Humboldt County Reports Three New Hospitalizations Due to COVID This Week

Press release from Humboldt County Public Health:

Covid Humboldt county featureHumboldt County Public Health reported today three new hospitalizations including one resident in their 60s, one in their 70s and one aged 80 and older. No new deaths were reported.

An additional 79 confirmed positive cases of COVID-19 were announced as well as 19 new probable cases for the period between Tuesday, Nov. 1 and Tuesday, Nov. 8. The total number of confirmed cases in the county stands at 22,390. An additional 5,368 cases are reported as probable.*

Public Health is reminding residents that one of the best ways to ensure a safe and healthy holiday season is to get a bivalent booster. The new bivalents reduce the likelihood of becoming infected with the Omicron variants and also reduce the chances of hospitalization and death should one become infected. Because boosters can take up to two weeks after vaccination for full protection, residents planning to attend holiday get-togethers should get a booster now.

The bivalent boosters are available to anyone aged 5 years and older and available at all Public Health clinics throughout the county. Appointments for childhood vaccinations are required and can be made at MyTurn.ca.gov. All bivalent boosters are single-dose and include components of the original virus strain and the Omicron subvariants. People can receive the updated booster regardless of previous booster doses received.

Public Health is also recommending that people get this year’s flu vaccine, which can be administered along with COVID-19 vaccines. Influenza cases are rising sharply this season. Anyone 6 months and older can get the flu vaccine and it’s updated for this season’s strains. According to the California Department of Public Health, it’s perfectly safe to get a flu vaccine at the same time as a COVID vaccine or booster. Public Health Main at 529 I St., Eureka offers both the flu and COVID vaccines on a walk-in basis Mondays from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.

Local COVID-19 vaccination data has been updated:

  • Since the last weekly report on Nov. 2, an additional 48 residents completed their vaccine series.
  • A total of 92,192 individuals, or approximately 68% of the county’s total population, have been fully vaccinated as of Tuesday.

OptumServe offers rapid antigen testing and PCR testing services at the Wharfinger Building in Eureka seven days a week. Walk-ins will receive only rapid antigen testing unless the attendee specifically states they require a PCR test. Appointments for antigen testing can be made by calling 888-634-1123. Wharfinger testing runs from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and is closed from 11 a.m. to noon and 4 to 5 p.m. Please note: Both the Wharfinger site and D Street Neighborhood Center will be closed on Friday in honor of Veterans Day.

See the schedule below for specific Public Health vaccination and testing clinic dates, times, locations and available services.

Fortuna — Thursday, Nov. 10, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Fortuna Veterans Hall (1426 Main St.)

Redway — Friday, Nov. 11, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Healy Senior Center (456 Briceland Road)

Eureka — Saturday, Nov. 12, 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Jefferson Community Center (1000 B St.)

Eureka — Monday, Nov. 14, 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Public Health Main (529 I St.)

Eureka — Tuesday, Nov. 15, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Rio Dell Fire Department (50 Center St.)

Willow Creek — Tuesday, Nov. 15, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Willow Creek Public Health (77 Walnut Way)

McKinleyville — Wednesday, Nov. 16, 1:15 to 4:30 p.m.
The Center at McKinleyville (1615 Heartwood Drive)

Arcata — Thursday, Nov. 17, 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
D Street Neighborhood Center (1301 D St.)

Trinidad — Thursday, Nov. 17, 2 to 4:30 p.m.
Trinidad Town Hall (409 Trinity St.)

* “Confirmed cases” represent the total confirmed positive PCR test results or detection of SARS-CoV-2 by genomic sequencing, and “probable cases” are individuals who:

  • Have a positive antigen (Ag) test for COVID-19, or
  • Were diagnosed with COVID-19 disease by a health care provider, or
  • Have symptoms of COVID-19 disease after being in close contact with a person having a PCR-confirmed test result, or
  • Were a decedent whose death certificate lists COVID-19 as a cause or significant contributing factor of their death, in the absence of a positive PCR test result.
Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

126 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
grey fox
Member
3 years ago

The Latest Covid Variants Can Evade Vaccine Protection, According to New Data.

New lab data suggest that vaccines and prior infections may not offer enough protection against several new COVID-19 variants cropping up in the U.S. and around the world.

https://time.com/6230059/covid-19-variants-omicron-vaccine/

To me this underscores the need for ongoing research and how important it is.

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

To me this underscores the need for ongoing…

SUCKERS…!!!

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

https://time.com/6230059/covid-19-variants-omicron-vaccine/

HEALTH COVID-19THE LATEST COVID-19 VARIANTS CAN EVADE VACCINE PROTECTION, ACCORDING TO NEW DATA
The Latest COVID-19 Variants Can Evade Vaccine Protection, According to New Data

BY ALICE PARK
UPDATED: NOVEMBER 9, 2022 1:51 PM EST | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED: NOVEMBER 9, 2022 5:00 AM EST
New lab data suggest that vaccines and prior infections may not offer enough protection against several new COVID-19 variants cropping up in the U.S. and around the world.

Dr. David Ho, director of Columbia University’s Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (ADARC), and his team reported the results from a set of studies at an ADARC symposium. They showed how well some of the latest variants—BQ.1, BQ.1.1, XBB, and XBB.1, which were all derived from Omicron—are evading both vaccine-derived and infection-derived immunity.

These new variants all have mutations in the region that binds to cells and infects them, which means that they’re highly transmissible, as prior Omicron variants were. BQ.1 is growing steadily in France, according to the public database of SARS-CoV-2 variants GISAID. By mid-November, European health officials expect the variant to account for 50% of cases in Europe, and to become the dominant strain in that region by early 2023. XBB is growing quickly in Singapore and India. Both variants have spawned new strains that have each picked up an additional mutation to create BQ.1.1 and XBB.1. As of early November, BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, combined, now make up about 35% of new cases in the U.S.

Other studies have found similar drops in antibody protection against BQ.1 among vaccinated people. But Ho’s group conducted what is likely the most comprehensive look to date at BQ.1, BQ.1.1, XBB, and XBB.1, and how existing immunity—from the original mRNA vaccines, the new Omicron boosters, and natural infections—stands up to them. Scientists took blood sera from 88 people in five groups (below) and exposed it to the four variants in the lab. Here’s what they found:

Fully vaccinated and once-boosted people (three total shots of the original mRNA vaccines) had 37- and 55-fold lower neutralization against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, respectively, than they did against the original SARS-CoV-2 virus, and about 70-fold lower neutralization against XBB and XBB.1.
Fully vaccinated and twice-boosted people (four total shots of the original mRNA vaccines) had 43- and 81-fold lower neutralization against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, respectively, than they did against the original virus, and 145- and 155-fold lower neutralization against XBB and XBB.1, respectively.
Fully vaccinated and twice-boosted people (three shots of the original vaccine plus one Omicron booster) had 24- and 41-fold lower neutralization against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, respectively, than they did against the original virus, and 66- and 85-fold lower neutralization against XBB and XBB.1, respectively.
Fully vaccinated people who had received the original booster and who had been infected with BA.2 had 20- and 29-fold lower neutralization against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, respectively, than they did against the original virus, and 103- and 135-fold lower neutralization against XBB and XBB.1, respectively.
Fully vaccinated people who had received the original booster and who had been infected with BA.4 or BA.5 had 13- and 31-fold lower neutralization against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, respectively, than they did against the original virus, and 86- and 96-fold lower neutralization against XBB and XBB.1, respectively.
The results show that people who had been infected with BA.2, BA.4, or BA.5 generally experienced the smallest drop in neutralizing antibody levels against against BQ.1 and BQ.1.1. But people who had three doses of the original vaccine and one Omicron booster produced only slightly better neutralizing antibody protection against XBB and XBB.1 than those who received three doses of the original vaccine. Public-health experts say that while vaccines may wane in efficacy against newer variants, they continue to protect people from severe COVID-19. There is early evidence that vaccine-induced immunity may also produce a broader range of virus-fighting antibodies over time.

Still, these results are a reminder that vaccines and drug treatments need to evolve with the virus. “These new variants are extremely good at evading our antibodies and are very likely to compromise the efficacy of our vaccines,” says Ho. They may also dodge the available antibody-based treatments for COVID-19, he says. The National Institutes of Health’s COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines currently only include one monoclonal antibody therapy, bebtelovimab, because the virus has evaded all of the previously authorized antibody treatments. But in an October update, NIH scientists acknowledged that the “subvariants BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 are likely to be resistant to bebtelovimab.” The drug is therefore only recommended if people either can’t take the antiviral drugs Paxlovid or remdesivir, or if these medications aren’t available. The virus can evade these treatments as well, but they remain the first line of defense against severe SARS-CoV-2.

The good news is that in places where these variants are spreading, they do not seem to be linked to more severe COVID-19 disease—measured by hospitalizations and deaths—than other Omicron iterations. Still, public-health experts say a spike in infections could still strain health resources, especially as other respiratory infections, including influenza and RSV, also gain momentum. The combination of several circulating infectious diseases could mean more illness overall, and, in turn, more people who might experience severe disease and require intensive medical care.

The rise of BQ.1, BQ.1.1, XBB, and XBB.1 points to the fact that when it comes to immunity, the virus may always be one step ahead, especially with respect to vaccines. “I would start to make these vaccines, and start to test them in animals,” says Ho. Even if those efforts began now, it’s possible they may still lag behind the virus and the new mutations it continues to gain. That’s why researchers are working on developing vaccines that would be more universally applicable to a range of different coronaviruses, which could shorten the amount of time it takes to build up a vaccinated population’s immunity.

Correction, November 9

The original version of the story misstated the status of the data discussed. The data will be submitted to a journal but have not yet been published.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I am a little mystified. Why did you take the article I just posted and print the whole thing out? Including the link.

I am sure you had a good reason but….

Also as Dr Walensky states, “The virus is not stupid”

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

It’s got a paywall.

I thought that you, and others, might want to actually read it.

Your welcome.

Walensky was obviously also a little mystified.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Not sure why you are seeing a paywall. It opens fine for me and was on google news.
And you used the exact same link.

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

Three new hospitalizations…

But no more dashboard…???

No more even viewing the old one…???

The familiar vanishing act…

It’s faded and faded and faded…

And now it has completely disappeared…

What is it that they don’t want anyone to see…???

“Influenza cases are rising sharply this season.”

Really???

Not, “COVID cases are rising sharply this season”…???

Did they predict the wrong kind of wave…???

Did they try and prepare us for the wrong wave…???

“Public Health is also recommending that people get this year’s flu vaccine, which can be administered along with COVID-19 vaccines.”

Really???

What???

No COVID wave, like l they predicted…???

And those that were first to get the new bivalent boosters, are already beginning to experience waning protection for wave that was promised, but never materialized…

A dirty, dirty, trick.

Just another lie, to “sell” the failed booster push.

RSV and influenza are making waves, but COVID, not so much…

Gosh, still 68%…

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

They clearly stated this last week…

As of today, the Humboldt County COVID-19 Data Dashboard is no longer operating. Local data including testing, cases and deaths by ethnicity, gender and age has transitioned to the Humboldt County section of the California Department of Public Health’s COVID-19 Dashboard.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

68%.

And 70% is not gonna happen by January 15th, 2023, a whole year after “they” said it would happen…

In fact, I wouldn’t bet on 70% happening by January 15th, 2024…

How about you…???

Last edited 3 years ago
Giant Squirrel
Guest
Giant Squirrel
3 years ago

Is this still a thing?
KAWABUNGA!

Screenshot_20221109-160058_Samsung Internet.jpg
Last edited 3 years ago
Giant Squirrel
Guest
Giant Squirrel
3 years ago
Reply to  Giant Squirrel
Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Giant Squirrel

Guess you didn’t get the memo.
Trump and “Peach Tree” Greene are both warning off challengers.

You wanted him , now you are stuck with him. May as well go down with the rest of the crew on the “USS Trump”.
To late to abandon ship now…….

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

Here’s the truth…

4 cases per day… Per hundred thousand.

Is this the big wave they tried to scare us with…???

They pushed the untested bivalent booster why???

Screenshot_20221109-161317.png
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

And here is the big COVID death wave ?

A big fat zero.

I believe that is a 14 day average.

I’d feel pretty foolish right about now, if I would have rushed right out and got the bivalent booster…

Screenshot_20221109-161430.png
Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

The wave is coming!!!
The wave is coming!!!

Errr..Ummm… PSYCH!!!

Screenshot_20221109-180024.png
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Where have I head that term before. Oh yeah….

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Smoke another one, Fauci, you pathological liar…

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/07/health/fauci-covid-fall-surge/index.html

And as you can see in graph above, that didn’t happen…

Screenshot_20221110-074719.png
Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Tell me again why they made a big push to start rushing an untested bivalent booster into American’s arms starting in September?

Hunter'sHardDrive
Guest
Hunter'sHardDrive
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Money

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

Bingo!!!

We have a winner!!!

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Fauci on April 7,2022…

” “I would think that we should expect that we are going to see some increase in cases as you get to the colder weather in the fall,” he said. “That’s the reason why the [Food and Drug Administration] and their advisory committee are meeting right now to plan a strategy, and we at the [National Institutes of Health] are doing studies now to determine what the best boost would be.” ”

_________________________________________

He sure blew that one, didn’t he…??? Times two.

No surge, aaand a failed bivalent booster to go along with it…

Meanwhile, the RSV surge that has happened instead, he didn’t foresee, aaand left us unprepared for.

He won’t be leaving a moment too soon.

And good riddance.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Would you rather be warned of something and not have it happen. Or be warned of something and have it happen? We are just now getting into colder weather. Lets hope it doesn’t happen but time will tell.
As far as the RSV surge goes the man is not a seer, has no crystal ball. I am sure he and public health officials are doing all they can to help alleviate the situation. And it is my understanding a vaccine for RSV is being worked on..The public also has a responsibility to help by following basic hygiene practices.
Now to the Bivalent. I received the bivalent booster and have not caught Covid, so that proves it works.
No vaccine is 100% effective…Studies are fine but lets give the booster some time and see how well it performs, compared to not getting it.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Pfizer Announces Positive Top-Line Data of Phase 3 Global Maternal Immunization Trial for its Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine Candidate

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Ironclad logic.

Rock solid.

?‍♂️

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

The same logic you used when Dr Walensky came down with COVID-19.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

You keep serving up pretzel logic.?

https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/pretzel-logic/

WHAT DOES PRETZEL LOGIC MEAN?
Pretzel logic is an expression used to describe someone’s “twisted reasoning.”

A classic pretzel is circular, full of holes, and twists in on itself—just like faulty reasoning. Hence the (delicious) expression, pretzel logic.

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

“Pretzel logic is used to describe inconsistent, illogical thinking that, once scrutinized, doesn’t stand up. It’s similar to the term illogic.”

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

And you sir are using elbow macaroni logic…

grey fox
Member
3 years ago

The Party of January 6 Appears to Have Taken the House. Prepare for the Crazy.

A political force propelled by irrationality and a dangerous lie, led by a man who tried to overturn a national election, who incited violence to block the peaceful transfer of power, and who has promoted the lunatic QAnon conspiracy theory and engaged in antisemitism, is poised to take control of the House of Representatives.

MAGA extremists are close to a form of minority rule
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/11/january-6-big-lie-election-results-house-takeover-republicans-column/

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

If the MAGAts do take control and do nothing but investigations and impeachment, there will be no question the only thing they are fit to lead is a circus, not a government. This election should be a warning.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Penguinn

This partisanship from both sides has to end. They are going to be in this endless cycle of gridlock..

As far as I am concerned trying to impeach Trump was doomed from the start and a waste of time. Same if they go for Biden.

Let’s get on with government business and tackle the real issues.

Last edited 3 years ago
Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Although the chances of impeachment were extremely slim, it was important to show that something as serious as sedition would result in a trial and that members of the GOP were more than capable of ignoring it for political purposes. Party over country, indeed.

Giant Squirrel
Guest
Giant Squirrel
3 years ago

Bidenflation continues at a skyhigh pace in October due to the Biden Regime’s policies after Biden inherited a very modest 1.4% inflation rate from his predecessor. Meanwhile rocketing interest rates have made home purchase impossible for most, we’ve lost 25% of our Retirement and soon to lose 25% of our home values because of Biden policies. Elections have consequences and thankfully it appears Biden lost the House.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Giant Squirrel

Americans and the Federal Reserve got some welcome news Thursday on inflation. The Consumer Price Index rose 7.7% for the year ending in October, a much slower pace of increase than the 8% economists had expected and the lowest annual inflation reading since January.

S&P, Nasdaq Stage Their Biggest Rally of the Year After Inflation DataU.S. stocks jumped after data showed inflation was weaker than expected in October. 
DOW is up 1000 points!

Last edited 3 years ago
HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

They also got the news that the Republicans may be taking over the purse strings.

WhatsReallyGoingOn?
Guest
WhatsReallyGoingOn?
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Of course the DOW is up. CEOS and investors know that Republicans are going to control the House for the next two years and will stymie any excessive spending or ridiculous social laws that a Democrat led congress would send to Biden to sign. A Republican controlled Senate will just be gravy on the biscuit. Nice touch, but not necessary to block any progressive legislation.

Investors hunkered down after the 2020 election and now know its safe to invest again. The Biden Administration* will be handcuffed.

Time for Biden to go back into hidin’.

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Giant Squirrel

Perhaps you should check the latest news and stock market reports? Also, look at the inflation rates in other countries. It is totally amazing that Biden is able to influence them, as well. You also seem to ignore the report that over 50% of what is being called “inflation,” is actually just price-gouging by corporations. Or do you think the $4 billion special dividend Albertson’s is giving to their shareholders just materialized out of thin air? You have proven yourself to be a very lousy prognosticator. Maybe time to give it a break?
I am not even going to get into the history of election performance in the midterms of a president’s first term in office. I will just say that Biden did extremely well under the circumstances. Maybe you could just look at what happened in 2018?

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Penguinn

People seeking simple answers to complex questions. Blaming Biden explains it all to them.
And they are now hung over from that Red Ripple…

The Real Brian
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Bye bye Boebert ?

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

The wicked witch of the west.
Let’s hope a Democrat house falls on her.

No folks, I am not advocating violence. It’s a metaphor.
You do not need to alert Ms Kemp.

Last edited 3 years ago
Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

“Brain-damaged?” Really. Are you a qualified medical professional? Have you examined the patient? No? Just a snide comment from someone who knows nothing.
For the record, “(T)he candidate has released two reports from his cardiologist and his primary care physician, both saying he is “fit to serve.”

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Penguinn

I agree, fit to serve sandwiches to Uncle Fester.

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Nasty. Just nasty. I hope it makes you feel better about yourself.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Penguinn

I suppose MAGAts is friendly in your world.

Last edited 3 years ago
Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

No equivalency. MAGAts are MAGAts by choice. Stroke victims are not.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Hmm, wait just a minute….

House 3
98% in

  • R
  • L. Boebert
  • INCUMBENT
  • 50.1%
  • 159,029
  • D
  • A. Frisch
  • 49.9%
  • 158,235

Last update 5:51 PM ET

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-elections/colorado-house-results

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Your link is not working for me.
Says application error.
xxxxxx
Last I heard was in recount territory.
Even if she does win, it should worry the Republican Party.

Last edited 3 years ago
HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

It works when I click on it.
Last update 7:12 PM ET

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Lots of votes still to be counted.

All that far-right BS is effecting voters. The Red Ripple Party best start reining in some of these people.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Yep, looks like the Republicans may win the popular vote too, in spite of the Democratic gerrymandering.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

I did find this at NBC news.

A record number of LGBTQ candidates won their midterm races this year, creating what some advocates are calling yet another “rainbow wave.”

Many races are still too close or too early to call, but as of Thursday afternoon, at least 400 out LGBTQ candidates had won their elections, according to the LGBTQ Victory Fund, which supports queer people running for office. That number surpasses 2020’s record of 336 and 2018’s record of 244.

At least 1,065 lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people ran for office this year, with 678 of them making it to the general election, the LGBTQ Victory Institute, the research arm of the Victory Fund, reported. With at least 400 wins so far, queer candidates will have a midterm success rate of at least 58%.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

LGBTQ have been in office since at least Harvey Milk in SF, so what’s your point?

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

That the Rainbow Wave is much stronger than the Red Ripple?

Last edited 3 years ago
HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

What makes you think that many aren’t Red?

The House of Representatives voted Tuesday to pass the Respect for Marriage Act, which would codify same-sex marriage into law.
With a 267-157 vote, the bill is headed to the Senate. 47 House Republicans voted in favor of the bill.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

My point being that LGBT politicians are becoming more and more accepted in society.

And that the anti-abortion, election deniers are becoming less popular.

So 157 Republicans voted against it?

I will be curious to see how many Senate Republicans vote for it.

Last edited 3 years ago
HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

I’ll be curious to see who has the popular vote.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

I am curious as to what is popular? Are they voting party or are they voting the best candidate.

WhatsReallyGoingOn?
Guest
WhatsReallyGoingOn?
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

You got the wrong rep. That title has been held by another for the last 35 years.

3E721605-0818-40BC-885A-026A114E2F26.jpeg
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  The Real Brian

Folie á deux?

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Are you suffering the
Dunning-Kruger effect?

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

souffrez-vous d’un manque de perspicacité?

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Your in America,, Speak English!…..
Are you one of them there Frankophiles?

Or a Gallophile?
We don’t much take with foreigners in this country.

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Looks like somebody may have spoken too soon…

Maybe it’s gonna be Bye, Bye, Frisch.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/boebert-inches-ahead-colorado-votes-continue-tallied

‘Boebert inches ahead as Colorado votes continue to be tallied’

“Rep. Lauren Boebert inches ahead of Democratic candidate Adam Frisch by 1,100 votes”

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

People voting party line instead of best candidate…
Though the jump may be enough to hold off Frisch, Boebert’s support appears to have flagged since her election in 2020, when she beat her Democratic challenger by more than 26,500 votes. 
Wake up call!

WhatsReallyGoingOn?
Guest
WhatsReallyGoingOn?
3 years ago
Reply to  Penguinn

Over regulation and a mega merger of Albertsons triggered that dividend. This did happen under Biden’s watch.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jennmcmillen/2022/11/09/kroger-albertsons-and-food-deserts-yes-we-should-worry/amp/

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago

I read the article. Did you? It says the deal has not received final approval, and would not go into effect until 2024 if it is approved.
And I do not think “over-regulation” is the issue. Quite the opposite.
Read for comprehension.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is warning of a listeria outbreak linked to deli meat and cheese, saying those who are pregnant, aged 65 or older or have a weakened immune system are at higher risk for becoming ill.

“If you are in any of these groups, do not eat meat or cheese from any deli counter, unless it is reheated to an internal temperature of 165°F or until steaming hot,” the CDC said in a notice issued Wednesday.

ByedonInflation
Guest
ByedonInflation
3 years ago

“Bideninflation” has been so horrible. So horrible the Donny Party will sweep the midterms! Oh. Hmm, maybe most folk understand current inflation causes and issues.

But hey, let’s just say “Bidenflation” over and over and over again cuz it’ll continue to stick with 8 or 9 of the regulars here at the club. Heck, Donny repeated stuff over and over and HE won, twice!

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago

LOL!

grey fox
Member
3 years ago

Mr DeSantis, 44, stormed to re-election in Tuesday’s midterms, making him the Republicans’ biggest rising star and a clear challenger to Mr Trump.
The ex-president warned him against it.
In a lengthy statement, Mr Trump dismissed Mr DeSantis as a political lightweight who had come to him “in desperate shape” when running for his first term in office in 2017.

Trump/Greene 2924!

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

All EVs by 3035!

grey fox
Member
3 years ago

Trump Claims Melania Supported Oz Because She Is Attracted to Men Who Are Unfit to Govern….

The New Yorker-

Last edited 3 years ago
Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

After his comment that, if repubs win he should get all the credit but, if they lose, he should get none of the blame, I have no doubt he would have said something that idiotic.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Penguinn

Yeah it was right on..

Art imitating life?

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Ave Satanas!

Al L Ivesmatr
Guest
Al L Ivesmatr
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Uh huh. Sorry Melania offended your Liberal sensibilities. I guess lots of humans have problems when they realize they wish they were as intelligent and beautiful. [edit]

Last edited 3 years ago
Kym Kemp
Admin
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Just so we’re clear…the author of this is Andy Borowitz, a well-known satirist. This is humor not fact. https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-claims-melania-supported-oz-because-she-is-attracted-to-men-who-are-unfit-to-govern

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Kym Kemp

At first I did include Andy’s name, but the devil in me took over
And it was so spot on.

I did cite The New Yorker.

Penguinn
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Your restraint is a model for us all.

Last edited 3 years ago
Giant Squirrel
Guest
Giant Squirrel
3 years ago

Defeated Democrat Congressional Campaign Chair Sean Maloney blames AOC for their loss of the House and control of legislative agenda in the midterms. They say a win by one or twenty is still a win but Republicans should have done better considering 75% Americans believe Biden Regime policies have our country going in wrong direction. Clearly Trump is a liability dragging down the ticket and needs to leave the stage, being the only opponent Biden could possibly beat in 2024.

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Giant Squirrel

Over$3 million has been raised to draft DeSantis for POTUS.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

This sounds like what’s been going on under Fauci, at the NIH, for quite some time…

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/folie-%C3%A0-plusieurs-madness-many-organisations-devika-das

‘FOLIE à PLUSIEURS’-

‘The Madness Of Many In Organisations’

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago

Nick Fuentes Says the Results of the 2022 Elections Prove ‘Why We Need a Dictatorship’

Kyle Mantyla | November 10, 2022 12:44 pm

Nick Fuentes, the racist, misogynistic, antisemitic, America-hating, Christian fascist leader of the white nationalist America First movement, reacted to the results of the midterm elections by declaring that the failure of Republican candidates to take sweeping control in a “red wave” is precisely why this nation needs to be taken over by a far-right-wing dictatorship.

Fuentes has been very open about his desire to see a “white uprising” in the United States that will install former President Donald Trump as a dictator, cancel all future elections, and impose Christian fascism throughout the country, allowing for women to be burned at the stake.

RWW-

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago

Kari Lake election – live: Arizona Republican casts doubt on governor’s race as Democrats win Senate seat.

Of course she is, she is losing…

WhatsReallyGoingOn?
Guest
WhatsReallyGoingOn?
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Biden/Fetterman 2024… that ticket will be a no-brainer…

Nooo
Guest
Nooo
3 years ago

That’s really harsh. Funny as heck but harsh.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago

Spencer Kimball
@SPENCEKIMBALL
Moderna found that its new booster triggered five times more antibodies against omicron BA.5 than the old vaccines in people with prior Covid infections.

The boosters triggered more than six times more antibodies against BA.5 in people without prior infections.

Moderna said it also found the new booster triggered robust immune response against omicron BQ.1.1, an emerging Covid subvariant in the U.S

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/14/moderna-covid-booster-better-against-omicron-bapoint5-triggers-response-against-bqpoint1point1.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Interesting that they didn’t provide a link to the studies or the Moderna press release…

I believe that their was a significant difference in the two study groups…

One group was given their 2nd booster after about 6 1/2 months, and the other group was given their 2nd booster, (the new bivalent booster), after 9 1/2 months, If I recall correctly.

Of course the group that received the booster 9 1/2 months after their last booster, would have a greater antibody multiplication than the group that received a booster 6 1/2 months after their last booster…

That’s not a fair comparison…

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Correction.

I’ve been reading too many studies…

“The researchers observed that HCWs receiving the bivalent BNT162b2 wildtype/Omicron BA.4/5 vaccine as the second booster shot showed a higher prevalence of adverse reactions than monovalent vaccine-boosted HCWs. Notably, the interval between the first and second booster administration was 193 days for monovalent vaccine recipients and 322 days for bivalent vaccine recipients.”

This was from a different pfizer study than the Moderna study linked above…

?‍♂️?‍♂️Oops…

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Here is a link to the actual Moderna study…

https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2022/Modernas-BA.4BA.5-Targeting-Bivalent-Booster-mRNA-1273.222-Meets-Primary-Endpoint-of-Superiority-Against-Omicron-Variants-Compared-to-Booster-Dose-of-mRNA-1273-in-Phase-23-Clinical-Trial/default.aspx

“Participants received mRNA-1273.222 and mRNA-1273 approximately 9.5 months and 4.5 months after their prior vaccination, respectively.”

(I guess I wasn’t that far off.)

But wait just a damn minute!!!

Our government recommended getting this Bivalent booster 2 months after your last dose, not 4.5 months or 9.5 months!!!

WTF…!!!???

And there is this…

“In an exploratory analysis of approximately 40 participants using research assays, both bivalent vaccines demonstrated robust neutralizing activity against BQ.1.1, despite an approximately 5-fold drop in titers compared to BA.4/BA.5.”

Five times less effective against the upcoming variant?

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago

The US midterm elections and the ongoing threat of fascism…

wsws.org/en/articles/2022/11/14/ebrm-n14.html

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago

She is at it again!

GOP rep Marjorie “ G. S.”Greene says she isn’t afraid of a GOP civil war: ‘We’re going to fight it out.”

Trump/Greene 2024!

Last edited 3 years ago
ED Denson
Guest
ED Denson
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Politics is the great game. I bid two no trump, and I bet I’ll win the game.

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

*

Screenshot_20221115-091212.png
Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Ahhhh, misleading screen shots…..

Butler said the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisations (ATAGI) had recommended against a fifth dose, or third booster, after evidence from Singapore’s recent wave showed that severe illness and death were rare among the vaccinated and that a fifth shot had minimal impact on virus transmission ..

Butler also accepted ATAGI recommendations that Pfizer’s (PFE.N) Omicron-specific vaccine be approved as a booster dose for adults; 4.7 million doses will arrive ahead of a rollout due to begin on Dec 12.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/australia-recommends-against-fifth-vaccine-dose-fresh-covid-wave-builds-2022-11-15/

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago

Nevermind That Summer Surge, Mate…

They’re NOT recommending a fifth dose down under…

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Ron Fouchier and Kowaoka are that last people that should have been allowed to discredit the lab leak theory, they are basically the first to achieve a viral gain of function process with H5N1, I believe…

Here is an old link to where I explained Fouchier and Kowaoka role long ago…

Almost 18 months ago…

https://kymkemp.com/2021/05/26/13-new-cases-reported-pfizer-vaccination-clinics-scheduled-for-next-two-weeks/#comment-1352292

Fouchier and Kowaoka are not to be trusted to dispute the lab leak theory…

Their significant contribution to the letter that dismissed the lab leak theory, was concealed.

They were very conflicted.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Definitely a conspiracy!

But…

What are the odds? Start, once again, with geography. What are the odds that, if the virus did emerge from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the first known cases would show up more than eight miles away, in a market complex across a river from the putative site of any “laboratory-associated incident”? Now factor in that this market complex, in particular, is one of fewer than two dozen in Wuhan—a city of 11 million people—known to have trafficked in live wild mammals as recently as November 2019; and that Chinese health officials had taken an Australian virologist to this same market five years earlier, telling him, as he recalled in a recent interview with Qiu, that it was “a possible place that could trigger future outbreaks”; and also that most of the cases from Huanan were confined to the market’s western section, which, according to the joint pandemic-origins study by China and the World Health Organization, housed seven of the 10 stalls from which wildlife products were sold. What are the odds?

The Atlantic~

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

You do realize how close to a Wuhan hospital the wet market is, don’t you?

Apparently you don’t.

It’s pretty close to right next door.

Do you think that the Wuhan hospital had the earliest COVID patients there?

It wouldn’t have had to go far, to get to the people at the wet market from there.

And what do you think the odds are that Fouchier and/or Kowaoka would have tried to conceal a lab leak, if that was the true origin?

Why did the rebuttal to the lab leak theory come from at least one of two involved scientists that weren’t mentioned in the rebuttal?

Ron Fouchier (far left) ignited a controversy about gain-of-function research in 2012 after he generated an airborne strain of a 60 percent lethal bird flu. He has played an important but largely unnoticed role in persuading the public that SARS-CoV-2 could not be tied to similar research. (Photo credit: Chris Condayan)

The virologist behind the most notorious lab-generated virus in history played an undisclosed role in persuading the world that the COVID-19 pandemic did not emerge from similar research, according to several sources.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Somebody from the market goes to hospital for treatment.
Yes I can see that..

And why have you not reported this? Are you in on the conspiracy to hide the true origins?

“Novel Coronavirus Circulated Undetected Months before First COVID-19 Cases in Wuhan, China”

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

“Notably, she reported knowledge of several possible COVID-19 cases in clinics and hospitals that were near Huanan Market from 11 December, and Huanan Market patients were hospitalized at Union Hospital as early as 10 December”

Screenshot_20221115-190645.png
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Here is the proximity of the hospital to the wet market…

Interestingly, both features will not identify at the same time…

As you expand the map to identify the hospital, the wet market identifier disappears exactly as the hospital identifier appears and vice versa…

The central pink area, to the immediate left of the wet market, is the hospital.

You claim the westernmost stalls were were the problem was!

That is the side of the wet market that is immediately adjacent to the hospital…

Can you add up 2 + 2?

Need some more time?

Screenshot_20221115-181447.png
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

As you expand the map to identify the hospital the wet market simultaneously becomes just the unidentified circled knife and fork…

They do not identify at the same time.

Why would that be?

To conceal the near proximity of the wet market and the hospital?

I’m sure that you weren’t aware of it…

You have to tap the screenshot to see them both..

Screenshot_20221115-181538.png
Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Sorry, lost interest.

Trump announced he is running for President again.
I need to see how I can help his election campaign.

I sure hope GOP Rep Majorie “Gestapo Soup” Greene is picked as his running mate.

Trump/Greene 2024!

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Start calling or writing your local Republican headquarters now.
Make sure delegates to the RNC nominate Trump as Republican candidate for President 2024..

Trump/Greene 2024!

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

You should be taken just as seriously as Ron Fouchier’s denials should have been taken on the dismissal of the lab leak origin.

Like, not at all.

Like, completely ignored.

The ideas that each of you have proposed are both ridiculous, and neither should be even considered.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Oh please.. You were all about the Lab leak theory., now it’s the hospital.
What exactly do you think is the connection? That Covid escaped the hospital?
Also “You claim the westernmost stalls were where the problem was!”
No, I did not!

You also keep ignoring this.
.“Novel Coronavirus Circulated Undetected Months before First COVID-19 Cases in Wuhan, China”

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Do you somehow not recognize that a lab leak theory can result in and include sick people in the hospital?

How is it that you “deduce” it must be one or the other?

(The hospital would just be a vector.)

As in…

Lab leak -> patient in hospital (right next door to wet market) -> wet market.

(In the stalls closest to the hospital even)

You dismiss the lab leak theory based on the long distance between the wet market and the WIV.

But you discount even the possibility of viral transmission to the wet market from the hospital that is literally right next door…?‍♂️

What part of unreasonable don’t you understand??‍♂️

You contradict yourself again, and again.

The very first patient with symptoms described possibly getting sick on the subway or in a hospital.

But the main point you haven’t acknowledged is that in no way should the testimony of Ron Fouchier been even remotely considered as far as the origin of COVID-19 not being a lab leak.

He was just covering for himself and his ilk.

And you are just deflecting as usual.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

I don’t give a fuck about Fouchier or his testimony. That’s you.

And you keep saying “you” like I am the author of what is said in my posts. ?…
I gave a different point of view from various sources..Where as you are postulating your own personal theories.
It’s a credibility issue.

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

I personally do not know where Covid-19 came from.

Where as you Guest are claiming you do know..
Once again a credibility issue…

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

I am claiming that the natural origin deflection story is false.

It could have come from any number of labs, including, but not necessarily, WIV.

The preponderance of the evidence is clearly in favor of a human caused incident.

There is absolutely zero proof, circumstantial or otherwise, of a natural origin.

That makes it an easy choice.

And when you do not use quotation marks in your comments, and /or proper credits, then yes, they are effectively your own statements.

Plagiarized, maybe, but…

You become the author.

It becomes a credit-ability issue.

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

Speaking of deflecting.

“Novel Coronavirus Circulated Undetected Months before First COVID-19 Cases in Wuhan, China”

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

“All eight COVID-19 cases detected prior to 20 December were from the western side of the market, where mammal species were also sold,” the study says.”
_____________________________________

“Also “You claim the westernmost stalls were where the problem was!”
No, I did not!”

-grey fox-

____________________________________

Really…???

Here is your comment…

https://kymkemp.com/2022/11/09/humboldt-county-reports-three-new-hospitalizations-due-to-covid-this-week/#comment-1579616

“…and also that most of the cases from Huanan were confined to the market’s western section, which, according to the joint pandemic-origins study by China and the World Health Organization, housed seven of the 10 stalls from which wildlife products were sold.”

Your comment was not bounded by quotation marks…

That makes the claim yours, whether it was plagiarized or not.

You copied it.

You presented it.

Simply stating…

“The Atlantic”

…at the end, does not make it not your claim, and either way, it makes it your contention…

Also, carefully consider this…

It is much more plausible that a humanly transmissible viral pathogen infecting people in a hospital would pass to the people in the adjacent wet market, than it is plausible that a viral animal pathogen would suddenly pass to the people in the wet market.

It IS a given that the infected people in the hospitals would be carrying something transmissible to humans…

And that has been proven!

On the other hand, it IS NOT a given that any of the animals in the wet market were carrying something transmissible to humans!!!

You see, that has specifically NOT been proven!!!

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

The world according to Guest…

816795BD-FFF4-4402-9B46-A83AA8558B1F.jpeg
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Still deflecting….

“Novel Coronavirus Circulated Undetected Months before First COVID-19 Cases in Wuhan, China”

Last edited 3 years ago
Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

What’s your point?

That just further contradicts the wet market nonsense.

And add a link to your quote, please.

Or at least properly credit it.

You keep repeating it without proper crediting.

What is your assertion with that statement anyway?

It’s a pretty empty statement without an assertion to go with it.

Screenshot_20221116-112235.png
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

It’s just you banging on about the Wuhan Market.

I (note the I) never said it originated in the Mkt place.

If you go to the article you will find a counter argument.
Here, I will put you out of your misery..

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/11/lab-leak-covid-origin-coincidence-wet-market/620794/

Concerning the other article,I posted that a while back. You just don’t remember it..
But that’s OK. Happens to a lot of seniors.

Last edited 3 years ago
HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  Guest

117th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. J. RES. 38

JOINT RESOLUTION

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.

That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency declared by the finding of the President on March 13, 2020, in Proclamation 9994 (85 Fed. Reg. 15337) is hereby terminated.

Passed the Senate March 3, 2022.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/sjres38/text

………………………………………………………………

Roll Call Vote 117th Congress – 2nd Session
XML Vote Summary

Question: On the Joint Resolution (S.J.Res. 63 )
Vote Number: 355
Vote Date: November 15, 2022, 05:16 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2
Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Measure Number: S.J.Res. 63
Measure Title: A joint resolution relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
Vote Counts:
YEAs62
NAYs
36
Not Voting
2

*Information compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate bill clerk under the direction of the secretary of the Senate

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1172/vote_117_2_00355.htm

Last edited 3 years ago
grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Trump/Greene 2024

Start donating now. Volunteer at your local GOP headquarters.

Lets get a head start on “Desantimonious”

Last edited 3 years ago
HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

Bye Bye Nancy….

grey fox
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Maybe…
But If so I am not looking forward to two years of gridlock. They get little done as is..

Nooo
Guest
Nooo
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

I look forward to it. So far the only gridlock has been pointed at ordinary citizens objecting to unregulated immigration, unmitigated partisanship and rewriting society. If at least the rewriting, retooling and attempts to legislate what people are allowed to think stops because of gridlock, it would be a relief. Now if the Supreme Court could be stopped from rewriting too…

Guest
Guest
Guest
3 years ago
Reply to  grey fox

?

HotCoffee
Guest
HotCoffee
3 years ago
Reply to  HotCoffee

Republicans tried in March to end the declaration. The measure passed the Senate, 48-47, along party lines, but House lawmakers didn’t take up a similar vote.
Tuesday’s vote marked one of the first issues to come before the Senate after the midterm elections.