Judge Rules Oklahoma Man to Stand Trial for Humboldt Threat Spree; Victim Calls for Full Justice

cell phone

Stock image. [Photo by Mark Aliiev on Unsplash]

Note: A preliminary hearing is not a trial and does not determine guilt. Daryl Ray Jones has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.


The preliminary hearing for Daryl Ray Jones reached its conclusion Tuesday morning in Humboldt County Superior Court, with Judge Timothy Canning finding probable cause to hold Jones to answer on 31 of the 35 charges against him — and at least one victim is calling on the court to pursue the full weight of the case at trial.

Court records show that proceedings began at 8:32 a.m. on March 10 in Courtroom Two, with Jones present in custody of the Humboldt County Correctional Facility. Deputy District Attorney Roger Rees presented the prosecution’s closing argument, followed by Conflict Counsel Meagan O’Connell for the defense.

O’Connell sought to have a significant portion of the counts dismissed, arguing that a number of the alleged victims had not expressed fear meeting the legal threshold required for criminal threat charges. Judge Canning disagreed, ruling that the evidence presented was sufficient to move the case forward — dismissing only four counts, Counts 17, 22, 23, and 26, where investigators could not determine the origin of the calls.

A second case against Jones has not yet reached the preliminary hearing stage. The court noted that Jones is not held to answer on those charges at this time, though the People retain the right to allege them in the information.

Arraignment on the information is set for March 24, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. on the Felony Calendar.

The ruling brings a close to the preliminary hearing that unfolded across many months. Beyond the wave of threatening calls that disrupted schools, businesses, and day cares across Humboldt County in the spring of 2025, testimony revealed that Jones is also alleged to have carried out sustained harassment of former classmates. During the preliminary trial, one woman describing a pattern of threats that predated the 2025 incidents by years and continued despite prior law enforcement involvement.

In a statement provided to Redheaded Blackbelt after the preliminary trial, she wrote:

“As a victim of Daryl’s threatening behavior, I am glad Daryl is being held to answer on the 30+ charges against him. From here, I am strongly opposed to the idea of a mental health release or a lenient plea deal. This man’s pattern of behavior — years of sustained graphic, violent threats against local women (and most recently, horrifying threats to school children) — coupled with his documented obsession with guns and ammo, makes him a clear and present danger to this community. His release via a mental health diversion would be the worst-case scenario and would be an unacceptable risk to public safety. Similarly, any plea deal that minimizes the severity of his actions with a reduced sentence would be equally as disappointing. All of the victims in this case, including the children, their parents/guardians, school staffers, local business employees, individual victims, and anyone else impacted by this man’s actions, deserve nothing less than full justice.”

The concern about mental health diversion is not without context. Jones’ case was previously paused while he underwent a mental competency evaluation; he was found fit to stand trial. During the hearing, defense attorney O’Connell pointed to statements Jones made to police in which he said he was asking for help and that he was never given the help he needed. Detective Celeste Villareal of the Arcata Police Department testified in an earlier session that Jones told her he “wanted to make people afraid” and believed that calling schools would get him help — a set of statements the defense has highlighted throughout the proceedings.

Whether the case proceeds to trial, resolves via plea, or takes another path, remains to be seen. Jones’ arraignment on the information is scheduled for March 24 at 8:30 a.m. Redheaded Blackbelt will continue to report as the case moves forward.


Note: Ryan Hutson contributed to this and previous reports by providing court documentation and/or attending court proceedings.


Earlier:

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Humboldt Love
Guest
Humboldt Love
3 months ago

Hard to believe O’Connell pushed for reduced sentencing due to a lack of enough fear to meet the criminal threshold. That’s gross. I saw middle schoolers drop their backpacks in a panic and run for their very lives when the alarm sounded at my local middle school – they will never forget this. How do you look yourself in the eye?

Quantum Quipster
Member
3 months ago
Reply to  Humboldt Love

“Everyone hates lawyers until they need one.”
-Anonymous, old adage.

Poking the bear,
Guest
Poking the bear,
3 months ago

Humboldt police don’t deliver justice. Most of them are busy chasing donuts.

Solar Bozo
Member
3 months ago
Reply to  Humboldt Love

Did you read it? No mention of O’Connell pushing for reduced sentencing. She objected to some of the charges by stating that they didn’t think they met the threshold for criminal charges. The trial will determine that. She’s advocating for the defense, that’s her job. (And no, I’m not on his side: he should go to prison. I am on the side of reading comprehension.)

Apopa
Guest
Apopa
3 months ago

Prosecute to the fullest extent of the law! Restitution for the costs of responders.

Reason
Member
3 months ago

Sure, dismiss calls from underermined origins. However, charge those threatening schools as conducting acts of terrorism. It actually fits the legal definition.