Local Planned Parenthood Announces Protest at the Humboldt County Courthouse Today After Supreme Court Strikes Down Roe V. Wade
[Photo from Planned Parenthood]
Community Protest today, Friday, June 24 at 5 pm in front of the Humboldt County Courthouse!
In a majority decision today, the U.S. Supreme Court has overturned Roe v Wade, threatening the right to safe and accessible abortion for millions of people nationwide.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision will result in over half our country’s states moving to wipe out abortion access. This would disproportionately harm people who already face systemic discrimination and have limited health care access. With Roe v. Wade overturned, 26 states have promised to quickly move to ban abortion. Some of these states will move to restrict, ban and/or criminalize abortion immediately.
The U. S Supreme Court may have failed to protect our rights, but we are not without power to fight back. We hope to see you tonight!
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
All levels of government view our protests the same way that a hawk views the squeaks of the mouse it is about to consume.
Protest isn’t going to sway the judicial branch (nor should it). Some of the legislature might pay attention as they need votes to stay in power. They’re the ones who could make abortion a constitutional right anyway.
I’m all for civil protest. Have at it!
There is Jane’s Revenge , out there bombing anti choice establishments, time to get creative
Big step backwards for America privacy today. Waaay out of step with public opinion.
By kicking it back to the states, it will actually reflect public opinion more accurately
Yeah, but the right to privacy and pursuit of happiness is a constitutional right. It’s not up to the states to uphold constitutional rights.
There is no right to abortion specified in constitution and activist courts should not be permitted to modify the constitution cuz there is already an explicit process defined to modify the constitution.
Abortion has not been made illegal, the supreme court has simply left the issue up to the individual states. I am a strong believer in letting voters decide contentious issues, not courts.
The point of the constitution is to restrict the power of the federal govt, to preserve individual liberty and the powers of the states.
I see both sides of the abortion issue and am ok with the voters of my state defining abortion laws.
The prevailing opinion in USA (and world wide, too, IIRC) is to make abortion legal in 1st trimester, illegal in last trimester (I’m not sure what the consensus on middle trimester abortion legality is).
For your reading pleasure:
The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
In other words, it doesn’t have to be specified to still exist.
Madison was referring to the FEDERAL government in 9th amendment, which is made clear in the federalist paper discussing the matter with Hamilton.
All this decision did was remove a poorly founded legal decision. Now it is up to the states to decide, or congress to pass a federal law upholding abortion.
SCOTUS is not supposed to make up law, which is what the did in Roe v. Wade.
The amendment seems pretty straightforward in that it says other, unlisted rights are not denied or disparaged.
Hence the right to an abortion should not be denied or disparaged by the federal government and yet they did just that today by denying one existed and allowing the states to individually disparage that right.
Thanks for your dispassionate, intelligent argument.
So any, anything can be deemed a constitutional right at the whim of a court? Doesn’t sound legit
Incorrect. There’s no right to an abortion in our Constitution.
That means the bill of rights and the Constitution was not necessarily exclusive of other rights.. The others are retained by the states to decide upon. That’s what the decision says. It’s a state issue.
Then that means the rights of the individual, endowed by the creator, to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, shall not be infringed.
(Nor aborted!)
More accurately, and I quote, from our very, Declaration of Independence…
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”…
Endowed with these rights, when they are created, and these rights are not to be delayed until their birth.
Nowhere does Our Declaration of Independence mention any delay, after creation, “until birth”.
According to your own reasoning…
Hence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, should not be denied or disparaged by the federal government, by denying one existed, before birth.
As far as I am concerned, the individual states should not be allowed to disparage that right to life, etc.
It is the very foundation upon which our Nation was built.
It must not be infringed.
Off-topic, but It actually reads ‘purfuit of happineff’, (but that was because making S’s look like F’s was all the style, at the time).
But its ok to enslave half the population with backwards Sharia Law? it means men can pursue happiness but women cant because are forced into bearing kids they dont want. Women have induced abortions since the beginning of time, its not going to stop, women will continue to abort foetuses, just more women will die from the process
The right to abortion already exists but is not a constitutionally specified right.
Nobody is claiming the constitution forbids abortion, it simply does not address abortion.
Each state has the right to pass their own laws limiting abortion.
The question about how to limit abortion (from no limits to some limits) is up to the voters, as it should be.
You should take a look at the state laws that either went into effect immediately or will soon go into effect limiting abortion.
And read Justice Thomas’ opinion that the right to contraception should also be overturned, as well as the right to marry whoever you want to.
Funny thing, is Thomas also going to go after Loving as well? Funny that he wouldn’t go that far.
And some states that will allow abortion right at birth
That misrepresents what the laws in those states says on abortion and ignores the medical ethics guidelines.
Exactly
That would be California. You excited ☠️☠️☠️
Thomas didnt say that, he said they may be susceptible to future challenge because of the broadness of the majority opinion.
That’s not what he wrote, he said they should be overturned:
“For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence [v. Texas]” — a landmark case invalidating anti-sodomy laws — “and Obergefell,” Thomas writes. “Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’ we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.”
“After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated,”.
By that logic, segregation, gay rights, senior rights and many other inalienable rights should be left up to the states.
Spot on. Nothing will change in California.
That’s like leaving the issue of slavery up to individual states, because that’s exactly what being forced to bear children is, slavery.
Which amendment says privacy and happiness?
If the government is supposed to protect our happiness they are really screwing it up.
Wouldn’t a constitutional right to privacy open the door for all kinds of things? I’d probably be in favor of most, but that could really backfire too.
Look, I don’t like this decision, but it is the duty of the legislature to codify constitutional rights. SCOTUS can only interpret them.
The legislature has had a lot of time to codify abortion as a constitutional right. Have they even tried?
I understand the outrage and frustration. It should be pointed at elected officials in the legislature.
I am for limited abortions being available, but I agree with the SCOTUS decision.
As you say, The legislative branch is supposed to make law, not the courts.
Oh, and Congress can’t pass a law making something a ‘constitutional’ right, it would simply be federal law.
I really hate to nitpick. Especially when we’re in agreement for the most part.
“The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.”
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution
Amendments codify and protect rights, right?
Oh gotcha, I didn’t realize you were speaking of amending the constitution.
I thought you were just talking about Congress passing a federal law allowing abortions, which they could do.
But even if they pass a Federal law, it could be overturned for being unconstitutional. The amendment process is THE WAY.
Does it make one happy to have an abortion, and hide the fact you had one? Not saying it isn’t ok to have one as long as you dont wait too long, but your rationale makes no sense. It’s not about those constitutional rights, rather its about when the rights of the fetus mature, and whether the constitution provides that’s a federal rather than a state question.
“Does it make one happy to have an abortion, and hide the fact you had one?”
Good question. I wonder how a whole lotta “pro life” Christian politicians of the last century would answer, y’know — the one’s who cheated on their wives, whisking their mistress or favorite prostitute off to the clinic.
if you define the pursuit of happiness as killing your progeny, you have far greater issues to overcome than a mere pregnancy
I define the pursuit of happiness as procreative sex without a condom. Followed by a menthol cigarette. Woo hoo!
Yep
You are quoting the preamble, not the articles of the Constitution. And the preamble affirms that “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” are inalienable God-given rights, not legislative rights conferred by a government (as you suggest).
But even this can be interpreted differently by both sides –
As the SCOTUS majority ruling clarifies, the Constitution does not mention abortion, and—if it is the People’s will—then congress should do things the right way and pass a Constitutional amendment in order to properly resolve this dispute and codify the right to abort a pregnancy.
Aside, what was up with the SCOTUS of 50 years ago that this wasn’t obvious then. It’s like they knew they were merely kicking the can (so to speak) down the road a piece.
don’t confuse the founder’s idea of ‘natural laws’, and ‘laws of man’. if you don’t believe in the creator then…….
I do and hold this truth to be self-evident!
You misquote and misstate the preamble, twisting reason and fact.
Fine, let’s make it a national referendum..
85 percent of American voters think abortion should be legal in some or all circumstances
“85% of American voters think abortion should be legal in some or all circumstances”
– grey fox-
Really? Are you sure?
(Could be…)
Link please…
Evidence please…
Source please…
This source claims 61% of “US adults.”
Does that equate to 85% of the “American voters”?
(It might)
https://thehill.com/changing-america/3479851-majority-of-americans-believe-abortion-should-be-legal-in-some-cases-poll-says/
“Though the final opinion will be issued in June, nearly one in five U.S. adults say that abortion should be legal in all cases, with no exceptions. Fewer than 8 percent say abortion should be illegal in every case, without exception.”
That means that less than 20% of US adults say that abortion should be legal in “all cases”, with no exceptions.
What they don’t ask, or answer, is… How many US adults say that that abortion should NOT be legal in “all cases”, without exception”.
But the answer to that unasked question can be easily extrapolated from the above statement, and the answer would be that over 80% of US adults disagree with abortion being legal in all circumstances, without exception.
Over 80% disagree with abortion being legal in all circumstances, without exception!
What would the American voters say about that?
Would the ones that disagree with “abortion being legal in all circumstances, with no exception”, also go up 14%?
If so, that would make it over 94% of “American voters”, that would disagree with abortion being legal in all circumstances, with no exceptions.
You realize this whole issue came down because Jackson’s Woman Health refused to abide by the law limiting abortions past 15 weeks. Most Americans (and most of the world) agrees with such limitations.
“The tyranny of the majority is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those of the minority factions.”
That is where the Rule of Law shines, protecting the voiceless minority, in this case, from the stupid shambolic and degenerate masses. FACT: every one of those 85% had a mother who chose to carry that person to term.
Interesting numbers. I hadn’t realized the Roman’s, Gaul’s, Pict’s, etc, had kept recorded data of deaths.
being that communism alone accounts for 10% of the number, with the Holodomer manufactured famine of Ukraine making up 1%, i don’t think it’s a far reaching estimate.
All these trolls should get a room and get off public forum. They are just trying to dilute or bury any reasonable dialog. I, for 1, am going down to the courthouse and exercise my rights to petition the government for grievances. This is absurd that the highest court( and I use that term lightly) can tell all states not to have gun safety, but can tell them do whatever their duly elected religious zealots command.
funny, sacrificing your children to Molech or Quetzalcóatl or heaving them in a “sacred” cenote…is my idea of religious zealotry
Don’t get mugged. Eureka looking pretty shorty lately 🤣🤣🤣
Just got back from that rally for wmons health rights. Completely awesome. Only 3 wacks, 1 pro gun, 1 pro covid, 1 pro ” 4 legs are better than 2″. The rest was amazingly supportive and peacefully roudy, with lots and lots of support via honks and hand gestures. Including two peace signs from sheriff’s cars. Haven’t hear that many horns sence the senseless truckers invaded. Abort the court.
Keep your God away from my laws and my body.
Comence : feeding frenzy trolls. Glad you did something today that helped the world be better. Great work to all at the rally.
I didn’t get that memo. Was there a poll?
I agree. If put to a vote state by state, how does this not give the citizens of the US as a whole, more freedom? Now we will be able to choose whether or not we want to live in a state dominated by an amoral majority, or one that emphasizes morals.
I don’t know, why not let each county make the decision about abortion, that would give them even more freedom!
Or, I don’t know, maybe, just maybe let each individual decide about whether or not to have an abortion and keep the county, the state, and the federal government out of their decision.
Abortion is a very unique animal in that it isn’t just about privacy, or personal freedoms (of which I am a big advocate) because no matter how you cut it, you are also dealing with another life and trying to weigh their life against the wishes of the mother. It’s not black and white for me… nor most people.
The main argument against abortion is predicated on a religiously-based belief that life begins at conception. This decision simply forces that religious belief onto others in states that are dominated by religious conservatives.
From a scientific POV, the egg and sperm, the zygote at conception, and the embryo that develops from it are simply stages in the reproductive cycle. It doesn’t become “a life” until it reaches viability. To argue otherwise implies that everything that might hinder the development of an embryo (e.g. birth control) should also be considered as under the purview of the state.
You are really stretching the truth on the science there Tim.
Scientifically, life begins at the moment of conception… period.
The abortion debate deals with when that life should be granted the protection to not me killed and at what point the fetus’ right to life outweighs the mother’s choice to abort.
As I said, most of the world believes that abortions should only be allowed quite early in pregnancy.
I disagree Hugh, labelling life as beginning at conception isn’t scientific, it’s religious. For example, after conception, the developing zygote must implant on the uterine wall for it to continue to develop. If it doesn’t implant the zygote is ejected from the body, hence, it isn’t alive.
Plus your religious definition complicates treatments of things like ectopic pregnancy or miscarriages or severe congenital abnormalities — all of which would be considered non-viable in most cases.
cells containing dna are not a form of life ?
the big issue is whether the federal government should pay for it, and fund planned parenthood, or even be involved in an issue between a woman, and her doctor.
That’s a valid point of discussion but there are a couple of things to consider.
First, should poor women be denied access to healthcare simply because they can’t afford it?
And second, Planned Parenthood mostly does contraception (which dramatically reduces the demand for abortion) and reducing sexually-transmitted diseases. Abortions are something less than 5% of the visits they deal with each year. And they already prohibited from using federal money on abortion services.
Okay. I’ll go with “You don’t know”.
And the poor people or those with family ties who can’t move but don’t agree?
Are shit out of luck. Let them be a lesson for others to learn from, and morals will get more attention.
Spot on, it’s not a constitutional right , but the state can make it tougher or easier. Nothing really changed , alot of nothing going on as usual.
The activist court drew back the curtain and showed a willingness to go after more rights.
Exactly
Very backwards indeed.
But we’ve been heading that way….
https://www.google.com/search?q=us+downgraded+on+democracy+scale&oq=us+downgraded+on+democracy+scale&aqs=chrome..69i57.9277j0j4&client=ms-android-samsung-rvo1&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Not the public I know…
Will access to abortions in California change because of today’s Roe decision? Then what’s the protest about? Perhaps California will enjoy an abortion tourism boon and supporters can donate to organizations that pay for plane flights to drive more traffic
If we want to save lives getting rid of the 2nd amendment would be more effective.
How would getting rid of the 2A save lives?
Hold on now, willow creeker has a point.
If 2A were repealed law-abiding citizens wouldn’t be able to shoot rapists, murderers, home invaders, abusers, thieves and thugs. So it would save some lives….
Or attacking enemies and tyrannical government
Long live the 2A!!!!
😄 true, I admit
Cuz then u would be forced to sit in ur moms basement without ur member extension that makes u feel more manly
Your clown comment doesn’t apply here. Tell Mama I said hi.
WRONG!!!
The woke folk are blowing this WAY out of proportion
They need the distraction from Biden wrecking the country.
You are in a fertility clinic when the fire alarm goes off. Before you escape, you have the option to save either a five yeat old child who is pleading for help, or a container of 1000 viable human embryos. Do you A) save the 5 yr old child, or B) save the thousand embryos?
You’ve got to ask yourself…
What is the five year old child even doing in a fertility clinic?
Playing with matches?
A five year old child pleading for help, or 1,000 viable embryos?
That is not the decision we are faced with.
It’s a false equivalence.
You’ll need a big bag for them thar embryos.
And you’ll need a tiny garbage can for your argument.
He says … as he takes off the lid of said can and reaches in for the 1000! We’ll catch up later, after your next 1000 nothingburger posts (in support of a some kinda wanna sue fauci/cdc lawsuit).
Speaking of flipped lids…
Say what?
See, pro abortionists are just EVIL! Why on earth would you take a five year old in for post-term abortion? Sorry your dalliance became an inconvenience, but raise your kid and don’t mooch off the rest of us to do it!
This little group of 5 or so Commentators on here everyday with the same ‘Biden caused gas prices, inflation, killing America lines’ are boring repetitive, simple minded and not based in fact. Trump won here. He scandalously appointed 3 SC Justices, cheating with Mitch McConnell. And her are the results. Next comes the Voting Rights Act, Same Sex Marriage, LGBQT etc rights, Immigration, all going backwards over 50 years.
I diagnosed OCD
I too, am tired of these jagoff dribblers. Same sh*t, different article. Get a new mantra. No man should even have an opinion on this subject. It’s not our business. Having a Y chromosome means shhhhhhh……..
I beg to differ. Although I’m a man, I was also once a fetus. Us fetuses need to stick together! I’ve done everything I could to save as many fetuses as I could by voting accordingly. And my tenaciousness and voting RIGHT will now save even more fetuses. Long live the human fetus!
Yes. I was noticing how many men are on here arguing about abortions! How many men really care about children once they are born? Will we house the homeless single moms or frown on them for needing help? Is this really about protecting children or about controlling women? There are loads of children in foster care. There are birthing clinics being bombed in other countries. If you care about stopping pregrancies don’t get someone pregnant. All these men whining about abortions on here need to hush. Put that same care and devotion to the women that kept their babies!
Yep
The pro-abortion people are the same ones who approve of arming the Ukraine to protect Hunter Biden’s investments. They don’t care about facts, science or democracy. They don’t really care about any certain philosophy at all. They just “think” whatever the democrats tell them to think.
yep.
Do your daughters live in California? If so, they can abort all their fetuses until their hearts are content. Did you teach your daughters not have loads of unprotected sex? If so, nothing to worry about.
I am not sure how you view this as an attack on your daughters.
This is where you guys miss the point. My daughters are here, but we stand with Women all across America. We also stand with Native Americans, latinos, BLM, Asians, poor, LGBQT, immigrants and any other minority you try to impose your 1950’s backwards ass white mentality on. That’s why we are not scared of your ‘Beer Bellies, Bibles, and guns”, we simply outnumber you and are not afraid of your ignorance. We have to stop it, but we will.
Well, then stop using the bullshit argument that they are “attacking your daughters” then. Why not just say you don’t agree with the position and present your argument… you know… like a rational adult.
Hey, there are exceptions on both sides, but you don’t honestly think the Dems would beat the Repubs in a physical conflict do you? I’m pretty sure the conservatives have a lot more guns, ammo and experience as a whole than the liberals. You are deluding yourself if you think otherwise. I think you have spent a little too much time in the California bubble.
RIP rednecks
But you won’t reign victorious in the court of law. Sucks to be you while the Republican bullshit motherfuckers have the Constitution on their side. Go pass an amendment like the liberals should have done in the first place!
Awww, mom!
*you’re
Pro-abortion…
Anti-gun…
E fucking V’s…
Send 50 billion in weapons to Ukraine…
Export all our gas to Mexico, Europe, etc…
What Bullshit!
The SCOTUS isn’t attacking anyone…
The SCOTUS is certainly not attacking your daughters…
How do you figure?
Figuratively?
I still don’t see it.
(They’re not the ones that you need to be worrying about…)
(Although I wouldn’t trust Kavanaugh as far as I could throw him…)
Sounds like you love your daughters… imagine if they had been aborted
And, you need to be put on a red flag list, boom.
Amen!
This is the insane idiotic comment of the Day. What facts Jethro, let Russia take over Ukraine. Maybe the Southern States can take over their right to slavery again.
Nah, you got the states wrong about slavery. Since democrats were the confederates and were pro slavery, founded the klan, and loved Jim Crow, the democrat majorities now are in Ca and New York. So yeah, the democrats in those states can re up their inner racist selfs and start plantations. Sorry to break that fact to you.
The Blacks I know loved San Francisco, Especially the Fillmore and Willie Brown, but they have been pushed out, not by rednecks, but by Gay gentrification and wealthy techies. Some left to go back to the south, especially Louisiana.
When is the last time you were in the South?
And just for the record, I’m 1/8th Cherokee and you aren’t representing me.
In fact you out and out made a threat against me, and i’m also someones daughter.
Cherokee, huh?
Interesting…
I’m a sliver Cherokee, myself…
Probably much less than 1/8th
My Dad’s Grandma or Great Grandma…?
I’ll have to ask him…
I wonder if that’s why we “click” sometimes, ☕, and of it’s why we sometimes think alike?
Could be, anyway, I appreciate our similarities in our opinions and beliefs.
As for Cherokee, Great Grandfather 100% on Mother’s side, brought my Grandmother from Tennessee to San Francisco when she was 9 yrs. old.
Sure are a lot of posts deleted from yesterday, and I thank everyone for their kind remarks given, and saw them all even the ones waiting for approval.
At least they “Think”!!!
Threatening the right to safe and accessible abortion for millions of “people” nationwide.
This sentence is hilarious to me.
What’s funny about that? Women aren’t people?
That’s what’s funny. They won’t say women.
what is a woman?
don’t you DARE say an adult female capable of reproduction, you bigot.
Paraphrasing a SC justice (referring to another matter), “I can’t define it, but I’ll know it when I see it.”
Maybe to you it’s funny but trust me you’re a Majority of 1 on that!!!
Every abortion is clearly life killed, it’s only a question if that life matters
Up next…same sex marriage & access to birth control. SCOTUS, please Curb your God!
They haven’t lost any rights. They are whining about nothing. Again. As usual.
“TheyI haven’t lost any rights.They areI am whining about nothing. Again. As usual.”There, FTFY
You live in America. Right to privacy doesn’t exist anymore. Government already knows your every move. Shouldn’t kill babies anyway. How sick
RWNJ comment section.
I predict a significant increase in anal sex that will leave the vagina to only be used for having babies. This ruling has virtually left vaginas obsolete in the world of intercourse
Didn’t you read Thomas’ opinion? That’s going to be banned again next.
Could we move demonstrations to anywhere but right next to 101?
It is already a challenge to drive 101 safely thru Eureka due to erratic behavior by pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.
Let’s not make it more difficult and dangerous staging demonstrations right next to 101.
I get that demonstrators want an audience and 101 drivers provide that audience but that is not the safest approach.
https://www.opb.org/article/2022/04/14/planned-parenthood-moving-into-town-on-oregon-idaho-border/
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/morning-after-pill-emergency-contraception
https://studentsforlife.org/2022/05/17/backwards-group-suggests-use-of-horse-medication-to-induce-abortion/
During a routine D and C… the fetus skull is crushed and the body is dismembered with forceps… then the cadaver of the fetus is re assembled by the health care worker to assure no fetus parts remain in the uterus. There are in general no funeral services for aborted fetus. Some fetus parts may be harvested for medical research in some situations.
Several corporations such as Patagonia, Netflix, Disney…etc will pay for protest bails…or for transportation/fees for abortions in other states.
With private funding of abortion… the major public debate between pro live and pro choice is muted.
No public money is used… the abortion is privately funded…and a private medical matter.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4073667/posts
https://www.businessinsider.com/roe-v-wade-abortion-patagonia-protest-bail-out-2022-6
Will the Corporations pay for the pregnant men too?
They can just come for a free vac-ca… or if denied, sue for discrimination?
Just speculating at the stupidity and complications these corporations set themselves up for.
Lord knows… people can vote their wallets..not participate in purchases with business they don’t like. You know how strict the 501C laws are… I don’t know how those questions your raise would play in corporate law. Probably need “slickery”..set up a Panama corp.. which would be a legal condom…which is how it goes…
It will be interesting………….
https://www.amerika.org/politics/holy-mackerel-the-confederacy-just-won/
…. from Brett Stevens… “farthest right”… basically a piece on the 10th amendment… and states rights.
Some may be triggered by the rebel flag… got to tough up…all of us butter cups…
Bob Dylan – Precious Angel (Official Audio) – YouTube
My wife was born at 6 months prematurely. She is perfectly healthy. So, she was not a fetus at 6 months, she was a viable baby human. Sorry pro kill baby people.
ahh….Math. I am a pro life Catholic zealot.
I imagine… over the 20 years of youth ministry..we have 34 children not aborted to our credit.
Catholics still hiding crimes against humanity. https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/canadian-native-childrens-graves-reflect-history-indigenous-vanishment
I heard they’ll pay for one out of state abortion vacation each year, it’s cheaper than 12 weeks of maternity leave
People will do..what they will do. I have seen lots of dead babies. Mortician…. gives one perspective. Most don’t know the acrid smell of death..and the smell of shit… when the bowels release. With aborted babies..its’ the smell of blood..and ambiotic fluid…a sort of salty protien smell…
Retroactively abort the supreme (sic) court.
LOL!
In fact, it is possible that AOC, Maxine Waters and other Democrats are conspiring to overthrow the government because of this.
I’m sure this raging will continue for quite awhile. The raging will be very interesting to witness.
don’t pay attention and they’ll go away.
Thank goodness we live in California!
Congress needs to legislate this right.
Leaving it up to the States is a mistake.
Some rights need Federal protection.
Imagine if Slavery was left up to the States?
Not a good idea.
We need to purge religion from government.
That’s the source of this ruling.
“Imagine if Slavery was left up to the States?”
i guess new york would be the first to re-impliment, if history is any indication….
https://wethoughttheywerewhite2.weebly.com/
here we go with the slavery comparison again.
One estimate of abortions in the USA since roe vs wade is 63 million. Sixty three MILLION. What a relief, all those unwanted bits o biology didn’t become kids then adults, consuming, breading more.
But, as to today’s scotus call, ok then: Let’s play that out as if 20 years from now … but with the caveat you can’t leave your rightwingding State. That’s right, live with the results of your thumper creed ‘n creation. Millions more born in your State, who go on to have millions more 20 years from there … in your State.
How are you playing this out?
New York City officials have come under fire for a botched rollout of monkeypox vaccines for at-risk gay and bisexual men just two days before Pride — amid fears festivities for the annual event will trigger a surge in cases.
Thirty cases of the rash-causing virus have already been detected in the Big Apple, with almost all among men who have sex with men.
In an attempt to stem cases, the city’s Department of Health began rolling out vaccines at a walk-in center for gay or bisexual men who had multiple sexual partners over the last two weeks.
But after a line more than 100 men-long formed within hours, the city was forced to suspend the offer.
Critics say the jab should have been rolled out sooner, as even the lucky few who did receive a shot Thursday will not be fully protected from monkeypox for at least two weeks — too late for this weekend’s festivities.
“We need more money to plan
for the second pandemic. There’s
going to be another pandemic.”
-Joe Biden
I think he might be referring to this one…
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/health/gay-bi-men-need-meningococcal-vaccine/index.html
” As of Friday, there have been 26 cases and seven deaths with 24 of these cases among men who have sex with men. Six of the deaths were also a part of the LGBTQ community. Half of the cases have been in men who identify as Hispanic.”
We have let a similar amount of immigrants in during the same period… many of them illegal… so what is your point?
Video of Biden Saying He Doesn’t View Abortion as a ‘Right’ Resurfaces
https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-abortion-rights-video-clip-roe-v-wade-2006-interview-1719106
oops, busted again.
He’ll say anything they write for him on a flashcard.
And how many people have major changes in their political beliefs between the ages of 63 and 79? Not very many! But of course Joe Biden’s has no actual morals or ethics. He is a blade of grass in the wind, bending to whatever breeze will get him elected and give him money and power.
They should start passing some hardcore child support laws . The women shouldn’t have to bear the entire burden of this travesty . Once their fancy monster trucks and expensive gun collections get ripped for failing to pay child support maybe some of these hyper macho deadbeat sperm donors who brag incessantly about their dick size will reconsider their choices Any father who fails to take care of the children they help bring into this world is something less than a man..
amen
This from the same article that gave the 85% of American voters.
The fact that most people don’t spend a lot of time thinking through their opinions on abortion nor do they understand a lot about it, she said. A series of polls by YouGov found that Americans don’t know much about abortions in general, like when abortions are typically performed (in the first six weeks), who gets them (people with kids), and how prevalent they are (42 percent of unplanned pregnancies end in abortion). The number of abortions in the US jumped 8 percent from 2017 to 2020, after decades of decline.
at that time, there was a disgruntled and depressed pregnant population. I blame hormones.
Don’t worry California. You will be able to abort whenever you want here. 9 months probably. We will have more abortions than any other state. People will travel to abort. Get your air b and bs ready. Pretty sick if you ask me. 🤷🏼🤷🏼 Oklahoma sounds a lot better now Mabey 🤣🤣
California exercising their right, deciding who stays and who goes.
After looking at pictures of protesters at the courthouse on LOCO, I’m pretty sure none of them will experience an unwanted pregnancy…
This is a wasted effort as absolutely nothing will change with California’s abortion laws. Now it’s just a states rights issue. It is sad to see so many women protesting, for the right to kill their unborn children, when birth control is an easy and available option.
that’s the perplexing issue. What happen to the use of birth control? for that matter common sense.
“Night of Rage”?
More like a meltdown by toddlers in the candy aisle.
Things are going back to some semblance of normal. It’s almost time to squash the depraved, lunatics going after our children in the schools our taxes pay for. Just gotta bring the right case before this Righteous Supreme Court.
First, we gotta shut down the bureaucratic vermin trying to legislate behind a title. Next battle: West Virginia vs. EPA.
Hmm.. I stand corrected. It appears that lops that want to keep killing babies are indeed getting violent all over the country…
In Democrat-ran cities!
Seattle, WA. (No surprise there… but I believe abortion is legal still, in Washington State.)
Washington, DC (I believe that Washington DC still allows abortion. If not, with one of the highest murder rates in the nation, if yo momma didn’t kill you, your brother will…)
Los Angeles, CA (State sanctioned murder is still allowed in Kalifornistan. )
That’s it, baby killers, burn these cities to the GROUND! You’ll show the Supreme Court, won’t you?!
The separation of church and state needs to be strengthened and enforced. Those Monkey Wankers on the supreme court acted out of their crazy backwards religious beliefs, they are cut from the same cloth as Saudi Arabian Sharia courts.
the ‘separation’ you speak of, is the prohibition of the government establishing a national religion, the decision was a reversal of a prior court decision, not an attack, or change to the constitution. that’s what happens when the court tries to legislate from the bench. slavery was the status quo for far longer than roe, it was wrong, whether it was a public policy or not. the feds should stay out of it.
margret sanger is probably rollin’ over.
“Jane’s Revenge” ranks are about to swell
Another way to solve the Abortion problem is to give all males vasectomies at age thirteen, which they can get reversed when they get married.
https://www.google.com/search?q=gorsuch+perjury&oq=gorsuch+perjury&aqs=chrome..69i57.5757j0j4&client=ms-android-samsung-rvo1&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8