O, the Places You’ll Pave: Humboldt Approves Year One of Road Overhaul

Stock photo of Humboldt County Department of Public Works road crew conducting paving work on Mattole Road.
Humboldt County has approved a plan for the first year of Measure O road projects spending, which totals $24 million.
The specifics of Measure O spending were detailed by Public Works Director Tom Mattson during a June 9 Board of Supervisors hearing on the county budget.
The Measure O sales tax is expected to generate $27 million a year in revenue, with 85 percent of it to be used for upgrading county roads. The rest will be spent on public transit services.
Measure O’s first year of roads spending will include grant matches that will leverage outside funding for a variety of road improvement projects, including on Alderpoint, Mattole and Shively roads, and the Honeydew Bridge.
Road resurfacing projects in the first year plan include three segments of Alderpoint Road and, in the north county area, Jacoby Creek Road, Patricks Point Drive and Myrtle Avenue in the Indianola area.
Segments of Old Briceland and Mattole roads, and Redway Drive are included in a list of second tier projects that will be done if any of the priority projects face unexpected delays.
Board Chair Michelle Bushnell said she’s “gotten some calls already” from residents of areas like Shelter Cove who asked why roads in their areas aren’t on the projects lists.
She asked Mattson if “there’s a way so that we can answer questions of people if they have them – do you know what the second year looks like?”
Mattson described longer range forecasting as iffy.
“We can estimate the second year but based on any given winter, that could completely change,” he said, adding that software program analysis is “generally going to tell us what I’ve been telling you for years – we need to maintain our good roads in good shape and pick up the bad ones a little bit at a time.”
He added that road projects are chosen under a “scientific process” but it can’t account for curveballs.
“I can present a much longer plan but I can tell you that it will be very hazy after year one because so much changes every year. If it’s a perfect world, I could predict you a five year plan,” Mattson said. “But I don’t know – if I get a big equipment breakdown, I’m going to need to move money. If we have major storm damage, I’m going to need to move money.”
One thing Mattson can assure is that Measure O revenue will allow something the county’s been talking about for years – ongoing funding for a continuous road improvement program.
“This is not a magic solution to the entire road system but it is a huge shot in the arm which will finally give us a surfacing program every year instead of a throw of the dart,” he said. The $24 million of first year spending is divided into various pots of spending — $2.5 million will be for winter storm damage repairs, $4 million will pay for grant matches, $9 million for surfacing, $6 million for personnel, equipment maintenance and materials, and $1.6 million mostly for ADA-compliant curbsides and ramps.
Supervisor Mike Wilson vouched for spending on multi-modal Complete Streets projects but said he’s still “very impressed” by the plan.
So is Supervisor Steve Madrone, who described Measure O as a reliable source of ongoing funding.
“The good news that we’re going to just continuously tell people is ‘thank you’ — we now have funding to actually make progress on everything over time,” he said. “Give us 50 years and we’ll get to your road, give us 10 years, we’ll get to your road.”
Earlier in the hearing, supervisors heard a presentation from the county’s legislative lobbying consultants on upcoming state and federal budgets, including potential local funding impacts.
Madrone noted that Measure O is “our money, the state and the feds can’t touch it,” which he described as “an incredible aspect given all the news we heard from the feds and the state lobbyists about where things are at – well, this one we don’t have to worry about, one we can program, we can budget for.”
Along with the roads spending plan, supervisors approved using Measure O to cover costs of staffing to administrate the new source of funding and its projects.
Also during the day’s budget hearings, supervisors approved a $500,000 contribution from American Rescue Plan Act funding for potential creation of a child care facility for county employees.
The first step will be a feasibility study that will assess the costs and benefits of doing it.
County staff was also directed to return with a budget plan for county parks and trails, whose current funding was described as being too sparse to allow parks to remain open through this summer.
The county budget is set for approval on June 24.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
NO roads will be fixed. This measure O is a scam. YOU have been scammed. All the TAX money will go to staffing. You have three supervisors who ripped you off.
”Madrone noted that Measure O is “our money” Meaning the BOS. Not you or me. Other peoples money is how socialists operate.
Other peoples’ money is also how the fire department shows up when you need them, how you have water and sewage service, how you have roads to drive on, and other benefits of “socialism”.
They actually filled in a few craters on AP road between Bridgeville and Blocksburg. The fresh tar mix was a standout. Thanks for filling those It’s a start.
Hah! Just wait. They patched some areas along a road i frequently travel. Again and again and again. Year after year. Now it is a paved 90% washboard road meandering all over the place. It’s a PITA suspension breaker.
I have traveled the road between Bridgeville to close to Blocksburg for many years. The patch material does not hold up well at all. It is sometimes a little oily which ends up all over the sides of my truck. Big trucks and/or rainy weather just cause it to break to pieces and end up along the side of the road. I wish they would use paving equipment and put down a good asphalt road surface. Now it is a game of pothole checkers!
Yup, at least it doesn’t jar your teeth or flatten tires.
—
Cold patch maybe 6 months to 1 year. (If it makes it that far).
Hot patch might last two years. (Patching depends a lot on traffic/weather.)
Chip Seal road… 5-10 years. (Repair potholes, asphalt slurry, top rock, finish roller.)
Black Top road… 15-20 years. (ala… Paving Machine and cohorts.)
Meanwhile, the road from Redway to Ettersburg and beyond has been falling apart and sinking for decades. 🙄
Out of $24 million, $6 million going to “personnel” is a 25% chunk of total Measure O spending…
That’s not for Roads OR Public Transit…
That’s being used to pay County salaries…
We’ve been duped and fooled again…
And, lower down, “$500,00” must be a typographical error…
Is it supposed to read “$50,000.00″, $500,000.00”, or something else…???
$500,000.00 is an awful lot to piss away on a “feasibility study”…!!!
Even $50,000.00 is a ginormous waste of money on a “feasibility study”…!!!
“…for potential creation of a child care facility for county employees.”
WTAF…???
Let me get this straight, is the taxpayer now going to be newly officially tasked with providing “Child Care” for, “County Employees”…???…,
Or, will the taxpayers now be tasked with “Child Care” for “County Employees’ “, “Children”…???
The latter, would not be in any way the taxpayers responsibility, whatsoever, but the former, sounds about right, par for the course…
I guess, as it’s written, the “County
Employees” may soon have a publically funded, designated facility, where they can all be “BABYSAT”, on the taxpayers dime, as if we weren’t all paying for just exactly that, already…!!!
SMDH…
That is DEFINITELY NOT FEASIBLE…!!!
That being said, duly hand over the $50,000.00, $500,000.00, or “$500,00” feasibility study money, because I just earned it, just as much as anyone else ever will…
Unless you are expecting people to do this work for free, then personnel costs are a necessary and critical part of the work – and that money then circulates back through our local economy.
Then it needs to circulate through road work companies FIRST, not 3 years later via a sales tax paid elsewhere else.
https://kymkemp.com/2025/06/13/former-public-works-employee-criticizes-measure-o-spending-on-non-road-positions/
https://kymkemp.com/2025/06/12/o-the-places-youll-pave-humboldt-approves-year-one-of-road-overhaul/#comment-1841168
“On June 3, 2025, the Humboldt County Budget for FY 2025-26 was proposed. Included were four positions that should be paid for out of the General Fund, but if approved, will be paid out of Measure O funds. Here are the Departments and the positions:
Auditor Controller, 1.0 FTE, Senior Fiscal Assistant,
CAO Management & Budget Team, 1.0 FTE, Administrative Analyst I/II
Purchasing, 1.0 FTE, Buyer I/II
County Counsel, 1.0 FTE, Deputy County Counsel I-IV”
IMHO:
VOTERS === DUPED BY THE SUPES !
Apparently the, $500,00″, typographical error should read “$500,000″…
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/agendizer/humboldt-county-supes/637/
“The board will also consider a few spending options for the $500,000 remaining in the Childcare Stabilization Fund, overseen by North Edge Financing. Those funds could either go toward funding “professional development initiatives” for people working in early childhood development or a long-term investment in a childcare facility for county employees. Staff is recommending the second option.”
______________________________________
“Staff is recommending the second option.”
______________________________________
Well, I’ll be damned…!!!
You don’t say…!!!
WTAF…???
No conflict of interest there, is there…???
Now the Humboldt County employees want the taxpayers to butter their bread on both sides…???
Pay them, AND PAY FOR THEIR PERSONAL CHILD CARE FACILITY…
I’d say that they are crossing the line…
But wait a minute, the Honeydew bridge was already replaced, before this set of projects was approved. What’s up with that?
Yup. Funding for the project was approved before Measure O.
If you listen real hard, you will here the rusty squeak of the back door opening and money previously budgeted for roads going out to be spent on studies and other “supervisors discretions”.
I just hope that O money will be spent on roads and not green paint, bicycle lanes, intersection hemorrhoids, and other wastes of money.
Sadly, it will disappear…
Anyone know if Golf Course Rd. in Bayside was ever re-paved? The county had planned to for several years.