County Receives More Than 2,300 Vaccine Doses From Fresno After Shortage Identified for This Week’s Clinics
Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Kevin Miller receives the vaccine delivery from Fresno County. [Photo from Humboldt County JIC]
More than 2,300 doses of COVID-19 were flown into Humboldt from Fresno County after Public Health identified a shortage of vaccine for this week’s clinics.
This week’s allocation of COVID-19 vaccine failed to arrive in Humboldt County due to a shipping error. Humboldt County Public Health worked with the state to find extra doses and found two trays — or 2,340 doses — of Pfizer vaccine at a medical office in Fresno County. When transporting those doses presented an additional challenge, Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims responded immediately, tasking her Sheriff’s Air Support Unit with delivery. Following a plane ride, all doses safely arrived in Humboldt this morning and were delivered to Public Health.
Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal extended his gratitude to Sheriff Mims and the entire Fresno County Sheriff’s Office. “When our county was in need of support for its vaccination efforts, Sheriff Mims stepped up,” he said. “This is another example of neighbors helping neighbors, and I want to thank everyone involved for their work to keep our community healthy.”
View the Humboldt County Data Dashboard online at humboldtgov.org/dashboard, or go to humboldtgov.org/DashboardArchives to download today’s data.
For the most recent COVID-19 information, visit cdc.gov or cdph.ca.gov. Local information is available at humboldtgov.org or by contacting [email protected] or calling 707-441-5000.
Sign up for COVID-19 vaccination: MyTurn.ca.gov
Check for vaccine availability at a local pharmacy: Vaccines.gov
Local COVID-19 vaccine information: humboldtgov.org/VaccineInfo
Humboldt County COVID-19 Data Dashboard: humboldtgov.org/Dashboard
Follow us on Facebook: @HumCoCOVID19
Instagram: @HumCoCOVID19
Twitter: @HumCoCOVID19
Humboldt Health Alert: humboldtgov.org/HumboldtHealthAlert
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
The main unreported thing is how much commission all the heroes get for (re)redistributing unapproved toxic phthalate in rush transport.
For the people.
Here’s another woman who died after taking the jab:
lifesitenews.com/news/35-year-old-woman-dies-of-brain-hemorrhage-11-days-after-receiving-jj-vaccine [edit]
Real news, not shilling for Big Pharma.
I won’t provide a link to a site I consider a low value, hate speech site. Anyone can copy paste and google the site if they are interested. https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3v5mx/youtube-just-banned-a-popular-anti-abortion-channel-for-covid-conspiracies
gatekeeper
I prefer the term “curator.” It indicates that my job is to dispose of the garbage. Conversion therapy is garbage. lifesitenews.com/lgbt/lgbt-recovery-conversion-therapy/
This kind of headline indicates the crap that’s pedaled there: Ex-gay Milo Yiannopoulos tosses $150K ‘sodomy’ engagement ring into Pacific Ocean
But her death, a loving wife, sister and mother (of four children and many pets) is not insignificant because you dont agree with their message, is it?
It’s is all over the news.
And even sacrosanct CDC is “investigating”
https://www.mystateline.com/news/cdc-investigating-michigan-womans-death-after-getting-jj-vaccine/amp/
Totally depressing.
That link is fine.
But if the KKK website were to host a story about veganism, I wouldn’t host a link it. The site is a space for hate speech. The same with the lifesitenews site. It’s a hate speech site.
I’m open to posting a wide variety of opinion. I draw the line at actual links to hate sites. You can post the address so someone can look for themselves but I refuse to have my site host a link.
One of the good things about linking to such sites is that, in responding to such comments, I have been actually reading them for the first time. And learned a valuable lesson. One common dismissal from such commenters is how the press is a shill for “Big Pharma” which plays to my own opinion about national media running interference for their favored ideas and I was deluded that they actually had thought about such stuff.
But all these “anti” whatever sites linked are actually shilling for a small group of the same people whose poor and odd ideas are repeated mindlessly using the same catch phrases that turn up so often in these comments- scamdemic, lamedemic, experimental medicine, jabs, GMO humans, etc. What I assumed was curmudgeonly but still a thought out position of distrust in authority is really a constant, crusading parroting as slavish attendees of a paranoid culture. They are not contrarians but mindless echo chambers for a tiny group of demagogues. They do not pick out one or two defects in conventional authority to criticise but independently examine other ideas as reasonable. They do no creative thinking and can not explain why they believe anything.. only make defective analogies to Nazi boxcars .
No, they repeat clearly verbatim any nonsense they read and delude themselves that is independent thinking just because it is not mainstream. To use another of their oft repeated catch phrases, they are just sheeple stampeding in a particularly mindless and destructive direction.
While many also get lost in the echo chamber of CNN, MSNBC and others which are also hate sites
Mika MSNBC, Joy Beher on The View for example .
Kkk : veganism?
That’s a stretch, and total disconnect.
But, if it makes you feel justified in discrediting because of the “source” that family’s loss, the pet’s loss of their person, the community’s loss of a valuable soul, and that woman’s *actual* death (not the pretend death that everyone is thinking is out to get ’em ) because of receiving an injection, an injection that RHBB habitually openly endorses and advertises. Have at it. . .
It’s your blog after all.
(I promise I won’t say I told you so when the magic jabby gets excused for uselessness and bad performance 💀 ☠️ 💀)
But will you admit your mistake and apologize when it doesn’t?
Ya get back to me in a decade or too which is the TYPICAL timeframe for these notoriously risky injections. Smfh
https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/vaccine-development-testing-and-regulation
Yes. It is my website. (It isn’t a blog. A blog is an opinion site. This is a news site.) And, I have a responsibility to not link to garbage sites.
Other people found the story using links that are not linked to a hate site.
If a person can’t find links to a story that aren’t on a hate site (a freaking low bar in my opinion), I’d suggest that they up the quality of the sites they read. Every person posting anywhere should make the effort to vet the site they are linking to–at minimum it shouldn’t be a hate site. That effort would make the internet a better place.
Didn’t you block Mike Adams and Natural News? Which has a respected history as a health and supplement site?
I was pretty surprised since so many local people are dedicated to good Non GMO foods and supplements.
RFK’s site? I recall Hollywood mothers on TV trying to find out what is giving their children Autism turning to RFK’s site for answers.
Definitely not a hate site.
Technically, I didn’t block them but I will delete links to them. They are not respected in any real world sense, HC.
Natural News run by Adams is considered a far right, conspiracy site.
Here’s the conservative Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-misinformation-lives-online-despite-efforts-to-stamp-it-out-11583272556
Don’t like WSJ: How about any of these other sites?
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/quackery/mike-adams-building-alternate-reality-online
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News
https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/6/25/21293246/facebook-misinformation-natural-news-conspiracy-theory
https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/20200620-ISDG-NaturalNews-Briefing-V4.pdf
https://www.politifact.com/personalities/mike-adams/
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/troll-farms-macedonia-philippines-pushed-coronavirus-disinformation-facebook-n1218376
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kavinsenapathy/2016/12/23/naturalnonsense-friends-dont-let-friends-read-natural-news/?sh=2e746aa6753d
I’d love to hear the definition of “conspiracy site”.
How does that work?
And he’s not “far right”, whatever that means.
Is everyone who values transparency and freedom “far right”?
Obviously not, since the far right values neither transparency nor freedom.
Which has a respected history as a health and supplement site?
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
If something is all over the news, then you can easily link to a real news site.
Netanyahu’s claim on February 9, 2021, was garbage-ish.
Virtually no Israelis were vaccinated when the 30 day period he referenced began.
The peak of Covid19 deaths happened about midway through, and at that point only about 10% of Israelis were fully vaccinated.
No mention of this was made in the article.
Considering the duration between time of infection and time of death, being say, two to three weeks, extremely few fully vaccinated individuals proportionately even existed at what would have to have been the point of infection.
Any conclusion about how few of the vaccinated people died during that time would be heavily skewed because they just didn’t exist yet in anywhere near equal numbers compared to the over 90% of them that were unvaccinated.
Any mention of some
“under 3% that died were vaccinated, and over 97% that died were unvaccinated”, is statistical
Bullshit.
Technically true, but extremely misleading, and intentionally so, without question.
I did my homework on this one.
The vaccination rate during this 30 day period went from basically 0% to 25%.
It would have needed to be 50/50 for 30 days and then factored for lag time between infection and death.
Considering the people did not drop dead upon infection, the pertinent vaccination rate was about 10% or less, at the peak of Covid19 deaths.
The entire comparison and any pro-vaccine statement based on some narrow-minded, cherry-picked observation, with no mention of miniscule vaccination rates and peak deaths makes Netanyahu’s claim Garbage as far as I am concerned.
Certainly Garbage-ish.
Be realistic.
It’s not the whole picture.
Not even close.
Well yeah….Netanyahu, another consistant liar, currently dodging criminal convictions.
“The Israeli People’s Committee Interim Conclusion Report, April 2021: From Uncontrollable Impulse to Criminal Spin?”
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Israeli-People-Committee-Interim-Conclusion-Report-April-2021.pdf
I’m sorry, it looks like an actual account of the death of a 35yo woman from brain hemorage after the jj jab. I dont see the hate speech /low value aspect.
Someone DIED after the holy JABoly!
(again , what is gained by a false story (if, as you are inferring, its a bogus account ) of someone DYING after and EXPERIMENTAL injection? It’s akin to accusing a rape victim of lying.
Meanwhile instead you link us to a site that offers commentary on the YouTube actions against the channel .
In reference to life site news, calling both masks and social distancing “useless” when it came to stopping the spread of the deadly virus, (not that far fetched. 6′ or 6o’ same exact risk according to recent data . And efficacy of masks at preventing exposure to the microscopic covid19 have been questionable since the beginning) VICE literally quotes God, oh I mean the CDC, and advise the wearing of “TWO SNUG FITTING MASKS ? ”
Make a person sick. For real.
If you want to link to a respected site, that offers that type of information you are welcome to do so. But links on the internet are a form of currency and add to how search sites perceive the site that hosts the link. And I don’t host links to hate speech sites even if the actual post at the site is about something else–the entire site includes anti LGBT hate among other nonsense.
So you want people to believe “two snug fitting masks” are a logical idea.
Wow.
The entire saga is so depressing.
Folks I’ve known to be pragmatic and intelligent, critical thinkers are way off the deep end. And I am blown away everyday at the hypnotic compliance, and brain-washed recitation of this half-cooked, flip-floppy viral rhetoric.
It’s giving me the chills.
And, I in turn, am stunned by the amount of people who would rather believe a random person on the internet with no credentials than multiple scientists who make studying disease their lives’ work.
Like Netanyahu?
Is he a doctor or scientist?
I certainly don’t believe his implications.
And a quote that mentions,
“In the last 30 days…”, without a reference date, sounds current, when it is not.
Too much was left out for the reader to be able to draw an accurate conclusion.
Like maybe 1 in 10 were vaccinated.
Maybe.
Probably much less.
Don’t you think he should have mentioned that?
Shouldn’t you?
Netanyahu is not a random person. He’s the head of state referencing statistics from his Health Ministry. I linked the article which clearly has the date on it.
However, here’s something that says roughly the same thing even more clearly in an article from last week.
“Out of a theoretical million people who get this vaccine,” just a few will suffer the peculiar clots, pediatrician and vaccine researcher Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia points out. “But out of a theoretical million people who get COVID, thousands will die.”
The problem is most people can’t understand the odds accurately. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/few-would-fear-covid-vaccines-if-policy-makers-explained-their-risks-better/
I’m not talking about vaccine risk.
Or covid19 risk.
I am talking about his blatant misrepresentation of facts.
Bending of the truth.
Netanyahu was facing fraud and corruption charges on the 8th of February, 2021.
The day before this article.
He was also pushing the vaccine as part of his March reelection campaign.
He was casting vaccination on a much more favorable light than it truly merited.
Why?
The truth would have sufficed.
But that wasn’t good enough for him, and he exaggerated the odds by glossing over or simply withholding the true pertinent facts.
Within a week vaccinations ebbed.
Obviously a blow to public trust.
Less people would be skeptical if only leaders like Netanyahu just told the truth.
You don’t seem to want to acknowledge that the odds were misrepresented by Netanyahu.
Or the fact that next to no one was vaccinated at the beginning of the 30 days and that changed everything as far as, “the odds being understood accurately”.
Why didn’t he address that?
Why won’t you?
Why do you shift the focus to vaccine risk being minimal?
That’s deflection.
The quote said, rather biblically, “In the last 30 days”…
May 5, @. 9:20 am..
You said “here’s what’s ‘happening’ in Israel”, as if it was current, not “here’s what ‘happened’ in Israel, because it was three months ago.
And then you said, “Sounds like the odds
‘look’ good…”, again suggesting currently, as opposed to “…the odds ‘looked’ really good…”,
suggesting old news.
No wonder I was surprised it was three months old.
Even when I clicked the link,
the reference date was obscure.
It was actually referencing
between 90 and 120 days ago.
But, This didn’t surprise me…
From the Jerusalem Post…
March 18,2021.
” Netanyahu
‘recruited’ Pfizer’s CEO to his election campaign – will it work?”
” Netanyahu is hoping that his relationship with the vaccine maker will give him a shot at another election victory”.
He is not to be trusted.
Doesn’t look misrepresented to me:
“Two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine have proved more than 95% effective against infection, hospitalisation and death from Covid-19 in Israel, the country with the highest proportion of its population vaccinated in the world, research has found.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/05/two-pfizer-covid-vaccine-doses-give-over-95-protection-shows-israel-study
This article was from yesterday.
Ah yes, three months later…
And not a word now from Israel on what the percentages are of Covid19 deaths in the last 30 days, as far as comparing whether they were vaccinated or unvaccinated like before.
Remember?
It was asserted that out of 1536 covid19 deaths, less than 3% were people that had been vaccinated, and over 97% were people who had not been vaccinated.
Remember, virtually no one was fully vaccinated on January 7, 2021, when the comparison period began, and roughly only 10%, 2 weeks in.
That is what this is supposed to be about.
Entirely different from vaccine efficacy.
Not even close.
Apples and oranges comparison.
Why does the article from yesterday not give deaths from the last 30 days, and then give the percentage of who died of Covid19 that were vaccinated, versus the percentage of who died unvaccinatedlike before.
Because those numbers now would look entirely different, probably much less favorably.
Just because a new efficacy figure is coincidentally the same number as the percentage of deaths
of the unvaccinated during the 30 day period starting January 7, 2021, (+- a day) does not show in any way shape or form that the previous comparison from February 9, 2021 was not a misrepresentation.
You see what you want to see, Kym.
Or you deflected again.
How is it that you see a 30 day Covid19 death breakdown expressed as percentage comparison, vaccinated versus not vaccinated, as in any way the same as a vaccine efficacy, just because they happen to be the same number?
Two totally different concepts.
That they are both somehow over 97% definitely does not mean that one number corroborates the other!
I thought you had me there for a second, but, not so, as it turns out.
You see, I never questioned the efficacy.
I only questioned the unrealistic relative relevance and the completely unscientific nature of how or why anyone possibly could have come up with the percentage figures given by Netanyahu, and then represent them as an accurate measure of anything other than
bullshit propaganda
designed to fool people into getting vaccinated through a scare tactic.
Doesn’t sound honest in any way.
I maintain my position.
It was dishonesty and a misrepresentation by Netanyahu.
How and why the numbers matched is meaningless, unless they were somehow manipulated in order to deceive.
It seems to have worked on you, and then on me by extension because I consider you intelligent, and tend to believe you initially the same as you believe in your sources. Your faith in them almost had me fooled.
You seem to imply by yesterday’s article that they knew 3 months ago what the efficacy would be as of yesterday, and that the information is the same, in order to correct me.
And hold firmly to your position.
The information is not the same.
It’s entirely different.
I can just about guarantee no one will ever hear about the percentages of Israeli Covid19 deaths in a 30 day period, vaccinated versus not vaccinated ever again.
It isn’t going to happen because those numbers are going to be changing now that over 60% of Israelis are vaccinated.
Kym, You said Ministry of Health………..did you mean Ministry of Truth?
“Netanyahu is not a random person. He’s the head of state referencing statistics from his Health Ministry.”
So you respect the possibly convicted criminal?
Are you aware of his dealings with pfizer? Another convicted criminal organization.
Didn’t you just say something in another comment about not trusting compulsive liars?
So many questions….just trying to grasp the mental gymnastics.
“multiple scientists who make studying disease their lives’ work”
It’s amazing what people won’t see if their paycheck requires them not to see it, credentialed or not.
It’s amazing how folks would rather take the word of known charlatans rather than respected scientists. I’m not saying that stopped clocks aren’t occassionally right and that experts are never wrong…but if I’m going to bet my life, it sure as heck isn’t going to be siding with known charlatans.
I suspect people like Erin Brockovich were called a few names like Charlatan more than once too.
When you say “known Charlatans” known as Charlatans by whom is relevant?
“Respected experts” is also vague and an opinion not fact.
Cuomo is given awards for killing the elderly, is he a respected expert?
Certainly, we might all have differing opinions on who is an expert or not. But in this case I would say that multiple epidemiologists weigh strongly as experts against Mike Adams who doesn’t list any education, writings, accomplishments to back his expertise in the subject. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mike-adams-2a71147/
Kym, you should try reading the links that some of your smarter commenters are dropping.
interviews with well respected world renowned Doctors and Scientists that are sounding the alarm.
Sucharit Bakti
John Ionneades
Michael Yeadon
James Lyon-Weiller
Carrie Madej
Scott Jensen
Pierre Kory
Wolfgang Wodard
Sherry Tenpenny
Dolores Cahill
Vernon Coleman
Knut Wichowski
there are many more, this list is just off the top of my head.
Don’t be obtuse, get over yourself and your concern over how google analytics perceives your site. Use your brain, I know it’s in there somewhere……under all that woke leftist crap.
I don’t have time to research all of them but I grabbed one in the middle–Carrie Madej–and looked her up. She’s a osteopath that spoke to the capitol crowd on January 6. She believes the Qanon craziness. She was gullible enough that she believed the Cannibal Club was a real restaurant that served humans as food…spoiler alert…it isn’t real and it doesn’t serve human bodies.
Look, you want me to believe that people like that are experts on vaccines and epidemics……….? That is the kind of crap that one of my children would have known better than to believe once they passed ten years old.
Kym, baby steps…….
start here:
https://odysee.com/@TLAVagabond:5/Dr-Sucharit-Bhakdi-Interview-COVID-Vaccine-Blood-Clot-Risk-Was-Known-Ignored-Buried:9
fishkiller, just say no to mind drugs. If you start there and end up at Carrie Madej–you should probably rethink your first step.
Also Bhakdi was awarded “The Golden Blockhead” last year for his discredited theories…
Just saying…you might want to look for someone more credible.
When the vast bulk of intelligent, pragmatic, critical thinkers reject your ideas that should tell you something.
Funny Third.
“Vast bulk”.
Dreamin’…
from the wrongthink site as source https://www.fox17online.com/news/local-news/ionia/ionia-co-womans-death-after-getting-j-j-vaccine-reported-to-the-cdc
https://www.clickondetroit.com/health/2021/05/04/cdc-reviewing-michigan-womans-death-after-johnson-johnson-vaccine/
So what? The small risk of blood clots among women of child-bearing age with the J&J vaccine, in this particular case fatal, is old news.
The study that found “6′ or 6o’ same exact risk according to recent data” also found that masks were exceptionally effective, and the distance-not-being-important was only for people with masks, while the 6ft rule was useful for people without masks. If you’re going to use their conclusions, use all of them, not just one context-free part of one of them.
The rate of death from side effect is still much lower than the rate of death from the virus, granted both are extremely low for most people.
Many products are on the market for years before all the side effects are known and the lawsuits begin.
Yet people are being threatened with vax passports , and mandatory vax, if they do not submit to an experimental jab.
Remember how long it took Erin Brockovich to get results on her investigations.
Real News? Why not link to anecdotes of people slowly suffocating in hospitals due to Covid-19? There are so many more of them to choose from. https://www.vox.com/2021/2/20/22280817/covid-19-deaths-us-nursing-home-icu-ventilator
Wait, wait…yes! I have some from cnn and npr too!
Be afraid!
(who funds them?)
Whose funding the anti vaxxers stories?
More links to what covid feels like:
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-04-10/coronavirus-daily-covid-19-diaries-online-are-helping-people-cope
https://medicine.iu.edu/blogs/student-life/i-am-not-invincible-my-covid-19-story
https://blogs.webmd.com/my-experience/20201223/covid-19-changed-everything-3-personal-stories
Moreb
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/05/03/covid-19-deaths-personal-memphis-reporter/4928605001/
https://www.wandtv.com/news/taylorville-man-encourages-others-to-get-vaccinated-by-sharing-his-covid-19-survivor-story/article_dcd40d58-ac4f-11eb-a07a-536c0eba0436.html
https://www.washingtonian.com/2020/11/16/8-stories-of-people-who-recovered-from-covid-and-still-deal-with-the-consequences/
And many more if you want to look- I got over 200 million hits on the search “personal stories about covid.”
I also checked under “I had covid and it wasn’t so bad”. Came up with some hits:
https://www.ketv.com/article/i-was-surprised-omaha-fire-captain-recovers-from-covid-19-never-had-breathing-problems/32497525
https://www.eatthis.com/news-ellen-degeneres-covid-symptom-back-pain/
https://www.savannahnow.com/story/news/2020/12/02/savannah-morning-news-reporter-rsquoi-had-covid-and-didnrsquot-knowrsquo/115084364/
There were a couple where I had to pay to read so I didn’t read them. But many of the ones I could read turned out to be a litany of misery but ended by announcing it wasn’t so bad.
I’m guessing google?
Who is HEAVILY invested in the jabs amongst other “necessities”.
Your point is….?
If you remember, Guest, I am not thinking the big, bad doesn’t exist. Though perhaps it hasn’t really been properly proven.
And yes, some will be infected if indeed it does.
But in order for the Plan to work, fear is a necessity.
People die every day. Car wrecks, disease, you name it. It was her time. How many people die from choking on food every day? She was probably obese and ate junk food. Big deal.
( see what you antivaxers sound like? You make no sense when you then come here pointing out a vaccine death . Make up your minds, don’t cherry pick which deaths are important to you.)
Yeah sure wrote “It was her time” . It’s Never to late to learn how to be a better person.
_________
https://www.verywellmind.com/can-people-learn-to-be-more-compassionate-2795560
Compassion involves the ability to feel empathy for others. This ability to understand the suffering of other people is an important component that motivates prosocial behaviors, or the desire to help. The ability to feel compassion for another person requires also having empathy and awareness. You need to be able to understand what another person is facing and understand what it might be like to be in their place.
Yeah Sure was being sarcastic.
The car wreck or Covid exposure are external risks.
We are aware and take precautions and initiate remedies if we become ill (early treatment is key.)
The risks from taking a vaccine are intentionally brought on.
There is NO COMPARISON .
No one who died, or is left disabled or ill from taking the vax’s ” time had come. ”
We are powerless once that macabre and unknown solution meets our divinely created immune system.
Talk about cherry picking.
So many tools!
Not taking the vaccine is a choice. If you subsequently contract COVID and die, then your death is just as much of an intentional action as if you had been one of the rare few whose death might be attributed to the vaccine. AND, you didn’t read the odds very well and made a poor bet.
Sure Kym,
And if you don’t drive a tank to cross the street and you get run over and die then you killed yourself on purpose.
You knew the risk and you did it anyways, with no tank.
Don’t take foolish chances,
Drive a tank. Save yourself.
Everyone.
But what about the cost, you say?
Nevermind that, think about the odds, you’ll never die crossing the street in a tank!
Now place your bet.
It’s very interesting how those that have gotten the shots have to keep reaffirming their decision as the right choice.
“I made the right bet, I am a winner”
Remember ‘Netanyahu Logic’
(“A jarring fact”)
February, 9, 2021.
“For the last 30 days”, (while almost no one was fully vaccinated, and almost everyone wasn’t fully vaccinated), “of the1536 that died of Covid19 in Israel almost no one among them was fully vaccinated, and almost every one among them wasn’t fully vaccinated”.
No shit?
Imagine that!
Talk about a sales pitch.
Fucking Genius!
Except it’s meaningless.
And everyone bought it but me?
Speaking of odds, what are the odds?
(Not to be confused with vaccine efficacy, mind you, that is completely different, right?)
So, just to clear up the whole choice, intentional, thingy…
If you die of the vaccination,
Would you consider that suicide, homicide, or maybe assisted suicide?
Act of God?
OD?
Assisted Homicide?
Look, every day people post links and facts showing the odds of dying with COVID if you don’t take the vaccine are much worse than having a bad outcome if you take the vaccine. Here’s what one calculation says: “Data shows the risk of dying from COVID is between 36 to nearly 79,000 times higher than the risk of dying from a J&J vaccine-related blood clot…The odds of being killed by lightning are 180,746 to 1. Of being killed in a car crash: 103 to 1. Of drowning in a swimming pool: 5,573 to 1. Of dying in a plane crash: 11,175 to 1. Of being killed falling down a flight of stairs: 2,700 to 1. Yet people stand in their back yards marveling at a lightning show cracking across a dark sky. And they drive in vehicles every day. And swim. And fly on planes. And walk down stairs so often every day their feet ache. Daily occurrences far riskier than worrying about dying from the J&J vaccine. In a world of odds, I find that odd.” https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/opinion/2021/04/16/odds-dying-j-j-vaccine-astronomical-benefits-many-gianficaro-column/7201538002/
If you and the others are this bad at calculating the odds of dying from COVID vs dying from getting the COVID vaccine and you just won’t pay attention when others calculate it for you, then there’s nothing we can do. But I can’t help but hope that if we keep showing you from different angles that you’ve made a mistake, you’ll eventually get it.
Being bad at math is a terrible reason to end up dead.
The chance of dying from Covid19 since it began in Humboldt are 1 in 3872, Kym.
1 in 551 nationwide.
Your (Kym Kemp), chance of having died in Humboldt is 1 in 30,000.
(5 in 135,000)
Probably much less
You are betting against that.
I don’t care what you are risking.
Chances are, it was unnecessary.
Mine is 1 in 67,500.(58)
I’m supposed to let someone inject me with some shit betting against that?
No thanks.
If you add our age groups…
1 in over 19,000.
The chance of dying in Humboldt under 49 is 0, Kym.
ZERO!
Who is bad at math?
You see what you want to see.
Comparing the odds of dying from the vaccine to: (dying of one thing versus dying of all causes) is apples and oranges.
(Netanyahu Logic)
“Who is bad at math?” You are, because our death rate based on confirmed tests is almost exactly 1%. Using the total population of the county as if it was the total number of people infected, or the current number of positives as the final number of positives, or whatever nonsense you did, does not result in good math.
Bushy,
I went by the dashboard stats , ma’am.
No one under 49 died in Humboldt. 2 – 50-59, and 5 – 60-69, for a total of 7- 0-69.
I’m talking mortality rate.
Or well, deaths per capita.
0 is pretty easy to figure in the under 49 group.
Nationwide….
1 in 551.
(331,000,000 ÷
600,000.)
Humboldt County….
(135,553÷
39)
1 in 3475, or
(135,553÷38)
1 in 3,567
( Dashboard discrepancy shown from total of 39 and 21+10+5+2 = 38 cumulative total
shown under positive case count)
I admit I erred when I used a total of 35 deaths before.
Kym’s chance,
60-69
5 deaths out of 135,553
1 in 27,111.
(I erred here, too, it’s not 1 in 30,000, as I said above) I entered 153,553 instead of 135,553.
If you want to call it under 69,
7 out of 153,553,
1 in 19,365.
Under 49 the death rate is 0.
Zero.
Bushy, kindly point out my error, please.
Your death rate and my death rate is the same,
(50-59)
Or let’s say under 59…
2 deaths in 135,553
1 in 67,776.
Let me be clear,
This is only about the relative risk of death.
I do not discount the possible benefit of the “vaccine”,
or do I discount the possible risk of it.
Much is unknown and yet to be seen.
Where did I err?
Be specific.
Don’t lump your risk with the rest of Humboldt,
When it comes to determining your risk of death from Covid19, act your age.
Another caveat.
We are not talking hospitalization, a serious matter, and worth considering a vaccination to prevent.
Absolutely.
I am not anti vax, just a stickler for facts.
What part of 0 deaths under 49,
(positive tests, by the way, as if it makes a difference, 0 is 0)
is so hard to understand?
2 in our age group.
5 in Kym’s.
Pretty simple.
Covid isn’t over yet. The number of people who have done something (gotten infected, died, etc) is going to go up. That 0 people under 50 have died so far does not mean that you have a 0% chance of dying if you’re under 50. That’s no better than looking at the start of last year, and declaring that since 0 people had died at any age, 0 people were going to die. You have to look at the outcomes relative to the number of people infected to get useful numbers, and have a sufficient sample size. We know a certain number were infected based on positive tests. We also know another number were infected but were not tested, so the actual number of people who have been infected is higher. This number we have to estimate. The estimate is not 100%, which would need to be true for your math to make any kind of sense.
That is gobbledygook.
Pure gobbledygook.
Are you sure you should have gotten that shot.
You and others sure are going overboard to convince yourself it wasn’t a mistake.
“Based on confirmed tests”
🙄
Keep using the “test” to back up your illusions.
I agree Guest.
Apples and oranges.
In certain age groups there might be a better chance of dying from the big, bad. In others, there might be a better chance of dying from the experimental jab.
Maybe.
Getting vaccinated is empowering. Sitting around waiting to be resigned if you get sick is what is helpless.
It’s nice to see Fresno Sheriffs helping our community beat this virus!
I’m confused (again?)
How exactly is the jab going to help you “beat the virus”?
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext
“The Israel MoH and Pfizer separately provided in-kind support to this study. ”
Fox, hen houses…
It is nice to be reminded that there are networks for helping.