Negotiating a New Diversion: Huffman Urges Stakeholders to Reach a Two-Basin Solution

Press release from the Office of Congressman Huffman:

Cape Horn Dam in Potter Valley long

[Photo by Sarah Reith]

Today, U.S. Representative Jared Huffman (CA-02) released a statement praising Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) initial draft plan to remove two dams on the Eel River. The plan also sets the stage for negotiating a new diversion from the Eel to the Russian river. 

“PG&E’s draft surrender application is a major step forward to achieving the Two-Basin Solution I’ve advocated for years. The plan includes full and expedited removal of two dams that harm salmon on the Eel River while allowing for a modern fish-friendly diversion to provide water to Mendocino, Sonoma, and Marin counties. I’ll be working to ensure that both elements are completed in a way that best protects communities, tribes, and natural resources in the Eel and Russian river watersheds,” said Rep. Huffman.

Congressman Huffman has played an active role in this matter, having facilitated initial discussions to create a Two-Basin Solution for the project and establishing the Potter Valley Project Ad Hoc Committee in 2018 when they learned that PG&E was surrendering the license. The committee, made up of a wide range of tribes, stakeholders, agencies, local governments, and PG&E, formed the basis for negotiations surrounding dam removal and water supply in the two watersheds.

Additional Details of PG&E’s Plan

The utility must provide a plan to federal regulators as part of the license surrender process triggered by PG&E’s decision to divest from the financially inviable Project, which has not generated power since 2021. PG&E must submit a final Draft License Surrender Application (LSA) and Decommissioning Plan to federal regulators in May, 2024, and a Final LSA in January, 2025.

PG&E’s draft also includes, as an alternative for evaluation, a revised framework proposal from a regional group to negotiate terms for a new diversion facility that could support ongoing limited water diversions into the Russian River watershed after removing the dams, provided such diversions are consistent with the full recovery of the Eel River ecosystem to self-sustaining, harvestable populations. 

Potter Valley Project Background

The Potter Valley Project includes two Eel River dams, a diversion tunnel that moves water out of the Eel River watershed and into the East Branch of the Russian River, and a powerhouse. The Project’s owner, PG&E, has allowed its license for the operation to expire and is currently working with federal regulators to develop a license surrender and decommissioning plan for the facilities. 

Located on the Eel River 20 miles northeast of Ukiah, Scott and Cape Horn Dam are over 100 years old. Equipment failures in 2021 caused Project owner PG&E to permanently suspend hydropower operations. Water storage levels in Lake Pillsbury, the reservoir created by Scott Dam, have been reduced by more than 25% due to increased seismic safety concerns with the dam. Scott Dam completely blocks fish passage to high-quality cold-water habitat in the Eel River headwaters. The smaller Cape Horn diversion dam has a faulty fish ladder that needs to be revised to meet current environmental standards. 

Removing the Eel River dams would make the Eel California’s longest free-flowing river and reconnect salmon and steelhead with almost 300 miles of cold-water habitat. 

Tribes, conservation and commercial fishing groups have long advocated for a free-flowing Eel River. In 2023, American Rivers named the Eel one of America’s Most Endangered Rivers, citing the Potter Valley Project dams as major factors driving Chinook salmon, steelhead, and Pacific lamprey toward extinction.

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Alf
Guest
Alf
2 years ago

Let me see if I understand this correctly. Dam removal is good for fish, yet major water diversion to another river for the wealthy is ok? It’s all so hypocritical. Typical of the pos representative who is all about representing only the rich.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Alf

One basin…

Our basin.

Huffman must be free basin’…

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
2 years ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

Or huffin’ paint.

The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  I like stars

Exactly.

Farce
Guest
Farce
2 years ago

Huffman says pretty words that give me hope. But…I suspect he speaks with forked tongue. His people, money and power are all from the diversion basin. It kinda sounds like that Israeli 2-state solution where we are the Palestinians and we just need to be cool and give up half our river and then more again each year…

Giant Squirrel
Guest
Giant Squirrel
2 years ago
Reply to  Farce

Tell Huffman a Hell NO! Humboldt reps should vote against any diversion instead let the flow clear the gravel from Eel so salmon swim free!

well . . .
Guest
well . . .
2 years ago
Reply to  Farce

Personally I don’t appreciate being compared to child murdering terrorist.

Crikey!
Guest
Crikey!
2 years ago
Reply to  well . . .

That’s how an apartheid state like the Israelis impose on Palestinians works. Children make up a large part of the population and the Israeli government has herded them in an open air prison for decades. Children growing up their entire lives like that. And, astonishingly it sounds like you think you’re on some sort of good side.
PS. The recent murdering babies story was war propaganda.

Last edited 2 years ago
Gary Whittaker
Guest
Gary Whittaker
2 years ago

Enough studies. Get on with the removal of the dinosaur. The south has had plenty of years to get a plan together and dragged their feet. We all know its an issue of greed, grapes and growth.

Farce
Guest
Farce
2 years ago
Reply to  Gary Whittaker

They have not done much to create water storage for their endless subdivisions. Billions of dollars made on the assumption they can just keep taking the Eel River water. No bueno!
On the grapes issue I am still hoping somebody puts together an inventory of which vineyards use up our Eel River water. I sure like wine and I know that some of those vineyards use their own water. I will not drink wine from stolen Eel River water…and I imagine many others feel the same way if they only knew

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
2 years ago

Follow the MONEY.

Tangled Massocells
Guest
Tangled Massocells
2 years ago
Reply to  Bozo

Judging by the downvotes… the operatives have been hard at work! Huffman (D). If Salmon could talk they’d say Taxation without Representation. The tax that’s confiscated – water.

Tangled Massocells
Guest
Tangled Massocells
2 years ago

This one didn’t stay up for very long!

Ben Round
Guest
Ben Round
2 years ago

This article? It’s still up (11-17-23).

well . . .
Guest
well . . .
2 years ago

What is the dollar value of Eel River water? How much are the southerners proposing to pay?