Granting Card Dealer Permit, Eureka Council Deals Ex-Con a Second Chance

Sean Padelford [Screenshot from video of the meeting]
Reversing an action taken by the city’s police chief, the Eureka City Council approved a card dealer permit for a man who was convicted of violent felonies but said he’s now sober and determined to be a benefit to the community and his young son.
Eureka requires all card room employees – not just dealers – to be licensed by the police chief. The chief can deny a permit for numerous reasons, including felony convictions.
That’s where Sean Padelford’s card dealer permit application ran into problems.
In July of 2024, he pleaded guilty to two felony charges, one for domestic violence and the other for assault.
Now into the first year of a three-year probation period after jail incarceration, Padelford wants to use his experience as a blackjack and poker dealer to gain work and appeared before council at its Sept. 16 meeting to argue his appeal of the permit denial.
He said he went through six months of residential substance abuse treatment at the North Coast Substance Abuse Council’s Crossroads program, followed by the New Life Discovery Project’s recovery program.
Finding work is a struggle and even Domino’s Pizza denied him due to his record, which he described as “devastating.”
But he said the owner of Eureka’s North Coast Casino is willing to give him a chance and is prepared to hire him “immediately.”
He admitted to his past mistakes, saying, “I don’t think I really have taken accountability for my actions my whole life and at 43, I’m finally starting to see some kind of light.”
Councilmembers praised Padelford for openly sharing his story but wanted more details.
Responding to questions, he said he said he was “drunk” when he committed domestic violence against the mother of his two-year-old son.
He was also under the influence when he assaulted a convenience store clerk during a chase, he continued.
Asked if he could be in an environment of alcohol and gambling and not relapse, Padelford said he “definitely” can and “more than anything else, I just want to be able to give my son some money.”
He added that he’d been court-ordered to stay away from his son’s mother but that’s been lifted and “peaceful contact” is now allowed by the court.
Padelford had said he’d been denied a card dealer permit twice before and Councilmember Renee Contreras-DeLoach supported the chief’s action.
“I’m sorry that you have this process that is ahead of you but it’s been barely over a year so my recommendation would be that we trust law enforcement’s recommendation that they’ve given multiple times in this area and hold off on granting this at this time,” she said, making a motion to that effect.
But although the city’s police chief denied the permit, Councilmember Mario Fernandez noted the rules allow wiggle room in saying the chief “may” deny the permit instead of “shall” deny it based on felonies.
He related his own experience, saying at one point he’d been on three-year probation and “I know what it’s like to have to wait that out and in that time, try and find work and try and do everything right.”
A majority of councilmembers were willing to allow the permit and Councilmember Leslie Castellano made a substitute motion to do so with the condition that the city be notified if Padelford violates any terms of this probation.
The motion to affirm Padelford’s appeal and give him the permit was approved in a 4-1 vote, with DeLoach dissenting.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
From being an addict to enabling addicts, really? I am with the chief on this one. I have no use at all for a “business” that makes money out of causing other people lose money. I don’t patronize any casino, period. In this case, I think it has a huge chance of going bad, causing relapse. Definitely another example of ECC not thinking it through.
Alf, excellent comment as usual. I totally agree with you!
Authoritarianism on public display here
Sub-Genie?
I don’t believe the council made the best decision. While this man has made progress in his recovery and sobriety, the amount of time has been relatively short. A more appropriate step would have been to connect him with a community resource that helps individuals with criminal records find employment, such as the Humboldt Second Chance Program.
Excellent comment K@t!
I think we all know how this is gonna turn out
One can hope for the best. But that is how gambling hooks the fool.
Say it proud, from experience.
Go to a ALANON meeting, and learn the definition of ENABLER…
Six Months in Rehab, now a job in a Casino?
Seems like a trigger to me…
The Eureka City Council has Omniscience, obviously…
On the other hand, if you can’t knit, and you can’t sew, you can probably get out on the Highway and weave…
This man should have tried a new game, but good luck, City Council…
Negligence has a cost…
Mr. Padelford, if you happen to read these foul comments, please don’t take them to heart.They all write foul responses to everything based on nothing. I watched the entire hearing start to finish and am pleased about the vote. It is 100% on you going forward and based on your track record of sobriety and group therapy, you were a good bet and deserved a chance to work.Gotta start somewhere. Let the foul wallow in their own excrement.
Also, not sure how someone would be able to contact you in the future with odd jobs around the place. I can always use help.
Getting a job in an alcohol washed place like a casino seems like horrible idea for any alcoholic much less one that wants to be sober. How is it this man wants this?
Then onto castigating commenters, calling them foul and wallowing in their own excrement because they see the pitfalls? The problem is not other people. Totally K@t made a most sensible idea of finding him another job.
Rewatch the council meeting and hear for yourself.
If this man has success with his sobriety and rehabilitation then he becomes a ‘poster child’ for the concept of ‘second chance’. All of us who’ve benefited from a system that allows for ‘correction’ and ‘recovery’ should celebrate every individual success. Those who don’t understand or care are just that. Life is complicated and we’re lucky to be able to live it.
Life is complicated but an alcoholic wanting employment in a casino where the reviews compliment the variety of beers on offer has just added a whole lot complication.
Time to vote out the council. Allowing felons to reintegrate prior to serving their sentence is but another example if the poor group think this governing body practices. Remember the great shopping cart regulation as well.
Too soon to be given a pass.
Simple, and true.
“more than anything else, I just want to be able to give my son some [OPM].”
There, fixed it…
I think the is a prime example of rewarding negative behavior…
This guy’s like…
TRUST ME, I CAN BE TRUSTED…
HICCUP..!!!
Who will the winners be…???
Why did he not mention his assault victims? And he wants only to give his mini-me money but not make retribution to those he physically assaluted? Nor does he want to show his son how to be a more present person etc? Why did he get special treatment anyway?
Hilarious. Convicted felon “improves” his life by helping people gamble away their money. Typical HumCo hypocrisy. PC chief and corrupt lib judges turn society upside down. Black is white, wrong is right. No surprise this website wastes verbiage on such a lout. The corrupted support their own.
Say it aint so
Fox in the henhouse
what could go wrong.
And the clientele that these establishments attract, not exactly a wholesome place for some who is in recovery, rehabilitation.
Who wrote this piece?
Daniel Mintz
You sir should feel shame for publishing this piece.
You should at least post a disclaimer and to express an opinion.
Why shoot the messenger?
Birds of a feather?
Councilmember Mario Fernandez “related his own experience, saying at one point he’d been on three-year probation” — how many other felons have been elected to public office?
The guy also says he was denied a card dealers license twice before — was that before or after he assaulted the mother of his son and the convenience store clerk?
And adding a condition “that the city be notified if Padelford violates any terms of this probation” seems meaningless — who at the City will be notified? — and by whom? — and then what happens? — the only sure bet is that the ECC is consistently clueless.
Lot of people here seem to like kicking a person when they’re down. A good christian ethic.
Forgetting that his crime was literally beating down others and claiming it was alcohol fueled? Maybe this issue is not objecting to helping but pointing out that the action is not likely to be helpful at all? And is a Christian ethic required?
Sorry but a simple “Asked if he could be in an environment of alcohol and gambling and not relapse, Padelford said he “definitely” can and “more than anything else, I just want to be able to give my son some money.” is not a sensible reason to override the police chief’s experience.
I’m all for guys who can try to clean up and turn their mess around. However, one thing that every counselor, pastor, social services worker, and ex-spouse I’ve talked to mostly agrees on is this: they want to stay away from temptation to fail. Then don’t go right to it, or you will. Why go back into the fire to see if you won’t burn?
This person becomes violent when intoxicated. They have admitted to and been found guilty of being violent with the public and a member of their own household, 14 months ago. When this person is under the influence, society is put in danger. We as a community have the right to want this person to stay sober. Allowing this person to work in an environment where they are surrounded by alcohol constantly places temptation in front of them all day long. I don’t know of any rehab programs, therapists, etc. that would recommend that environment for a person trying to maintain sobriety. It’s not kicking someone when they are down to point out the obvious risks our community could face if he gives into all that temptation. We have the right to express our concerns and let the city council know how we feel about our safety being ignored.
Soooo.. does this mean the City Council has basically given the Chief a vote of No Confidence?
Sounds like it
This guy is working the system. Addition and woman beating make him a significant risk to society. I vote for mandatory Alcoholics Anonymous attendance with nightly Zoom chats with professional counselors. Protecting women from this perp is a total priority, and I don’t know how Law Enforcement will proceed.
Though AA isn’t right for everyone and its success rate not that good it is cheap and hence so is what we get from it ..for those it works for great AND majority it does not long term. It seems to be good for people who are very social in a public way and like to have others hear them talk …performance, fake it till you make it which is again fine AND not good for so many people even damaging for some so it should not be the go-to for everyone.
AA is most successful for people who are willing to work steps. Going to the meetings may keep you sober, but working the steps is a great way to clean up the wreckage in your past and acknowledge your role and responsibility in what you have done.
He did not mention his wife or is she an ex now? Either way only mentioned his “Son” his progeny, his mini me AND NOT THE VICTIMS OF HIS ASSAULTS. He should be able to work AND not sure a card dealer is humbling enough environment for this guy. Dominos would have been a better role of the dice for him.
Best wishes to you, Sean! Stay strong and steady!
There’s a process
in California for
a convicted felon
to have their record
expunged in order
to get a license.
Lots of factors
involved.
“Lots of factors involved”
Yep — and currently on probation doesn’t qualify.