Humboldt County Jail Reports: Daily Booking Sheet – February 27, 2026
Humboldt County Correctional Facility [Photo by Mark McKenna]
HAILEE MAE LOPEZ Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff Jail / TBARNWELL Time of Arrest: 02/26/2026 09:22 Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrant Charges/Arrested For:
- PC 273a(a) (2 counts): Child endangerment likely to produce great bodily injury or death (F)
- VC 23152(a): Driving under the influence of alcohol (M)
- VC 23152(b): Driving with BAC of 0.08% or higher (M)
- VC 23578: DUI aggravating factor enhancement (S)
YORAH CHOMICKITOLAN Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / CASSIDY Time of Arrest: 02/26/2026 10:09 Incarceration/Bail Status: O.R. (Released 02/26/2026 12:40) Charges/Arrested For:
- VC 2800.1(a): Evading a peace officer (M)
HAKIM JAMAL PORTER Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / CASSIDY Time of Arrest: 02/26/2026 10:09 Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest Charges/Arrested For:
- PC 422(a): Criminal threats (F)
- PC 240: Assault (M)
- PC 1203.2(a): Violation of probation (M)
- PC 1203.2(a)(1): Violation of probation (F)
WILLIAM RANDOLPH MASTER Arresting Agency/Officer: Arcata Police Department / CUMBOW Time of Arrest: 02/26/2026 13:22 Incarceration/Bail Status: O.R. (Released 02/26/2026 14:59) Charges/Arrested For:
- HS 11364(a): Possession of drug paraphernalia (M)
- PC 488: Petty theft (M)
TAMMY LEE HUMPHREY Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / DEP. HWANG Time of Arrest: 02/26/2026 17:41 Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest Charges/Arrested For:
- PC 594(b)(1): Vandalism (F)
- HS 11364(a): Possession of drug paraphernalia (M)
MARISA ALEXANDRIA WHEELER Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / B. BERRY Time of Arrest: 02/26/2026 20:30 Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest Charges/Arrested For:
- PC 647(f): Disorderly conduct – public intoxication (M)
ALLEN RAY JAMES BARBERO Arresting Agency/Officer: Arcata Police Department / SANCHEZ Time of Arrest: 02/27/2026 00:05 Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrant Charges/Arrested For:
- VOP (M): Violation of probation (Misdemeanor)
CARTER CHRISTOPHER ROGAN Arresting Agency/Officer: Arcata Police Department / J. AULT Time of Arrest: 02/27/2026 01:31 Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest Charges/Arrested For:
- PC 647(f): Disorderly conduct – public intoxication (M)
JAMES MICHAEL CAMERON Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / VACA Time of Arrest: 02/27/2026 01:08 Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest Charges/Arrested For:
- VC 23152(a): Driving under the influence of alcohol (M)
- VC 23152(b): Driving with BAC of 0.08% or higher (M)
MARIAH ANN CORDER Arresting Agency/Officer: Other Humboldt County Law Enforcement / MAYR Time of Arrest: 02/27/2026 01:35 Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrant Charges/Arrested For:
- VOP (F): Violation of probation (Felony)
NICHOLAS DEAN WILLABY Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / SANCHEZ Time of Arrest: 02/27/2026 01:57 Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest Charges/Arrested For:
- PC 647(f): Disorderly conduct – public intoxication (M)
Note: This list above was compiled by AI using the Booking Sheet from the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office. All information was current as of the time the HCSO booking sheet was completed. Note the time on the original booking sheet for that information. AI can make errors — if you notice one, please reach out to us at [email protected]. Additionally, if a charge is later dismissed, reduced, or you are formally cleared and can provide official documentation (such as a court order or a letter from the District Attorney’s Office), we will update the log to reflect that change in status. We do not remove accurate historical booking information but will note verified updates to the official record.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
Higher taxes, Californians are told, will improve education, reduce traffic, and even fight climate change.
But they never do. And never have.
Instead, we face more and more taxes, like an insanely tall layer cake on some crazed reality-TV cooking show.
Start at the bottom, with the state’s wildly high income tax.
The top tax rate is 12.3% on income and capital gains, plus a 1% “millionaire tax” surcharge, and a payroll tax with no wage cap. Together, those can push the top rate to 14.4%.
The 9.3% bracket starts at a taxable income of $72,724, and even Californians with taxable income below $11,080 owe 1% of it in state income tax.
Next, there is a layer of property taxes. These were only partially restrained by Proposition 13, which voters passed in 1978 to slow the rate of increase.
Renters and consumers pay property taxes, too, as owners pass the cost through in the form of higher rents and prices.
Want to get out? The sale of a property may trigger a real estate transfer tax — up to 5.5% in LA, for properties worth more than $5.3 million, thanks to Measure ULA, a 2022 ballot initiative.
(A new ballot initiative to repeal or restrict local transfer taxes is headed for the November statewide ballot, led by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, which defends Prop 13.)
The next layer of tax burdens comes in the form of sales tax hikes at the local level. They’re soaring above 10%
https://nypost.com/2026/02/26/opinion/the-insanely-tall-layer-cake-of-california-taxes/
Californians are currently paying 61.2 cents in taxes per gallon of gasoline and 46.6 cents per gallon of diesel fuel. That doesn’t count the hidden taxes from the state’s climate change policies, including the sale of carbon permits under cap-and-trade, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard.
State lawmakers say those fuel taxes are not enough. They’re studying a plan to tax drivers by the mile, taxing electric vehicle drivers as well.
It’s rare that a tax in California is ever repealed, reduced or allowed to expire. The last major tax cut was Proposition 13 — nearly 50 years ago.
Newsom has just about ran out of other people’s money. California is now looking to turn red, It’s the last hope California has.
Cali carried Trump in 2020 and 2024. One day it will all be made clear …
It’s a reminder of how any system can tilt off‑balance when everything leans too far one way — the same way the Bush and Trump tax cuts both increased the deficit, and the Citizens United ruling opened the door to unlimited political spending — and how much calmer things get when perspectives drift back toward the middle instead of pulling endlessly left and right. That’s the only place we actually get anything done together.
In other news, Hilary is caught in a lie.
AI generated. Cant you tell the difference?
this one too.
Epstein did visit the White Horse in 1993.
But, Hillary Clinton in the picture is not her, in 1993.
This is the original:
This is Hillary in 1993:
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQliraCR_1EVtYS_1CRgBTDqFecr-Zl9P1fRg&s
Hopefully, you are not referring to Bill Clinton as “the White Horse”…
LOL, no.
AI because you cant see the top of Monica’s head?
on the down stroke…..LOL…..
At least Monica was of age unlike the young girls Trump and his pedophile friends were hangjng out with.
Fascinating. This “proof” just showed up now.
But while I’m here, if we’re making First Ladies testify, where is the subpoena for Melania? She is seen pre-AI pictures hanging out with Epstein and Maxwell.
One thing Cormer may not have considered is that the precedent for making Presidents testify may well mean that Trump will face the same thing. (His immunity does not cover this, as he was not POTUS at the time).
Surely he did consider that. But there is a long established principle that, while sitting Presidents can be investigated, they can not be prosecuted. Likely that extends to First Ladies too. In other words they can not be forced to testify. In fact Clinton’s prosecution by Paula Jones was suspended while he was in office. He settled much later. After it ended it way to the Suprene Court. And no one ever pursued the issue of his having lied about it under oath.
There is a procedure for removing from office- it’s impeachment. And that requires a vote from Congress. But there is a valid reason for stopping prosecutions while in office. It easily becomes a political weapon and not a matter of guilt.
Of all the stupiditiex of p politics, this idea of charging sitting President’s is among the most stupid. What an incentive to horrible actions by any sitting official with power to threaten them with arrest.
All this moral outrage (faux considering the Ckintons and the Democrats pushing Hillaey Clinton’s nomination) , using it as political tool, over Trump is going have some horrible consequences yet the left keeps doing it thinking to get something from it. There is a reason for statutes of limitations and part of it is that not having one suspends the sword over anyone’s head to be used as a political weapon. It’s not a matter of righting wrongs- it becomes so disruptive that any good achieved is squashed by the evil it generates. What if IRS decided to prosecute every pot grower for failing to pay taxes in the past?
WTF?
“Of all the stupiditiex of p politics, this idea of charging sitting President’s is among the most stupid. What an incentive to horrible actions by any sitting official with power to threaten them with arrest.”
Are you saying the President is above the law? Trump already thinks he is, let’s not encourage him more.
Speaking of liars.
Move along, nothing to see here. He wasn’t recruiting for his pal Jeffery.
Did some girls end up working at the Mar a Lago spa?
We will never know because those files mysteriously disappeared into the shredder in Bondi’s office.l
AI fake…………..
Nope, unlike yours it is real.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/14/teen-models-powerful-men-when-donald-trump-hosted-look-of-the-year
“In 1992, Trump hosted the competition again. On a similarly golden evening in early September that year, another group of contestants boarded the Spirit of New York, chartered for another Elite cruise. One of the girls on the boat was Shawna Lee, then a 14-year-old from a small town outside Toronto. She recalls how the contestants were encouraged to parade downstairs, one by one, and dance for Trump, Casablancas and others.”
And people are starting to burn for it. But I suspect that some of the delay isn’t so much for legal reasons as it is ” ‘hol up, I need a month to settle my affairs and keep my money out of reach at least until I’m out of prison”.
Resignations.
More people.
“This image is AI generated as it contains a SynthID watermark, meaning it was generated with Google AI.” https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/hillary-clinton-jeffrey-epstein-pictures-debunking-viral-photos-showing-young-former-first-lady-amid-questioning-101772159195248.html#google_vignette
So how how does anyone see the watermarks?
wish for it.
You have to use Google Search by Image / Lens. If you read Kym’s link it tells how the photo was shown to be fake. Besides the water mark there is other tell tail signs.
Visually? You don’t. Not typically anyway. That’s the idea if you need to worry about someone with Photoshop tools for age-old photo manipulating and someone copying your material and just editing out watermarks. It’s in the meta/EXIF data of the image files and even that can be manipulated. AI can’t manipulate without a prompt. It’s preloaded with what it “thinks” you want it to do. It doesn’t know how to by itself. That’s the “binary thinking” of it that allows us humans to discern it. Anti-AI apps can match against itself and known originals to flag it, thus the pre-loading part. But visually, it takes a bit of skill or a good Anti- sort of app to know what’s fake, short of being the actual photographer of an event. But mismatches in lighting vs back/foregrounds, 6 fingers on one hand, strange reflections and other oddities that twist scale and angles and things like machines that can only run in one direction are in some deepfake working in reverse (e.g. a 747 taking off from a 2000 foot runway or stopping mid-air and doing 90-degree turns…things physically impossible)
But, a decent designer that wants to maintain copyright controls knows how to get around all that, least of all AI photo manipulation itself. There’s a lot of good ones out there. But these bastardized images come too fast and too much to be caught and reposted 100,000 times before someone notices.
For when you are the creator:
One watermarking app I’ve used for years is uMark.
Glaze is another one I’d recommend for content creation and can watermark in a way that screws up AI stealing your content and someone else trying to use it for fakes. You could try to make fakes with my stuff, but I’d know when or where it popped up again, even if manipulated.
For finding the fakes (and there are anti-fake detectors that try to “humanize” too I’ll not list)
ZeroAI is pretty good (Google play store). Detects without also bombarding with ads and stealing your data while it’s on a hunt. Others like CopyLeaks, Scribber and Turnitin for writing are pretty good to. There’s really a bazillion of them out there now.
Edit. One more. This one is handy for deepfakes and facial recognition.
Facia.ai
Thanks. A question I have is can Google’s SynthID detect the difference between AI-generated image and image taken with AI-supported camera hardware/software? Suppose my camera or software used to “develop” raw images has AI chip or software, will Synth know the difference between my photo and one AI-generated?
Eh. Are you talking about digital cameras, like Canon and Nikons or cell phone cameras? SynthID can’t tell the difference, really as it’s looking for alterations AFTER an original was produced, regardless if the original was AI assisted when coming directly from the camera. Metadata goes with it unless itself has been altered or deleted (just changing a time stamp in your camera’s settings can make something inadmissible in court or cause all sorts of political problems if your photo was taken on Tuesday and not today)
Companies like Canon already have AI-assisted models like the EOS R3. But these are cameras where you use an outside cloud service apps for editing or are more for RAW image processing and things like autofocusing and color correcting. That is, it’s still an original because YOU are the creator of it and it came from YOUR equipment, thus it’s still an original even if you removed some of the background objects. It the very first, unaltered later, original, even if it’s off a cell phone.
Now if someone takes your one-off image straight off the camera or wherever you post it, and manipulates it either by themselves or with AI, then yeah, there’s a ton of apps beyond your own eyeballs that can detect the change. But it first has to know what the original was to compare, otherwise SynthID and others have no idea. It can only guess. Or…..say if you take a pic, save it, then take it again but change the lighting or contrast before saving they’re both still originals. If you posted them online the AI detectors might have a fit because it’s not sure which one is the original and BOTH might get flagged as fake. Camera filters and face recognition while using filters to say, make a dating app pic look better are notorious for this even though they’d technically be original. But then we have other, actual human ways of detecting fakes.
This goes for video, audio, visual, clothing, sculpture, knockoffs, anything. But make a change in color to say, someone’s hat and save it as your own, then it should catch it. However if you don’t at least try to watermark or somehow protect the integrity of the photo and copyrights, it is absurdly easy to steal your content and call it mine. I won’t need AI to do it, but it does make it almost instantaneous.
“it’s looking for alterations AFTER an original was produced, regardless if the original was AI assisted when coming directly from the camera.”
I don’t think that is correct. Do you have a link? 🙂
Not so much a link as it’s the limitations of the AI application you’re using. So it’s kind of a yes or no, but AI works mainly after-the-fact. But for AI to know that you used AI on a camera it would need to first have some pretty detailed info on your equipment, app used, etc. A lot of apps do that already just to function, or do things like remote service diagnostics; it can’t work without knowing what you got first. If you only have one photo to use, then by default that’s the original, assuming it’s not a recreation of something else. Like say you and someone take a photo of the same thing but you use a color filter on your AI enabled camera, and your friend does not. Those are both originals. IF it doesn’t know what’s installed on your equipment and other identifiers or labels to the photo, it can’t know the original from each other when asked “Is this photo fake?”. It can guess and maybe it’s correct. And it definitely “hallucinate” which is a huge issue. It can’t come back with a “ya know? I don’t have a clue, you figure it out”. I can say “I found these 4 photos that all appear to be originals”.
If you both uploaded them somewhere and AI was able to kype your works and use them for training, it may have issues what is more “original” unless something tells it that it is, e.g. ability to see what app was used to create or modify it. That already exists, and long before AI was even a thing (like TinEye reverse image search)
What it does mean is AI has to do some pretty deep and rather invasive searching if works are not properly labelled and watermarked. And like money, even that can be counterfitted. So yeah, I’d worry a bit about your own file protection because AI is basically just a kid in a candy store.
Show me the watermark on any of the pic i posted.
If you read the link Kym posted there is a google Gemini link which explains why the picture is fake.
Not what was asked.
https://kymkemp.com/2026/02/27/humboldt-county-jail-reports-daily-booking-sheet-february-27-2026/#comment-1907947
I don’t know watermarks, but if you honestly look at these two pics you’ll see. Notice how the people in the background are in the exact same positions and expressions (the two men behind Bill). Everything is the same except for Hillary “replacing” Bill. Click on the pic you posted to expand the picture of “Hillary” and compare to this pic from Wikipedia below.
If you do can you say how anyone looking at a photo of the internet can find them?
If you mean water marks they are invisible to the naked eye. See my comment above.
That will only work if there is a readily available image online that a google will find. And would be a burdensome tool to use especially if a search is not motivated by obsession. A watermark is something readily seen. Not needing a hunt to find. As far as I can tell with having just started reading about digital watermarks, it is far from a casual thing to find them.
And still not what was asked which was “show me” the watermark. Not how to find a digital watermark by using search tools. A watermark needing that much effort is not really serving its purpose of easy identification.
What you are not understanding is that the watermark is invisible to the naked eye. You can’t be shown something that is invisible.
What AI “sees”
Visible watermarks are easy to crop out, paint over, or delete. Because SynthID is baked into the “DNA” of the file (the pixels or the sound waves), it is much harder to remove. It’s meant to stay attached to the content even as it gets shared, compressed, or edited across the internet
Not sure what you mean. No disrespect. I found the picture of Bill with Epstein the old fashioned way.
Found the image by googling “Epstein in the White House” (because I recognized the wall of the Green Room), which Wiki has an article about and that was the picture, cut for the article, but in the upload there is the full picture. As for Hillary’s fake picture I just clicked on the image here from Mr. Clark’s post and it showed the full picture.
“And the challenge now is to practice politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible.”
https://time.com/4361626/hillary-clintons-first-national-splash-life-magazine-in-1969/
Thursday February 27,2026
“I’m a greater believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it.” — Thomas Jefferson
This was found in JE’s apartment …
The lore about the red shoes is *far* worse than him just taking the Lolita Express …
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Calling it a “serious breach of the Department of Justice’s code of conduct,” on Thursday Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that she had terminated a career DOJ employee who was caught with a copy of the U.S. Constitution on his desk.
Bondi said that the employee, who had worked at the department for 37 years, had “raised suspicions” by using “telltale phrases like ‘due process’” in DOJ memos.
At Bondi’s direction, US marshals ransacked his office, discovered the offending document, and frog-marched him out of the building.
Bondi took the opportunity to remind all DOJ staffers that the U.S. Constitution is on the Republican Party’s banned reading list.
Tell me again how democrats will save democracy by undemocratically installing their 2024 nominee …
Not on the Botowitz Report so totally u h knowable,
The difference being that what the Democrats did was legal within US and Constitutional law, unlike the things the Trump administration is doing.
More proof morons are governing america (maga) …
Tell me again [edit] who’s low IQ’d now ??
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/staggering-incompetence-critics-rip-trump-054815047.html
SynthID: Tools for watermarking and detecting LLM-generated Text
https://ai.google.dev/responsible/docs/safeguards/synthid
Google’s SynthID: A Guide With Examples
https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/synthid
Scalable watermarking for identifying large language model outputs
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08025-4
Ow! My head already hurts. This is going to take a lot of time to digest. So far it boils down to someone can tell but it needs work to do it. If Alamy can obviousIy watermark their copywritten images, why can’t AI do it too? Something that appears on each reproduced image unless it is paid for? Anyway thanks for the links. I will work on it l
Actually, it is simple with A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
https://deepmind.google/models/synthid/
Well that is simple. I can see I need to get over my reluctance to let AI do my searching for me. It’s just such a slippery slope to be spoon fed information. But I’m finding it more and more difficult to find links to things other than what search engines choose anyway so maybe that ship has sailed.
Trouble is I’m old enough to question what search engines tell me because I can remember that it really happened differently. I remember from experience that an event or interpretation of an event was not like the aggregate internet limits itself to telling.
Anyway Thanks again,
I’m not disagreeing! I have turned off AI wherever I can…I’m just sharing route I took over the slippery slope — being a retired software developer and given what google knows about me you may understand the path I was given to research…
.
It can…but you have to tell it what to watermark it with and in a way you can be sure it’s still your own. It needs some direction.
Primer on digital fingerprinting.
A blog I sub too that has a 101 on tools and techniques for AI watermarking
Edit: Should ad that all this AI detecting can work the other way too, especially in music. I know musicians and DJs that routinely have streamed shows on sites like Spotify and SoundCloud only to have them shutoff due to copyright infringements or believe them to be unlicensed fakes….OF THEIR OWN MUSIC. AI in that sense of detecting violations or fakes isn’t helpful and actually costs people money and ability to expand their audiences. It can be both an investigator and an arresting officer at the same time. And now everyone has problems.
Some people also use this water mark.
Feb 27 is WINTER, right? 73 degrees F at almost 5PM at Eel River Camp?! (I predict snow in March…)
Tune into KMUD for the 5:30PM Friday Shortwave Radio Report of news around the world, followed by the KMUD News.
Online at https://www.radiorethink.com/tuner/index.cfm?stationCode=kmud&stream=lo&launchedFrom=secureStreamRedirect
or if you missed it find it in the Archive at https://archive.kmudfm.org
*
I suppose a question asking why I got put on moderation would go unanswered…
Did I forget a comma…???
Too many comments today…???
So, we have more people being revealed to have more than just a casual interaction with Jeffrey Epstein via files revealed so far. Who wants to match up names with another blogger that claims to have the guest list for the Bohemian Grove?
Late day tech news: the comingling of organic and machine neural network processing gets a little bit more entwined.
A couple of years ago, a company called Cortical Labs released a video that showed a simplified version of Pong being played by a culture of human neurons in a Petri dish. The idea that a bunch of neurons in a dish can do anything is impressive enough, but it turns out that things have gotten significantly crazier since then, because the company has now managed to get a similar culture of neurons to play Doom.
In a very slick marketing video, the company demonstrates “real neuron gameplay”: Doom running on its CL-1 neural computing system, a microchip upon which 200,000 human neurons are mounted in something called a “multi-electrode array.” (For comparison, while the exact number of neurons in an average human brain remains the subject of some debate, it’s in the order of tens of billions—which really just reinforces how astonishingly powerful and complex our own brains are.)
What a bunch of fucking morons. The DoD is a certified clown show right now.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-shoots-down-customs-and-border-protection-drone-texas/
At least this time it was a real drone and not party balloons.
Though it might be a good idea to take away that toy until they get older.
The Persians are very happy tonight.
“Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.”
Donald Trump Twitter 5:39PM 10/9/12