Reduced Power Use Impacts RCEA Budget

lightbulbs in a row one onHumboldt County’s decrease in energy use is a financial challenge for the Redwood Coast Energy Authority (RCEA), whose power sales revenues are under what the agency forecasted and budgeted for.

Short term and long term financial scenarios were presented to the authority’s board of directors at its May 22 meeting.

A trend of reduced revenue has RCEA reconsidering something it’s explored in the past – having nearby counties join its customer base.

Short of that, supply and demand dynamics are kicking in and reduced energy demand will lead to lower customer rates.

But that means less revenue, as explained by RCEA Planning and Finance Director Lori Biondini.

“Overall, the energy we’re delivering and has been paid for has been down,” she said. “We have lower revenues because we have a decreased load and we also have, probably, a drop in rates.”

Summarizing levels of expenses and income, Biondini added, “costs are a little bit up and retail revenues are a lot down.”

The imbalance is expected to be more striking in the 2026 to 2027 fiscal year, when the RCEA’s budget is projected to dip into the negative.

Power Resources Director Richard Engel noted that the current fiscal year’s financial scenario is actually improved from last year but is “down pretty significantly” compared to the previous financial report in February.

That’s due to a reduction in RCEA’s number of customer accounts, Engel continued.

From late 2022 to late 2024, the agency’s number of residential and non-residential accounts dropped by about 2.5 percent.

It’s not because people are “opting out” of RCEA, Engel said.

“It’s not that our market share slice of the pie is shrinking, it’s that the whole pie is shrinking,” He continued. “It’s just that the number of electric accounts in Humboldt County overall, that we could potentially have, is going down.”

The decrease in power use is greater than the decrease in accounts would suggest.

“It does seem like the loss of customer accounts might have been tilted towards larger customers,” Engel said. “The actual load decrease over that same two-year period was more on the order of 12 percent.”

And that reflects the condition of the county’s economy, particularly its former economic linchpin.

The drop is noticeable in Arcata, where a utility users tax was first approved by voters in 2016. The tax amount increases sharply on those whose energy use goes 600 percent over a baseline threshold and Engel said RCEA’s “high user tax revenue” dropped fairly quickly, from hundreds of accounts to about two dozen.

Some high energy users, such as Sun Valley Floral Farms, have gone out of business, which Engel described as “a chunk to lose.”

Another emerging factor is related to recent federal government changes, with termination of commercial leases for some federal offices.

The most energy-intensive future project on Humboldt’s radar is the Nordic Aquafarms indoor fish farm but as noted by Engel, “Their timeline for actually building out their facility is being pushed out by probably several years so we can’t really expect that to come in and make up for lost load too soon.”

RCEA is a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) agency. CCA programs allow local government agencies to buy power and sell it to local customers.

Some CCA agencies are seeking to expand their customer bases.

“What we’ve seen as the changer now is existing CCAs expanding into neighboring counties,” Engel said.

That’s been considered in the past by RCEA and with limited revenue now and into the future, it could become more likely.

Boardmember and County Supervisor Natalie Arroyo said she’s “interested in hearing more about that” as it’s “strategic” to do so in the context of the revenue drop.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago

I used rcea once. My energy bill increased by about 15% from what pge was billing me. Then I realized that rcea was just tacking another fee onto pge power. Rcea isn’t a power company, it’s a middle man. Hope they go under

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
1 year ago

IMHO:

Yup… just another ‘middle man’ tacking charges on top of other charges… on top of…
I’m leaving them.

Hasta la vista…

2knucks
Guest
2knucks
1 year ago

Ditto

nice truck
Guest
nice truck
1 year ago

ditto

KrabbySue
Member
KrabbySue
10 months ago

Ditto and OMG they were so nasty when I opted out. As long as they include 20% biomass they will NEVER again be on my radar.

Tangled Massocells
Guest
Tangled Massocells
1 year ago

Everyone believes that the loss of accounts scenario will result in lower rates. Arcata- lol. The tax load/rate-baseline routine was likely some part of contributing factors to Sun Valley going bust. Loss of Federal office leases? How about marijuana businesses going bust? Humboldt County is now an ever advancing economic dead zone! Not sure why other counties would want to be part of RCEA’s expansion plan? Good Luck! “We will leave the lights on!”

Craig
Guest
Craig
1 year ago

This reminds me of when the pulp mills shut down, and the water rates jumped considerably, and I laugh because when the pulp mill were still running, we were told by the water district that we needed to conserve water otherwise the rates would go up.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago
Reply to  Craig

They did anyway, even with the what, several millions of gallons of water not being used by the mills anymore? They lost their biggest customer so everyone gets to pick up the slack in revenue.

Real Facts
Guest
Real Facts
1 year ago

reca charge is the same as PGE. The charge is either billed by PGE or rec same price same charge unless you want all green energy. Our bill yearly true up is 5 dollar difference than PGE. PGE gives me that information. Rec is not attaching a charge on top of the PGE bill.

Craig
Guest
Craig
1 year ago

I opted out from being added to RCEA’s list when the option was first presented, so I’m not causing a problem for them.

PG and E on the other hand, I’ve reduced my electric usage from them by 80 percent on an annual basis, and though I’m only a drop in the ocean electricity wise, I’m one of many other households doing the same.

Ernie Branscomb
Guest
Ernie Branscomb
1 year ago

The economic solution for the average retired person is to leave Humboldt county and California. It’s just that I’m too stupid to leave.

Timb0
Member
1 year ago

Friend moved to Indiana. Low cost electricity and housing, but has endured 2 close tornadoes in the course of a year. No thanx.

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Timb0

There’s problems nature gives. Then there’s problems humans inflect on themselves.

Country Joe
Member
1 year ago

You’re not stupid Ernie. This is home and still a beautiful place to live.

Ernie Branscomb
Guest
Ernie Branscomb
1 year ago
Reply to  Country Joe

agreed…

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
1 year ago

having nearby counties join its customer base.”

Great. Now I can have even more people knocking on my door trying to sell me 3rd party supplier garbage. Who will it be now, because if it’s not RCEA it’s the other hucksters trying to wiggle in between.

And after years of trying to sell me, time-of-day and whatever savings and rate locks, how much have I actually saved? Zero. Been steadily going up actually yet my actual usage is drifting down year to year

Whatta Joke
Guest
Whatta Joke
1 year ago

Ah, BOOHOO!

Yabut
Guest
Yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Whatta Joke

It is an issue but not necessarily what is being discussed. The thing that comes to mind is the loss of businesses that used the power and paid the bills. Who then aren’t there to hire people to work for them.  It’s like Humboldt Co expects the slide into economic misery to continue and nothing can be done about it so no one worries about it. The government related entities just raises sales taxes to make up lost revenue. 

spewydog
Guest
spewydog
1 year ago
Reply to  Yabut

Government doesn’t raise sales taxes, that would be the voting public. I’ve said it before, it baffles me how people bitch about taxes yet vote for bond measures and sales tax increases. The voting public seems to be pretty dense sometimes. Just look at the Orange Turd.

SunnyJim
Guest
SunnyJim
1 year ago

I’ve been a customer of RCEA since 2017. Two accounts, both with solar panels on the roof and NEM 2 agreements with PG&E. Both accounts are under the EV2A rate plan, we charge a hybrid Chevy Volt, time of use rate plan, cheapest power during non-peak hours, costliest power during peak hours. I opted into the 100% green power option from RCEA because we produce more electricity than we consume, even with charging the car every other day.

Just here to lay out the other side;
This set up totally works for us. It works for many people who had the foresight and ability to jump on rooftop solar while the incentives were in place. There’s still a 30% Fed Tax Credit on the books for 2025 but the current administration will likely kill that with the new tax cuts for billionaires.

We pay ZERO $ for electricity from RCEA because our rooftop solar systems produce more than is used, on both accounts. On both accounts, we are getting checks from RCEA for the excess power we’ve generated, $208 for one account, $280 for the other.

I fully recognize that not everyone had the capability to act in a timely manner to secure their energy independence, but I’m here to say that this set up works very well for us and many other households.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  SunnyJim

So you think you are saving money and being smart with your rooftop solar. Let me ask you this, have you had to replace your roof yet?

willow creeker
Member
1 year ago

Wow sick burn! Yeah, he’s probably got all kind of lag holes in his roof, they probably didn’t put silicone in the holes! What a sucker. Yeah.

Wasn’t me…it was the dog
Guest
Wasn’t me…it was the dog
1 year ago
Reply to  willow creeker

Yeah dude! A burn! You totally missed my point! The interface between a roofing company replacing the roof and the solar company having to first come out and remove the panels and then reinstall them on the new roof afterwards, and all the money that costs! Bro! Sic! A roof only costs about $20,000-$30,000 to replace. Having a solar company come,out and uninstall panels and then reinstall everything adds another $5000 or more to the cost of the new roof! Whoa! But yeah I was talking about a couple holes that can be caulked! For sure!

Last edited 1 year ago
THC
Member
THC
1 year ago
Reply to  SunnyJim

Out of curiosity how much did the system cost to put in?

Colwell Glen
Guest
Colwell Glen
1 year ago
Reply to  THC

Around $21K for solar array.
Around $10K for 3 zone heat pump
Around $2K for electrical panel upgrade, car charger circuit etc.

Everything above eligible for Fed and State tax credits back when installation was completed, including labor.

As another commenter pointed out, it’s a good idea to re-roof before installing solar if your roof has less than 20 years of life remaining.

We have a steep 8:12 roof pitch, and so higher labor costs on the install.
Removal and reinstallation of roof solar panels and racks for re-roof will run around $7K. Def a consideration.

THC
Member
THC
1 year ago
Reply to  Colwell Glen

So only 33,000 for the free power.
And no battery back up, So when the power goes out soon does yours? Do you at least own the hardware?

Last edited 1 year ago
THC
Member
THC
1 year ago

So why is PG&E still denying new power hook ups?

GrumpyOldGuy
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  THC

Because it limited to the amount of load their infrastructure can safely carry in certain areas of the County. Some of their circuits are at their capacity limit, and will be until those identified circuits are upgraded to carry more load.

THC
Member
THC
1 year ago
Reply to  GrumpyOldGuy

They had plenty of power when everybody and their mother had an indoor in their garage. If anything the power demands around here have dropped significantly over the last 10 years.

moviedad
Member
moviedad
1 year ago
Reply to  THC

Only in America does increased supply create more scarcity necessitating higher prices.

DramaQueen
Guest
DramaQueen
1 year ago

Many agencies, including Humboldt County love to forecast revenues based on what they want to see instead of using reasonable and conservative projections until they can substantiate their “projections.” NEVER will you hear “Our projections were flawed” The problem is they increase expenditures based on their flawed and political projections and then when revenues do not align with their unrealistic projections they do not reduce expenditures based on the depts who increased spending proportionally. Agencies despise conservative projections because the current leadership always wants to claim they somehow and magically increased revenues for their own resumes’ and egos. When there projections cause structural deficits and layoffs they then blame “unfunded mandates” “bad economy” or other forces outside of their control. Love this agency blaming “reduced energy use” vs people realizing WTF why am I paying more for no good reason just to support this agency that is unnecessary, not to mention presenting reduced energy consumption as a negative.

Humboldt
Member
Humboldt
1 year ago

My account defaulted to rcea when they hooked up with pge. I had the option to opt out, but they presented it as a “green alternative” ; that they were using renewable resources for electricity.

This article didn’t mention anything about green energy.

I wonder if that is still their deal?

i also wonder if it is actually any different from how pge produces electricity? Or if it’s all on paper.

i study my pge bill and it appears that pge refunds me the cost of producing electricity that is paid to rcea. It appears to be dollar for dollar. Someone below said it cost more to use rcea. I’ll have to look for added on fees I might have missed.

Otherwise, it seems pointless to have them involved.

It is really disturbing when they complain about a reduction in energy use.

Yes, it affects their bottom dollar, but it is using fewer resources…

Bug on a Windshield
Guest
Bug on a Windshield
1 year ago
Reply to  Humboldt

Yes, they are providing you with green, renewable resource, electricity. PG&E is also providing me with green, renewable resource, electricity. Just as I am also getting electricity generated by nuclear, so are you. Our bills come from separate entities, but, follow the power lines out of your house. They will go out to the pole, down the street and into my house. All the electricity generated goes into the same grid. Unlike one organic tomato in a crate of heavily pesticided, gmo tomatoes, electricity is indistinguishable and carries no markers telling you it was generated by coal, diesel, hamster on a treadmill, hydro, nuclear, solar, tire and trash burning, or wind. We can all justify which power bill we get all we want, but we are all getting the same green, brown, black, blue, yellow electricity.

Your choice to use RCEA encourages green companies to exist. I encourage them in other ways. There is no doubt that energy demands are increasing. In the end, power bill providers will welcome any and all electricity into the grid. Just keep some of the production N.I.M.B.Y.

On a side note, considering the hamster on a treadmill joke I made, I wonder if any health and fitness gyms have their bank of treadmills, stairclimbers, spin bikes, etc hooked up to generators and batteries. If, say, at 7am and 5:30 pm during their peak times, those machines are used en masse to their fullest output, how much power would be generated? Just curious.

Humboldt
Member
Humboldt
1 year ago

Yes.
I commented on this in the article above. About rcea.

I failed to mention exactly this phenomena.

My first thought on reduced usage, particularly in Arcata, was indoor grows.

Probably with legalization and the drop in underground prices, it is no longer needed.

ht
Member
ht
1 year ago

Ironically, earnings are down because the businesses like Sun Valley went broke from paying their excessive power bills. 🙂

justsayin
Guest
justsayin
1 year ago

Love it. No reason for RCEA to exist other than to support itself.