Today, Mendocino County Sheriff Detectives Are Assisting Humboldt County Law Enforcement Investigating Bell Springs Homicide
![Law enforcement at the scene of Richard Grayson Drewery's homicide. [Lauren Schmitt from KMUD kindly shared these photos from the scene]](https://kymkemp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/147648316_1171220969959136_4126855718252871579_n.jpg)
Law enforcement at the scene of Richard Grayson Drewry’s homicide. [Lauren Schmitt from KMUD kindly shared these photos from the scene]
According to Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office Public Information Officer Captain Greg Van Patten, MCSO detectives are “helping do a neighborhood canvas by knocking on doors and seeing if anyone has information.”
Van Patten clarified that the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office is the lead investigatory agency regarding the case. Still, MCSO is assisting because the “deceased just lives over the county line in Mendocino County.”![Law enforcement at the scene of Richard Grayson Drewery's homicide. [Lauren Schmitt from KMUD kindly shared these photos from the scene]](https://kymkemp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/147792354_1009610046530305_4951599142794873943_n.jpg)
Pictures taken by KMUD’s Lauren Schmitt indicate detectives are gathering evidence near the location where Drewry was killed. California Department of Fish and Wildlife is using a track K-9 on the scene.
![Law enforcement at the scene of Richard Grayson Drewery's homicide. [Lauren Schmitt from KMUD kindly shared these photos from the scene]](https://kymkemp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/146624688_1057824984730460_7319270372286349416_n.jpg)
According to a press release from HCSO, on January 26, 2021, deputies were dispatched to the Bell Springs Road area near Island Mountain Road regarding a gunshot victim where they located a Richard Grayson Drewry. Lifesaving measures were attempted, but Drewry succumbed to his injuries.
![Law enforcement at the scene of Richard Grayson Drewery's homicide. [Lauren Schmitt from KMUD kindly shared these photos from the scene]](https://kymkemp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/147834618_166216188415925_7224341478697073777_n.jpg)
On February 3, HCSO’s Public Information Officer Samantha Karges confirmed that based on an autopsy, HCSO “determined that Mr. Drewry’s manner of death to be a homicide.”
Karges clarified that HCSO has not “identified a suspect and are actively working on this case, following up on all leads.”
Karges asks that anyone with information regarding the case contact HCSO at 707-445-7251 or the Sheriff’s Office Crime Tip Line at 707-268-2539.
Earlier:
- One Person Reported to Have a Gunshot Wound Near Island Mountain Road
- Shooting in Southeastern Humboldt County Fatal, Says Sheriff’s Office
- 85-Year-Old Rancher Killed By Unknown Person in Bell Springs Area: Findings From Autopsy and Investigation Reveal Shooting Was Homicide, Says Sheriff’s Department
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
Are they just now going out to the property to do an in depth investigation? It seems like a bit of time has passed now. I hope this is solved asap.
Agreed. Were they waiting for a window of nice weather to investigate. This seems like a poor start to an investigation. I hope this doesn’t turn into yet another unsolved local homicide.
Who killed Hugh Duggins?
Who killed Stephanie Gawboy? (Spelling?)
Who killed Chris G?
Who killed Bob the Builder T.?
Who killed Garrett R?
Who killed…
On and on. Sad.
The poor girl burned up in the homeless camp and the two Mexican nationals dumped on AP road too.
Who killed Karen Mitchell
Man I been saying who did for years they only one I know is dead the other two alive n tuna that’s all I know about them I’ve been trying to talk my friend into letting her family know but people are scared still but we called that hotline and they didn’t do s*** about it
Gee, I wonder if the culture of silence has anything to do with the high number of unsolved murders? What about Khadijah Britton? Everyone knows who, no one is coming forward with information that will convict him and his accomplice.
I’d say the “culture of silence” is a thing for those involved, but not our community as a whole. As in most murders, the perpetrators do there best to keep the details secret from the rest of us.
Who killed Les Crane?
Who killed Jennifer Drewry?
Do you think Drewry was murdered?
They were up there investigating the day of the murder and for the next 3 or 4 days. This could be a follow-up or having others out to collaborate. Dick was a good man and a long time friend/family and I hope they can find who is responsible. I only chimed in here to let you know that there was no delay in investigation as it appears here.
Good.
Thanks Sprout. I hope the killer or killers are brought to justice.
CDFW is involved? Why? Are they just becoming another major law enforcement unit being used for all crimes? Or is it because it might be a water issue? Are they now the agency involved anytime “water” is suspected? I only ask because it seems like they may have a major case of “mission creep”.
They have a mandate to circumvent the 4th Amendment.
Specifically, they can patrol blue-line streams without a warrant.
https://rcflood.org/I-Want-To/Learn-About/Blue-Line-Streams
It’s much broader than that.
https://californiaoutdoors.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/whats-the-level-of-wildlife-officers-search-authority/
[Quote]
Question: Do California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) wardens have the authority to search a sportsperson’s truck, boat, cooler, etc. without a warrant or probable cause? If so, how would an abalone check point (for example) not be a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment of the constitution? I’m all for stopping poachers, but not at the cost of violating what makes our country so special. Thanks. (John McClellan)
Answer: In the hunting and fishing context, wildlife officers are authorized to conduct compliance inspections that would likely require warrants or probable cause in other contexts. Hunting and fishing are highly regulated activities. The fish and wildlife belong to the people of the state and not to any individual. Many states, including California, recognize this and have enacted statutes to allow Wildlife Officers to conduct regulatory inspections when interacting with those who are engaged in hunting and fishing activities. Some of these include:
• Authorization to inspect boats, buildings other than dwellings, and containers that may contain fish or wildlife (Fish and Game Code, section 1006)
• Authorization to “enter and examine any…place of business where fish or other fishery products are packed, preserved, manufactured, bought or sold, or to board any fishing boat…or vehicle or receptacle containing fish…and may examine any books and records containing any account of fish caught, bought, canned, packed, stored or sold.” (Fish and Game Code, section 7702)
Also, people are required to exhibit upon the demand of a wildlife officer all licenses, tags, wildlife, and any device or apparatus designed to be, and capable of being, used to take wildlife (Fish and Game Code, section 2012)
The courts have consistently upheld these inspection authorities. As for check points, CDFW has used check points for the past 25 years as a focused and effective means of educating resource users and deterring violations of our wildlife laws. In a state as vast as California with a population of over 38 million people and with a staff of only 400 sworn officers, CDFW needs to ensure that the funds and manpower resources we have are put to the most efficient use possible. Conducting checkpoints allows us to contact thousands of people who are using our public trust resources with a handful of officers. For those who are not using our public trust resources, the check points provide us an opportunity to educate them about our state’s wildlife resources and our role in protecting those resources. The courts have established minimum standards that must be followed when we conduct checkpoints, but just like DUI checkpoints, wildlife checkpoints have been upheld by the courts.
That is such a good question.
One of the bullet shells must have landed in a culvert, CDFW jurisdiction.
I’m guessing CDFW is involved because they had the dog available. Note in the photo that the CDFW warden is the dog handler.
They could be involved in the investigation if it’s got to do with poachers. Maybe he stumbled upon a poacher. Very nice family sorry for your loss they’ve always done right for the land almost always seen one of them cleaning the trash off the side of the road. I know Pat won’t let this rest he’s going to bring his dad justice.
Knocking on doors in dope growing territory? Could get interesting.
The response seems to be very slow…
It might be that CDFW is involved to make statevresources available because the local Sheriffs probably don’t have the resources available to adequately investigate.
The State is involved via CDFW which makes sense as the case probably is receiving more attention because of the victim’s status as an elderly (presumably) non-grower.
Also, CDFW’s jurisdiction would also extend into both counties…
Interested to see if they make any progress!
There’s a logical response.
CDFW is also more competent than both sheriff offices combined, so I’m not sure why it would be a bad thing having them involved.
Yes- Buzz gave a logical response. I’m not saying it’s a bad thing or not. I hope they get the pos who did this. I have respect for the folks out at Drewry Ranch and I used to know one of the family (niece or cousin) from out of the area. My concern is CDFW and their mission. Always respected their part in protecting wildlife. Very concerned about them lately and their expansion into law enforcement on other levels…and their their ability to do warrantless searches. I don’t like cops running over civil liberties and it always ends up that way until we beat them back… That said I wish the Drewry family peace and resolution in this horrible and unnecessary tragedy.
Blake Lehman…. Hey I’ve got an idea, if you’re going to place your opinion, how about you tag it with your NAME? Your opinion doesn’t mean SHIT if you hide behind a sudonim
Easy now. Don’t read it if you don’t recognize a name. Blake Lehman carries no more significance to me than Farce. Especially because you skip the issue, and rail on comment technique. Ben Franklin regularly “posted” opinions under sudanyms (sp?) Poor Richard was a famous one. I will sign off using one, even if it non sequitur, since comments under two different names get deleted. Nom de plumes allow people to be more candid without retribution. They allow us to hear from teachers, elected officials, etc. without them creating the appearance of representing others in their organization. If this turns out to be a murder, then there are issues that inspired somebody to kill. That’s a good reason to stay anonymous! Should the Sheriffs in this case ignore a tip if it comes in from an anonymous source?
I sincerely hope that the responsible person(people) are located and will receive the ultimate sentence. Praying that his family finds closure.
Now these thugs are murdering elderly men. Something needs to be done, enough is enough.
I am sure someone saw something somewhere or someone somewhere knows something. Disgruntled neighbor… road rage…. an old grudge…. “no known enemies”… so sad to hear a solid elderly rancher is the victim of a ruthless homicide.
Murderers lurking in these communities, not a very safe environment any more, not for the young or elderly. If you know something; please come forward!
Police should begin with interviews closest bordering neighbors of this man. Lots of crazy drivers in that neck of the woods, could it be road rage?