Surfer Reaches Shore After Distress Call Near Big River Beach

WaterRescueFeaturedA water rescue is underway off the Mendocino Coast just after 11 a.m. Wednesday morning.

According to scanner traffic, a surfer was in distress near Big River Beach and unable to return to shore. First responders were dispatched to the area, and a Coast Guard helicopter was requested.

Rescuers relayed to dispatch that the surfer was able to get close enough to shore to stand five minutes after the first reports. Shortly thereafter, the surfer was able to make their way onto the shore and declined medical assistance.

According to surf-forecast.com, surf conditions along the Mendocino Coast on Wednesday include moderate winter swell, with waves estimated in the 4- to 6-foot range. West to west-northwest swells with periods around 12 seconds were producing steady sets at the river mouth around the time of the incident.

Please remember that information gathered from initial reports is subject to revision as more facts become available.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

30 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Martin
Guest
5 months ago

I think the surfer was “higher” than the surf! The surfer should be charged for the first responders and the Coast Guard flight. I know that won’t happen but is really should.

Onlooker
Guest
Onlooker
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Wow, that’s some judgmental guesswork on your part! It’s unlikely that the surfer, being, you know, in the water, made the call requesting assistance. And if I saw someone in trouble, I’d probably call first responders too. Wouldn’t you? If the surfer got in on their own and you had made the call, should you be charged for the response?

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  Onlooker

I call them as I see them. I have the right to be judge mental [edit]. The surfer should be responsible for his/her actions which required first responders and the Coast Guard.

Last edited 5 months ago
Deanna Beeler
Guest
Deanna Beeler
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

It’s spelled judgmental. Unless you’re British.

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  Deanna Beeler

WRONG, try again please.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Martin says: “I have the right to be judge mental.”

Is it god (that you give lip service to) that gives you that right?

You seem to have forgotten Matthew 7:1 and the injunction to “Judge not, that ye be not judged.”

You’ve never apologized for your completely false judgements against the parents of baby Oliver who you accused of fleeing the scene when in truth they risked their lives trying to save their baby [edit]

Better to stick to your apparently insincere condolences and quit making false assumptions and passing judgement without knowing the facts.

Last edited 5 months ago
Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  Truth Be Told

I will stick to what I believe is the truth and nothing less. I have never made insincere condolences or false assumptions. I think you are being judge mental towards me. Where do you seem to get your information, I really don’t know.

Truth Be Told
Member
Truth Be Told
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Martin, you frequently make false assumptions and cast judgements.

Maybe you’ve forgotten your despicable comments to this tragic story: “INFANT MISSING AFTER VEHICLE PLUNGES INTO TRINITY RIVER EARLY THIS MORNING”

One of your comments:
https://kymkemp.com/2025/05/01/infant-missing-after-vehicle-plunges-into-trinity-river-early-this-morning/#comment-1830442

And another person’s reply:
https://kymkemp.com/2025/05/01/infant-missing-after-vehicle-plunges-into-trinity-river-early-this-morning/#comment-1830970

Followed by my reply to them:
https://kymkemp.com/2025/05/01/infant-missing-after-vehicle-plunges-into-trinity-river-early-this-morning/#comment-1831035

Now do you remember?

Last edited 5 months ago
ABA
Guest
ABA
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

“I have never made insincere condolences or false assumptions.”

Utter horseshit.

poncho
Guest
poncho
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

id say onlooker spells just fine! and i am a multi time spelling CHAMPION. you disqualified yourself. goodbye!

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  poncho

The first word in your comment is incorrect. Goodbye.

g

Onlooker
Guest
Onlooker
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Back to basics. Did the surfer call for assistance? Should you charge someone for another person’s actions? Can’t you just be glad there are first responders?

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  Onlooker

I believe the surfer did call for assistance, but he was standing in only 5 feet of water and made his way to shore all by himself. Considering he made the call he should have to pay for his actions.

Timb0
Member
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

already paid–in taxes

ABA
Guest
ABA
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Just because you have the right to be an asshole doesn’t mean you have to exercise it.

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  ABA

I believe the same goes for you also ABA.

Charles Hunter Wilson
Guest
Charles Hunter Wilson
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Were you there sir? If not maybe you should reconsider.

Martin
Guest
5 months ago

Charles were you there at the scene?

yamadog
Member
yamadog
5 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Only morons fail to understand that no extra money is involved in rescues. First responders and Coasties are salaried. Rescues are excellent training as well.

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  yamadog

Not all first responders receive a salary. Tell that to the men and women who make up a great group of volunteer first responders. They do it to help others in need and they don’t ask for anything in return. Have you donated to a volunteer fire department?

Stacee
Guest
Stacee
5 months ago
Reply to  yamadog

Exactly

Randall
Guest
Randall
5 months ago

6 @ 12 seconds ? Who would want to paddle in.

FB native
Guest
5 months ago

Another idiot. If you go in the water here you better learn about tides and weather. Check the noaa information to avoid trouble, and yes they should be penalized for risking our first responders.

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  FB native

Finally, a comment that makes sense. Thank you.

Casual Observer
Guest
Casual Observer
5 months ago

There are some strong rip currents at that break. Probably got caught in a rip on an out going tide and struggled for a bit.

quesoso
Guest
quesoso
5 months ago

Knowing how to deal with rip currents is just part of basic surfing knowledge. 

Sandy Beaches
Guest
Sandy Beaches
5 months ago
Reply to  quesoso

Absolutely.
Most surfers with years of experience have been in situations that they would rather not have been in.

farfromputin
Member
5 months ago

The dude survived. What else matters?

Martin
Guest
5 months ago
Reply to  farfromputin

Nothing farfromputin!

Charles Hunter Wilson
Guest
Charles Hunter Wilson
5 months ago

While I’m a bit too old to still surf (unfortunately) I was an avid surfer for 50 years, most of it on the lost coast. So coming with this experience I am going to guess that the surfer lost their board due to either their leash coming off or not using a leash at all. Then someone on shore saw that the surfer had lost their board but didn’t realize that a surfer in a wet suit is still well prepared for a swim in. 4 to 6 feet at 12 seconds should be child’s play.

I used to joke that when I was suited up and in the water I was just another marine mammal. And not the top of the food chain either.