Protestors Against Ice Gathered in Trinidad Yesterday
Protestors against the actions of ICE gathered in Trinidad yesterday. [Tina Freeland photos]
About 25 people turned out Friday for Indivisible Trinidad’s two-hour protest in support of Minneapolis’ general strike against the continuing ICE threat in the Twin Cities, and to demand “ICE Out for Good,” referring to the 37-year-old mother who was murdered by an ICE agent.
The focus of Indivisible protests nationwide — in Minneapolis and Portland, Maine — has been on ICE arrests and invasions of communities, along with Donald Trump’s policies and misguided initiatives, such as his threat to seize Greenland by force.
Indivisible Trinidad (“the few, the fierce”) will host another protest today (Saturday 1/24) on Main Street from noon-2 p.m. Come out and let your voice be heard.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
‘Referring to the 37-year-old mother who was murdered by an ICE agent’ statement is such a blatant yellow journalism false statement. This is what separates news from opinion, and reality from propaganda. Very nice smiles however.
You’re confusing a press release with a news article — but you’re correct that it’s a blatant falsehood to claim Renee Good was murdered — nor was she shot for protesting or for attempting to flee — she was shot and killed because she was accelerating her vehicle towards an armed agent who was literally on her bumper.
Ross placed himself on her bumper.
And the fatal shot came through the side window, well after even the most exaggerated claim of endangerment could be made.
Hello? The acceleration of her car did that. Oh, and the hitting part contributed.
The pulling of the trigger after he was to the side of the vehicle is still the leading contributor, though.
Heck, she first backed up. Then went forward. Accelerating as she swerved. The fact that so much nitpicking interpretations of videos after the fact as to where he was standing is required to absolve Good and blame Ross when a bullet hit the front windshield is telling that you fully intend to ignore any questions about it.
Nope.
The first shot was the first shot…
All other shots followed the first shot..
No, the bluebellies are lying.
Evidence please…
Do you have a forensic autopsy report…???
What leads you to believe which shot fired was the fatal shot…???
Because you have provided no evidence to support that otherwise purely speculative allegation…
It’s kind of been all over the news.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/22/independent-autopsy-outlines-renee-goods-gunshot-wounds
https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/22/renee-good-autopsy-ice-minneapolis
Not even one of those links even begin to suggest that the fatal shot came through the side widow…
“Preliminary findings also show that a gunshot wound to her right breast and another to her left forearm were not immediately life-threatening.”
Only one bullet went through the front widow. That was the one that hit her in the chest.
“Good sustained a gunshot wound to the left temple that exited the right side of her head” That one came through the side window.
Says who…???
And now, video has surfaced by a MN doctor that says she had a pulse for 8 minutes but was denied medical care. That wrongful death suit is going to be enormous.
No amount of truth can sway the true believer
The anthropogenic climate change deniers have demonstrated that pretty clearly.
Deniers?
you are using the brainwashing term to apply to another thing that you don’t want reasonable discussion on?
Using the term ‘denier’ as a tactic to ‘shut em down’ is not going to age well in my prediction. I know i know i’m prolly just a crazy right winger, but let me explain a fact that you may not want to believe, the time for group imposed authoritarian control on free thought is over and in the end the ‘Deniers’ will be shown to be correct as they always are. Because we never arrive at the divine truth, we get close but to stop and think you have no reason to listen to new evidence or experiences from others is just the attitude from the top that incited the youth at the bottom to rebel. You are the fighting for the system of conformity and against the pursuit of science.
No no. Please continue to pursue science.
And when that science demonstrates that the current consensus is wrong, then the scientific community will adopt the new findings.
But, until then, anyone who continues to deny the preponderance of the scientific evidence is, quite simply, a science-denier.
It’s a thin line between science and dogma.
With the big difference being the quality of the evidence used to support the claim.
In science the only characteristic we use to judge quality of data, or evidence as you put it, physical reproduction and the degree of uncertainty, accuracy, and precision in the measurement of the results.
The truth, and the course of science is nothing is true until it can no longer be disproved. It’s a continuous process. ‘Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get’, Mark Twain
Well science tends to say bullets do not arc 90° from a man shooting from the side to go through the front windshield. Science therefore says some part of him was in the front of the vehicle.
He was to the front and to the side when he fired the first shot.
But it’s also not the first shot I find most egregious–
even if it was completely unnecessary.
It was the second and third shots he fired after he was entirely to the side of the vehicle.
The autopsy shows that she likely would have survived the shot he fired at an angle through the corner of the front windshield.
The fact that he continued firing is why he should stand trial for murder.
Those things put out multiple shots within a couple of seconds. Faster than any human can react. If you don’t blame him for the first shot but do foe the others, you are blaming him for being human.
Oh bullshit. They don’t use full-auto pistols. Each shot requires a separate and discrete trigger pull.
“He was to the front and to the side when he fired the first shot.”
-Jebs-
__________________________________
One can’t even possibly be in two places at once…
Obviously your observation is coming directly from the rear…
LOL…
😉 😁
Do you really not understand how angles work..
or are you just in one of your moods where you misunderstand something simple and then get inexorably hung up on it?
You definitely have your very own angle…
I do understand how that works…
Did you see where one of your links claimed that the first shot went through the lower right side of the windshield…???
That’s obviously wrong…
Maybe it’s you that has “misunderstood something simple”…
Let me know when the official autopsy is released…
Ask the warren commission about that….
Its been TheScience at least once before.
And so do the conspiracy theories live forever.
The only thing that ends conspiracy theories is facts. Which is why when the conspiracy theory involves multinational corps or government agendas its hard to trust the science they offer as facts to quell the conspiratorial voices of dissent. Especially when the historical record shows us the government and the corporate interest will both fake or hide science to profit or control. Look at J&J talcum powder lawsuit, they did their own study and found it was dangerous but also mathed out that it would cost less to pay the hard to prove damages and continue to sell talc, until it wasn’t. But the reason they lost the biggest claim suit ever is that they knew and lied and then go caught. The truth leaves too much evidence it is hard to suppress and when you can only do it with cult brainwashing it is showing in the words of your faithful.
Gosh, could it be there was more than one agent?
Evidence is to be tested in the scientific community which i am guessing there not many publishers here. All submitted evidence is to be considered wrong until you can replicate it yourself. This is the issue with Big Science, they rely on gate-kept systems of data collection to generate the ‘data set’ and none of this is a scientific experiment with replication at its core, its all ‘studies’ which can NEVER prove anything beyond an observable correlation. Causality requires isolated variables and controls and a falsifiable assumption. Can you re create the ‘science’ you have absolute faith in? Have you gathered the core samples and tree rings and made layer gradient and depth predictions which your science could show where provable?
True science is trust-less, this is the peer review part. This is why i point to the inability to reproduce results in studies in independent labs as a sign that you should in fact not trust ANY of the modern science. Also this is well know in the fields of actual experimentation, not just data crunching curated datasets which have been normalized to show desired trends.
Trust the scientific process and its skepticism, never trust the ‘science’ or the scientist. Its better to be late to find the truth but be sure with your own experiments than to have faith that your right and trust the science.
I have explained this issue to you before, you claim all kinds of absolutes in the state of knowledge, do you care to reply to the issue of reproduction in TheScience(tm) your stumping so hard for because it supports your side in an argument that makes you feel morally superior to the ‘deniers’?
Yeah jebs we got that on the other thread about Gender:Eureka Sanctuary status for transgendered. Remind us again about the science that defines male and female?
Science defines a biological male or female– and even then it’s not always so cut and dry.
Gender is a personal consideration, not a scientific finding.
Just like you wouldn’t be required to use science to prove your personal favorite flavor of ice cream, nor should anyone attempt to use science to tell you your opinion is wrong.
Whats the point of knowledge if not to inform opinion making? Or are you arguing again that once you have an opinion it should be trusted and reinforced and never questioned?
You’re confusing opinion with belief.
If my favorite ice cream is mint chocolate chip, I don’t need to provide any evidence to support that, and no amount of evidence can prove my wrong.
If my belief is that mint chocolate chip ice cream makes you more intelligent, well then, I better have some evidence to back that up.
And that belief– along with any evidence I provide in support of it, is absolutely open to be challenged.
No your erroneously correlating the word belief with idea of a hypothesis, which is the fuel of the scientific process. In this context belief and opinion are one and the same. And your also demonstrating the emotionally reactionary nature of your cognitive process, the intangible feeling that mint is your favorite ice cream is a fact not a belief, but only you can test that fact, its abstract and introverted, i could see you eat it every time and have the opinion that its your favorite. My opinion would be based on my observations as most opinions almost always are.
The Eastern portion of the US is prepping for a major ice storm. The ice caps are not melting.
Unless I’m holding my globe wrong, I’m pretty sure the Eastern United States in not at one of the poles.
You do know that until the ice caps and tundra melt we are still in the holocene? We have ice free periods regularly on the Milankovitch cycles?
But since the Milankovitch Cycle is currently in a cooling phase, we can’t really blame the roughly 1.5℃ we have warmed over the past century on that.
No we blame it on the little ice age from 500 years ago. In contrast to the medieval warm period which these two events give enough variance to manipulate any dataset and confuse anyone who thinks climate isn’t a dynamic cycle.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grindelwald_Fluctuation
There at the top of this propaganda from the machine you trust is your two degrees.
Her vehicle was stationary when he walked in front of it — he wasn’t trying to position himself in front of her or prevent her from fleeing — I don’t believe she intentionally drove at him (she was distracted by the agent attempting to open her door and by her idiot wife) — but she did in fact accelerate towards him while he was a couple feet or less from her bumper.
People are fixated on the tragic outcome of her actions while ignoring that it was 100% avoidable if she’d obeyed lawful orders to stop and exit her vehicle.
Or didn’t obey but didn’t chose to hit the accelerator either.
But the intensity of the desire to hate ICE overrides every bit of reason. While disavowing that her actions contributed is so blinding and intense as to be pathological.
What speed was the car going when the poor liddle agent was “struck” by it?
How fast does 3000 lbs have to… never mind. The trouble with refusing to rein in hate is it corrupts the speaking from the inside out.
At one point her backup lights show in the video. She reversed direction so in front of her car stopped being the safer location.
It’s closer to the truth to claim she committed suicide by cop.
And rightwingers say the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights was put there for citizens to effectively resist government oppression and thuggery. Are they wrong?
Not at all, smoke em if you got em.
Well RHBB should stop being a tool for lefty propaganda by publishing any of their press releases no matter how miniscule the group or biased the content. The disingenuous nonsense that she would publish right wing local propaganda too but no one sends them to her doesn’t hold water as she certainly manages to personally network every Progressive agenda but not others.
If she wants to post scheduled demonstrations, post the time and place and contact only.
You’re spending all day on the internet shouting about “the left” again. Is that every day this week?
The difference is that posting eats up too much of my time because I keep looking up stuff and providing links. On the other hand you apparently don’t waste any time with that nonsense, do you? You just drop opinion like a goose drops crap- lots of it all the time without effort.
Do you not know where you live? Besides we aren’t to that point yet in the script, we still have the constitution and free speech, seizing the press, that comes after the consolidation of the party power structure aka the night of long knives. This is all a remix of original catalog material from the 40s.
As the heavy hand of King Donald comes down on any media that refuses to parrot the Trump line.
True, no need to mention the warrant.
Changing what hand was holding your cell phone to withdraw your gun with the other hand before any acceleration and then smacking the phone onto the corner of a vehicle that is now turned away and trying to take off Is it an excuse for intentional homicide. Him claiming she was a stupid **** after he just shot her was not a man afraid for his life that is an angry man who knew what he was doing. His camera view looks like he was hit but all the other camera views that have been analyzed in exactly the same timeline as his does not portray what you were repeating
Lying liars and the lies they tell. Funny how she was shot in the SIDE of the head if she was “accelerating her vehicle” TOWARDS the agent. Innit?
The “threat” to the killer was made up by ICE to explain the shooting of an unarmed woman by a masked thug.
FBI agent who initially investigated fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis has resigned
Soon after the agent opened the civil rights investigation, she was ordered to reclassify it as an investigation into an assault on the officer. The FBI blocked the BCA from participating in the investigation.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/23/politics/fbi-agent-investigated-ice-shooting-resigned
Well simply starting investigating it as a “civil rights investigation ” shows the agent fell in with the Minnesota BCA had being directed by their outraged governor.
Claims that Trump was the one who politicized the FBI are wrong. It became increasingly politicized from a federal police force to a “intelligence ” for over 20 years since 9/11. Biden investigated Trump allies and in fact the FBI Agent this story refers to, Tracey Mergen, testified as a Biden government witness against a man, Tom Barrack, acquitted of acting as an unregistered agent under the Trump Administration. “The government anticipates calling Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Special Agents Tracee Mergen and Warren Chiu to testify about the false statements made by defendant Thomas J. Barrack during his interview”.
The whole government legal system had become one big political incestuous mess.
Even the largest of national medias lets their agendas dictate what they see in actual videos of the shooting. All of them.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/end-of-an-era-robert-s-mueller-set-to-step-down-as-fbi-director
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-13/barrack-saw-uae-as-fascinating-investment-source-fbi-says
A small group of folks with big smiles and clean signs with no nasty words. They showed that you can have an opinion on Karen Good being shot by ICE Agents in a peaceful manner.
I still don’t agree with the representation of her shooting as “murder”. It was at most an incredibly sad mistake on both parts. But…that said…I appreciate that the protestors do not get vehemently angry and hateful and I fully respect their right to protest. Protest is a basic American right…
“I may disagree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it”- a real American
To call a killing a murder requires judgement to be rendered.
I believe the words Ross uttered after he shot her provided ample justification for calling it murder.
Innocent until judgement is rendered is the official policy of the empire last i checked.
That quote is French.
It was the French who bailed us out in the Revolutionary War.
So, without the French, would there be a “real American”?
(Yes. Of course the answer is yes. Just like there are real Canadians, real Australians, real New Zealanders, etc. We didn’t actually have to fight a deadly and costly war to gain independence. That’s just the way we do things here.)
Really? The French did not bail “us” out. They were at war as usual with the Britsh so politically “Having lost its own North American colony to Britain in the Seven Years’ War, France sought to weaken Britain by helping the American insurgents.” They supplied arms in the same way the US supplies Ukraine or supplied the Afghani against the Russians. It didn’t work out for them any better than those worked for the US. It was mutual use.
You’re both right. The French bailed us out by following French self interest.
And Jebs, yes we did need a revolution. Those other former colonies still genuflect to the British Crown. Screw that. America is a British, French, Dutch, German, Italian, African, Irish, Scandinavian, Spanish…. and now global country.
Of course the French had their own personal interests in mind.
That still doesn’t mean they didn’t help provide arms, finances, training, and naval support– including that oh so critical naval blockade at Yorktown that prevented Cornwallis’ army from escaping, thus forcing them to surrender.
Fun fact: We also don’t give nearly enough credit to Spain.
The largest battle the British fought during the American Revolutionary was fending off Spain’s attempt to capture Gibraltar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Siege_of_Gibraltar
Without the Alhambra decree would there be a real america… So I have read you discuss the genocide of the new world, now those other colonies somehow are blessed and noble and didn’t fight a war? Which side of the story are we on? Also all the other colonies that didn’t fight a war have no rights, no free speech no guns no basis for defending them anyways. Thats why they are all host to hugely unpopular leaders and the people are close to civil war or division in two of the three nations you cited.
Farce, I have never said murder only shooting.
I may totally disagree with them, but their First Amendment right to protest and the way they are doing it is absolutely exemplary.
Another one.
Minneapolis shooting: man shot dead by federal officers was 37-year-old US citizen, police chief says
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jan/24/minneapolis-shooting-live
I posted a couple of citizen videos in another thread. They’re uncomfortable.
Uh….kris….this guy was pointing and brandishing a firearm at the officers. He had numerous magazines on him….they tried to disarm him. I don’t care what country he’s from. YOU DON’T go after cops or anyone else with a firearm unless you want to lose your life.
Please provide evidence of your claim that he was pointing and brandishing a firearm at anyone. The videos of the incident that I’ve seen clearly refute your claim.
There is no evidence he was pointing or brandishing a firearm.
There isn’t any because he wasn’t. Though it’s now being said that he was legally carrying a firearm, but in videos it’s seen to be removed from him prior to him getting shot a dozen times. This was clipped from another site:
He was flashing the piece on the street earlier in the contact is the official word.
You’re allowed to carry a handgun in Minnesota.
Here’s a slowed down version for you. If you can’t figure it out, I don’t know what to tell you.
He was “flashing” a goddamn phone, man. And everybody and their cousin around there has video of it now.
The allegation is that before the video you saw he brandished his loaded weapon in public.
He was shot AFTER whatever firearm he had was already removed. It’s quite clear in many videos. Or are everyone’s phone recordings just some AI-generated lie?
He was legally carrying and not brandishing. That was established already elsewhere. He clearly had a phone being “brandished”. How do 7 thugs f–k that up? Oh wait…they did.
“established already elsewhere”
Low Effort Intellectual Maneuver
You can not prove a negative with a clip of video that doesn’t contain the time in question. How can you establish the lack of weapon brandishing in the not filmed portion of the interaction?
Be honest! “official word” What crap!
Tell me you haven’t watched a single one of the hundred videos of it without telling me. Here’s a close up for you. Does this look like a gun to you? Here’s a hint; you can call your mother on it before you get killed.
Armed
WARNING: NSFW videos. You’ve been warned.
Oh, but hold up, there’s another one today. Minneapolice ICE agent unloaded a clip on a guy already on the ground and pistol-whipped. This is more like an execution, not a take-down.
This is one of several that are popping up now. Am reading that allegedly some of the witnesses that were recording nearby are in federal custody as well.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/s/CYQGrQYTy3
Here’s another from a different angle (buffers, may need to download).Also NSFW.
https://files.catbox.moe/sp296e.mp4
Star Tribune report.
This is so fucked up. I want to remind everyone that during the civil rights movement we saw bombings close to everyday is some parts of the US. Everything in my soul hopes that doesn’t come again. But people need to realize how very serious this situation is. For example, small things get some extra-large gauze bandages and antiseptic at the store this week. We get to choose how we want to show up being able to help people is a good way to prepare. It’s not like first aid gear gets wasted. We shall overcome.
Really looking forward to the violence, eh? But the reality is 👇
Violence is happening.
It’s happening whether I like it or not. I don’t want this but its happening. I don’t have any control beyond my own actions just like you.
You’re right about one thing anyway. I have been preaching on this site about the result of hateful rhetoric for years. Stopping it is clearly out of my control. But not out of the control of those who keep repeating and rejoice in the hate. They could easily stop. They just won’t. Bit that doesn’t mean they are not in control. Just not of themselves.
You have been preaching hateful rhetoric for years. You are part of the problem.
Nobody was rejoicing, hence there was a protest to begin with over the VERY thing that just happened again a few hours ago. And you’re right, they’re not in control. Certainly not the agents themselves.
Right you are, however the power to initiate war lies within all people and you can only control your actions.
Yeah, like ancient Rome was ultimate example of peace. Pax Romana watered with slavery, blood, vengeance and tribute.
It was in fact a long period of stable order for most of the known world, we are living in the remnants of that global order and those struggles from then are still driving global politics. But yes Rome was good, no one argues that, well one group of folks do, but they got old beef, its in the book, you can read up on it.
Those agents scattered like a flock of quails when the shots were fired.
Here is another view.
https://www.nbcnews.com/video/video-appears-to-show-shooting-involving-federal-agents-in-mi
Broken link, but go to home page video there.
RIP
MN Startribune has a write up on him. An ICU nurse who worked for the VA. Thanks DHS, now you killed one of the very people who help your military buddies when they need medical care.
OK, in one of the videos there’s a woman in a pink jacket recording. Allegedly this is her video being reposted. There are concerns about her safety or if she was detained after posting. This too is NSFW.
https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesota/comments/1qlv7kc/pink_jacket_ladys_video_close_angle/
He was carrying a piece setup to take a ‘silencer’ with a coupe of mags.
Open carry state with a permit.
What a Sig Sauer with an actual silencer looks like.
No gun is seen in any video I’ve watched so far. And at least a couple with agents saying they can’t find it.
I watched this one 10 times. There is no gun presented. The guy has a phone in his hand.
Did he have one on his person? Maybe. He’s allowed to in MN. But he certainly didn’t draw and fire on anyone.
The glowie in grey grabbed it off his during the final moments of the scuffle, i cant see him clearly take it off the guy, there is a new video,
setup as in it has a threaded barrel, the knurled knob on the end of the longer than stock barrel is covering it.
Open carry has no permit for open carry of a handgun, but does require one for a pistol. You need to know the difference.
It is VERY clear, with no question about things like if an agent was about to get run over or anything else. It’s right fucking THERE. 7 agents, one guy. Pepper sprayed, Takend down, Beat in the head. Shot TWELVE times while on the ground. That isn’t an arrest. That’s an execution because Billy Badass Agent got overexcited.
Not only that, it looks like the first agent shot him while he was pinned to the ground and very easily could have shot another agent. And as the shooting continued it was also putting bystanders in harms way with ricocheting bullets.
The White House propaganda machine is already hard at work on this.
“The Border Patrol Union in a statement on X: “Border Patrol agents are trained extremely well to protect themselves, their fellow agents, and innocent third parties. When a supposed “peaceful” protester brings a weapon (such as a loaded handgun) and brandishes it, there are going to severe consequences and repercussions. We have pleaded with and warned the media and the politicians that their irresponsible, hate-filled and false rhetoric is going to get people unnecessarily hurt, or worse, killed when they portray our agents and officers as the aggressors. They have encouraged these reckless confrontations and attacks on our agents and officers who are performing their lawful duties and enforcing the laws that Congress has put on the books. The fake and dishonest media and the shameless politicians should be held accountable for willfully misleading the public and enticing these protesters and agitators. We have full confidence that when more facts are revealed, our agents and officers will be shown to have utilized justifiable force in eliminating the threat.”
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-reacts-fatal-minneapolis-shooting-11412712
when they portray our agents and officers as the aggressors.
Except of course, they *are* the aggressors as multiple videos in multiple places show.
They are also violating the law by breaking into homes without a judicial warrant and detaining US citizens for hours without cause.
It’s not a “fake and dishonest media” misleading the public, it’s the gaslighting administration that calls peaceful protesters and observers “domestic terrorists”.
LOL @ taking the Border Patrol Union at their word.
Like I said, the propaganda machine hard at work.
The video’s don’t lie.
The viewers of videos do.
No need lie today. Videos are crystal clear on this one.
He was carrying a legally permitted weapon – 2nd amendment, ya got a problem with that? – and I’ve seen all the available videos, no brandishing. None.
The weapon was discovered on him when he was under the dog pile of agents, he was disarmed and a second later, executed.
This is another case of who you gonna believe, trump or your lying eyes.
This explains the supporters of Trump’s lies
Imagine for a moment that you have not seen everything that happened today on the web videos you saw, which are like two minute window but the claim is he brandished the weapon before the interaction on camera. This won’t be the one unless the left give in and fucks up in such a way to give him the ability to trigger the insurrection act, this is about disrupting the schedule and running of the midterms. Expect more shootings until they can do the thing they have been planning all along, how else 3rd term? Just my ill informed opinion.
“Oh my god, what did you do?”
I wonder if they will say this every single time?
A clip?
When the people lead, the leaders will follow.
TODAY ICE AGENTS MURDERED AN ICU NURSE WHO WAS DEFENDING A WOMAN BEING PEPPER SPRAYED. ALL THE SAME ICE LIES ARE BEING REPEATED.
BUT VIDEO SHOWS THE TRUTH. HE WAS LEGALLY CARRYING A FIRE ARM BUT DID NOT ACCESS IT. HE WAS FLAT ON THE GROUND WHEN HE WAS SHOT MULTIPLE TIMES.
It should come as no surprise considering their overseas training and the doctrine of their masters.
https://scalawagmagazine.org/2025/08/ice-and-the-idf-the-transnational-nexus-of-state-control/
ICE just murdered a 2nd US citizen…
It’s “funny” how most people don’t recognize a fascist govt until after it’s defeated, by it’s own people in revolt or due to defeat on the battlefield.
Multiple WARNINGS have been given now.
Shooter was not an ice agent it was a border patrol agent.
Same shit, different wrapper.
Now they’re coming for the Second Amendment. Guess we’re about to find out–again–what a bunch of fucking hypocrites the MAGA fascists are.
Or….as I’ve also been reading, we’ll find out what hypocrites the NRA is. They’re awfully quiet today, especially about the whole “2A and standing up to a tyrannical government” shtick. Make a decision, boys.
Now, Icers murder a man for possessing a licensed gun that was not displayed, and say it was “because he was armed”.
Whatever happened to the Bill of Rights, and where are the voices of the Second Amendment supporters?
And where were they when Philando Castile was murdered under similar circumstances?
How is this a 2a issue with the facts we have currently?
Yup.
So, if someone has a beef, real or imagined, against someone who is dark skinned (US citizen or not), they can basically swat that person.
edit: while I’m here. There are over 2 million undocumented people in Texas. So why is Trump and the DHS so focused on Minnesota which has around 130K or so? Why threaten the state with actual troops and even at one point, even now, the 11th Airborne? Are they going to parachute into Minneapolis?
Yes and maybe get a cashout in the process.
Nobody likes a government informant.
IMHO:
Correction:
No THIEVES, RAPISTS, ANIMAL ABUSERS, WIFE BEATERS,TERRORIST, METH FIENDS, FENTANYL DEALERS, CARTEL MEMBERS, MAFIA SOLDIERS… (etc) (etc)… likes a government informant.
Yes, but everyone loves the idea of being a war hero
Press Releases should be fact checked.