible for discounts under the federal pricing requirements set for in Section 256b of Title 42 under the United States code. AB 1460 makes no changes to the 340B program, it simply allows covered entities to use the 340B program as intended.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spamned
Guest
spamned
1 year ago

That’s gonna work really well with medicaid gutted

hospitals will close

rural health clinics gone

thanks Pres Musk

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  spamned

This would be under Medicare Part C for prescription drugs. It doesn’t include the rest of the hospital operations, only pharmacies. MediCal is the state version of Medicaid that the rest of the US has. Limiting the number of contracts helps no one but the manufacturers.

spamned
Guest
spamned
1 year ago

You are not understanding what is happening.

This will kill rural health care, such as it is.

Tom Siegmeth
Guest
Tom Siegmeth
1 year ago
Reply to  spamned

Your comments have nothing to do with the 340B program nor AB1460. Do you work for pharma?

Tom Siegmeth
Guest
Tom Siegmeth
1 year ago

AB 1460 has nothing to do with affecting Medicare or any other federal programs. 340B legislation has been in place since 1992 and requires manufacturers to provide drugs at a discount for grantees known as covered entities (ie DSH hospitals, FQHC, FQHCLAL, Ryan white grantees, STD clinics, etc) which uses NO TAXPAYER dollars. This allows covered entities to generate 340B savings based on reimbursement that goes right back to grantees to use to support patient care whether it be for prescriptions for underinsured/uninsured or use in the best way to support patient care. The statute requires drug manufacturers to participate as part of their participation in Medicaid. Grantees generate these savings from all prescriptions if they have a contract with contract pharmacies and their patients have prescriptions filled there; however, pharma began implementing restrictions 6-7 years ago. Without 340B savings, many healthcare organizations in rural and urban areas serving primarily patients on MediCal and Medicare could not keep their doors open. Nearly 20 states now have similar bills and a few states have been successful in passing similar bills in red states so I’m surprised that this bill hasn’t been introduced and passed years ago.

Permanently on Monitoring
Guest
Permanently on Monitoring
1 year ago

The main problem with rural health programs is the patients…

They can staff, usually, if their employees are well paid, but locals make bad Admin, and lack of everything from housing to restaurants, in places like Portola or Garberville or Lone Pine, causes employees to flee…

Rural Health also discriminates against Elder Employees, Males and White People are often not hired or treated without respect and dignity, which is illegal…

And the patients have co-occurring conditions, drug problems and/or no way to pay…

It’s a quagmire for Patients and Employees both, and the net result is a poor result, patients in beds out in the hallway, lawsuits and bizarre events…

Healthcare used to be easier, but access should be for everyone, not just those who can pay, and employment policies in rural facilities needs to be assessed and reviewed.