Eureka City Schools – Board of Trustees: Deal or No Deal (Grand Jury Report)

Press release from the Humboldt County Grand Jury:Grand jury icon

The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury has released the fourth report of their 2023-2024 term, entitled “Eureka City Schools – Board of Trustees: Deal or No Deal.”

On December 14, 2023, the five-member Eureka City Schools Board of Trustees approved a real estate transaction exchanging property at the site of the former George C. Jacobs Junior High School for a small residential property plus a multi-million-dollar financial consideration. This report does not address whether the transaction is a good or bad idea for the district. It is about the Eureka City Schools Trustees decision-making process in this matter.

After months of protracted negotiations, a deal between Eureka City Schools and the California Department of General Services, on behalf of the California Highway Patrol, seemed likely to conclude at a purchase price of $4 million.

On December 14, 2023, the Eureka City Schools Trustees were suddenly presented with a proposed Resolution and Agreement for a unique real-estate deal – exchanging the Jacobs property for a small residential property at 3553 I Street in Eureka plus a multi-million-dollar financial consideration – with an entity named AMG Communities-Jacobs, LLC. The proposed property exchange would bypass California Education Code requirements for the sale of exempt surplus property.

Within the span of three hours, the Trustees met in closed session to discuss the real estate deal, reportedly for the first time, and then voted in open session to approve that deal. The public only had access to the details for about an hour and a half before the vote.

The Brown Act was enacted in 1953 to provide for public participation in governmental decision-making. It applies to all legislative bodies, standing committees of local government agencies, and governing bodies of non-profit corporations formed by a public agency. In essence, with few exceptions, all governmental decisions must occur in open meetings that allow meaningful public participation in the decision-making process. California residents have a right to both observe and participate in official decisions before those decisions are made.

A secretive, last-minute, quick-judgment, behind closed doors decision, in an intentionally compressed time-period, and without public knowledge, is exactly the kind of decision-making the Brown Act intended to avoid. In selling the Jacobs property, there was no effective opportunity for the public to know about, consider, and participate in an important decision regarding selling a valuable public asset, even if the result of the decision is perceived to be in the near-term best interests of students.

The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury concludes that the Eureka City Schools Trustees acted hastily and without sufficient due diligence. While apparently literally complying with the technical requirements of the California Government Code (Brown Act) with respect to a real-estate transaction, the Trustees violated the law’s general intent for public participation and transparency in decision-making.

If you want to serve your community in a unique way that could improve local government, this is your opportunity. Applications to serve on the Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury can be found at https://humboldtgov.org/510/Civil-Grand-Jury. Additional information provided by the Civil Grand Jurors Association of California can be found at https://cgja.org/.

HCCGJ 23-24 REPORT - EUREKA CITY SCHOOLS Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Frog
Guest
Frog
1 year ago

The Eureka. City School Trustees…. Not very trustworthy. AMG… Hmmm which “local” bigwigs have last names starting with A and M that are anti downtown housing? One owns a grease trap bar and the other is a sub prime mortgage bundling lunatic that lives in baton rouge… A.M. Group AMG? Just speculation of course…

No Joke
Guest
No Joke
1 year ago
Reply to  Frog

Oooh, that’s a connection I hadn’t thought of.

Kathleen
Guest
Kathleen
1 year ago
Reply to  Frog

Won’t you be eating your words when you find out who the owner of AMG is!!! Why the dig on a person who owns a mortgage business who servicers sub prime loans? Do you think he made hundred of thousands of people miss their mortgage payments each month? I would guess they do that all on their own. Seems to hit a nerve with you…lol

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago

It’s typical Eureka government behavior. This was based on greed, likely from both the board and the bidder. Every board member needs at minimum to be reprimanded. I would suggest total replacement. This is a clear example of why I chose years ago to separate from serving as a teacher. If you can’t trust the school board, can’t trust school superintendents and other administration, you’re left with only one choice, to separate from the situation. Unfortunately this is extremely common in the state of California.

Boffin
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

Greed? The board members don’t get a commission on this. The only entity that gets the money is the school district.

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago
Reply to  Boffin

Eureka City Schools, if you haven’t followed it, is full of greed. The previous greedy BS move was trying to steal Academy of the Redwoods. Greed doesn’t have to be for personal gain at all. There’s not currently a shred of integrity in Eureka City Schools. I, fortunately don’t have school age children. However, if I did, Eureka City Schools is the last place I would consider enrollment. Corruption is the only thing Eureka City Schools has to offer.

Boffin
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

I don’t see any evidence of greed here. I think you chose the wrong word.
That being said, this process was a joke.

Alf
Guest
Alf
1 year ago
Reply to  Boffin

Please take a moment and actually Google the definition of greed, or if you prefer, use a paper dictionary. I did. There is no question I used the correct word.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  Alf

ECS was short on money to rebuild the ball fields. I wonder how money from this fits in being that reconstruction begins this year? As far as I am concerned, all of them on the trustees can go F themselves. This was some shady s–t, and exactly as pointed out, what the Brown Act was for. And they ignored it. It’s too bad, really. There’s a lot of folks in those neighborhoods that were welcoming of the CHP/DMV offices being located there. But nevermind ECS will do as they please.

Steve Koch
Guest
Steve Koch
1 year ago

The grand jury did an excellent job explaining what the problems were with this process and made good proposals for fixing the process.

It would be interesting to understand how and why this grand jury was so competent.

Peanut15
Member
Peanut15
1 year ago

All five should lose their positions effective immediately! It’s time to hold people accountable! Openings for the five new positions should be announced and perhaps a special election put in place.

Boffin
Member
1 year ago

I’m curious how people would feel if the CHP deal had gone through and it was later discovered someone else was willing to pay substantially more for the property? Isn’t the board supposed to do what’s best for the district? Losing out on millions for the district would seem like a bad move?

QuetzelBeacon
Guest
QuetzelBeacon
1 year ago
Reply to  Boffin

CHP might have matched the offer, given the opportunity?

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  QuetzelBeacon

Yup. Can’t do a lot on 3 hours notice. Time was on their side to run the deal in secret. Not to mention in the article it says that the deal circumvented education code requirements. BY the very education folks. They had this in mind already.

steve
Member
steve
1 year ago

This is a big deal in this community. Both parties should be more open and alleviate the worries and concerns.

Boffin
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  steve

I completely agree. But that’s not my point

Sandy Beaches
Guest
Sandy Beaches
1 year ago

Could be a movie plot here. The people walk out of a foggy forest, make some deals that some people can see and others can’t see. Then disappear back into the foggy forest. Call it the Field of Schemes.