Local Climate Groups Urge HCAOG to Restore Strong Climate Commitments in Regional Transportation Plan
Press release from CRTP, EPIC, and 350 Humboldt:
CRTP, EPIC, and 350 Humboldt urge the Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG) to acknowledge the climate crisis in its Regional Transportation Plan, and to maintain the much-needed ambition of the plan’s goals and policies for tackling the crisis.
HCAOG’s Regional Transportation Plan is the official long-range plan for transportation in Humboldt County. It is updated every four years, and a new draft is currently being circulated for public comment.
Transportation is the leading source of local climate pollution, and the plan has long recognized climate change as a crisis. During the plan’s last update in 2021, HCAOG also added Safe and Sustainable Transportation Targets that commit the region to achieving specific milestones on the way to a safe, climate-friendly transportation system.
The new draft plan, however, eliminates every use of the phrase “climate crisis” from the document. It even goes so far as to edit the phrase “climate crisis” out of a quote from the California State Transportation Agency–one of many state agencies that routinely refer to climate change as a crisis.
The watering down of the plan’s language is matched by backsliding on Safe and Sustainable Transportation. The plan proposes an unnecessary and harmful delay to HCAOG’s target for the construction of non-car-dependent housing, as well as delays to electric vehicle charging station targets and other needed climate actions.
Perhaps most troubling, the new plan would eliminate a policy calling for “project funding consistency.” In other words, HCAOG is removing the only policy that held it accountable for the projects it funds being consistent with its own climate and safety goals. Without implementation, a plan is just words on paper, and funding consistency is one of the key reasons for a regional transportation plan to exist. To ensure that the region’s transportation projects save lives and help stabilize the climate, HCAOG must put its money where its mouth is.
CRTP, EPIC, and 350 Humboldt applaud HCAOG for previously acknowledging the climate crisis and for adopting its Safe and Sustainable Transportation targets four years ago. We call on HCAOG not to reverse climate progress. We urge members of the public to join us in contacting HCAOG and telling them to acknowledge the climate crisis and act accordingly.
Comments can be submitted to HCAOG at [email protected].
Official comments submitted by our organizations can be found at: https://tinyurl.com/RTPComments.
CRTP, EPIC, and 350 Humboldt urge the Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG) to acknowledge the climate crisis in its Regional Transportation Plan, and to maintain the much-needed ambition of the plan’s goals and policies for tackling the crisis.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
Environmental programs are the problem for Humboldt County. Any actual living wage jobs will be shut down for supposed environmental safety. But yet let drug addicts and mentally ill run free.The Food stamps program is not designed to get people off of it it designed to keep them dependent on Government. This is not how it should be ran.
The offshore wind farm would provide lots of living wage jobs.
Increased bus service will not only provide living wage jobs,
but will also make it easier for other people to get to their job.
Reading your comment in its entirety, though, shows that you really had no interest in inserting anything meaningful. It sees as though you just wanted to bitch.
There is no adequate existing Humboldt Bay Port infrastructure, nor is their qualified heavy marine manufacturing infrastructure or qualified wind energy manufacturing tradesmen…
Not to mention the complete lack of power transmission infrastructure to get the energy ashore, and to it’s place of use…
A wind farm materializing off of Humboldt Bay, assembled in Humboldt Bay, is a pipedream…
Even if it did materialize, it would likely bypass Humboldt entirely, the energy generated, doing Humboldt zero good…
Nothing you say is meaningful, unless it can realistically materialize with the existing infrastructure, of which there is none…
It’s non existent…
The wind farm is not realistic…
It’s fictional, and will likely remain fictional…
It’s as fictional as the local workers prepared to construct it and maintain it, and the place to build it, and the ships to transport it and install it…
Newsom is arranging new oil and gas drilling in California, behind your back, while he simultaneously hamstrings the alternative renewable energy grid tie type systems he just vetoed…
I don’t remember the exact description of what Newsom vetoed, but it wasn’t a step in the direction he misleads others into thinking he faces…
Since my comment was in response to a comment about the lack of living-wage jobs in Humboldt, you seem to be agreeing that developing the offshore wind project, including the development of port infrastructure and the construction of transmission lines, will inject much needed living wage jobs into this region.
I’m saying that, realistically, it isn’t ever going to happen successfully, in the foreseeable future, Jebs…
That means, “No jobs, Jebs…!!!”
Spin the metrobus wind farm job creation nonsense, however you want, but you’re wasting your energy…
If you think it makes financial sense to develop a deep water port in Humboldt Bay, just in order to service a non existent wind farm, you probably think it makes just as much sense that they will all take the Redwood Transit bus to get there and back, and everything will just be hunky dory…
Hint:
Living wage workers don’t have to, or want to, take the fucking pathetic, stinking, metrobus petri dish mobile…
They can afford to, and want to, drive their very own cars…
While you’re at it, imagine that…
Not everyone craves longingly for the nostalgic olden days of Jackie Gleason and the Honeymooners…
Because, urban legends, or not, those days are over…
Just rebuilding the Schneider dock will provide a few jobs. And there will be entirely new port jobs needed just to do things like installing and maintaining various electrical systems that connect pretty much anything. C/R will have to expand its electrician and welding programs to compensate. There will be all sorts of ship crews, deckhands, general labor yard workers, managers, and foremen needed. These won’t be minimum wage jobs either. Many of these are probably going to start north of $30/hr or more if higher-skilled union labor is used.
Infrastructure has to “materialize” within existing infrastructure?!
You’re making a lot of sense there buddy.
The project is building the infrastructure.
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2025/dec/9/offshore-wind-workforce-and-supply-chain-analysis/
How many jobs would the imaginary wind farm create?
How many jobs would increased bus service create?
Also, why do you cetaceaphobes and ornithophobes hate marine mammals and birds?
“An economic assessment found that an envisioned 170-acre terminal to support the offshore wind industry could generate as many as 830 local jobs and more than $130 million in industry output over a five-year period.” https://siteselection.com/a-eureka-moment-for-offshore-wind/
As far as the jobs needed to build the transmission line infrastructure– well, I’m tired, so other people can look that up, but one would be fairly safe to imagine that it would be quite a few.
I really don’t understand your last line about hating marine mammals and birds.
I that regarding the long disproven claim that offshore wind somehow harms wildlife?
That’s a good one. Jobs! Gnocchi matters. Do you envision a future where the bus afficianodos actually get to drive the bus? Just wondering……..wildlife….good one! Cetaceans matter….buy a Diesel or Gas truck! Yep. And go about your life…….enjoying.
Everything is imaginary before it’s built.
Oh you mean destroy what’s left of our fishing industry. You do realize the amount of oil and diesel the windmills require. The astronomically large Blades are not disposable. This would not provide long time work force here and all power will be shipped out. Obviously you are uneducated in this department or are too invested and showing your ignorance. Dont be one.
The farm itself and the infrastructure to maintain it will stay here for years. https://thepublicsradio.org/south-coast-bureau/how-many-jobs-does-an-offshore-wind-farm-create/
Here too.
More from PBS.
Audiocast on construction from WGBH (catch it before all public radio turns to dust.)
ONshore farm development blog series for contrast to OFFshore and similarities.
Need parts? Get some here.
Go ahead and educate yourself. It really is a bit annoying when one poster demands that another be educated, then shows us just how much reading and studying they’ve done on their own.
For extra credit, here’s some more that specifically focuse on recycling. How much free time do you have?
Clean Grid.
Dept of Energy (at least in 2022 maybe not now) said they’ll help you recycle.
LM Windpower will come and get them from you.
Iowa has been doing it for some years now. Also in Iowa
Science Direct paper on composite recycling strategies
England and Europe are already doing it.
And the Chinese.
No Blade Left Behind
That “windblade landfill” in Texas that I’ve seen pics posted here? Totally not a landfill. It’s storage for blade recycling. Study it out, yo.
And the best for last, what else can be done with blades? Well, make playgrounds and furniture!
Enjoy!
Even the founder of the weather channel blew the whistle on the global climate change Hoax.
Oh the founder of the weather channel. I’m sure they are top-notch climate scientist.
A guy who left The Weather Channel a year after it was founded and never had anything to do with its science.
John Coleman was a TV presenter, not a climate researcher, and his personal opinions never represented the network, the AMS, NASA, NOAA, or the National Academy of Sciences.
Every major scientific body on the planet accepts human driven warming because the evidence is overwhelming. Waving around Coleman’s decades old TV credentials as if it overturns physics, satellite data, ocean heat content, radiative forcing measurements, and peer reviewed research is clown level reasoning.
One retired weatherman disagreeing with the data is not a whistleblower. It is one more guy who didn’t understand the science in the first place.
I think it may have been John that gave Jim Cantore his first weatherman job right out of college. He’s been at the WC ever since.
Meh… the “Climate Crisis” is a shakedown, not a business plan. No wonder the wording changed this year. Bill Gates is off the bandwagon, the Obamas have two beach-front properties now and the rich and famous who tweet about climate change are most likely tweeting while on a private jet.
No one takes these “climate clowns” seriously, anymore.
Correct its on to the next tax scam. The green policy made every current politician a millionaire, funny how the politicians played the environmentalists and played them for trillions of tax dollars. Takes alot of money to make every politician a millionaire but we did it! Thank you , you’ve been had, the planet isn’t in any better state but politicians are happy.
More leftwing nonsense. I pass riderless buses everyday and tesla chargers with no cars charging. We have plenty of clean burning natural gas here. Leave humboldt alone. We dont need to ruin the bay and ocean to supply energy to the south. We dont need the government confiscating more land for preserves and giving handouts to people who cant otherwise make it here.