California Resolution Calls for ‘Year of the California Grizzly Bear’
Press release from the Center for Biological Diversity:
State Sen. John Laird (D-Santa Cruz) has introduced a resolution in the California legislature to declare 2024 the “Year of the California Grizzly Bear” to mark the centennial of the extirpation of California’s official state animal. The last reliable sighting of a wild grizzly bear in California was in the spring of 1924 in Sequoia National Park.
“The extirpation of the grizzly bear from California a century ago is the most significant species loss in the state’s history,” said Laird. “The grizzly was ecologically and culturally significant to California, and today, 100 years since its disappearance, it remains an important icon for the state, evident by its place on our state flag and seal. This year more than ever, we should reflect upon its loss and do everything we can to ensure no other native species goes extinct under our watch.”
Senate Resolution 75 is focused on the historic and current importance of grizzly bears to the ecosystems and people of California. S.R. 75, introduced earlier this month, is sponsored by the California Grizzly Alliance, a coalition of researchers, tribal leaders, wildlife advocates, land managers and community members exploring the feasibility of restoring grizzly bears to the state. The resolution also has support from California Native American Tribes across the state, including the Yurok Tribe, Tule River Tribe, and Tejon Tribe.
While the resolution does not call for reintroduction of the bear to California, it raises public awareness of the cost of losing grizzly bears and other elements of California’s unique biodiversity. S.R. 75 encourages Californians to observe this year by promoting the conservation and restoration of California’s wildlife with activities, events and educational programs. The resolution declares that it is the state’s policy to continue supporting California’s efforts to protect and restore native species and habitats.
“The Yurok Tribe strongly supports Senator Laird’s resolution recognizing the California grizzly,” said Yurok Chairman Joseph L. James. “We hope the state’s landscape will one day recover enough to support this culturally and ecologically invaluable species. We know from our reintroduction of the California condor that it will take decades of hard work and collaboration.”
California grizzly bears coexisted with the ancestors of contemporary California Native American Tribes for thousands of years, and remain an honored, vital and revered relative for many Tribes and cultures.
“On this year’s 100th anniversary of the last credible sighting of a grizzly bear in California, I think it’s important for people to understand that it’s not just a picture on a flag, it’s not just an animal that was here,” said Tejon Tribe Chairman Octavio Escobedo. “It was something that was revered culturally by people up and down the state. It was an integral piece of the biodiversity of regions that they populated.”
Recent research into the genetics, diet and habitat use of California grizzlies has increased scientists’ understanding of the grizzly’s role in the state’s ecosystems.
“Over the past decade, our understanding of California grizzlies has completely changed,” said Peter Alagona, professor of environmental studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and author of several studies on the California grizzly. “The California grizzly was not the beast of legend. It was a typical brown bear: average size, mostly vegetarian and genetically indistinguishable from grizzlies living today in Montana and Wyoming. There is no biological reason why we couldn’t bring them back.”
An estimated 10,000 grizzly bears inhabited California at the time of European settlement, one-fifth of the total 50,000 grizzlies estimated in the lower 48 states. Following widespread persecution, there are only about 2,000 bears left in the lower 48 today, and none in California.
“In California, grizzlies are gone not because of habitat loss but because people simply killed them all,” said Brendan Cummings of the Center for Biological Diversity. “If grizzlies are to meaningfully recover in the lower 48 states, we need to seriously consider bringing them back to areas where good habitat still remains. I truly believe grizzly bears can and should have a future in California.”
A Senate vote on the resolution is expected in April.
Separately, the California Fish and Game Commission is expected to commemorate the grizzly centennial with presentations and discussions on the past and potential future of grizzly bears in California at its April 18 meeting.
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1.7 million members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
State Sen. John Laird (D-Santa Cruz) has introduced a
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
Just now getting around to this a hundred years late?
I say leave the remaining bears alone. California is to dangerous a place for them.
A mountain lion killed a 21-year-old man and mauled his 18-year-old brother in El Dorado County, east of Sacramento, California, in the first such fatal attack in the state since 2004.
Mountain lions typically avoid humans; one emerged outside the home of this writer in Los Angeles in October 2022 and retreated without incident.
And the wolves haven’t even gotten started yet…
*
The mountain lion that killed the 21 year old and wounded his brother has been euthanized…
Supposedly it’s the same one…
https://youtu.be/9ibYU9uUeFc?si=XMMJUBKa3pSZzkIY
The people who are advocating for “restoring grizzly bears to the state” are the type who would freak out when they see the garbage man show up on trash day with a riot shotgun slung over his shoulder – because that’s how they roll in Brown Bear country.
Peter Alagona and Brendan Cummings have no idea what they are talking about. We have an over population of bear now. And the grizzly is not the same at all. Grizzlys are bigger and much more aggressive to protect their territory. That is why they were killed off. And the Natives would have done it before the White man if they could.
Grizzly bears are the only animals that pray on Black bears.
Now the Black bears overpopulate without the Grizzlies.
Mother nature is all about checks and balances.
They were kept in check until they made dogs illegal for hunting in ca a few years ago
That is a myth. Grizzlies don’t say grace.
These bears come in a couple of flavors.
You have the fat, satiated fish eaters that hang in the estuaries and on the rivers. (Need lots of fish we don’t have to keep them happy).
Then you have the hill dwellers that must hunt and eat anything they come across to survive. They are a nightmare.
Humans look real good to them, compared to a ground squirrel.
I see a ban on hunting coming, with the excuse that we need to feed the bears and wolves, or to “keep things in balance”.
No need for guns if we can’t hunt. Right?
The ones on the mendocino coast hunted humans from what I’ve heard from both historical records and one Native friend originally from there.
Yup.. it was #1 predator of native americans !
—
>”… garbage man show up on trash day with a riot shotgun slung over his shoulder – because that’s how they roll in Brown Bear country”
Well… Bonta won’t allow that !
—
Go figure.
Center for Biological Diversity?
In other words please send us money.
This is how we make our living, by donations, and press releases are free publicity.
Go fly a kite!
Reintroduce them to Humboldt county, thousands of them. It’s only natural.
Canyon Creek in the Trinity Alps would be a good place to reintroduce. Would deal with overpopulation there.
Be careful what you wish for.
Bringing back the grizzly bear would certainly solve the homeless problem.
You are looking at this wrong , start in Marin County and several in San Francisco and Sacramento too , great start
Yes. Reintroduce the Grizzly. It will help the stem the migration of the SoCal locusts moving northward and infesting our northern counties. Better yet, put up a huge wall at the Humboldt County line which keeps the grizzlies in and the locusts out.
It would be wonderful if they could be reintroduced.
There is plenty of room.
The ranchers may have to control their herds better, though.
Or better yet- remove cattle from the outermost reaches and restore more land to wilderness status.
Just wanted to let you know I appreciate your sense of humor. Every comment you make I can see you sitting there going “I wonder what I can say that is so out of touch it fires everybody up?” It’s a hoot! Keep it up!
There’s always the hope it might cause some people to think.
It rarely does.
You first…
OK
Thinking critically, as opposed to merely letting one’s imagination run wild:
there are around 25,000 Grizzly bears in the United States,
and they kill an average of less than one person per year.
That’s fewer than the number of people killed by either horses or cows,
and roughly comparable to the number of people killed by vending machines.
This causes me to wonder why some people seem so afraid of something that just doesn’t pose that much of a risk to humans.
It’s almost as if people fear that which they do not understand.
“critical-thinking” (which usually means that you research everything that you believe in and discount completely every thought that you don’t like.)
The reason that vending machines are most likely to kill someone is because people are more likely to be around vending machines than bears. I just assumed that without even critically thinking about it. Conversely, you implied that vending machines are more dangerous.
True critical-thinking would be to consider the knowledge of those around you and not assume that you are right.
I agree with the guy that said we should release the grizzlies where the people that want them are…. L.A. San Francisco, Sacramento.
That would be excessively cruel to bears.
They’d kick the bears out like they did the illegals. They really don’t want either of them just makes em feel fuzzy to say so.
Frankly anyone who doesn’t fear a grizzly bear has already exposed their lack of understanding.
Critical thinking asks how many of the 25,000 grizzlies live in Alaska – in areas where there are very few people?
Here I must admit that I just assumed that grizzlies would be released in sparsely populated areas of California as well.
I’m not sure why some commenters here jumped to the conclusion that they would be wandering through populated areas.
I get that the government has been known to bungle some pretty good ideas, but I’m still going to give them the benefit of the doubt here.
What is hilarious is your hypothesis??? about cows and horses! By the way… estimates are for 55,000 grizzlies in the US. So… 25,000 (gasp – misinformation!). Anyway estimates are about 2000 in lower US. Those are in remote areas in lower population States (the article even sez that). Critical Thinking wanted you to know that simple math estimates are for 53,000 in Alaska (Hawaii don’t have any and Guam isn’t a State – lol). Odds are quite a few in Alaska have never even seen a human to attack.
The number I saw said that there were 55,000 in North America which, fun fact, includes Canada.
None of what you said- or attempted to say, refutes the fact that encounters involving human fatalities are exceedingly rare.
California will likely never see more than a few hundred bears roaming only the most remote portions of our State.
It’s interesting to watch so many people get their panties in a bunch over this.
It’s finding any evidence left of a human, at all, that was attacked by a Grizzly bear that is so exceedingly rare…
You are always the guy with statistics but no practical real-life experience. And that’s the problem with city people making the rules…
You think a bear is going to care about where you think they should stay? They go where food is. Certainly human inhabitations but the salmon runs will attract them too. What do you think will happen to these wandering bears?
There are 30 million cattle and 7 million horses in the US. There are less than 50,000 grizzlies. Your “critical thinking” has some giant holes in it.
Bear Joke: A man asks a gunsmith to best modify his .44 mag to handle grizzlies. Upon picking it up, he finds the front sight filed off. When pressed, the gunsmith explained that it would hurt less when the bear shoved it up his a_ _.
They tell me that Grizzly crap smells like bear spray.
… and contains little bells (the bells help the bears find the hikers – quickly).
Ha Ha! Two guys sleeping in a tent when a grizzly starts huffing and pushing on the tent. Bear’s gonna come in. They wake up and one guy starts quickly putting on his shoes. The other guy says “Why? You can’t outrun this bear”. The first guy says “True. But I can outrun you!”
I choose to be here in bear country – and want no harm for them, its their home too. Still, there is a giant difference between a black bear and a brown bear. Well meaning as they might be, it would be helpful if people who grew up and remain in the city where there have never been bears, should come live with them, and understand what it means to live with bears. Just one example: regulating firearms like we live in the urban jungle…
I can want brown bears to inhabit their old habitat. The reality is, vastly more people occupy that habitat, and I cannot think that another 1000 bears in SoHum will be good for people or bears. I can honor brown bears with proclamations, but it doesn’t mean I want to co-exist.
Maybe the well meaning should understand these gross over simplifications:
A 200lb black bear is only coming for you – if you continue to stand between it and the food source you stupidly left out, otherwise it will amble right on by you.
A 500lb grizzly is going to tear you into pieces just for standing there in its territory, it may never even notice there is a food source beyond you.
If you’re going to live with grizzlys, you’d better know how to recognize those narrow set grizzly eyes. And to carry a guide gun everywhere you go.
*
And what makes people think that they haven’t already kicked some loose in the Sierra’s ? The kid next door had a game cam picture of a bear on property that backs to Humboldt Redwoods property, I’ve seen hundreds of black bear around here and it looked like none that I’ve every seen. Easily double the size of normal bear and had a big hump, night photo so couldn’t get the color.
Most people don’t believe me or discount it but I think there is at least one hybrid population up near mt shasta. I saw a brown colored black bear up there that had a dish shaped face and a sort of halfway back hump. And yes, it being brown doesn’t mean anything.. But the face and hump were unusual.
There are several black bear, what they call color phases. Can be black, brown, red, buckskin even.
The largest black I ever saw was a red phase male, with enough hump to make you glitch. It’s not uncommon. The head is the quick tell.
There’s published science out there that claims browns and blacks cross.
Arm yourself with somma that and hash it out with the nay sayers over a few beers.
Imagine when the good people of California will celebrate 100 years of the disappearance of Sacramento lawmakers.
No way we’d wait 100 years to do that. More like every year for 100 years.
And no way anyone would ever even consider a parasitic Sacramento lawmaker being reintroduced.
We reintroduce them every 4 to 6 years.
Worried about grizzly bears being gone from California, not me. Black bears do most of the damage in around homes, garbage dumps, fruit orchards, etc. If you want to see a real grizzly bear, may I suggest you take a trip to Kodiak, Alaska. Don’t go alone and carry some strong firepower in the shape of a big caliber rifle and/or handgun. Your life will likely depend on it. A seasoned and very knowledgeable guide is also a must.
Been there, done that…
You have been there, that is great. Did you get a grizzly on your trip?
Nope.
Went fishing there…
More like a Kodiak bear was eyeing me up for dessert…
Too close for comfort…
Did you fish in and around Homer Alaska? Halibut capital of the world, and other great rock fish. When you see a Kodiak giving you the eye, that is my time to slowly walk away and keep looking behind myself. They make you feel like a poacher in their fishing spot.
Someone else has apparently been to Kodiak and got a grizzly. How can I tell, by the bloody thumbs down.
Bear blood on your hands. That is when it is good to have a couple of friends with you. One to help skin and cut up the meat and the other fella to watch for bears that can smell a dead animal from a long distance away.
Or, you could go to the Larsen Bay dump. Larsen Bay is a small village on the west side of the island and the dump is quite a bit away. Something to do I guess, been there myself. Funny story…friends drove there to watch the bears in a small beater car. One of the passengers made the joke that the bears would see the little car with four people in it and think to themselves “Crunchy on the outside, but soft in the middle”.
Even the Kodiak city dump has the big bears. Though the town has tried to discourage bear-watching there, people still do it.
Do not shoot them there though. That just cheating.
Maybe they can reintroduce the grizzlies in Santa Barbara near the Professor’s house?
Yup.
>”21-year-old killed by mountain lion in El Dorado County, 18-year-old brother severely injured.”
Has been several decades since the last lion attach on a person.
Was in the news this morning. https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/mountain-lion-kills-man-northern-california-19365657.php
I know about the new attack. I was replying to Bozo.