[UPDATE 1:21 p.m.] Internet Outage Disrupts Garberville Area, Knocks Out Phones at Rural Health Center

Internet Outage signAn internet outage affecting parts of Southern Humboldt and possibly beyond began around 9 p.m. last night, disrupting service in the Redway/Garberville area and temporarily knocking out phone lines at Redwoods Rural Health Center, according to a source at the facility.

The health center initially reported that both its internet and phone systems were down due to the outage. In a later update, staff said they were able to switch to a backup system with 101 Netlink, restoring phone service and internet.

“Redwoods Rural Health Center is suffering… SUFFERING an internet outage,” the center wrote earlier in a social media post.

Early, unconfirmed reports from community members suggest outages may also be affecting other areas served by Frontier, though the full scope of the disruption has not been officially detailed. We believe that the outage extends beyond the clinic and beyond Southern Humboldt with an unconfirmed report from the Ferndale area also.

A text message sent by Frontier Communications to customers acknowledged the outage, stating that the company is “doing everything possible to resolve it” and that updates would be provided as more information becomes available. The message did not include a cause or estimated time for restoration. Here is a page to check for outage in your area.

We have reached out to Frontier Communications and requested information on  the cause of the outage and an estimated timeline for repairs. They have not responded at the time of our posting.

UPDATE 8:45 a.m.: One customer received the following, “Frontier has confirmed a large network outage at one of their third-party network providers (AT&T).  AT&T is working on that issue, and we will continue to receive updates from Frontier as the situation progresses.  At this time there is no Estimated Time of Repair.”

UPDATE 1:21 p.m.: Our reporter in Garberville is saying that Frontier is back working for her.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

23 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Allen
Guest
Allen
1 month ago

The horror! Panic in the streets!
We are so dependent on the Internet now.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 month ago
Reply to  Allen

Pretty important when your doctor needs access or to share with another RIGHT NOW, or say, something needs to be accessed from something like MyChart so a procedure can continue. An internet issue can also shut down POS terminals at stores, ATMs, and even cell towers as those also have hardwired connections to a larger network. There’s more affected than not being able to watch YouTube or comment on RHBB. Also, digital phones can go out too as if Frontier or AT&T (Uverse) was your bundle, you lose everything. Things like this is why I don’t do bundled services: it reserves a back up system for you by default.

Allen
Guest
Allen
1 month ago

Like I said, we are so dependent on the Internet now. It is not healthy. We are becoming slaves to a technology that is supposed to make our life easier. Who is controlling who?

Friday
Member
1 month ago
Reply to  Allen

And, before that, we were so dependent on land lines. Before that, it was telegraph & radio. Before that, it was horse & buggy. What’s your point, exactly?

Allen
Guest
Allen
1 month ago
Reply to  Friday

Not even close in comparison.

melanopsin
Member
1 month ago
Reply to  Allen

At least as designed, internet as a whole has no single point of failure.

Allen
Guest
Allen
1 month ago
Reply to  melanopsin

In theory. Say Amazon Web Services or Cloudflare goes down they drag others with them.

melanopsin
Member
1 month ago
Reply to  Allen

single points of failure for major portions, yes, but the whole internet doesn’t collapse.

those services are spread widely too; not everybody uses them…

Last edited 1 month ago
Ed Voice
Guest
Ed Voice
1 month ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Did anyone check with Ralph Emerson, make sure GSD did not hit and knock down another power pole with their service truck?

melanopsin
Member
1 month ago

Newer phones have satellite capability. A good idea for emergency services. I have Starlink for backup. Don’t use it much, preferring the phone Tethering Hotspot, but Hotspot data is becoming expensive, and being forced to switch from USCellular to T-mobile will reduce bandwidth to 3G speeds after only a few GB usage. The third party site you recommended (I forget the name right now) costs less but it will use T-mobile network — unclear it it will get throttled as for T-mobile users.

Starlink is FAST but with a satellite burning up on reentry every 16 minutes there’s a lot of Aluminum and other elements fallout leftover in upper atmosphere:

https://www.spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=29&month=04&year=2026

A GIANT ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY EXPERIMENT: Every 16 hours, a Starlink satellite falls out of the sky. It’s part of the SpaceX business model: Old obsolete satellites re-enter to make way for newer models. This may sound like a good way to keep Earth orbit from becoming too cluttered, but it comes with a cost. Every Starlink that burns up dumps about 30 kg of aluminum oxide into the upper atmosphere.

That aluminum is not supposed to be there.

comment image

This histogram of Starlink re-entries is updated daily on Spaceweather.com

So far this year (April 28, 2026), 171 Starlinks have reentered, adding more than 5 metric tons (5,000 kg) of aluminum oxide to the stratosphere and mesosphere. How does this compare to natural sources?

The primary natural source is meteoroids — the same “shooting stars” that streak across the night sky. As they burn up between roughly 75 and 110 km, they release a faint dusting of metals. Recent studies suggest that meteoroids disperse between 40,000 kg and 58,000 kg of Al₂O₃ into the atmosphere each year. Starlink in 2026 is on track to add between 26% and 39% of that natural total.

comment image39% may not sound too bad, but consider the following: The size of the Starlink constellation is rapidly increasing, and SpaceX’s competitors are racing to catch up. A full buildout of planned megaconstellations with corresponding re-entries could inject more than 360,000 kg of Al₂O₃ per year — a 640% excess above natural meteoroids (Ferreira et al. 2024).

It all adds up to a giant uncontrolled experiment in atmospheric chemistry. Researchers already know that aluminum oxides can destroy ozone in a complex series of steps involving Al₂O₃, HCl, AlCl₃, sunlight, Cl, and O₃. Other side-effects may reveal themselves in time.

Last edited 1 month ago
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 month ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Pretty much every smartphone since ~2018 has GPS SOS tech built into it just for such an occasion. I found that out after needing service when hitting a boulder on 199. Unfortunately it’s very slow, and unable to send photos, or extremely slowly. That and the text messages are limited in length (think old Twitter and 168 character limits). Not much help to a medical provider that has a hundred pages of data needed with images, or needs to send MRI or PET scans to another, which I’ve also have needed to be done. Not much help when a surgery is just two hours away.

Starlink is nice. I have it (thought I’d rather give Kuiper a shit if it comes to fruition this year). It’s a necessity at a location that has zero cell coverage, little radio except line of sight, and I can use the wifi part for cell use and if the power is out, just plug it into the generators. I’m not an internet junkie out in the hills, if I can even find my phone I left somewhere, but having it for rainy days or emergencies, like a snake bite, it’s needed.

T-Mobile/US Cellular is another point of irritation, which is partly why I don’t use either. T-Mobile has their proprietary network that they’re forcing on every new phone sold, and simply not updating older phones to use it. So you not only get a bill, you get new payments too, even with a $800 trade in on a $1500 phone, AND you have to turn in your old device to get the deals. They’re making sure they get even more of your money. And 5G? Yeah. Sure. I have a bridge to sell you if you think you’re getting it anywhere a mile away from Eureka or Arcata.

melanopsin
Member
1 month ago

I don’t like the fact T-mobile blatantly lies (and gets away with it!):

June 2026 is the last month to refill your account. You need to take action to move your account. The great news is that T-Mobile has plans that match or exceed the value of your current service.

My USCellular plan peovides 35GB hi-speed Hotspot Tethering, while the more expensive best T-mobile plan only allows 5GB. Beats me how that is a match or exceeds the USCellular plan value…and:

Unlimited Plus Monthly general terms Limited time; subject to change.

So I remain on US Cellular until at least June 2026 — unclear if they mean June 1st or through June; I haven’t asked…

Last edited 1 month ago
melanopsin
Member
1 month ago
Reply to  melanopsin

third party Boost Mobile Prepaid 40GB for $50 Unlimited+ plan

https://www.boostmobile.com/plans/prepaid-plans

interesting, I notice my phone has been unlocked without me asking…Galaxy S22+

Last edited 1 month ago
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 month ago
Reply to  melanopsin

I still use a former G22 that was on T-mobile, and unlocked it for Boost. I didn’t want to be saddled with yet another bill on top of a bill. The Galaxy I already owned and it just took a phone call to unlock it. that was the only way to keep my phone as T-Mobile wanted be to buy new. But I only pay $26 for unlimited on it, is that $50 actually multiple lines? Seems a bit high but still cheaper than most.

melanopsin
Member
1 month ago

RHBB website stayed online as far as I know thanks to much work by Kym & crew on a new server…USCellular & T-Mobile seem unaffected.

Last edited 1 month ago
Bill the retired cook
Guest
Bill the retired cook
1 month ago

I love my 101 netlink only had 1 problem and they fixed it in about a hour or so.

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
1 month ago

Indeed. My link to the world for many years. Reliable and….my service has gotten better and cheaper over time. Thank you 101 NETLINK

laura cooskey
Guest
laura cooskey
1 month ago

About noon-thirty it came back on in the lower Mattole Valley.

melanopsin
Member
1 month ago
Reply to  laura cooskey

noon minus thirty — I like that! 🙂

Redwood Rumor Mill
Guest
Redwood Rumor Mill
1 month ago

Roads tore up, 4 years later still no fiber optic cable completion: California has been pushing its ambitious Middle Mile Broadband Network since construction first kicked off in 2022 near Poway in San Diego County. The $3.6 billion project aims to lay thousands of miles of fiber optic cable to create a high-capacity statewide backbone, intended to help close the digital divide by enabling private providers to extend last-mile service to underserved urban and rural communities. As of early 2026, progress stands at roughly 8,185 miles in total planned network, with about 46% of fiber installation complete: thousands of miles remain in pre-construction or active installation phases, while only a few hundred miles are ready-to-connect and the very first operational segments have just begun lighting up in places like the Bishop Paiute Tribe area. Officials still eye full completion around the end of 2026, though permitting delays continue to loom.
Pouring billions into burying and maintaining these physical cables looks strikingly wasteful in the Starlink era. Starlink’s low-Earth orbit satellites already deliver fast, reliable broadband across nearly all of California—often 100+ Mbps with improving latency—without the enormous upfront trenching costs, years of bureaucratic delays, union-driven labor expenses, or vulnerability to earthquakes and wildfires. While fiber promises impressive specs once built, the technology and user needs will likely render these expensive ground installations partially outdated within a decade as satellite constellations advance, terrestrial wireless options expand, and demands evolve. Taxpayers will foot the bill for decades of maintenance on a project that could have instead used targeted subsidies for Starlink user terminals and service to connect the truly hard-to-reach households far faster and cheaper. California’s insistence on this old-school cable-heavy approach, four years after breaking ground with limited results so far, exemplifies bureaucratic inertia over embracing scalable, future-proof innovation that actually serves people today rather than digging expensive holes for tomorrow’s obsolete infrastructure. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iFSdPq2Laww&pp=2AEAkAIB0gcJCVACo7VqN5tD

268
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 month ago

100 mbps for Starlink? That’s on the mini. I just did a test on my standard one this morning and got 378 down, 63 up and 27nm latency. And that’s with about 30% sky blockage from trees. It rarely drops below 200 even in the rain. Also, fiber lines don’t have to be underground and can be threaded through existing pipes. They can also be hung on about anything. But why advocate for Starlink as an only option? Never put all your eggs in one basket when it comes to services.

Last edited 1 month ago
melanopsin
Member
1 month ago

Speed depends on Starlink plan. $50/month Residential Plan is for 100Mb/s on the Standard. (like mine)

https://starlink.com/residential

Last edited 1 month ago
melanopsin
Member
1 month ago

These folks in an extremely remote village have fiber and 5G cellular…

Climbing up China’s most dangerous village, Sichuan Cliff Village, is so scary


https://youtu.be/Hx94_YVl_hY