Humboldt County Approves First ‘Green Cemetery,’ Where Bodies Return Naturally to the Earth

Sacred Groves Executive Director Michael Furniss

Sacred Groves Executive Director Michael Furniss

A “green cemetery” project that seeks to allow the dead to “return to the earth gently, in harmony with the land” has been permitted by Humboldt County’s Planning Commission.

The operations plan of Sacred Groves, Inc., the non-profit permit applicant, also describes green cemeteries as “living sanctuaries” demonstrating “a shift in how we think about death, memory, and our place in nature.”

A conditional use permit for the Sacred Groves Conservation Green Burial Cemetery was approved at the commission’s Nov. 6 meeting.

Located on Kneeland Road in the Kneeland area about 1.5 miles from the Butler Valley Road intersection, Sacred Groves will encompass 47 acres with a maximum burial density of 120 graves per acre.

Sacred Groves project sIte's grassland area

Sacred Groves project site’s grassland area

Sacred Groves Executive Director Michael Furniss defined green burial’s basic aspects as “no embalming, only biodegradable materials and no concrete vault or plastic liners.”

The cemetery site is currently used for hay production, grazing and forestry. Those uses will continue, with some of the hay field converted to oak savannah forest.

Sacred Groves will offer three burial options – forestland burial, grassland burial and burial in the oak savannah restoration area.

Furniss, who described himself as a “soil scientist,” highlighted the ridge-top project site’s suitability as a cemetery.

“It has a highly suitable soil, which is crucial, and is a big reason we chose and are pursuing this site,” he said. “It has excellent, deep, well-textured, loamy soil, good organic matter, good percolation characteristics and infiltration, good aggregate stability, rich biota, and is highly fertile.”

He added, “So it’s really an ideal soil, and that really turns me on.”

Green burial is a growing movement, with about 20 green cemeteries in the U.S. California has green cemeteries in Lincoln and Mill Valley, and the Caspar Cemetery in Mendocino allows green burials.

So does Trinidad Cemetery, by “special arrangement,” Furniss said, but he added that it’s “very nearly full and the Trinidad City Council has recently tripled the price to discourage clients in hopes of saving the very few remaining spots for Trinidad residents or those having relatives that are buried there.”

Furniss said 492 mostly local people have “signed up and are following our progress.”

Enthusiastic support for Sacred Groves was voiced during a public comment period.

Marc Daniels, the co-owner of the Mind’s Eye Coffee Lounge in Ferndale, related his non-profit sector work in the Aleutian Islands in Alaska, where green burials are a timeless tradition.

“When somebody passes away in the community, it’s the family and the community that lovingly prepare the deceased, build the casket, dig the grave, care for the person, and that heals a community,” he said. “I’ve seen it so many times over the years and ever since I started learning about green burial, I know I’m in favor of it and I think it’s wonderful that we might have that option more.”

McKinleyville resident Jennifer Wheeler, a botanist and environmental scientist, described green burial as part of a natural cycle.

“I don’t want my last contributing act on this Earth, if at all possible, to be adding to more human-caused pollution,” she said. “No cremation carbon emissions, no forever garbage in or on the ground, no plastic flowers, no polyester flags. I want my children and grandchildren to come visit my final resting place in the most natural place possible and in doing so, offer them a place to find communion, perspective and beauty in an increasingly disordered world.”

Rick Littlefield, owner of Eureka Natural Foods, said green burial “seems like such a natural kind of an approach to end of life with some dignity, and we don’t have that choice right now.”

Rebecca Stauffer, a member of Sacred Groves’ board of directors, said green burial is “the cleanest, greenest, and really most beautiful way to bury our loved ones” and is “so Humboldt county.”

The conditional use permit is necessary due to the site’ zoning but written public comments have been largely supportive.

Potential issues related to a watercourse, a water utility line and a cultural resources site in the vicinity are addressed by excluding them from the project’s activity area.

Some commissioners raised public health and safety concerns, questioning whether burials will be deep enough to prevent animal disruptions.

But a written staff report says “no evidence has been submitted that the project, as conditioned and mitigated, will be detrimental to public health, convenience, safety and welfare,” and a minimum burial cover depth of 18 inches was ultimately deemed to be adequate.

Commissioners’ approval of the permit was unanimous.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

87 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago

“minimum burial cover depth of 18 inches”

That seems totally inadequate…



soiled
Guest
soiled
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

18-inches, wow, sounds like Coyotes might be digging a few up for dinner… hate to have a well downstream of that parcel.

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
7 months ago
Reply to  soiled

Most historical burials have not been six feet deep; the “six feet under” rule is a relatively modern standard originating from a 1665 London plague decree, and historically, burial depths have varied greatly depending on customs, practicality, and location. Before this decree, graves were often dug to a shallower depth, and modern regulations often require only 18 to 36 inches of soil over a casket. 

Dan
Member
Dan
7 months ago
Reply to  soiled

There are alternatives.

2187220-native-american-burial-scaffold-1891
Susan
Guest
Susan
7 months ago
Reply to  Dan

Yes , and food for condors.

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
7 months ago
Reply to  Susan

Sky burial is a thing in the Himalayas.

OhNoYouDon't
Guest
OhNoYouDon't
7 months ago
Reply to  I like stars

My first thought upon reading this article is if I can open a sky burial business in Dinsmore …

Pat Bitton
Guest
Pat Bitton
7 months ago
Reply to  Susan

That’s my wish – to be laid out on a hillside and eaten by condors.

Concerned
Guest
Concerned
7 months ago
Reply to  Susan

No condor wants to eat a PFAS, Taco Bell-laden carcass like us…let soil and microbes degrade those contaminants so that we can contribute further, positively.

Amelia
Guest
Amelia
13 days ago
Reply to  Concerned

Well the condors would do well with my remains. Cremation horrifies me. I’m on board with green burial, even moreso, sky burial. I feel the earth has a relationship with humans and what consciousness, spirit, or memories may remain in our flesh.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago
Reply to  Dan

Poor horse.

Martin
Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  Dan

Dan, thank you for posting how some Indian Tribes disposed of their family or friends. Very touching!

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

In fact the article mentions “Some commissioners raised public health and safety concerns, questioning whether burials will be deep enough to prevent animal disruptions.” Even though approved. It’s not enough to discourage dogs. Probably not bears either. The snow up there, while it may speed decomposition, it will keep bodies “attractive” during a good part of the year when food is scarce. They must have thought about this?

Michael J.
Guest
Michael J.
7 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

This is the legal standard in California and there is zero evidence anywhere in the USA of bodies being dug up when buried at the depth.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago
Reply to  Michael J.

Well having buried an animal deeper than that and woke up with the animal’s head near the back porch, I’m not as sure as you.

1000001352
The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  Michael J.

There is evidence of 189 bodies relinquished to a natural burial company, that hadn’t been buried at all, that were just accumulated together in some kind of a building, unrefrigerated, until the smell was so bad that it was finally reported to law enforcement, and the 189 unburied and accumulated bodies were found inside…

This was news in early October, 2023, I believe…

Canyon oak
Guest
Canyon oak
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

Yes, I remember the story, I think it was in Colorado.
what could possibly go wrong?

Last edited 7 months ago
soiled
Guest
soiled
7 months ago
Reply to  Michael J.

shallower burial depths are used with vaults and liners. Add that heavy equipment is going to be operating out there (logging, agriculture) you may wanna go a little deeper, especially if those soils are as deep and loamy as presented.

farfromputin
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

If that is worrisome, ask to be buried with a shovel.

Michael J.
Guest
Michael J.
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

This is the legal standard in California and there’s absolutely no evidence anywhere in the USA of animals digging up bodies buried at this depth.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
7 months ago
Reply to  Michael J.

Not even worms or grubs? And what about humans exhuming remains? Humans are animals too. But since you posted in absolutes, here you go.

Last edited 7 months ago
Redwood Dan
Guest
Redwood Dan
7 months ago
Reply to  Michael J.

A bobcat slaughtered all my chickens and only took one or two. I dug a hole about 2 feet deep and buried the dead ones. It was dug up the next day and partially eaten with feathers everywhere. I buried it all again and put a half sheet of plywood over it with a bunch of rocks on top. The next day it was dug up again, the critter dug laterally under the plywood to get at it.

Farce
Guest
Farce
7 months ago
Reply to  Redwood Dan

Wow! Yes I’ve used that plywood on top, rocks on top of that and then bury method for my 3 cats and 1 dog burials. I’m lucky I guess! That critter digging it up thing was a concern of mine fer sure. I went deeper than 18 inches definitely deeper.

Debra L
Guest
Debra L
7 months ago
Reply to  Michael J.

We’ve had chickens dug up at that depth

Guest
Guest
Guest
7 months ago

Will it only be available to humboldt county residence?

Akasha
Guest
Akasha
7 months ago

18 inches seems to be way too close to the surface. I say 3 to 6 feet just to put in my two cents.

yamadog
Member
yamadog
7 months ago
Reply to  Akasha

Traditional burial depths are too deep for proper decomposition is what I’ve read.

Paul
Guest
Paul
7 months ago
Reply to  yamadog

That may be true, but when I buried my dog three years ago three feet deep a bear kept pawing the dirt aside three or four times to get at the remains. I felt bad seeing my dog’s remains getting close to the bear’s reach, while the flies on rotting flesh wasn’t pleasant either. I had to place large rocks over the entire grave for Brownie to RIP (just like in the old cowboy movies).

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
7 months ago
Reply to  Paul

I always leave my dogs above ground when they die. I make a wire cage to prevent their bones being scattered. I honor their lives with their skulls. Decomp takes less than a year. I would prefer that someone I love does the same for me

Mr. Clark
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  Akasha

six feet has been used for many (thousands) of years for a reason.

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Not really.

Michael J.
Guest
Michael J.
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

This is from the Black Death times in the 16th century before germ theory when bodies were believed to be very dangerous. You are almost 700 years behind.

farfromputin
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

FYI The corpse is buried vertically.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  farfromputin

Thanks for the heads up, but I don’t think that claim will stand up to scrutiny…

farfromputin
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

I thought vertical burials were more common, but I learned their use depends on the availability of suitable land.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  farfromputin

Yep…

Standing room only…

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

A large auger could dig the holes.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Six feet was first codified in 1665 and lacks a scientific foundation.
https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/31633/how-did-6-feet-become-standard-grave-depth

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

Most historical burials have not been six feet deep; the “six feet under” rule is a relatively modern standard originating from a 1665 London plague decree, and historically, burial depths have varied greatly depending on customs, practicality, and location. Before this decree, graves were often dug to a shallower depth, and modern regulations often require only 18 to 36 inches of soil over a casket

donna
Guest
donna
7 months ago

i love the idea. sign me up.

Onceler
Guest
Onceler
7 months ago

Did they address traffic and related impacts to the already abysmal maintenance conditions on the Kneeland Road?

Festus
Member
Festus
7 months ago

Isn’t going to increase methane and CO? Where are the greenhouse gas people?

Susan Nolan
Guest
Susan Nolan
7 months ago
Reply to  Festus

If you’re thinking cremation has a smaller carbon footprint, I’ve heard that cremation releases as much CO2 as driving cross country twice.

Farce
Guest
Farce
7 months ago
Reply to  Susan Nolan

Wow! They really need to ban that then!! Chipping and shredding w broadcast dispersal seems more attractive every day….

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  Susan Nolan

“cremation releases as much CO2 as driving cross country twice”

“The claim is approximately correct; one cremation releases about 535-540 pounds of \(CO_{2}\), which is equivalent to a 500-509 mile car trip. Driving a cross-country trip can be around 2,500 to 3,000 miles. Therefore, two cross-country trips would be about 5,000 to 6,000 miles, which is roughly ten times more than a single cremation. So, the statement is incorrect.”

AI

___________________________________

Maybe the confusion started here…

Earth Funeral

https://earthfuneral.com

The Environmental Impact Of Funeral Choices

Jun 18, 2025 — Cremation releases 360,000 tons of CO₂ annually … ➡️Its reputation as a cleaner option is driving growing interest across the country.⬅️

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
7 months ago
Reply to  Festus

IMHO: I sense a new Humboldt er… growth death industry !

Capturefgderwfds342
Martin
Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  Bozo

That illustration of a man putting a body through a woodchipper makes me sick!

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
7 months ago
Reply to  Martin

IMHO:

Well… that is good… I guess. Kinda what is supposed to do.

Reckon you didn’t see the movie ‘Fargo’ ? (1996)

Fargo received seven Oscar nominations at the 69th Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Supporting Actor for Macy, winning two: Best Actress for McDormand and Best Original Screenplay for the Coens.

Chipper is now preserved in a museum… with a dummy’s foot stuck in it.
Donate a few dollars to the museum and they will take your photo with it ! They even have hats you can put on for the photo !

Capturedfewsdfd
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
7 months ago
Reply to  Martin

Ever watched Soylent Green?

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
7 months ago

IMHO: Fargo/Soylent Green… heck… not that bad.

Worst scene in a movie.

Monty Python… ‘Meaning of Life’… the ‘Mr. Creosote’ scene.

About a quarter of the Minor theater patrons were clawing their way out of the theater, gagging and staggering for the exits.

(That memory goes ‘a ways’ back.)

— Wiki stuff…

Film director Quentin Tarantino said that the “Mr Creosote” scene was the only time he was unable to view a graphic film sequence, recollecting, “If somebody vomits, and I actually smell vomit while I’m watching this, I’m just going to hurl !”

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
7 months ago

This is awesome.
I hope it’s a while before I’m there, but this solves something that has troubled me for a while.
Burial at sea was the route I was going to go with, but I like this idea much better.

Steve
Guest
Steve
7 months ago

Plop a trees\bush over each one. rooty, rooty, rooty, ………

farfromputin
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Historically, it’s been grassland. Hay production should continue to be a good business.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago
Reply to  farfromputin

But not with the suggested mounds of dirt over the graves. The dirt will either be raked into the hay or, if the layer is trying to get the hay cut low, even mowed.

Honestly…
Guest
Honestly…
7 months ago

IMO, they should mandate deeper burial. Can you imagine going to visit a loved one and seeing a dog, coyote, bear or anything else that can dig them up, chewing on a piece of them? It’s “natural” to let animals eat dead carcasses so they can decompose faster, but I would want better for my loved ones.

Farce
Guest
Farce
7 months ago
Reply to  Honestly…

I think it’s nice that they allow the wild animals a chance for some food. It shows compassion for the furry creatures! I’d be honored to be eaten up and incorporated into a wild beast body….Perhaps they can open up a Dead Body Farm next door for those of us who would prefer that option- for scientific research purposes of course!!

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago
Reply to  Honestly…

” As a general rule, the ideal burial depth for optimal decomposition conditions is 3.5 – 4 feet from the bottom of the grave to the soil horizon, which also guarantees an 18-24 inch smell barrier that prevents animals, two and four legged both, from being able to smell anything. By adding the displaced soil to the top of the grave in a mound, that depth is doubled until it gradually settles. ”

https://www.sacredgrovepreserve.com/faq

“At the same time, most adherents of green burial seek to balance concerns about the sacredness of human remains and wildlife conservation with a respect for the natural processes of biological decomposition, which function best and most usefully when closer to the surface of the ground. The deeper one goes into the ground, the less biological activity one finds and the more difficultit is for the ecosystem to process and recycle those remains back into the web of life (and this is especially true with our thin Keweenaw Peninsula topsoils). The reality is that there is a tradeoff: human remains cannot be safely buried as shallow as would be optimal for decomposition, but there is still a strong desire to respect the sacredness of that process by not burying any deeper than necessary. What we have found in our research is that the tradeoff lands anywhere between 3 and 4 feet deep, with preferences leaning toward the lower side of that range.”
https://kgba.weebly.com/uploads/7/2/7/1/72716657/report_on_grave_depth_and_wildlife_disturbance_2016_03_06_without_intro.pdf

MJFurniss
Guest
MJFurniss
7 months ago
Reply to  Honestly…

Does not happen. Ever. No evidence of that whatsoever, tho it is a very common concern expressed. The 18″ rule has been in place in CA for decades, without incident.

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
7 months ago
Reply to  Honestly…

Most historical burials have not been six feet deep; the “six feet under” rule is a relatively modern standard originating from a 1665 London plague decree, and historically, burial depths have varied greatly depending on customs, practicality, and location. Before this decree, graves were often dug to a shallower depth, and modern regulations often require only 18 to 36 inches of soil over a casket

Yikes
Guest
Yikes
7 months ago

The ground water will be contaminated with rotting flesh, pills and God knows what else. Do the planet and everyone on it a favor and get cremated.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago
Reply to  Yikes

The ground water is likely to be way deep up there.

Kris
Guest
Kris
7 months ago

Though I wish to be cremated, I wouldn’t mind being fertilizer for hay.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  Kris

Something tells me it will be some Blue Ribbon, Guinness Book of World Records hay…

Kris
Guest
Kris
7 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

You must have got that information from the Washington Stand. They make a lot of hateful, misleading comments.
To bad they don’t make printed copies, would make good fertilizer for the garden.

Last edited 7 months ago
The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
7 months ago
Reply to  Kris

Washington Stand…???

You must be confusing my comment with this one…

https://kymkemp.com/2025/11/09/humboldt-county-approves-first-green-cemetery-where-bodies-return-naturally-to-the-earth/#comment-1881213

Before Furniss will accept an application, they don’t need an RSVP, but they will want to know your NPK…

Enzo
Guest
Enzo
7 months ago

Oh Humboldt. I am forbidden in this county from burying my horse on my property unless there are certain restrictions. Among them are that the animal has to be buried a minimum of 3 feet Below the soil, and absolutely cannot have died from any type of infectious disease.

Martin
Guest
7 months ago

I am very pleased that they approved this Green Cemetery program. I know that many folks love Humboldt County and the surrounding lands and forests and would love to be buried there. My only concern is that the grave should be deep enough to prevent animals from digging up the remains. That point needs to be discussed so that they can tell you how deep to bury your loved one.

Korina42
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  Martin

It has been discussed; there are standards for green burial, so no need to reinvent the wheel.

Tom Morrin
Guest
Tom Morrin
7 months ago

Something to consider …..
Growing up in Ireland, there was an old (unofficial) graveyard near my old family home. It was full of stillborns and children who died before they could be baptized. Typically, they were buried in very shallow graves (lack of large predators, granite rock inches below the surface etc) and marked only with a stone.
However, the communal well was at the the bottom of this sloping graveyard. I once asked my mother if anyone had ever gotten sick from drinking the water, while she grew up using the well ? By her excellent memory, she couldn’t recall a single case, nor are there any records of a related illness.

NorCalNative
Guest
NorCalNative
7 months ago

I made a will earlier this year. I’m donating my body to UCSF School of Medicine.

Joanne McGarry
Guest
Joanne McGarry
7 months ago

We can bury the dead naturally yet no one alive can camp legally in Humboldt County. Priorities are interesting. Where do the unhoused who die get buried, by the way?

Pat Bitton
Guest
Pat Bitton
7 months ago
Reply to  Joanne McGarry

If their bodies are unclaimed, I assume they are buried in Potter’s Field. I understand Humboldt’s Potter’s Field is in the Sunrise Cemetery in Fortuna.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
7 months ago
Reply to  Pat Bitton

Myrtle Grove in Eureka. NCJ had a story on it in 2017.

Sunrise actually was cleaned up in May, and many markers lost to time were revealed.
Sunrise has very few folks who fit the designation. I have relatives buried there. Most of them go back to the early days of Hydesville, Carlotta, Fortuna, and the nearby. There are a few, but not many, of the “Potter’s Field” variety.

Ocean View has some as well, scattered around the grounds. Some of those departed may also have been returned to the county where any sort of record could be found and buried as such.

Ahuka 2400
Member
Ahuka 2400
7 months ago

All this (waves hands at the Universe) is nothing but a figment of my imagination. It will all vanish into the mist at end-of-program. So there will be nobody to have to deal with my body, no place to put it, and most likely no body either.

Lisa H.
Guest
Lisa H.
7 months ago

Blue Lake Cemetery has had a section for green burial for a number of years now. In my experience managing end of life affairs for clients, the cemetery’s protocol seems to be a burial depth of at or near 6′ deep.

Bill Lutjens
Member
7 months ago

I looked it up.
This you tube pretty much explains what why and alternatives too burial.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2dvXWX3Sdw

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
7 months ago

 I want my children and grandchildren to come visit my final resting place in the most natural place possible and in doing so, offer them a place to find communion, perspective and beauty in an increasingly disordered world.”

If they do, but to each their own. I’ll be dust in the wind, so none of that will matter.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
7 months ago

That was my blithe attitude about myself. But it came as a surprise to me how much I felt when I lost my mother. I was surprised how much I resented any cheapness in her funeral. Totally misplaced but big feelings tend to leak over into lots of things. She of course never commented but it made a some bad feelings in the family for a while. It is never all about the deceased.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
7 months ago
Reply to  Yabut

My elders will be interred post-cremation. I’ll just be as I say; in the wind. There is a clause for other fam and others that they can have ashes put into things like necklaces or rings if they so choose. No funeral or memorial (unless it’s a funeral pyre I suppose) necessary, but ultimately that will be their decision.

moviedad
Member
moviedad
7 months ago

I always wanted
this kind of burial
before I had to
bury my mother.
Now that I am
but a few years
from my own exit,
I find the whole idea
to be vain.
Cremation is much
easier on people
without funds to
finance such rituals.

Not Sure
Member
7 months ago

I like how all you serial killers are suddenly experts on proper human corpse disposal.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
7 months ago
Reply to  Not Sure

Nah, they do their research. Also, I stepped on a Cheerio. Does that make me a cereal killer?

farfromputin
Member
7 months ago
Reply to  Not Sure

Who kills for cereal?

Catalina
Guest
Catalina
7 months ago

It’s amazing to me that we have to be thankful for the crumbs that they throw to us… Allowing us to dispose of our bodies in some money making venture. Why can’t we be buried on our own land? Rules and regulations are over the top. This is a tiny step in the right direction. But it is absolutely pathetic that we can’t have more choice over where our beautiful bodies go when we are finally finished with them. I do not want to be buried in a strange place among strangers.