Opinion: California’s Next Governor May Be All Business
If Xavier Becerra is California’s next governor, he’ll be a workhorse rather than a show horse
By Dan Walters, CalMatters
This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

In the eight decades since the end of World War II, 11 men have served as governor of California — counting Jerry Brown twice.
Six, beginning with Earl Warren, have been Republicans and the remaining five, including current Gov. Gavin Newsom, have been Democrats.
However, there’s another way of differentiating their governorships — whether they were content to govern or yearned for higher office. That’s also a 6-5 split, the majority having national ambitions and the minority focused on governing.
Newsom’s governorship has about six months remaining, after which he will almost certainly launch his campaign for president. He is in the same ambitious category as Warren, the 1948 GOP candidate for vice president who later became chief justice of the U.S Supreme Court.
Another Republican governor, Ronald Reagan, sought and won the presidency. The four others —Goodwin Knight, George Deukmejian, Pete Wilson and Arnold Schwarzenegger — pretty much stuck to governing.
The same could be said of Democrats Pat Brown and Gray Davis, while Pat Brown’s son Jerry had two very different stints as governor, running for president twice and the U.S. Senate once during his first eight years, but sticking to the job after returning to the governor’s office 28 years later.
This bit of gubernatorial history sets the stage for what is likely to be another governance-oriented regime by Democrat Xavier Becerra.
Becerra will face Republican Steve Hilton in the November general election and is the overwhelming favorite. It’s been two decades since any Republican won statewide office in California (Schwarzenegger’s re-election in 2006), and Democrats have a very wide advantage over the GOP in registered voters — 45% to 25%.
Given the odds in Becerra’s favor, some speculation about his forthcoming governorship is warranted.
Personally, Becerra is a 180-degree departure from the verbose, ever-bragging Newsom. He’s soft-spoken, obviously proud of his background as the son of working-class immigrants in Sacramento, and a dedicated ally of labor unions. Rather than climbing the political ladder one rung at a time, as Newsom has done, Becerra advanced largely through appointments.
After stints as an attorney in the state Department of Justice and a legislative aide, Becerra served one term in the state Assembly, put in 24 years as a Southern California congressman and was appointed attorney general in 2017 by Jerry Brown, filling the vacancy caused by Kamala Harris’s election to the Senate. Four years later, newly elected President Joe Biden named him health and welfare secretary. He left the post last year and launched his campaign for governor shortly thereafter.
Becerra was seemingly stuck in the lower tier of candidates and unlikely to make the primary election cut until fortune intervened.
In April, Rep. Eric Swalwell, who was leading in the polls, pulled out of the race and resigned from Congress amidst allegations of sexual harassment and abuse, leaving billionaire Tom Steyer as the leading candidate.
But overnight, or so it seemed, business interests, labor unions and other elements of the political establishment pumped money and other resources into Becerra’s campaign. That ultimately resulted in a top primary finish and a spot on the November ballot.
Given his background, it’s unlikely that as governor Becerra would try to make attention-getting splashes as Jerry Brown did in the 1970s and Newsom has done since 2019. He will have a very full plate of issues that remain unresolved, including crises in homelessness and housing, poverty and California’s loss of business and population to other states.
Becerra’s governorship will probably resemble that of Brown’s second stint, dealing with real issues rather than grandstanding. That would be a fine model to emulate.
This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
If someone can’t make rational decisions on gun control issues, why should we want them to run a state?
I’m not against certain gun control laws, but this man has pushed for more rediculouse, useless legislation than I can stomach.
His fervor for such idiocy tells me all I need to know about what kind of governor he would be.
NO ONE appears able to make rational decisions on gun control.
No one in the DEM controlled CA government that is?
Well, let’s try making some rational decisions concerning violent criminals then. Far less complex.
To which “rediculouse [sic], useless legislation” are you referring?
Pretty soon you won’t be able to own a toilet brush with a handle on it. The magazine rack next to your easy chair will be limited to ten, your beer cans will be microstamped, and your gas powered lawn mower will require registration, subject to confiscation.
Read up. Just don’t let loyalty replace reality.
You’re not really making your case.
In fact, if anything, you’re showing that your original claim is probably about as grounded in reality as these.
And here, for a moment, I thought you were being serious.
B.S.
Glad we agree ; Becerra Sucks!
Wait- so as a DEM Becerra can be like Pat Brown or Gray Davis?! Didn’t we all recall Gray Davis because he sucked so bad and sold us all off that we couldn’t stand it anymore? We are still paying for that energy ripoff bullshit- yes, it’s buried in our highest-in-the-nation PG&E bills. So he might be like Gray Davis- a DEM workhorse? I sure hope not!! But…I’m not sure he’s a Pat Brown either so…ummm…okay…. I’m still amazed how Newsom and the DEMs literally destroyed California and people still love them. Stockholm Syndrome?
I won’t vote for anymore califo4nia Democrat until they have a plan 5hat isn’t milk8ng us for fucking money.
“Given the odds in Becerra’s favor, some speculation about his forthcoming governorship is warranted.”
-Dan Walters-
Someone is counting their chickens before they’ve hatched…
And it’s pretty funny…
Not one mention of Chevron oil, who pumped $539,200 into Becerra’s election funding…
No mention of the statement he made about continuing healthcare for illegals paid for by taxpayers!
Yes! “Funny Business”!
I’m old enough to remember when Becarra was head of DHHS he “lost” 85,000 unaccompanied minors. He also has stated that Newsum did a good job on homeless issues, even though Newsum spent $24billion with no oversight and the issue has gotten worse.
Well…it’s the same party leadership that wanted to push that babbling Kamala Harris on us. Then when people voted in Trump instead they steered the country into massive political and social division saying “nazi”, “fascist” and “evil” because we wouldn’t elect a full-on moron. Can you imagine us having Kamala Harris dealing with hard-core Iranian leaders?! Yeah- Trump sucks but they made us have him!! The dissonance in that party’s message is palpable. Or maybe I remember too much? Anyways I believe CA needs a shake-up and not more of the same failure strategy…and no I don’t really like Hilton or REP party either but the DEMs have had a big chance and they showed us exactly how they are….and now all our money is gone!!!
“California’s Next Governor May Be All Business” says the headline. Emphasis on ‘BUSINESS’! He will be and has already proven as loyal to BIG business, in the form of his corporate campaign backers! Ugh!!