California Legislators Urge EPA to Tighten Air Quality Standards While Preserving the Use of Prescribed Burns

Press release from the Office of Congressman Huffman:

Black smoke Point Fire 6:15. A comparison with the screenshot at the top of the article shows what looks like substantial growth.

[Stock photo of wildfire from AlertWildfire screenshot]

As millions of Americans confront heavy wildfire smoke, Representative Jared Huffman (D-Calif.-02) and U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)—as well as Representative Scott Peters (D-Calif.-50) and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—led 21 of their colleagues in sending a letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urging them to allow the deployment of prescribed fires as EPA tightens federal health-based air quality standards.

The members are urging EPA to work closely with California’s air districts, land managers, and fire practitioners on developing a solution that both safeguards clean air and prevents the consistent cycle of devastating wildfires that undermines our efforts to make progress on clean air.

In January, EPA proposed to strengthen a key national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for fine particle pollution, also known as PM 2.5, to better protect communities. In the letter, the Members of the California delegation outline their strong support for EPA’s efforts to strengthen the NAAQS for PM 2.5 to ensure stronger public health protections, particularly for communities who are disproportionately affected by air pollution stemming from goods movement and catastrophic wildfires.

However, the Members outline their concern that implementation of the rule could inadvertently limit land managers from deploying prescribed fires, which help California communities avoid the larger catastrophic wildfires that more significantly pollute the air and threaten public safety. Prescribed burns have proven to be an effective and necessary tool to combat wildfires in the West and reduce emissions in the long-term. Numerous studies have shown that despite California’s and EPA’s collaborative efforts to reduce air pollution, wildfire smoke has unfortunately eliminated much of California’s clean air progress. This outcome would only exacerbate the risk of catastrophic wildfires that decimate communities and fundamentally undermine the air quality gains that California and EPA are both aiming to achieve.    

“California and the EPA have long worked hand-in-hand to achieve clean air gains, and no one supports the protection of clean air more than we do because we have seen how polluted air so negatively impacts public health and the quality of life for Californians. That’s why we support the EPA’s efforts to strengthen the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for fine particle pollution,” wrote the lawmakers. “However, we are concerned that the proposed rule could inadvertently hinder the ability of land managers to deploy prescribed fires that help California avoid the larger catastrophic wildfires that more significantly pollute the air and threaten public safety.

“Scientific and public health experts agree that a significant increase in the use of these beneficial fire practices is essential to reducing overall PM. 2.5 exposure and addressing the long-term impacts of rampant wildfire on our communities,” continued the lawmakers.

In the last five years, California has experienced some of the largest fires in state history and the negative health impacts of lingering wildfire smoke. Collectively, these devastating fires have burned over 2.5 million acres of land, damaged 30,000 structures, and have been responsible for the destruction of entire communities.

The letter, led by Senator Padilla and Representative Huffman, is also signed by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Representatives Scott Peters (D-Calif.-50), Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.-33), Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.-24), Lou Correa (D-Calif.-46), Jim Costa (D-Calif.-21), Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.-10), John Garamendi (D-Calif.-8), Josh Harder (D-Calif.-9), Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.-51), Mike Levin (D-Calif.-49), Ted Lieu (D-Calif.-36), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.-18), Doris Matsui (D-Calif.-7), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.-15), Grace Napolitano (D-Calif.-31), Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.-19), Katie Porter (D-Calif.-47), Adam Schiff (D-Calif..-30), Mike Thompson (D-Calif-4), Juan Vargas (D-Calif-52), Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.-14), and Brad Sherman (D-Calif.-32).

Full text of the letter is available here.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Bozo
Guest
Bozo
3 years ago

Yeah… those forest fires are a big nuisance for the lawmakers.

Big Rick
Guest
Big Rick
3 years ago

The EPA is not a governing entity that they do not create laws that we have to follow. They make up their own arbitrary rules as they go along and we are forced to follow them because they will force a financial loss for you if we don’t.

Sounds like a form of embezzlement to me.

Why anybody follows what any of these entities, who are not elected governing officials, say is beyond me

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
3 years ago

“Scientific and public health experts agree that a significant increase in the use of these beneficial fire practices, [Resulting in a significant increase in 2.5PM Exposure], is essential to reducing overall PM. 2.5 exposure and addressing the long-term impacts of rampant wildfire on our communities,” continued the lawmakers.
_________________________________________

Spoken like true lawmakers and politicians…

In other words, it’s like corruption, according to the lawmakers and politicians:

” In order to combat corruption, we must allow it to significantly increase”…

“That way, in the long run, we will all be way better off…”

_________________________________________

A perfect example of “smoke and mirrors”.

“The use of these beneficial fire practices…”, must be very lucrative…

Are you breathing any easier yet?

Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
3 years ago

I knew this was going to be the rub with the new movement towards ‘fire as management’ on public land, and even private land.
There’s gonna be smoke and yellow shirts for the next couple decades, and the laws meant for maintaining air quality and sedimentation of waterways with silt and ash will have to be relaxed if we want to let tribes, contractors and agencies deploy their new burn regimes.
There’s gonna be smoke one way or another, mine as well try to choreograph the burns when it’s safest

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago

Get the industrial generators and air scrubbers , crack me up. Maybe they can also pipe the exhaust from the generator through the air scrubber also. What would we do without Politicians?

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
3 years ago

These Red Queens should simply mandate smokeless fires.

brodie
Guest
brodie
3 years ago

Most people are either sucking smoke thru a Cigerette, Bong, Vape pen, Joint etc, so they are not to worried about their lungs.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
3 years ago

I thought the point of the Jail Reports was to give the pitchfork-wielding mob a place to go and spew their weird, angry diatribes. So far, with one exception, every comment on this article sounds like a bunch of discombobulated bitter rankle. People are trying to come up with a resonable compromise in the search for a solution to an existential problem and all some people seem to be able to do is bitch. Y’all have actually succeeded in making me feel sorry for politicians. Go take a walk or something.

Trashman
Guest
Trashman
3 years ago

Smog nazis again act now and beg forgiveness later.