Eureka City Schools – Board of Trustees: Deal or No Deal (Grand Jury Report)
Press release from the Humboldt County Grand Jury:
HCCGJ 23-24 REPORT - EUREKA CITY SCHOOLSThe Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury has released the fourth report of their 2023-2024 term, entitled “Eureka City Schools – Board of Trustees: Deal or No Deal.”
On December 14, 2023, the five-member Eureka City Schools Board of Trustees approved a real estate transaction exchanging property at the site of the former George C. Jacobs Junior High School for a small residential property plus a multi-million-dollar financial consideration. This report does not address whether the transaction is a good or bad idea for the district. It is about the Eureka City Schools Trustees decision-making process in this matter.
After months of protracted negotiations, a deal between Eureka City Schools and the California Department of General Services, on behalf of the California Highway Patrol, seemed likely to conclude at a purchase price of $4 million.
On December 14, 2023, the Eureka City Schools Trustees were suddenly presented with a proposed Resolution and Agreement for a unique real-estate deal – exchanging the Jacobs property for a small residential property at 3553 I Street in Eureka plus a multi-million-dollar financial consideration – with an entity named AMG Communities-Jacobs, LLC. The proposed property exchange would bypass California Education Code requirements for the sale of exempt surplus property.
Within the span of three hours, the Trustees met in closed session to discuss the real estate deal, reportedly for the first time, and then voted in open session to approve that deal. The public only had access to the details for about an hour and a half before the vote.
The Brown Act was enacted in 1953 to provide for public participation in governmental decision-making. It applies to all legislative bodies, standing committees of local government agencies, and governing bodies of non-profit corporations formed by a public agency. In essence, with few exceptions, all governmental decisions must occur in open meetings that allow meaningful public participation in the decision-making process. California residents have a right to both observe and participate in official decisions before those decisions are made.
A secretive, last-minute, quick-judgment, behind closed doors decision, in an intentionally compressed time-period, and without public knowledge, is exactly the kind of decision-making the Brown Act intended to avoid. In selling the Jacobs property, there was no effective opportunity for the public to know about, consider, and participate in an important decision regarding selling a valuable public asset, even if the result of the decision is perceived to be in the near-term best interests of students.
The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury concludes that the Eureka City Schools Trustees acted hastily and without sufficient due diligence. While apparently literally complying with the technical requirements of the California Government Code (Brown Act) with respect to a real-estate transaction, the Trustees violated the law’s general intent for public participation and transparency in decision-making.
If you want to serve your community in a unique way that could improve local government, this is your opportunity. Applications to serve on the Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury can be found at https://humboldtgov.org/510/Civil-Grand-Jury. Additional information provided by the Civil Grand Jurors Association of California can be found at https://cgja.org/.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
The Eureka. City School Trustees…. Not very trustworthy. AMG… Hmmm which “local” bigwigs have last names starting with A and M that are anti downtown housing? One owns a grease trap bar and the other is a sub prime mortgage bundling lunatic that lives in baton rouge… A.M. Group AMG? Just speculation of course…
Oooh, that’s a connection I hadn’t thought of.
Won’t you be eating your words when you find out who the owner of AMG is!!! Why the dig on a person who owns a mortgage business who servicers sub prime loans? Do you think he made hundred of thousands of people miss their mortgage payments each month? I would guess they do that all on their own. Seems to hit a nerve with you…lol
It’s typical Eureka government behavior. This was based on greed, likely from both the board and the bidder. Every board member needs at minimum to be reprimanded. I would suggest total replacement. This is a clear example of why I chose years ago to separate from serving as a teacher. If you can’t trust the school board, can’t trust school superintendents and other administration, you’re left with only one choice, to separate from the situation. Unfortunately this is extremely common in the state of California.
Greed? The board members don’t get a commission on this. The only entity that gets the money is the school district.
Eureka City Schools, if you haven’t followed it, is full of greed. The previous greedy BS move was trying to steal Academy of the Redwoods. Greed doesn’t have to be for personal gain at all. There’s not currently a shred of integrity in Eureka City Schools. I, fortunately don’t have school age children. However, if I did, Eureka City Schools is the last place I would consider enrollment. Corruption is the only thing Eureka City Schools has to offer.
I don’t see any evidence of greed here. I think you chose the wrong word.
That being said, this process was a joke.
Please take a moment and actually Google the definition of greed, or if you prefer, use a paper dictionary. I did. There is no question I used the correct word.
ECS was short on money to rebuild the ball fields. I wonder how money from this fits in being that reconstruction begins this year? As far as I am concerned, all of them on the trustees can go F themselves. This was some shady s–t, and exactly as pointed out, what the Brown Act was for. And they ignored it. It’s too bad, really. There’s a lot of folks in those neighborhoods that were welcoming of the CHP/DMV offices being located there. But nevermind ECS will do as they please.
The grand jury did an excellent job explaining what the problems were with this process and made good proposals for fixing the process.
It would be interesting to understand how and why this grand jury was so competent.
All five should lose their positions effective immediately! It’s time to hold people accountable! Openings for the five new positions should be announced and perhaps a special election put in place.
I’m curious how people would feel if the CHP deal had gone through and it was later discovered someone else was willing to pay substantially more for the property? Isn’t the board supposed to do what’s best for the district? Losing out on millions for the district would seem like a bad move?
CHP might have matched the offer, given the opportunity?
Yup. Can’t do a lot on 3 hours notice. Time was on their side to run the deal in secret. Not to mention in the article it says that the deal circumvented education code requirements. BY the very education folks. They had this in mind already.
This is a big deal in this community. Both parties should be more open and alleviate the worries and concerns.
I completely agree. But that’s not my point
Could be a movie plot here. The people walk out of a foggy forest, make some deals that some people can see and others can’t see. Then disappear back into the foggy forest. Call it the Field of Schemes.