Humboldt County Jail Reports: Daily Booking Sheet – September 19, 2025
Humboldt County Correctional Facility [Photo by Mark McKenna]
The Humboldt County Correctional Facility’s Daily Booking Sheet. This is information from the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Department. This shows individuals booked into the jail or given supervised release. Any individuals described should be presumed innocent until proven guilty:
Kaleb Anton Tufts
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Whitchurch
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 04:48
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC602 (Misdemeanor) – Trespassing
• PC647(f) (Misdemeanor) – Public intoxication20250919_BookingSheet
Christian Michael Johnson
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Soltow
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 11:51
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC25400(c)(7) (Misdemeanor) – Carrying a concealed firearm by prohibited person20250919_BookingSheet
Marcus Lee Hills
Arresting Agency/Officer: Fortuna Police Department / Watson
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 12:20
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – Released per PC 849(B)(2)
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC647(f) (Misdemeanor) – Public intoxication20250919_BookingSheet
Jonathan Ethier
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Soltow
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 13:07
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – Released per PC 849(B)(2)
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC647(f) (Misdemeanor) – Public intoxication20250919_BookingSheet
Steven Laverne Keesey
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / Dickson
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 12:55
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – Bail Bond
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC496d(a) (Felony) – Receiving a stolen vehicle
• HS11377(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of methamphetamine
• HS11364(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of drug paraphernalia20250919_BookingSheet
Ricky Lawrence Pifferini
Arresting Agency/Officer: State Parks & Recreation / McDaniel
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 14:13
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(a) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: alcohol
• VC23152(b) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: blood alcohol concentration over 0.08%20250919_BookingSheet
Kelly Shane Pifferini
Arresting Agency/Officer: State Parks & Recreation / Cather
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 13:47
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – Bail Bond
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC422 (Felony) – Criminal threats20250919_BookingSheet
David Gregory Chessey
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Stancliff
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 16:41
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC14601.2(a) (Misdemeanor) – Driving on a suspended license for DUI
• VC5200(a) (Infraction) – Improper display of license plates20250919_BookingSheet
Pimnunihun Itspihun Cennane
Arresting Agency/Officer: Department of Fish and Game / A. Do
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 15:22
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest / Foreign Warrants
Charges/Arrested for:
• FG5652(a) (Misdemeanor) – Fish and Game violation
• PC594(a) (Felony) – Vandalism (Foreign Warrant)
• PR4423.5 (Misdemeanor) – Probation revocation (Foreign Warrant)20250919_BookingSheet
Juan Luis Vazquez Lopez
Arresting Agency/Officer: Ferndale Police Department / Gardner
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 18:00
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – Released per PC 849(B)(2)
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC647(f) (Misdemeanor) – Public intoxication20250919_BookingSheet
Stormy Lynn Marinella
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / Alves
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 18:40
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• HS11350(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of controlled substance
• HS11364(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of drug paraphernalia
• HS11377(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of methamphetamine
• PC1551(a) (Felony) – Fugitive from justice warrant20250919_BookingSheet
Matthew Ryan Lincoln
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / O. Alves
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 18:26
Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrant – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• BP4060 (Misdemeanor) – Possession of controlled substance without prescription
• HS11350(a) (Misdemeanor, 2 counts) – Possession of controlled substance
• HS11364(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of drug paraphernalia20250919_BookingSheet
Corey Wayne Sand
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Couch
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 22:20
Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrants & Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC594(b)(1) (Felony) – Vandalism over $400 (Bench Warrant)
• PC487(a) (Felony) – Grand theft (Bench Warrant)
• PC459.5 (Misdemeanor) – Shoplifting (Bench Warrant)
• VC10851(a) (Felony) – Vehicle theft (Bench Warrant)
• HS11350(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of controlled substance (Bench Warrant)
• PC1170(h)(5)(B) (Felony) – Felony sentencing provision (Bench Warrant)
• PC1203.2(a) (Misdemeanor, 4 counts) – Probation violation (Bench Warrants & Fresh Arrest)
• VC14601.2(a) (Misdemeanor) – Driving on a suspended license for DUI (Bench Warrant)
• HS11377(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of methamphetamine (Fresh Arrest)
• HS11364(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of drug paraphernalia (Fresh Arrest)20250919_BookingSheet
Marius Armando Renzullo
Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / Evans
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 23:05
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(a) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: alcohol
• VC23152(b) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: blood alcohol concentration over 0.08%20250919_BookingSheet
Jonathan Raymond Ghidinelli
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Couch
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 22:38
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(f) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: drugs20250919_BookingSheet
Andrew Jerome Kienitz
Arresting Agency/Officer: California Department of Corrections / Vivian
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 22:20
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(a) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: alcohol
• VC23152(b) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: blood alcohol concentration over 0.08%20250919_BookingSheet
Shelby Lavon Brown
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / Sloan
Time of Arrest: 09/18/2025 23:59
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• HS11364(a) (Misdemeanor, 2 counts) – Possession of drug paraphernalia
• PC488 (Misdemeanor) – Petty theft20250919_BookingSheet
Brandee Marie Gray
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / Kane
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 00:17
Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrants – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC496d(a) (Misdemeanor) – Receiving stolen vehicle (Bench Warrant)
• PC1203.2(a) (Misdemeanor) – Probation violation (Bench Warrant)
• PC602(m) (Misdemeanor) – Trespassing (Bench Warrant)
• PC496(a) (Misdemeanor) – Receiving stolen property (Bench Warrant)20250919_BookingSheet
Emerald Elizabeth Dickens
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / K. Soeth
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 00:36
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest / Local Court Case
Charges/Arrested for:
• HS11377(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of methamphetamine
• HS11395(b)(1) (Felony) – Cannabis cultivation violating environmental law
• HS11364(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of drug paraphernalia
• PC1203.2(a)(2) (Misdemeanor) – Probation violation
• VC14601.1(a) (Misdemeanor) – Driving on suspended license
• PC4573.6 (Felony) – Bringing drugs/alcohol into jail20250919_BookingSheet
Robert Calvin Lewis
Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / Quevedo
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 00:45
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(a) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: alcohol
• VC23152(b) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: blood alcohol concentration over 0.08%
• VC14601.2(a) (Misdemeanor) – Driving on suspended license for DUI
• PC1203.2(a) (Misdemeanor) – Probation violation20250919_BookingSheet
Natasha Kyara Sovereign
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Couch
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 00:57
Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrant
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC3455(a) (Felony) – Revocation of post-release community supervision20250919_BookingSheet
Jonathan Ethier
Arresting Agency/Officer: Eureka Police Department / Whitchurch
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 00:11
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC647(f) (Misdemeanor) – Public intoxication20250919_BookingSheet
Joshua Amador Staley
Arresting Agency/Officer: Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office / Sloan
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 01:42
Incarceration/Bail Status: Bench Warrants – O.R. Misdemeanor
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(a) (Misdemeanor, 2 counts) – DUI: alcohol (Bench Warrant & Fresh Arrest)
• PC1203.2(a) (Misdemeanor, 4 counts) – Probation violation (Bench Warrants)
• VC23578 (Special Allegation) – DUI enhancement (Bench Warrant)
• VC14601.1(a) (Misdemeanor) – Driving on suspended license (Bench Warrant)20250919_BookingSheet
Vonda Joyce Carlson
Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / Berry
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 02:34
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• HS11377(a) (Misdemeanor) – Possession of methamphetamine
• HS11550(a) (Misdemeanor) – Under the influence of a controlled substance20250919_BookingSheet
Barbara Augustin
Arresting Agency/Officer: Fortuna Police Department / Humphery
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 02:40
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• PC647(h) (Misdemeanor) – Prowling
• PC148.9(a) (Misdemeanor) – Providing false identification to a peace officer20250919_BookingSheet
Justin Damon Aiton
Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / Vaca
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 02:20
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(f) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: drugs20250919_BookingSheet
Bear Gandalforion Dragonheart
Arresting Agency/Officer: California Highway Patrol / A. Mendez
Time of Arrest: 09/19/2025 02:30
Incarceration/Bail Status: Fresh Arrest
Charges/Arrested for:
• VC23152(a) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: alcohol
• VC23152(b) (Misdemeanor) – DUI: blood alcohol concentration over 0.08%
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
Friday September 19, 2025
“The impossible exists only until we find a way to make it possible”
—Mike Horn
Like this?
On Friday, the House of Representatives adopted a resolution to honor the “life and legacy” of Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated last week while speaking on a college campus in Utah.
H.Res. 719, titled “Honoring the life and legacy of Charles ‘Charlie’ James Kirk,” was introduced by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on September 16, 2025, and co-sponsored by 165 House Republicans. No Democrats co-sponsored the resolution. The measure condemns Kirk’s assassination and praises him as a “courageous American patriot” who championed free speech and constitutional principles, and calls for unity against political violence. Gatewaypunditnews.
Here is one black man’s message – Charlie Kirk was no racist:
https://x.com/thatsKAIZEN/status/1967652741905518882
I’ve seen videos of Kirk saying many un-Christian like things. Stuff that would be appropriate at a KKK meeting. If he was a patriot America has low standards.
Really??
Please provide links to videos.
Let’s see them. You know you’re bullshitting. Stop it.
Yet they can’t seem to pass a resolution demanding the release of the Epstein Files.
Once again the leftist media DOESN’T HAVE THE GUTS to settle the $15 Bazillion defamation suit with our Brave Temperate Leader. The seedy liberal gossip rag the NYT just waited and let the filthy treasonous judge throw out the case! Thats UnAmercan. ⬅️ ↖️
➡️ Well, strap on your chaps because it’s about to get BUCK WILD! ⬅️ ↕️
🔄 I’m recommending the humble private citizen re-file, but this time make sure to list ALL of Leader’s, I mean private citizen’s finest accomplishments! Probably want to get an AI rendition of the future Ballroom, completed, but burnt by raging leftist lunatics hell bent on defaming His great works. ☑️
MAGA Cult
MAGA is a campaign slogan. Thats all. Why are you so afraid of it?
Silly leftists! It was just a campaign slogan! You just got Trumped! He’s just trolling HA! HA HA hahahahaha!
to be honest the part where Elon bribed voters with a million dollar prize to MAGA which is highly illegal, but somehow the case found its way to a MAGA approved judge…
and then Elon hiring “big balls” and a couple other twenty year olds to get all DOGE’D out (for real actually snapping up as many social security numbers as possible and who knows what else)was kind of concerning… “big balls” gets punked by teenagers in DC which leads to martial law being declared in DC…
didn’t a Fox News person just call for the execution via injection as a solution to the homeless crisis? With no repercussions?
name one actual thing that MAGA has successfully MAGA’d. please I’m really curious.
Easy.
He shut down illegal border crossings, which was probably the main thing he was elected to do. Anything else accomplished is just gravy.
As to the Fox guy, this was during a discussion about the POS who stabbed the girl on the train. He did not say it was a solution to the homeless problem, he said we need to keep mentally ill, homeless people in jail if they won’t accept treatment, or give them a lethal injection or something.
So not as bad as you stated, but still pretty vile. I have no problem with this guy losing his job over that statement. He did apologize, for whatever that is worth.
This sounds familiar.
Goebbels Ends Careers of Five ‘Aryan’ Actors Who Made Witticisms About the Nazi Regime
BERLIN, Feb. 3.—Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels today ended the professional careers of five “Aryan” actors and cabaret announcers by expelling them from the Reich’s Chamber of Culture on the grounds that “in their public appearances they displayed a lack of any positive attitude toward National Socialism and therewith caused grave annoyance in public and especially to party comrades.”
https://www.nytimes.com/1939/02/04/archives/goebbels-ends-careers-of-five-aryan-actors-who-made-witticisms.html
Kimmal was suspended for saying things his employer did not like. It has nothing to do the the first Amendment or government.
If you are trying to insinuate the President Trump fired him, because Trump is a nazi, you are wrong. It also show you know nothing of political history. President Trump is a constitutional conservative. You really should examine the last administration for overreach, corruption, and scandal.
No Trump is not a Nazi but is acting like an authoritarian and that road leads to Fascism.
But you be a good little soldier and march in step while the country slips into an Oligarchy.
This country was founded on oligarchy just like many others. Don’t bullshit yourself.
People should get real and quit trying to use the “O” word to sew panic.
Look the word up and we see rich dudes running countries. It’s as old as time and comes down to who likes which bunch of oligarchs. That’s not going to change.
Granted, one must compete with them to maintain freedom, and that’s why I like the USA, ’cause we’re allowed to do that here.
You might not win the power race, but you do have the opportunity to get rich off their backs, in very legitimate ways.
the trump appointed head of the fcc is the one that applied the pressure to get him fired. Super simple. It actually has a lot to do with the government.
The FCC is responsible for enforcing FCC licensing regulations.
Funny how much the word hypocrisy comes up when discussing the Trump administration.
So you missed the reign of the Bidens?
BORING!
no zeal
Boring, Biden was brain dead.
President Biden is right.
Political satire is one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech.
It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people in to the discussion.
That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship.
Guess who said that!
https://x.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/1521117482303602689
“It’s no longer free speech.” — Trump. He’s right, it’s fascism.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/19/trump-no-longer-free-speech-00574219
So antifa is an organization.
The Parliament of the Netherlands has approved by an overwhelming majority a motion by conservative leader Geert Wilders to classify Antifa as a terrorist organization, a brave step that forces the government to act immediately.
This decision, taken this Thursday, follows the leadership of President Donald Trump, who on Wednesday declared Antifa a «major terrorist organization» in response to the cowardly assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Western Europe finally awakens to the danger of these masked thugs who sow chaos under the antifascist pretext!
The assassination of Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA and an unwavering voice for freedom, occurred on September 10 in Utah at the hands of a left-wing extremist.
https://gatewayhispanic.com/2025/09/breaking-news-dutch-parliament-approves-designating-antifa-as/
This just in, someone agrees with trump.
Orbán, who has hollowed out Hungary’s civic institutions over his 15 years in power, said he was “pleased” with Trump’s decision to list Antifa as a “major terrorist organization” in the US, and that Hungary would do the same.
It looks like Antifa has gone global. lol
77 million US citizens agree with President Trump.
so 22.19% of US citizens agree with trump.
He’s hoping other folks didn’t notice.
I guess they forgot this.
June 6 1944
So the US government is really ANTIFA? Quite a trick for anarchists and communists to even have uniforms and get in the same boat as they described themselves as “range of left-wing ideologies, and tend to hold anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, and anti-state views.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifa_(United_States)
You’re working really hard to miss the point.
As usual, trying to divert attention away from the truth of the matter.
Inconvenient truth one again rears its ugly (to some) head. Thank you!
Another one of the commenters on this site who thinks context doesn’t matter.
What was said about Kirk was true, get over it.
One of those smarty pants. “Context” makes me feel weird so I avoid it.
“Smart” people don’t like what I say
For one thing it was a motion not a law.
Antifa is not a formal organization.
Wilders is not a conservative but a far-right politician.
Same with Orban. Of course they are against anti-fascists
Are you saying your for Fascism?
As long as we keep the Leftist Lunatics always from the levers of power, at all levels of government, American citizens will never have to worry about this country becoming fascist.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/article/what-did-jimmy-kimmel-say-about-charlie-kirk-the-comments-from-his-monologue-that-led-abc-to-suspend-his-late-night-show-142011825.html
“This is what Kimmel said:”
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
[(News Flash: If you are one of the Liberals that took this Jimmy Kimmel gag literally, not facetiously, and so you believed every word of it, word for word, I’ve got news for you…
What part of Jimmy Kimmel being a total joker don’t you fully understand…???
He ain’t Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather, or Peter Jennings, so if you took him for his word, you got pranked…
The jokes on you, and you have liberal egg on your face, courtesy of Jimmy Kimmel, but you just don’t realize it that the facetious Jimmy Kimmel joke, is actually on you…
The most hilarious part is that the Liberals don’t realize that this is actually an insult towards them, delivered facetiously…)]
This is what I remember happening in the comment section…
[(“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the [LIBERAL] gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of THEM and doing everything THEY can to score political points from it.”)]
[(DOES “THE NICK FUENTES CONNECTION” RING A BELL…???)]
“In between the finger-pointing, there was grieving.”
[(Umm, folks, as the facetious joke, (that was really about the Liberals), continues, there was Liberal finger pointing, but it was, glaringly, sans grieving…)]
“On Friday, [9/11] as the White House flew the flags at half-staff, which got some criticism, but on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this.”
(Just more gag plus a lead in to his next punch line…)
This is the kind of disingenuous horseshit logic that is all too prevalent in the current administration:
Harvard’s finances are also facing new scrutiny. McMahon said she had concerns over the school’s financial well-being because its federal funding is under threat. Harvard has a $53 billion endowment, the largest of any university.
https://apnews.com/article/harvard-trump-admissions-data-744f069c4140b0c6f2af02a447642c76
So your administration froze billions in already approved federal funding for research and education at Harvard, which a judge recently ruled that you had to pay them because the cuts were clearly political retribution, and you are now using that as a pretext to put them under additional scrutiny and stress.
To the entire Trump administration: kindly fuck all the way off. Rapidly.
I appreciate the chuckle.
OH no, we’ll be around for the next 3 years dismantling the damage that the democrat has caused.
..
What ever happened to Kym’s insistence on links or at least making stuff easy to find?
The sources are listed in the bottom of the graphic, sorry it’s a screenshot without the hyperlinks active.
Remember the “drug” boats Trump’s DoD blew up?
https://www.latintimes.com/venezuela-announces-capture-alleged-dea-agents-massive-drug-shipment-589688
In new level of stupid, RFK Jr.’s anti-vaccine advisors axe MMRV recommendationThe vote to strip the recommendation came after a day of inept discussion.
https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/09/in-new-level-of-stupid-rfk-jr-s-anti-vaccine-advisors-axe-mmrv-recommendation/
Here’s an important bit wayyyyy down in there:
“Goldman noted that if the committee rescinds the recommendation for MMRV for children under 4, the shot would no longer be covered by the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, a federal program for Medicaid-eligible and under- or uninsured kids, which covers about half of American children.
I read that as, “we’re not only taking away that recommendation, we’re making sure disadvantaged families can’t pay for it either”.
Guess who gets paid anyway? The drug manufacturers. Profit over people, because RFK Jr said so. The same Junior who said no one should be taking medical advice from him.
NBC published this, I wonder if RHBB will publish it, too….???
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-vaccine-eligibility-limit-over-65-health-conditions-cdc-rcna232374
‘CDC panel votes to limit who is eligible for this fall’s Covid vaccine’
“Only people 65 and over or with underlying health conditions should get the shots, the advisory group recommended. There my be insurance roadblocks for others.”
“On Friday, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory panel unanimously recommended limiting the Covid shot to people 65 and older or those with underlying health conditions, based on an individual decision or with their doctor. The panel rejected a separate recommendation that the agency should encourage states to require a prescription.
Friday’s recommendation aligns with the Food and Drug Administration’s approval in August, which cleared the shots for people 65 and up and those with underlying health conditions.
People under 65 are advised to consult with their doctor, the panel said, with “an emphasis that the risk-benefit of vaccination is most favorable for individuals who are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease.” “
Of course the people appointed by an administration that doesn’t believe in science set policies that are not supported by science.
Just so..
Link please….
https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/09/19/nx-s1-5545946/cdc-covid-vaccine-acip-recommendations
’CDC vaccine panel adds new rules for getting the COVID vaccine in a tense meeting’
“Friday’s vote essentially says “this is no longer routinely recommended-…”
Now that’s how it’s done.
https://x.com/i/status/1969065528992952528
That link just brings up a selfie in Men’s Briefs. Are they comfortable? Will you stand by your assessment?
BREAKING NEWS…!!!
COVID VACCINES NO LONGER RECOMMENDED FOR ANYONE…!!!
https://apnews.com/article/cdc-advisers-vaccines-hepatitis-b-covid19-a1fb61ef7e29d93d2828618d890cceb3
‘Kennedy’s vaccine advisers change COVID shot guidance, calling them an individual choice’
ATLANTA (AP) —
” Health Secretary Robert F.
Kennedy Jr.’s new vaccine advisers added confusion Friday to this fall’s COVID-19 vaccinations — declining to recommend them for anyone and leaving the choice up to those who want a shot.
In a series of votes Friday, advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention took the unprecedented step of not recommending them even for high-risk populations like seniors.
The Food and Drug Administration already had placed new restrictions on this year’s shots from Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax, reserving them for people over 65 or younger ones who are deemed at higher risk from the virus.”
Welcome to RHBB, where the absolute truth gets downvoted on the regular…
Go figure…!!!
I prefer to get my medical advice from medical experts,
not people who were appointed because of their political loyalty.
Well, then that rules out taking your medical advice from the West Coast Health Alliance…
State Governors make up about half of their leadership…
I’ll go with the FDA And CDC every time over dimwit Newsom and company…
The FDA and CDC are political organizations staffed by Trump appointees.
Try the American Medical Association and American Academy of Pediatrics.
They are science-based organizations whose members are not selected by politicians, and they continue to recommend getting vaccinated.
The AMA is a professional organization based on advancing the incomes and authority of doctors. Sometimes science has nothing to do with it. Always politics has to do it it. The same with the AAP. In their history, they have advocated against science if it hurt their bottom line.
The real issue is should the FDA and CDC be used as political tools. You may have missed it when under Obama in 2010 there was an expensive reorganization to accommodate minority complaints which created its own set of complaints about ignoring science to promote a political goal. There has never been a time when either agency was not political.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/minority-health-and-health-equity/fda-office-minority-health-and-health-equity-10-year-anniversary
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5308193/
https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/leo_statement_for_WSJ.htm
AMA AAP..
Conflicts of interest…
Was the lone upvote yours? Or the other TRG-ish accounts?
Yep, because, wait for it, we are not members…
Up vote and down vote away, non member, and you will accomplish as much as I can, along with every other non member…
Pretty silly question coming from a fellow non member, with the inability to up vote and/or down vote…
🤦♂️ 🤷♂️
https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/acip-recommends-covid19-vaccination-individual-decision-making.html#:~:text=ATLANTA%20%E2%80%94%20SEPTEMBER%2019%2C%202025%20%E2%80%94,individuals%20six%20months%20and%20older.
ATLANTA — SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 — The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) today unanimously recommended that vaccination for COVID-19 be determined by individual decision-making.ACIP’s recommendation applies to all individuals six months and older. It includes an emphasis that the risk-benefit of vaccination in individuals under age 65 is most favorable for those who are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 and lowest for individuals who are not at an increased risk, according to the CDC list of COVID-19 risk factors.Individual decision-making is referred to on the CDC’s adult and child immunization schedules as vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making, which references providers including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists
Continued…
‘ACIP Recommends [That] COVID-19 Immunization [Be] Based on Individual Decision-making…’
_______________________________________
As noted on AP News link..
“In a series of votes Friday, advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention took the unprecedented step of not recommending them even for high-risk populations like seniors.”
(NO LONGER RECOMMENDED FOR ANYONE…!!!)
Good news! Ol shifty eye over at the fbi spotted another spent shell at the CK shooting – before the scene was quickly cleaned cameras cleared and grass paved over- this one engraved with a full signed confession from Jeffery Epstein! So no more questions further discussion will be made illegal so as not to ruffle the fragile feathers of those captured by bleach blonde spray tanned super sized mcvalue meal “strong man” idealogy. Thanks for your attention to this matter.
Kym and many others have been making a big deal about the cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel.
Please allow me to give my prospective on the matter…
While I will agree that the FCC should not be making veiled threats against talk show hosts, this ranks about 793rd on my Give-a-Fuck list. I shall explain.
It is as though you have all forgotten the last decade of conservatives being banned from social media (I am here because I was banned from LoCO), conservatives losing their jobs… Roseanne Barr, Tucker Carlson, Gina Carano, Scott Cawthon, anyone who wouldn’t take the Covid shot, etc. Jimmy Kimmel, Steven Colbert and many, many others cheered on those firings! I am an advocate for free speech, but do not be surprised when I do not get overly upset when people who celebrated others losing their free speech, finally lose theirs. Conservatives warned this would happen, liberals ignored our warnings and now they cry over it.
Jimmy Kimmel, and now Steven Colbert, put forth the already proven false claim that the shooter was a MAGA man. A Trump supporter. One of our own. He knew this was not true, but he wanted to give his leftist viewers a reason to not feel bad, to not be introspective about the possibility that their rhetoric may have led to this horrible event. He told them not to worry, don’t feel bad, it was one of those crazy MAGAs who did this. It was THEM!
So, is Jimmy Kimmel’s cancellation a threat to free speech in America? Sure, to a small extent it is, but it is not even a blip on the radar compared to the chilling effect on free speech when Charlie Kirk got his life gruesomely taken by a bullet in front of his friends in family, for the simple act of sitting down on a college campus and respectfully debating the issues.
We conservatives have had to worry about violence from the left if we dared to express our views for quite awhile. Hats ripped off, drinks thrown on you, vile accusations yelled at you, cars vandalized, grades lowered, jobs lost, friends and family disowning you, the list goes on and on. I have lived it, many on here have lived it, you cannot tell us it is not true. These are not things the left has had to worry about in the past, and frankly still don’t. Primarily only those celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk have had any consequences. I would sincerely prefer that no one would have to worry about these things, but maybe the left experiencing a small amount of what we have endured for a decade will be the catalyst for change and a more civil America.
There have been real consequences for conservatives expressing their views over the last decade–Charlie Kirk paid the highest price–no one should dismiss that. But political violence and censorship concerns don’t run in one direction only. Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed (paying the same high price as Kirk), and State Senator John Hoffman and his wife were injured (also a high price). Nancy Pelosi’s husband was sent to the hospital after a hammer attack. On January 6th, about 140 police officers were injured by right-wing protestors. These are all high prices to pay.
Forgetting one side’s pain while remembering only the other’s is part of what deepens the divide. When we heard about Kirk’s death, I cried. I sent a reporter to cover the vigil. We here at Redheaded Blackbelt are not ignoring the pain of those on the right. On this site, we host a variety of opinions—including ones very critical of me personally—because I think free speech is best served by allowing those voices space rather than banning or deleting them. As long as people follow the rules, they get to speak.
That’s why I find it alarming when the U.S. government itself weighed in on a non-violent statement by Kimmel on MONDAY—before the Justice Department released official information on TUESDAY showing Robinson appeared to be “leaning more to the left – becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.” In other words, like many others on both the right and the left, Kimmel spoke too soon. But only he was singled out by the FCC.
To quote Ted Cruz (not someone I usually align with): FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s warning—“We can do this the easy way, or we can do this the hard way”—sounded less like oversight and more like the mafia. Cruz said, “And I got to say, that’s right out of Goodfellas. That’s right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going, ‘Nice bar you have here. It’d be a shame if something happened to it.’” Once government pressure enters the picture, it isn’t just Jimmy Kimmel’s job at risk—it’s everyone’s ability to speak freely.
What time is Jimmy Kimmel on tonight? I want to see what dumb thing he’s going to say tonight!
We all knew on Monday Kym. Only those who were willing to replace their common sense and critical thinking skills with their desperate need to blame this on the right thought otherwise.
As I have said before, we should not be judging which side is engaging in political violence by the crazies who actually go so far as to kill. Not only is it often difficult to determine if they had political motivations (not this time!), but the everyday violence effects far more of us.
Why don’t you want to address the violence that is the easiest to see?
What side holds demonstrations, often violent, in order to prevent someone with opposing views speaking on a college campus?
What side will scream in another’s face, throw drinks, hit them and spit on them for wearing a president’s campaign hat?
What side burns buildings, loots stores, burns Teslas when they don’t get their way?
What side illegally takes over bridges and roads, threatens cars and blocks innocent people from getting to work or receiving medical care?
Not that there is even a legitimate comparison in the deaths, shall we compare the reaction of the left to George Floyd’s death to the right’s following Charlie Kirk?
Shall I continue???
You dare to mention government intervention because the FCC guy made a veiled threat without actually doing anything? Have you forgotten about the back door access into Twitter and other socially media by Biden and Obama’s DOJ? The government was actively giving lists of people to investigate and ban. Have you completely forgotten about Obama’s IRS scandal?
Kym, I do appreciate that you aren’t ignoring the pain on the right, but many, many on the left are… and I still can’t overlook the fact that you threw your lot in with the absurd notion that the shooter could have been MAGA, even after we knew the writings on the bullet casings.
We simply aren’t playing the both sides game anymore Kym, because it is utter and complete bullshit. It isn’t completely from the left, but it slants very hard that direction.
None of their “trusted” media sources told them what to think and say between close of business Friday night through Tuesday morning.
Except, no.
“Based on government and independent analyses, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities, amounting to approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001.” https://theconversation.com/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-more-deadly-than-left-wing-violence-what-the-data-shows-265367
“All the extremist-related murders in 2024 were committed by right-wing extremists of various kinds, with eight of the 13 killings involving white supremacists and the remaining five having connections to far-right anti-government extremists. This is the third year in a row that right-wing extremists have been connected to all identified extremist-related killings.” https://www.adl.org/resources/report/murder-and-extremism-united-states-2024
https://kymkemp.com/2025/09/12/humboldt-county-republicans-reiterate-the-value-of-free-speech-following-tragic-shooting-of-charlie-kirk/#comment-1866287
➡️The theory of Kirk’s killer being far right has moved from fringe conspiracy sites into mainstream media coverage. That shift is worth observing in and of itself and why I mentioned it⬅️—But it doesn’t mean the content is verified, nor does it mean I endorse it. I’m just intrigued as a reporter to see these waves of theories.
https://kymkemp.com/2025/09/12/humboldt-county-republicans-reiterate-the-value-of-free-speech-following-tragic-shooting-of-charlie-kirk/#comment-1866120
Kym Kemp
6 days ago
Reply to LiberaLunacy
I want to be clear that I am not saying this is a fact. ➡️I’m saying that this theory is moving off the conspiracy pages onto more mainstream platforms.⬅️I don’t think we have the information to make a decision on this right now. People on both sides are searching for ways to blame the other side for the assassination. The only good news about that kind of blame is at least both sides still apparently think political assassination is horrific. The reality is if the shooter is left or right though doesn’t make the left or right more likely to be correct.
__________________________________
You say,
“People on both sides are searching for ways to blame the other side for the assassination.”
___________________________________
But, you see, Charlie Kirk who was assassinated, wasn’t a member of the left, he was a member of the right, so it would be natural, OCCAM’S RAZOR, for the right to blame the left, who hated him, but it would be/was VERY ABNORMAL/UNUSUAL/INEXPLICABLE, for you, and/or the left, to have ridiculously and absurdly blamed or even in any way implicated the right, who did not hate him…
IT MADE NO SENSE…
That’s just obvious projection, and or obviously tribal deflection and diversion…
Okay, now go look at the methodology for those studies and you will see they probably aren’t worth the paper they are printed on. I researched the CATO institute study and no violence during the summer of love was counted as violence from the left, but they do count things like prison violence by skinheads as right wing violence.
Again, deaths are a poor indicator of which political side is more prone to violence anyway. Anyone willing to kill is obviously on the extreme end of either political side, if the killing is even attributable to political beliefs as opposed to just being nuts. I am more concerned about what the average person on the right or left is willing to do, and the mainstream left is far more likely to use and accept the use of violence to further their objectives.
“You wrote: ‘you threw your lot in with the absurd notion that the shooter could have been MAGA…’
No, Hugh. What I did was point out what major outlets were reporting as a possibility in the immediate aftermath. That’s not the same as endorsing it, and I should have realized some of my readers are either unwilling or unable to make that distinction. I’ve already said I should have waited for the facts before even mentioning it — that’s on me for not realizing the limitations of intellectual discourse here with some of you. I come from a family and a community that ranges through theories understanding that talking about a theory doesn’t mean endorsing it–unless you explicitly state you are doing so. I should know better than to do that outside of trusted friends who are used to wide ranging conversations. And I already apologized for that.
But pretending that talking about a theory makes me ‘throwing my lot in’ with that theory is pretty fucking irritating.
Furthermore, political violence comes from both the right and the left. I named a number of horrible political attacks on people on the left by people on the right and you breezed by them as if they were of no consequence. While I cried over the death of a young father even though I did not agree with him politically. I paid a reporter to cover that story about the vigil because even though there were only about 50 people there and it was short notice, it was the right thing to do–to acknowledge the horror of what happened. But you can’t even choke out a few cheap words of empathy online for 140 injured officers let alone murdered lawmakers. We are not the same—not our left and right politics but how we look at our responsibility as human beings to acknowledge the facts of a situation and the humanity on all sides.
Ignoring one side’s violence while harping on the others is one of the many things that keeps us from having a serious conversation. I’ll keep trying but I struggling to think it is worthwhile in this case.
Sorry Kym, you did more than point out that outlets were covering the theory. My reading comprehension is pretty decent. Read it again with a more critical eye.
Of course I feel empathy for the Hortmans and officers injured on Jan 6th. I did not ‘breeze by them.’ My posts are already too long and they were not my point of debate, which by the way you have once again ignored.
Why won’t you address my questions as to which side engages in day to day violence against those who express opposing views? You know it is the left and you don’t want to admit it.
Which side claims words are violence and that they are justified in responding with actual violence?
Oh, they also say ‘Silence is Violence’, so they pretty much have all their bases covered on why they are justified in punching you.
Kym, I am not suggesting you share those views, not everyone on the left does, but a pretty disturbing percentage of them do! As I pointed out in the YouGov poll, nearly three times as many liberals said violence was sometimes or always justified against their political opponents.
Again, I do not need a poll to tell me that. I live in the real world. I see it on a daily basis. I have many friends on both sides, and sadly I see this acceptance for violence even in my friends and family on the left.
Hugh, you keep insisting I did more than point out what outlets were reporting, but I’ve reread my own words. I know what I wrote, and I’ve already acknowledged I should have waited for facts before repeating what was circulating. That’s not “throwing my lot in,” it’s relaying early coverage — and I’ve owned the mistake of timing.
As for your challenge about “day-to-day violence”: political intimidation and harassment exist on both sides. You cite a poll about liberals’ attitudes toward violence. Fine — but polls reflect stated attitudes, not the whole of lived reality. On the right, we’ve seen police officers beaten on January 6, election workers threatened, and public officials harassed or worse. On the left, we’ve seen confrontations at campuses and protests turn ugly. Both are real.
The problem is not that only one side tolerates or excuses violence; the problem is that each side minimizes its own and maximizes the other’s. That selective vision makes your “day-to-day” argument ring hollow.
And I’m done for tonight. I’m running one of our community school’s biggest fundraisers tomorrow and I haven’t finished all the articles that need to be posted before I sleep.
I hope you got some good sleep Kym. I worry about your mental and physical well being due to how much time you spend on here. I often feel guilty for even responding to you, as I know it is likely you will take the time to make a counterpoint.
This is the last I will say regarding your post about Charlie’s killer possibly being a right wing Fuentes supporter…
If the main subject of your post was simply to point out some established media were now suggesting this, but you personally did not believe it (or desperately hope for it) then I would have expected something more like this…
-While quite unlikely on its face, some mainstream outlets are now reporting that the shooter may have been a right-wing Nick Fuentes follower.-
I don’t know Kym, I have never seen you post something from Fox News that you didn’t agree with simply because you thought it was newsworthy that mainstream news was reporting that way. Certainly not without saying why you disagreed with it.
Only you know why you posted that content. You say it wasn’t in any way endorsing that viewpoint as an actual possibility. I am skeptical, but I will take your word for it and attribute the lack of clarity in the post to overwork and sleep deprivation.
Good luck with your fundraiser!
Right…???,
And AS A MATTER OF FACT, the CDC is no longer recommending covid vaccinations FOR ANYONE AT ALL, and no reporting nor commenting on THAT, precisely because Kym Kemp…
…wait for it…
…DISAGREES…!!!…
ONLY THAT WHICH RHBB IS IN FAVOR OF, GETS MENTIONED, AT ALL, EVER…!!!
NOT NEUTRALLY, NOT IN FAVOR, NOT MENTIONED, WHATSOEVER…
RHBB IS CLEARLY IN FAVOR OF THE LIBERAL LEANING WEST COAST HEALTH ALLIANCE, SO OF COURSE NOT JUST TOP BILLING PRIORITY…
… EXCLUSIVE BILLING PRIORITY…!!!
UPDATED FDA AND CDC COVID PRESS RELEASE GUIDELINES AND/OR LIMITATIONS AND CDC ACIP’S COMPLETE LACK OF COVID VACCINE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANYONE AT ALL ARE NOW GLARINGLY COMPLETELY EXCLUDED FROM RHBB…!!!
WHY IS THE CDC, ACIP, AND FDA PRESS RELEASE UPDATES BEING ARBITRARILY, MANIPULATIVELY, AND POLITICALLY CONCEALED/CENSORED AND WITHHELD FROM RHBB READERS…???
THAT’S NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE, SO WHY IS IT HAPPENING NOW…???
WHY ARE WE SUDDENLY BEING DEPRIVED OF CDC, ACIP, AND FDA, UPDATED, CURRENT PRESS RELEASES THE LATEST OF WHICH, THE CDC ACIP NO LONGER RECOMMENDS THE COVID VACCINES FOR ANYONE AT ALL…
DOES RHBB NOT WANT US TO BE MADE AWARE OF/ KNOW THIS FOR SOME KIND OF PERSONAL REASONS…???
THE POLITICALLY OPPOSITIONAL WEST COAST HEALTH ALLIANCE PRESS RELEASE WAS INSTANTLY PUBLISHED BY RHBB, SO WHAT’S THE ISSUE WITH NOT ALSO PROMPTLY ISSUING/PUBLISHING CDC ACIP AND FDA PRESS RELEASES, AND/OR REFUSING TO PUBLISH THEM AT ALL…!!!???
THAT’S SOME TRUE BLUE CENSORSHIP…
” “You wrote: ‘you threw your lot in with the absurd notion that the shooter could have been MAGA…’”
“No, Hugh. What I did was point out what major outlets were reporting as a possibility in the immediate aftermath. That’s not the same as endorsing it, and I should have realized some of my readers are either unwilling or unable to make that distinction…”…
“But pretending that talking about a [Right Wing Conspiracy] theory makes me ‘throwing my lot in’ with that [Right Wing Conspiracy] theory is pretty fucking irritating.”
“…that’s on me for not realizing the limitations of intellectual discourse here with some of you…”
-Kym Kemp-
_________________________________________
(SATIRE FONT)
➡️➡️”CAVEAT:⬅️⬅️
➡️ ➡️ …I ALSO RESERVE THE RIGHT TO UNLIMITED “Take-Backies”… ⬅️ ⬅️
➡️I haven’t specifically stated that I endorse this theory, and even if I do, it’s gonna have to be properly notarized, by a legal Notary Republic, with a witness, signed and countersigned, with the officially embossed seal of approval and then duly published in two different legal publications in legally sufficient consecutive editions, before ANYONE can HOLD me to having actually said it…
GOT IT…??
GOOD…!!!
That being said…
(See what I did there…???)
LOL…!!!
PLUS…!!!
I USE A PSEUDONYM…!!!
I AM RESPONSIBLY IRRESPONSIBLE THAT WAY…!!!
I DON’T USE MY REAL NAME WHEN I COMMENT SO THAT NOBODY CAN PERSONALLY HOLD ME TO WHAT I SAY, NO MATTER WHAT…
AN EXTRA EXTRA DEGREE OF SEPARATION FROM RESPONSIBLE ACCOUNTABILITY…
I KNOW, RIGHT…!!!???
…MMMORE SMAAARTER…!!!
THOSE THAT SO PROUDLY PUT THEIR “JOHN HENRY” ON THEIR COMMENTS, DO SO AT THEIR OWN PERIL…!!!
THEY’VE ALREADY SIGNED ON TO OWNING IT, BEFORE THEY HAVE EVER EVEN SAID IT.!!!
(…OR HAVE THEY, ACTUALLY…???…)
➡️Because, “I’M”…, …”REALLY…!!!”, (…”PSYCH…!!!”), …”NOT REALLY”…, …”saying” this, BUT, this “theory “seems to be trending on social media, Mkay…??? https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/svg/2b05.svg
➡️(That should cover me if my prophetic superpowers, hyper-observance, AND/OR premonitional clairvoyance, fails me, and this doesn’t age well, right…???)⬅️
➡️END CAVEAT⬅️
Yes, Kym, Hugh Manatee is correct…
(Nobody is “pretending” what “IS”, any more than anyone else is “pretending” what “ISN’T”…)
You definitely went there…
Denying it changes nothing…
The caveats won’t change that fact…
Did the Right Wing Conspiracy Theory cleave to you, or did you cleave to it…???
Either way, the crux is, and “the sticking point”, IMO, is whether or not your’ Right Wing Conspiracy “theory” was carried further from the point of it’s initial connection/adhesion with/to you…
(I combed through your Newsweek link, and it didn’t originate there, as far as I saw…)
Even if you just dipped a toe in the Right Wing Conspiracy theory RHBB comment section “water”, ripples naturally formed, and the vicious right wing conspiracy theory rumor you posted/posited/postulated, proceeded, at that precise point, to spread outward from there..
Did you think it was an unmentionable, absurd notion…???
No, it seems, you did not, and neither did you not indicate that you thought it was an unmentionable ABSURD notion,
And IF your’ right wing conspiracy “theory” would have “panned out”, to have been true, I’m sure that you would have still continued to side with it, go with it, and cleave to it…
If it proved true, (which it didn’t), would your position have now/then become, “I told you so, I told you so…”, instead of, this, “I NEVER TOLD YOU SO”, “I NEVER TOLD YOU SO” position you have taken, JUST because it DIDN’T prove true…???
Did you deem it to be ACCURATE enough to REPEAT…???
IT, would seem so, SO, IT would seem…
Only because it FAILED to gain traction, and confirmation,DID YOU NOT continue to go, ‘RIGHT” along, with it…
Some of your readers recognize and realize the apparent unwillingness or inability to make ANY of THOSE connections…
I happen to be one of them…
Can your feet not be held to the fire in front of us even to the same degree that you wet them IN THE Right Wing Conspiracy theory, THEORETICAL POOL, “right” in front of us….???
Why it would be so excessively irritating to you is what is beyond “us”…
(Or, for the sake of consistency, maybe it isn’t…)
You put your chips in when you gambled on a proverbial weak hand, “an unsuited inside straight”, by even floating such a Right Wing Conspiracy Theory, regardless of how momentarily or how theoretically haphazardly, nonchalantly, and/or wholeheartedly you did it…
And the rest of your cards didn’t come…
And now you want your proverbial chips back…???
Even if it was just a “friendly bet”, that the
assassin was , you didn’t win, so you don’t get your wager back, even if it was just your proverbial “ante”…
Yes, your theory quickly ended up sinking right to the bottom of the “blue” whence out of the “blue” it came, by the time the weekend was over…
From the “weekend new lows”, of which, Jimmy Kimmel, on Monday, spoke…
Did you jump in with both feet…???
Maybe not…
Did you get in over your head, either way…
It would appear so…,
Appear so, it would…
Or, you wouldn’t be so energetically doing, “the backstroke”…
You definitely did point a toe into the water, with rippling far enough that it brought all of our attention to it, whom clearly saw, and were “moved” , enough to respond to the resulting ripples…
Yes, we then went there with you long enough to consider it, reject it completely, and then respond long enough to send you that rejection message…
Did you go too far…???
Did we follow you there…???
Did “we” then go there with you, or not…???
Can we return from having gone there with you…???
No, realistically we cannot, and so, realistically, neither can you…
We return together, or we remain together…
You don’t get to return, and leave us behind, holding your bag…
So, you may have thought that you reserved the right to take back what you were suggesting, but it doesn’t work that way in the real world…
Freedom of speech comes with great responsibility, and ideally, accountability…
You are now, not speaking to me, just over what “I” said…
But you want a pass…???
You, want everyone to magically allow you to go back in time, and unsay what you said…
How about you also grant that kind of magical priveledge to others…
Kind of a “Get out of moderation/ get unbanned free”, card
Once I say something, I can’t unsay it, so why how can you…???
Adolescent or childish, “Take Backies”, no longer work, once we grow up…
What has been said, has been said…
Water under the bridge…
There’s no going back…
There is no unsaying it…
You can deride us for recognizing it.
You can reprimand us for making the connection…
You can eliminate us from RHBB…
But you can’t change THE FACT that things said, CANNOT be unsaid…..
Period. Full stop.
Did you or did you not also call attention to Tyler Robinson’s Mormon, MAGA-Centric, Conservative, Republican, upbringing, in an additional attempt to paint the assassin “Red/Righty/ Republican, to defend the Blue/Lefty, Liberals…???
Because Im not sure one way or the other…
IF THAT, TO YOU, MEANS…
“We are not the same—”
Please tell us what exactly, what you think is the difference…
“how we look at our responsibility as human beings to acknowledge the facts of a situation and the humanity on all sides.”
‘We are not the same—”
Would that be, (ONLY theoretically of course), as in, “you” meaning…
” “I” get “Take-Backies”, but “I’m” the only one…”
And/or…
” “I” get to demonize “your” side, but “you” don’t get to demonize “my” side…”
And/or…
” “You” have to accept me demonizing your side, but I don’t have to accept you demonizing “my” side…”
And/or
“How “I” look at “my” responsibility as a human being to acknowledge the facts of a situation and the humanity on, (MY side,/ YOUR side…), is NOT THE SAME as “I” look at “you” looking at “your” responsibility as a human being to acknowledge the facts of a situation and the humanity on (YOUR side/MY side…”
“…YOUR SIDE/MY SIDE…, …FFS…!!!”
“…MY SIDE/YOUR SIDE…, …FFS…!!!”
“FFS…!!!”
“WTF…???”
“…that’s on me for not realizing the limitations of intellectual discourse here with some of you…”
If you find any of this objectionable, I’m going with, “I didn’t say that”, because I didn’t officially “endorse” it, whatever that means…
Just pretend I didn’t say it, like you are pretending you didn’t say what you said about “other people” spreading the vicious rumor about Tyler Robinson being an alleged follower of Far Right NICK FUENTES…
If you hadn’t actually brought that up, I would have never even heard of it…
So if you didn’t say anything about it, how did I hear about it…???
And how can you possibly even suggest that what YOU posted DIDN’T COME FROM/VIA YOUR “CAMP”…???
I may have been born in the night, but it damn sure wasn’t LAST night…
Here is where you , LAST SATURDAY, ALSO quoted the INDIA TIMES about Tyler Robinson’s alleged political leanings, quoting that “he comes from a family that is Republican and staunchly MAGA, according to his grandmother…
And…
“…even as unverified online reports have linked Robinson to the Groypers, a far-right, white nationalist movement.”
https://kymkemp.com/2025/09/12/humboldt-county-democrats-condemn-violence-call-for-reflection-following-utah-tragedy/#comment-1865950
Kym Kemp
7 days ago
Reply to Kabloona
“Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old Utah native arrested for the fatal shooting of Turning Point USA founder and Trump ally Charlie Kirk, comes from a family that is Republican and staunchly MAGA, according to his grandmother. Although MAGA supporters have pointed fingers at the Democrats for Kirk’s death, Tyler’s grandmother, Debbie Robinson’s comments about his family’s political leanings have only deepened the confusion.
The case is set to move forward, with Tyler Robinson expected to be formally charged in court on Tuesday, September 16. Authorities continue to investigate his motive, noting that bullet casings recovered at the scene contained anti-fascist messages, even as unverified online reports have linked Robinson to the Groypers, a far-right, white nationalist movement.”
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/were-republicans-for-trump-says-grandmother-of-charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-deepening-the-mystery-around-tyler-robinsons-motive-and-the-groypers-link/articleshow/123863158.cms#google_vignette
___________________________________
Is this just another Right Wing Conspiracy Theory that you were floating that didn’t pan out…???
It’s not like you just did it once…
Up till and including this point, I haven’t seen ANYWHERE where you are equally entertaining the idea that the assassin that murdered an outspoken high profile righty, could have even possibly be a lefty, even though Occam’s Razor would clearly indicate that would MOST LIKELY be the case…
And, this is a pretty extreme comment here, 146 comments BEFORE you posted the Tyler Robinson/MAGA family connection…!!!
Where you unjustly AND inappropriately DIRECTLY linked/associated/connected/ a list a mile long of Right wing extremism with Republicans, AS IF IT WAS THE SAME THING, even though Right Wing Extremism IS NOT LIMITED IN ANY SPECIFIC WAY TO REPUBLICANS…
WHAT EXACTLY WERE YOU TRYING TO PROVE…???
HAVE YOU CORRECTED THAT…???
IT REALLY SHOULD BE CORRECTED, IF IT HASN’T ALREADY BEEN…
https://kymkemp.com/2025/09/12/humboldt-county-democrats-condemn-violence-call-for-reflection-following-utah-tragedy/#comment-1865804
Continued…
Nope, it hasn’t been corrected yet, it’s still incorrectly directly connecting/tying…
“Conservatives”
…to a…
“List of Right-Wing Domestic Terror Incidents, 2017-2022”
➡️”I’ve listed a number of violent incidents tied to conservatives before but you just won’t give up this one side is the bad guy rhetoric so here:⬅️
How about this list:
➡️List of Right-Wing Domestic Terror Incidents, 2017-2022″⬅️
List that follows is a mile long, but it is absolutely not “tied to conservatives”…
It’s misleading misinformation, and UNTRUTHS, that should be promptly edited, retracted, corrected, and/or deleted, in the interest of truth…
Well I don’t know where YOUR head is at, but Israel is just ridding the Gaza strip and the West Bank of the 2 million sub adult, and really just subhuman child terrorists taking up space better used for glamorous Mediterranean resort development. Besides, a little exile to Egypt has long been recognized as a character builder.
“That’s why I find it alarming when the U.S. government itself weighed in on a non-violent statement by Kimmel on MONDAY—before the Justice Department released official information on TUESDAY showing Robinson appeared to be “leaning more to the left – becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.” In other words, like many others on both the right and the left, Kimmel spoke too soon. But only he was singled out by the FCC.”
-Kym Kemp-
______
SMDH…
Kimmel didn’t “speak too soon”, but you sure did…
The knowledge that Tyler Robinson was a lefty obviously emerged before Jimmy Kimmel’s facetious joke saying it was MAGA that was trying to distance itself from the shooter, which meant that it was actually the left that was desperately trying to distance ITSELF from the shooter, just like YOU did…
That was Jimmy Kimmel’s cryptic, comical message…
6 days ago, which would be BEFORE MONDAY…
https://kymkemp.com/2025/09/12/humboldt-county-republicans-reiterate-the-value-of-free-speech-following-tragic-shooting-of-charlie-kirk/#comment-1865990
Kym Kemp
6 days ago
Reply to Lee Schmortz
“I don’t want to speak too soon but you might want to check out Nick Fuentes, an even further right spokesperson, who thought Kirk wasn’t right enough. Some major news organizations are hinting that the evidence is leading to the shooter being his follower.”
https://kymkemp.com/2025/09/12/humboldt-county-republicans-reiterate-the-value-of-free-speech-following-tragic-shooting-of-charlie-kirk/#comment-1866361
AND I CORRECTED YOU 5 DAYS AGO, ON MONDAY, same day Kimmel called the left out, not the right, albeit facetiously, about the left trying to pin Charlie Kirk’s murder “on anyone but them”…
The Real Guest
5 days ago
Reply to Kym Kemp
” “I don’t want to speak too soon but you might want to check out…” “[Lance Twiggs, Tyler Robinson’s transgender partner..]”
“Some major news organizations are hinting that the evidence is leading to the shooter being his follower.”
-Kym Kemp-/-New York Post-
There, fixed it for you…”
________________________________________
You seem to have overlooked the fact that Jimmy Kimmel is a fucking comedian, and you actually took him literally, like he was “Dan Rather”, the fucking news anchor, breaking the fucking news, when Jimmy Kimmel was actually speaking facetiously, because he’s Jimmy Kimmel, the fucking comedian, cracking a fucking joke…!!!
He facetiously implicating MAGA, which means that the correct interpretation of that, would be that Jimmy Kimmel was implicating LIBERALS for accusing Tyler Robinson of being anyone but one of them, just like you did…
You, along with so many others just didn’t “get” Jimmy Kimmel’s humor…
(Maybe I am a humor connoisseur….???)
It’s late night fucking “stand up”, not 60 fucking Minutes, FFS…
Your perfectly content to mistakenly take him literally, because that exonerates you from being one of the ones that Jimmy Kimmy was actually implicating, albeit facetiously…
But what Jimmy Kimmel said, was a facetious joke, and you just keep going farther and farther down the rabbit hole of taking what Jimmy Kimmel said literally, as if he wasn’t facetiously fucking joking about it being MAGA THAT WAS DOING IT…!!!
But don’t feel bad, because apparently the Trump administration didn’t get the joke, either, and thought it was about them, too…
Because had the Trump administration got the joke, they would have understood that Jimmy Kimmel was actually INSULTING THE LIBERALS, on the comical pretext of insulting the MAGA crowd…
But even the pretext may have rightfully offended them…???
Trust me, when Jimmy Kimmel was talking about a group of people stooping to new lows, after the Charlie Kirk assassination, he damn sure wasn’t talking about the MAGA crowd…
Understand…???
That interpretation of Jimmy Kimmel’s joke doesn’t even make sense…
I watched it all unfold, even documenting it, and it was definitely the left, trying to associate Tyler Robinson with following Nick Fuentes, when the truth was already “coming out” that Tyler Robinson was actually “following” his transitioning roommate,Lance Twiggs…
That you are trying while failing to establish a timeline that attempts to suggest that Jimmy Kimmel was “speaking too soon”, in order to dilute the fact that you spoke too soon, is telling…
Jimmy Kimmel wasn’t speaking too soon, because the Tyler Robinson lefty information came out before Monday, not after Monday, like you suggest…
The Tyler Robinson lefty in came out just after you pulled your Tyler Robinson/Nick Fuentes association, desperately trying to implicate assassin Tyler Robinson a righty…
Monday morning or sooner…
India times..???
New York post…???
Jimmy Kimmel was not calling out Maga, he was facetiously calling out LIBERALS for unconscionably trying to portray the assassin as a righty…
He had plenty of time, after the Tyler Robinson lefty revelations to, along with his writers, develop his “act’s” “material”…
You act like his words were his, when he was just reading what his comedy writers wrote up for him…
You act like he was telling it like it was, when he was actually comically, telling it LIKE IT WASN’T…
IT’S CALLED FACETIOUSNESS…
ITS A LOT LIKE SARCASM, BUT IT’S A BIT MORE SUBTLE AND TOTALLY TWISTED…
AND sometimes, it can even be intentionally misleading…
A type of facetious double-entendre, you might say…
Facetious misdirection, ala
Jimmy Kimmel, with some figurative prestidigitation, and, voila, suddenly the right AND the left has egg on their face, courtesy of Jimmy Kimmel…
But, most hilariously, the Left doesn’t even realize it, and so really “goes to town” with Jimmy Kimmel droppings on their faces, as if it should be the Right that should be embarrassed by it, not the Left…
LOL…
Jimmy Kimmel’s joke is on you, and the rest of the liberals that tried to paint Tyler Robinson Red, or at least any color besides Blue, I’m afraid…
Read what Jimmy Kimmel said, like he was saying it facetiously, (because that’s how he was saying it, because he’s a fucking comedian, and he’s no amateur, that shit is deep), and then maybe, just maybe, you will understand…???
Maybe you still won’t, but I just hope you will consider it, and at least momentarily stop going down the rabbit hole your in, to reach even lower lows…
You keep speculating on why ABC fired Kimmel…
Let me try…
May Jimmy Kimmel writes his own material…???
ABC fired Jimmy Kimmel because he was really, really insulting the Liberals, while playing it off as really insulting the Right…
Get it…???
Therefore, not making any friends, at all…
Nothing but enemies…
“You’re fired Jimmy Kimmel, for telling it like it is, by telling it like it ISN’T, and totally pissing everyone off, including us, here at ABC…”….
He was totally telling the truth, but spinning it backwards…
That’s what made it a Jimmy Kimmel, late night joke…
Think of it as sarcasm, only deeper and more cerebral…
Interesting theory you have there TRG.
While it makes sense that his statement was actually a sarcastic slap at the left’s obvious attempt at portraying the shooter as anything but a fellow lefty, I don’t think Kimmel was being that clever. I think he meant exactly what he said and was trying to protect his lefty viewers from having to feel any guilt or remorse.
I hope I am wrong and you are right, but I don’t think that is the case.
I appreciate the consideration…
Comedy is tricky, and Jimmy Kimmel is no amateur comedian, however dry…
I think that he actually is that clever, but sometimes I think I am pretty clever too, so there is that …
In my attempts to research and decipher the true meaning of humor and comedy, I turned to the Master Cackler, Kamala Harris, for a thorough explanation…
She responded with this…
The India Times posted this on Sunday 9/14/25.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-tyler-robinson-not-cooperating-with-fbi-had-relationship-with-trans-roommate/amp_articleshow/123883995.cms
Governor Cox confirmed Tyler Robinson and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs were in a romantic relationship over the weekend. I believe it was the New York Post where I first read that the shooter was sleeping with another man in furry pajamas. Jimmy Kimmel’s writers must have known, too, because that hack couldn’t come up with his own material. He should use the fact that all he does is read a teleprompter when delivering his monologue in any lawsuit he decides to bring against people at ABC being mean to him, although it was probably advertisers pressuring ABC.
“Jimmy Kimmel, and now Steven Colbert, put forth the already proven false claim that the shooter was a MAGA man. A Trump supporter”
Neither one of them made any such statement.
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Kimmel said it, Colbert repeated it.
You want to explain to me how this statement doesn’t suggest the shooter was MAGA? If you had zero information about Kirk’s shooting other than this statement, what would you conclude about the shooter’s political beliefs?
That is your interpretation, what he actually was doing was pointing out MAGA hypocrisy.
Which is just your interpretation. Which is farther off base. Kimmel needed to lie in order to point out MAGA hypocrisy. If the murderer cited only liberal tropes, he was not MAGA therefore there was no hypocrisy.
Frankly this is a stupid argument for liberals, including Kimmel, to assert. What really happened was Kimmel was just following an biased assumption to its logical conclusion. Due to liberal fragility, liberals assume that it’s always the right wing that is violent. This murderer was violent therefore must be motivated by right wing ideas. This mistake in logical so common has a name- it’s an a priori fallacy. Kym used the same sort of logic when she announced the murderer came from a right wing state, had right wing parents therefore he was motivated by right wing ideas. There is, as in most things, an element of truth in this, but even so misses the crucial issue.
Now being angry of ABC canceling Kimmel, because his statements right or wrong, were political free speech and the government had no business being involved? That’s a seperate issue. And one that does not need Kimmel to be right or wrong.
That is your opinion.
Kimmel pointed out how fast MAGA went about trying to prove Tyler was not connected to them in order that they could use the shooting for political points. Hypocrisy.
That’s again your opinion. Does it ever cross your mind that opinions are not the same as facts? And that a statement can include both elements of truth and falsehood?
Face it- you select the part of Kimmel’s statements because you want to echo it while glossing over the words that are not true because you think it diminishes its validity. Seeing both is what would be clear sighted.
Not that others don’t do the same because they want to refute his allegations, but in this case, wanting to rebut accusations of the murderer was a MAGA believer is supported by facts and the attempt to double down on it like Kimmel did had no facts to support it.
Kimmel himself said his statements had been “grossly mis-characterized by a certain group of people.”
Yep, the left didn’t think is was actually an insult towards them…
“Kimmel said it, Colbert repeated it.
You want to explain to me how this statement doesn’t suggest the shooter was MAGA? If you had zero information about Kirk’s shooting other than this statement, what would you conclude about the shooter’s political beliefs?”
-Hugh Manatee-
_________________________________
Hugh Manatee,
I want to explain to you how this statement…
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
DOES AND DOESN’T actually suggest the shooter was MAGA…
Jimmy Kimmel is a late night comedian…
When he said that, he said it facetiously…
THAT is what made it a joke…
He was being “funny” by telling it like it was, by telling it like it WASN’T…
When he said that, it was AFTER the left had already ABSURDLY tried to PAINT the assassin as A RIGHTY, (“anything other than them”)…
However, the pretext suggests the shooter was MAGA…
But, offensive as that is, it was just part of the ruse, as he was actually insulting the left for their Liberal projection, denial, AND deflection…
Just replace “MAGA” with “LIBERAL” in Jimmy Kimmel’s facetious statement/joke, and you get…
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the [LIBERAL] gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
AND AS THE FACETIOUSNESS CEASES TO BECOME THE ACTUAL TRUTH, OF WHAT HAD JUST ABSURDLY HAPPENED OVER THE WEEKEND…
Suddenly Jimmy Kimmel’s message is not blaming MAGA, at all, which he never said…
And he is suddenly telling it like it is…
Actually bagging deservedly extra hard on the Liberals, who had it coming for absurdly and unconscionably trying to blame the right, for assassinating Charlie Kirk, while attempting simultaneously to exonorate their own liberal party, and/or leftist ideology…
It’s like sleight of hand, (prestidigitation), but sleight of speech, (facetiousness), instead…
Everyone got the overt pretext, but overlooked the fact that Jimmy Kimmel is an accomplished comedian, not a news reporter, so they missed the true covert Liberal bashing intended meaning…
Everyone will accuse me of being out to lunch, just because I’m the only on that got the joke, and properly understood the comedian…
But you see, it takes one to know one…
I fancy myself as an amateur comedian…
“And Kym Kemp is really, actually the ONLY one that REALLY, ACTUALLY, properly understood Jimmy Kimmel’s. true FACETIOUS meaning, because the COMEDIAN WASN’T JUST JOKING AROUND, HE WAS TOTALLY BEING SERIOUS…”
SEE what I did there…???
LOL…
(I just learned it from Jimmy Kimmel…)
It’s called, being facetious…
(Telling it like it IS, by telling it like it ISN’T…)
(UNO REVERSO)
Kym’s a liberal, and actually suggested, ON SUNDAY, however subtly, that Charlie Kirk’s assassin, Tyler Robinson, was actually a Mormon-ish, nick fuentes-ish, MAGA-ish tighty righty, instead of a Liberal LEFTY LUCY, BUT that aged very poorly very quickly…
SO OF COURSE, SHE FIGURES THAT JIMMY KIMMEL FIGURES JUST LIKE SHE DID, MINIMIZING AND DISMISSING HER “TYLER/RIGHTY” ERROR, AS IF IT NOW, SOMEHOW, MAGICALLY, WASN’T EVER ONE, AND, SOMEHOW, AT THE SAME TIME, SHE WASN’T THE ONLY ONE THAT MADE IT…
AND she didn’t get Jimmy Kimmel’s liberal bashing facetious ruse…
And now the denial, projection and deflection continues as she tries to implicate Jimmy Kimmel, as if he was speaking literally, not facetiously, for being the one that “spoke too soon”, when he’s the only one, that actually didn’t speak too soon…
What he was actually talking about that the liberals had done, they had already actually done…
That the difference…
“…and there was [NO] grief…”
(That’s what actually happened, too…)
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/it-was-one-of-us-utah-governor-spencer-cox-hoped-charlie-kirk-shooter-was-not-from-us-faces-backlash-online/ar-AA1MrxyG
Hello? What Cox said was he hoped that Robinson was from another state or another country because his actions was an assault on democracy and against American ideals. Not because he thought he and his fellow countrymen wanted to assault democracy too. But simply because he didn’t like the idea of having any point of commonality with such actions.
Of course the internet blow back that is like the crap on here misses the point that they too have the same commonality of being American. It is required that haters see themselves as different in order to hate without hating themselves. It doesn’t mean that their self identified differences are factual. It means they prefer self-soothing over self-examination.
Cox was hoping that the shooter didn’t look like them because it’s far easier to blame “others” than to acknowledge it was someone raised in your culture who could do such a horrific thing. I think that’s what Kimmel and the others were suggesting with their comments — that the shooter, regardless of his current ideology which we’re all still just guessing at based on what’s being released by folks with a distinct political interest in the story, was a white male raised as one of their own.
I’ve seen reports that the shooter’s gamer handle was “Donald Trump” but I’m not giving that any more credence than anything else that’s being said about him because there’s no way to know a) if it’s true, b) if it was meant as idolizing, or c) it was intended as irony.
Indeed. But then that’s equally true for liberals trying disavow a person acting on their own rhetoric. Throwing race into it make it even more disingenuous.
And no one tries to imply something is ironic by faking that something in the first place just so they can accuse others of hypocricy. And that’s what Kimmel did. Pretty hypocritical, huh? Just saying oops and moving on would be sensible. Heaven knows of course that nothing in this is sensible.
Have you seen Utah? When a governor says “Looks like us.”, it’s kind of implied.
Now that one should’ve had a link and I forgot.
https://usafacts.org/data/topics/people-society/population-and-demographics/our-changing-population/state/utah/
Oh sure, because Kimmel’s grand master plan was to “fake irony” just so he could accuse people of hypocrisy. That makes total sense — forget the fact that his whole point was about how fast folks trip over themselves to say, “Not one of us! Must be the other guys!” when the shooter looks uncomfortably close to home.
But hey, maybe you’re right — maybe the real lesson here is that if everyone just shrugs and says “oops,” the whole messy business of accountability magically goes away. Brilliant strategy.
Pay no attention to the Politically Motivated “DR” GAVIN NEWSOM Anti-Trump Fly By Night Hokie Ass West Coast Health Alliance
You’re better off paying attention to the CDC
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/19/health/cdc-acip-hepatitis-mmrv-covid-vaccine
CDC advisers vote that patients must consult a health care provider for Covid-19 vaccination, but no prescription required
“Vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention voted unanimously on Friday to shift away from a broad recommendation for Covid-19 vaccines to say that people who want one must consult with a health care provider, a process known as shared clinical decision-making.
The committee now says people 65 and older should make the decision about whether to get a Covid-19 vaccine with a doctor or another health care provider. It should be the same for people ages 6 months to 64 years, the vaccine advisers voted, but with “an emphasis that the risk-benefit of vaccination is most favorable for individuals who are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease and lowest for individuals who are not at an increased risk, according to the CDC list of COVID-19 risk factors.”
Enhancing informed consent
In a separate vote, the committee recommended that the CDC amend its the Covid-19 vaccine information statements, which spell out the risks and benefits of a vaccination.”
President Donald J Trump was mentioned 16 times in this edition of the Jail Report. The commenters “Tim” and “Mr. Clark” mentioned him 5 times apiece and “Tim” provided 3 links to real news articles about the President. “Allen” and “The Unreal Real” provided gifs that will help Donald J Trump obtain clicks to spread the MAGA message. Your President thanks you for your support and rest well knowing as you wake up this wonderful Monday morning that the Leader of The Free World is already awake and working to Make America Great Again!