New Cal Poly Humboldt Study Looks at Trees, Powerlines, and Wildfire Risk

Press release from Cal Poly Humboldt:

firefighters silhouetted looking toward a mountain on fire

[Stock photo from InciWeb]

Wildfires and power outages caused by vegetation near powerlines have contributed to some of the state’s most destructive fires.

To better understand and avoid those risks and guide safer management, researchers at Cal Poly Humboldt partnered with a utility company to study tree failures (falling trees and branches) and fuel buildup along powerline corridors.

“Working directly with the utility company allowed us to connect what we were seeing in the field with real-world risks to communities,” says Forestry Professor Lucy Kerhoulas, a lead researcher of the study. “The goal was to identify where and why tree failures are happening, so management efforts can be focused where they matter most.”

Kerhoulas conducted the study alongside Cal Poly Humboldt faculty Rosemary Sherriff, Geography, Environment & Spatial Analysis professor; Kerry Byrne, Environmental Science & Management professor; and Zoe Ziegler, Forestry graduate student.

The study, published in the Journal of Environmental Management, focuses on rural, heavily timbered regions of Northern California, where power outages caused by falling trees and branches are common and can also spark wildfires.

“Tree failures can cause fire ignitions and/or power outages, which can create a lot of issues for residents,” Kerhoulas says. In fact, outages caused by falling trees or branches are among the most common reasons for power outages, and can impact hundreds of thousands of people at a time.

By comparing vegetation near powerlines with vegetation farther away, researchers identified several factors that increase risk.

One of the study’s most notable findings was higher levels of woody debris near powerlines. In many cases, tree-felling and pruning by utility vegetation crews left coarse woody material on the ground, increasing fuel loads around powerlines. Removing that debris is a key step in reducing wildfire risk, the researchers found.

The team also found that some vegetation types are more vulnerable to failure than others. Oaks, for example, showed higher levels of damage than conifers, making them a higher priority for management. Areas with dry conditions and thick duff layers also had increased tree failures, making them a high priority for management treatments to minimize the risk of potential ignitions. Beyond fuel concerns, the researchers found that effective vegetation management can help reduce beetle infestations, which weaken trees and make them more likely to fail.

Looking ahead, researchers hope to use remote sensing tools such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). NDVI, according to NASA, measures vegetation “greenness” to assess plant health. Integrating satellite data with on-the-ground observations could help utility companies scale this study’s findings to larger landscapes to more efficiently identify high-risk areas and prioritize preventive work.

These strategies, Kerhoulas said, not only protect infrastructure but also enhance community safety.

“Ultimately, even small changes in how vegetation is managed near powerlines can make a big difference in preventing fires and keeping the lights on,” she says.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
melanopsin
Member
4 months ago

“One of the study’s most notable findings was higher levels of woody debris near powerlines. In many cases, tree-felling and pruning by utility vegetation crews left coarse woody material on the ground, increasing fuel loads around powerlines. Removing that debris is a key step in reducing wildfire risk, the researchers found.”

Not to ridicule the study too much but this seems kind of “duh” for one of the most notable findings.

Wonder why the name of “a utility company” is withheld?

Last edited 4 months ago
melanopsin
Member
4 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

This work was funded by a grant from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).

ABA
Guest
ABA
4 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

When PG&E’s contractor (fuck you very much, Wright Tree Service) pruned and cut vegetation around the powerlines on my property they left all the debris right where it dropped. Including in the middle of my driveway and within five feet of structures, not to mention directly underneath the powerlines they were supposed to be “protecting.”

It is very, very “duh” but apparently they need to hear it.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
4 months ago
Reply to  ABA

That was pretty much the scene from Bull Creek to Ettersburg. PG$E left downed trees and slash everywhere but right under the actual powerlines. Not easy to drag full trees down 50 degree inclines or even out of ravines. Now they’re dead, dried out and getting full of bettles. Everyone and their cousin that had a tree service jumped at chance to make some money, and not much on the clean up.

Last edited 4 months ago
melanopsin
Member
4 months ago

pdf

A B S T R A C T

Rural powerlines are critical for delivering electricity to communities far from urban areas but present a sig-

nificant hazard when located in forested regions, where damaged trees can fall onto high voltage lines. In four

diverse Mediterranean forest types in Northern California, USA, we evaluated the stand-level conditions driving

levels of tree damage (i.e., structural damage, biotic damage, and beetle presence) and fuels (i.e., litter and duff

depths, fine woody fuel loads, and coarse woody fuel density) using generalized linear modes in paired plots

(adjacent to powerline corridors and within the nearby interior forest) at each site (50 total sites). Tree structural

damage was inversely related to stand-level structural diversity in yellow pine plots (p < 0.001) and beetle

presence was lower in plots adjacent to powerline corridors in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; p = 0.039) and

deciduous oak (Quercus sp.; p = 0.003) plots. Further, deciduous oak plots had relatively high levels of structural

(p = 0.013) and biotic damage (p = 0.003). Litter depth decreased (p < 0.001) and duff depth increased (p =

0.015) with greater aridity. Powerline-adjacent plots also had lower levels of fine woody fuels (p = 0.011) and

higher levels of coarse woody fuels (p < 0.001) than paired plots in interior forest. For diverse Mediterranean

regions such as Northern California, our study demonstrates how risk assessments to prevent outages and

powerline-ignited wildfires can be informed by site-level conditions such as dominant vegetation type, forest structure, aridity, and proximity to powerline corridors.

Last edited 4 months ago
Mariahgirl
Guest
4 months ago

We really need Humboldt state involved in trimming the trees in Humboldt County.

treeman53
Member
treeman53
4 months ago
Reply to  Mariahgirl

Lol

treeman53
Member
treeman53
4 months ago

Rather than maintaining vegetation near their powerlines, they wasted billions on renewable intermittent energy that the state mandates with its renewables portfolio standards, neglecting necessary, costly infrastructure maintenance.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
4 months ago
Reply to  treeman53

Along with maintaining infrastructure, the State needs to increase the amount of energy we produce. We also need to transition away from fossil fuels as quickly as possible.
California now gets about 2/3 of its energy from renewables.

Last edited 4 months ago
CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
4 months ago
Reply to  D'Tucker Jebs

Which is fine, but capacity hasn’t kept up, so companies like Edison have to sell it off to other states like Arizona. It has to go somewhere or it isn’t making any money and investors frown on that.

D'Tucker Jebs
Member
4 months ago

You’ll hear no argument from me against nationalizing the energy sector.

Public goods and services should not be controlled by for-profit companies.

Last edited 4 months ago
Dave Kahan
Guest
Dave Kahan
4 months ago

The authors of this study are very much wrong on several points, imho. Firstly, opening up the canopy so much as they’ve done all over Southern Humboldt has resulted in drastically increased growth in the surface fuels. Secondly, as long as they dispose of the flashier fuels, leaving one layer of coarser fuels (logs) on the ground is fine. If they remove the kindling, they’re not likely to ignite. And for most of them, if they have good ground contact, they’ll begin to rot and not constitute a fire hazard within five years or so.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dave-kahan-8320a7219/