Bills Introduced to Protect U.S. Coasts from New Oil and Gas Drilling

Press release from the Office of Congressman Huffman:

To mark World Oceans Day, Congressmen Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) and Mike Levin (D- San Juan Capistrano) announced they will introduce a package of legislation to permanently protect the West Coast and Arctic Ocean from the dangers of fossil fuel drilling. The package of legislation includes Rep. Huffman’s Stop Arctic Ocean Drilling Act and North Pacific Ocean Protection Act and Rep. Levin’s Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act.

Fishing, tourism, and recreation along California’s coastline support nearly 600,000 jobs and roughly $42.3 billion in economy activity. More than 4 million gallons of oil have been released into the Pacific Ocean as a result of the 1969 Santa Barbara blowout, the Refugio Beach spill of 2015, and other leaks from oil rig and pipeline activity, affecting more than 935 square miles of ocean.

“The risks of offshore drilling for our ocean-dependent economies and marine ecosystems are astronomical. The science and public opinion are clear: we must ramp up the transition to a clean energy future, and we can’t let ourselves get locked into decades of more dangerous fossil fuel drilling off our coasts,” said Rep. Huffman. “We’re using every tool to help coastal communities that are facing sea level rise, increase in severe storms, and other climate impacts. Our bills go hand-in-hand with other necessary actions to reduce emissions and invest in renewable energy – all while reducing risks and making sure that our coasts are clean, safe, and available to everyone in America, not just a sacrificial lamb for the fossil fuel industry.”

“Southern California’s economy depends heavily on the vitality of its world-renowned beaches, cherished marine life, and ocean-dependent businesses that drive tourism and other activities. The ramifications of offshore drilling are too devastating to ignore, and I will always oppose oil companies’ efforts to exploit and damage our coastline. Our bills put the California environment and coastal economy first. I stand with the overwhelming majority of Californians who want to protect our coastline. Rep. Huffman and I look forward to moving these bills through the legislative process and building support,” said Rep. Levin.

The Stop Arctic Ocean Drilling Act would make the Arctic Ocean off-limits to any future drilling proposals by prohibiting any new or renewed leases for the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas or any other minerals in the Arctic Ocean Planning Areas of the Outer Continental Shelf.  

The North Pacific Ocean Protection Act would prohibit the Department of the Interior from issuing a lease for the exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas in specified areas of the Outer Continental Shelf off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California, ensuring a sustainable future for coastal communities and the millions of jobs and billions of dollars in wages that depend on healthy oceans and coasts.

The Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act would prohibit any new leasing for the exploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas along the Southern California coast, from San Diego to the northern border of San Luis Obispo County.

What Supporters Are Saying:

“Protecting our coasts from the disastrous impacts of offshore drilling remains a vital step toward solving the climate crisis and protecting millions of U.S. jobs that rely on a clean coast economy,” said Mike Messmer, acting campaign director at Oceana. “Oceana applauds Congressman Huffman and Congressman Levin for introducing this legislation to protect our coastal communities from dirty and dangerous offshore drilling. From toxic oil spills that cause economic and ecological devastation, to the acceleration of the climate crisis facing our world today, we simply cannot afford more drilling for oil and gas. The solution is clear: we must prevent new offshore drilling and invest in clean, renewable energy sources to create a viable clean energy future.”

“This important legislation will protect our environment, economy, climate and way of life from the harmful effects of offshore oil and gas development. The Surfrider Foundation urges members of congress to support these and other bills to permanently prohibit new offshore drilling in U.S. waters,” said Pete Stauffer, Ocean Protection Manager, Surfrider Foundation.

“The Business Alliance for Protecting the Pacific Coast (BAPPC) is a proud supporter of the Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act.  Our membership in California, Oregon, and Washington represents more than 8,100 business voices who believe offshore oil & gas development is bad for business, and that it poses an unacceptable risk to our livelihoods, employees, communities, and environment,” said Grant Bixby, Founding Member, Business Alliance for Protecting the Pacific Coast.

“California’s vibrant coastal economy relies on clean beaches and a healthy ocean. The Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act safeguards against offshore drilling’s consequences, such as oil spills and worsening climate impacts which all pose significant risks to coastal communities and small businesses. It is imperative to implement permanent protections and we extend our gratitude to Rep. Levin for leading the charge and safeguarding our precious coast,” said Vipe Desai, Executive Director, Surf Industry Members Association.

“Congressman Jared Huffman and Congressman Mike Levin know that we must invest in a just transition away from fossil fuels for our communities, for our ocean, and for our planet. Their legislation to stop new leasing in the Arctic, the North Pacific, and the Southern California Coast is a step in the right direction to ensuring that the ocean is leveraged as a source of climate solutions instead of harmful emissions. We are grateful for their ocean climate leadership and for their efforts to protect some of our most pristine ocean ecosystems,” said Jean Flemma, Ocean Defense Initiative.

“In a climate emergency, we simply cannot afford to hand over our coastal waters to polluters for new drilling. We won’t risk local economies wildlife and habitat for dangerous and dirty fossil fuel extraction. These bills would make significant strides in protecting the West Coast, the Arctic, coastal communities, and fragile ecosystems,” said Valerie Cleland, senior oceans advocate for the Nature program at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Original cosponsors of the North Pacific Ocean Protection Act include Representatives Mike Levin (CA-49), Nanette Barragan (CA-44), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Gerry Connolly (VA-11), Sara Jacobs (CA-51), Derek Kilmer (WA-06), Earl Blumenauer (OR-03), and Julia Brownley (CA-26).

Original cosponsors of the Stop Arctic Ocean Drilling Act include Representatives Mike Levin (CA-49), Andy Kim (NJ-03) Nanette Barragan (CA-44), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Gerry Connolly (VA-11), Don Beyer (VA-08), Earl Blumenauer (OR-03), and Julia Brownley (CA-26).

Original cosponsors of the California Coast and Ocean Protection Act include Representatives Jared Huffman (CA-02), Sara Jacobs (CA-51), Raul Grijalva (AZ-07), Nanette Barragan (CA-44), Eric Swalwell (CA-14), Deborah Ross (NC-02), Juan Vargas (CA-52), Julia Brownley (CA-26), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Gerry Connolly (VA-11), Ted Lieu (CA-36), and Brad Sherman (CA-32).

The legislative package is endorsed by Natural Resources Defense Council, Surfrider Foundation, Ocean Defense Initiative, Oceana, Monterey Bay Aquarium, Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center, League of Conservation Voters, Earthjustice, World Wildlife Fund, Cook Inletkeeper, and Sierra Club.

Ocean Conservancy endorses Southern California Coast and Ocean Protection Act and North Pacific Ocean Protection Act.

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

29 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Stevo
Guest
Stevo
3 years ago

Agree that offshore drilling here is risky. However I hope someone has enough sense to allow for slant drilling of the leases from onshore facilities just outside the CCMZ. That would be sensible..

Why? The latest is that EV work trucks (Ford) just are hugely expensive and don’t have range when loaded.

Alf
Guest
Alf
3 years ago

How about introducing a bill to stop all off shore wind farms. The environmental impact will be far greater than dumb ass Huffman will ever know, much less actually care about. I guess, if it helps pad his pockets and keeps his corrupt ass in his job, the environment doesn’t matter.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Alf

The idea of the bills is to protect the environment. Offshore wind energy is clean and does not harm the local environment. Plus, it will be a great boon for our local economy.

Griffon
Guest
Griffon
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

How clean is offshore wind? Lifespan of a turbine and disposal? Does not harm the environment?

Wow, the fact that you just make these statements with no supporting evidence, while demanding citations from others is absolutely hilarious.

old guy
Guest
old guy
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

drilling may help the west coast, crude oozes up all over west L.A., it could relieve some of the pressure. ( think the La Brea tar pits, and crude goo that washes up on so. cal. beaches way before offshore rigs) just throwin’ it out there. some A.I. ‘s say yes.

D'Tucker Jebs
Guest
D'Tucker Jebs
3 years ago
Reply to  old guy

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are now 412 ppm vs 280 ppm at the start of the industrial age.
We’re at a point the Earth can be compared to to a smoker with advanced lung disease. We can no longer be debating how much more pollution is acceptable. The answer is none.

Country Joe
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  old guy

I visited the La Brea tar pit decades ago and it was definitely worth the stop.

Bud
Member
Bud
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

There are positive and negatives associated with everything, including offshore wind. You should should consider the negative environmental and economic impacts before making blanket statements.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Bud

I did.
wind power has a carbon footprint 99% less than coal-fired power plants, 98% less than natural gas, and a surprise 75% less than solar” https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2021/04/28/how-green-is-wind-power-really-a-new-report-tallies-up-the-carbon-cost-of-renewables/?sh=2dc84b9873cd 

Alf
Guest
Alf
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Total BS. It is extremely detrimental to the environment to mine for the raw materials needed to make these generators. It’s detrimental to any environment to have high power transmission lines. It just a new way for “green” idiots to justify their uselessness.

Country Joe
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Bud

Well, Howdy Bud…

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Who got the contract to build these windmills? Not a Humboldt company. Will they be built in Humboldt? No. Will they even touch Humboldt county ? No . How will our economy prosper exactly D ?

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Lone Ranger

They will be built locally.
economic assessment found that the terminal could generate as many as 830 local jobs and more than $130 million in industry output over a five-year period” https://www.energy.ca.gov/news/2022-03/state-approves-105-million-prepare-port-humboldt-bay-offshore-wind

Country Joe
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Sounds great if the project doesn’t end up like Obama’s Solyndra scam. Two $750 Million-dollar solar panel factories that were never built but the money is gone.
Remembering “Solyndra” – How Many $570M …
https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/

Last edited 3 years ago
Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

You clearly missed the meeting in April of 2023 , these WILL NOT be going to a local contractor or built here locally. And they will be barged up here. No local revenue on this one D.

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 years ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

You sound like a salesman

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago

Stop fossil fuels, inflation is awesome.

Uri
Guest
Uri
3 years ago

It sure seems as though there is an intention to undermine our energy independence and instead rely on untested technologies such as this off shore wind. I just cant see that off shore wind will not have major impacts to marine life.
The fact that China is selling us the majority of the solar/battery components while building more and more coal fired plants certainly makes one wonder if this is the way they intend to conquer our nation. With Biden so compromised its not inconceivable that he has been put in place to usher in the conquest. Either people like Jared are just naive or they are intentionally helping is hard to say.

Another local
Guest
Another local
3 years ago
Reply to  Uri

Actually China is building dams to have large holdings of fresh water and hydro electricity. I think we should have large dams for the next drought. Instead natives are destroying them to return the river back in time.

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
3 years ago
Reply to  Another local

There is a huge reservoir being planned more centrally located for cities and Big Farma. I think it will rely on ephemeral or winter run-off rather than blue-line waterways. The Klamath dams won’t be needed and turning the river “back in time” to its former abundance and beauty seems noble, beneficial, and worthwhile. What am I missing?

Uri
Guest
Uri
3 years ago
Reply to  Another local

I don’t have much of a problem with most existing dams but new ones I reserve comment on. Why we don’t use the dredging machine the Harbor district has to remove valuable sediment behind dams like the Klameth one and trade out the existing turbines for fish friendly ones I just don’t understand. Yes there are fish friendly turbines.
Building new dams often involves drowning productive farm land and communities which does not sit right with me.
There is no back in time. Time does not retreat.

thetallone
Guest
thetallone
3 years ago
Reply to  Uri

My solar panels are over 30 years old and still putting out electricity. I’d call that energy independence.

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
3 years ago
Reply to  Uri

China and Russia will likely join forces along with the Modern Republican Party, Donald John Trump, and authoritarians worldwide like Hungary’s Orban renewal (you can quote me) to destroy American democracy and freedom worldwide. That process goes on right now before our very eyes; don’t take my word for it. Check out the screw-democracy editorial in the august WSJ editorial June 10 – 11, 2023. Trump will skate again like Hans Brinker. Sorry, Uri, I appreciate your contrary opinions, they make me think and reconsider my opinions but if America goes down, it’ll come from your side of the political fence. That much is certain.
Wind power remains debatable. I worry about the effect on birds. I worry about over-population, pollution, climate change. I lean toward wind power but remain open to data.

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
3 years ago

Fossil fuel independence is definitely a step in Russia taking us over, crack me up. Go Biden , go green, more inflation please. These voters haven’t had enough.

Country Joe
Member
3 years ago

Trump will skate again because taxpayer funded set ups against him didn’t work. And let’s not forget the fact that he was found innocent after the democrats spent $ Millions to set him up. Schiff just knew Trump was guilty with zero proof. No Russian Collusion. No rapes. Nothing but lies from our biased and corrupt lame stream media that is the propaganda arm of the democrat party. America is going down now thanks to demented Bunker Joe OBiden.

Two Dogs
Guest
Two Dogs
3 years ago

Maybe you’re trying to mix partisan politics with reality here. Oil and water don’t mix. Your prediction of who will capture the flag is interesting, but I notice a lot of what you fear happening as we sit under present rule. The ball is in the air and there are folks of all sorts at center court.
If a person relies on the WSJ, or any mainstream publisher for information that can be used to make a decision based on fact, they become nothing more than a cog in a propaganda machine.
It takes work to put together what is happening in the world, but it seems we are more interested in getting information from some fucker with clown hair and fake breasts when it comes to what we truly need to know.
It’s sad we have doomed ourselves to be controlled by rich power mongers on both sides of the political aisle. Oligarchy is the stuff revolutions are made of.

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 years ago
Reply to  Two Dogs

I agree that the wealthy donors who control BOTH parties are the enemy of the regular people. They don’t have nationalistic loyalty…They are loyal to their profits and piles of money and power. The debate about DEM vs REP is a sideshow and a distraction to the increasing concentration of wealth and power. Sure there are some small differences between the parties’ social programs but at the end of the day the uber-wealthy are closer to each other than they are to any of us peons…and we are very expendable in their pursuits of yet more more more…Don’t let them divide us.

Uri
Guest
Uri
3 years ago

You say I can quote you but you remain anonymous. Meaning irresponsible for what you say. Come on man. Really.

Country Joe
Member
3 years ago
Reply to  Uri

You nailed it Uri…