Welcome to our letters to the editor/opinion section. To submit yours for consideration, please send to [email protected]. Please consider including an image to be used–either a photograph of you or something applicable to the letter. However, an image is not necessary for publication.
Remember opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect that of Redheaded Blackbelt nor have we checked the letters for accuracy.
A letter from KMUD’s news director written yesterday:
Today, I received a number of calls and emails from members of the press, concerned community members, and longtime KMUD supporters asking how President Donald Trump’s new executive order—aimed at ending federal funding for NPR and PBS—might impact Redwood Community Radio. In response to those questions and concerns, I’ve written a letter to the editor, which I’d like to share with you here:
At this time, the immediate implications of Thursday’s Executive Order for KMUD remain unclear.
First, the Executive Order explicitly targets National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). KMUD is unaffiliated with either—unlike Cal Poly Humboldt’s KHSU, which is an NPR member station or local PBS affiliate KEET. As a result, KMUD is not directly named or immediately affected by the order.
Second, there are serious legal questions surrounding the President’s authority to issue such an order. Patricia Harrison, President and CEO of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), stated:
“CPB is not a federal executive agency subject to the President’s authority. Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.”
She emphasized that Congress explicitly forbade any federal agency or official from controlling CPB or its grantees, citing 47 U.S.C. § 398(c). CPB was created through the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 to ensure every American—regardless of geography or income—has access to high-quality, non-commercial public media.
KMUD does receive support through CPB-funded programs, however, no funding changes have yet been enacted as a result of this Executive Order. Still, many see the order as part of a broader campaign to dismantle public media.
In March of this year, I interviewed Janine Jackson of FAIR.org and Counterspin who put it bluntly: “Defunding public media isn’t about saving money—it’s about control. It’s about ensuring media are accountable to powerful interests rather than to the communities they serve.”
She pointed to Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint supported by former and current Trump officials, which calls for eliminating federal support for public media altogether. Advocates warn this is not just a budget issue—it’s an attempt to silence independent journalism.
Ironically, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) had already received bipartisan support and funding approval through 2027—making this move feel abrupt and politically motivated to many in public broadcasting.
Opponents of public media argued that it “crowds out” private media, that it has become “irrelevant” in the age of internet access (a claim that simply doesn’t hold true in rural areas like ours), and pointed to PBS content they deemed inappropriate—specifically, a program featuring drag queens reading to children. But that segment never actually aired on PBS television; it was posted online, on the network’s website.
Then, in April, came the threat of a proposed rescission bill, which could have clawed back CPB funding—even though those funds had already been allocated. A rescission is a rarely used mechanism that allows the president to propose canceling funds previously approved by Congress. However, for the cancellation to take effect, Congress must approve it by a simple majority vote.
While this bill was expected to reach Congress in late April, delays tied to the budget reconciliation process have stalled its progress—further contributing to financial uncertainty for stations like KMUD.
And now, this Executive Order.
In my opinion, this Executive Order was issued precisely because public media continues to enjoy bipartisan support—especially among those who understand the vital role we play in rural communities. As many know, natural disasters do not fall along party lines. They impact everyone, regardless of who they voted for.
Stations like KMUD serve entire communities, and we’ve consistently been on the front lines of communication during wildfires, earthquakes, snowstorms, and the COVID-19 pandemic—providing accurate, timely, and often life-saving information.
Even local officials recognize this. Just the other day, Mendocino County Sheriff Matt Kendall reached out to express his full support for KMUD. He even offered to author a letter on our behalf, acknowledging—as many others do—that KMUD serves everyone, regardless of politics or background.
Donald Trump has issued more Executive Orders than any modern president, according to The New York Times. The order signed on May 1st states that it is: “Ending the taxpayer subsidization of National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).”
Notably, it does not mention CPB’s broader funding to other stations like KMUD. However, it was issued the same week CPB filed a federal lawsuit against Trump to prevent the politically motivated dismissal of board members—another reminder of escalating tensions between the administration and public media. The lawsuit, which centers on CPB’s statutory independence, names both Trump and Russell Vought, a Project 2025 architect. (Link to lawsuit)
Why CPB Funding Matters
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) receives approximately $535 million annually—just 0.0079% of the federal budget. Yet this modest investment delivers enormous value, particularly in rural communities like ours. CPB funding supports emergency alerts and disaster communication, local journalism that reflects the unique needs of our region, training for volunteer broadcasters, and cultural programming that amplifies diverse voices often left out of commercial media. Unlike corporate broadcasters, public media outlets are not driven by advertisers or shareholder interests. Stations like KMUD are fueled by local volunteers, community support, and a commitment to public service—and that’s exactly what’s at risk.
Public Media & Community Media
While public and community radio stations often share similar missions and values, their programming and focus can differ significantly.
Public broadcasting tends to have a broader scope and audience reach. Take KHSU, for example—a station that airs content from around the world, offering critical global perspectives and stories from across the country. These are often voices and issues left out of mainstream commercial media.
Community radio, on the other hand, prioritizes local engagement, empowerment, and directly addressing the specific needs of the communities it serves. When I report the news at 6 p.m., I know exactly who I’m speaking to: you, the listener. We’re not creating content for a national or global market—we’re serving our neighbors in Humboldt, Mendocino, and Trinity counties.
This distinction was especially clear following the M6.4 earthquake in Rio Dell. While NBC was focused on capturing headlines, KMUD was focused on delivering life-saving information—the kind our community urgently needed.
\Some members of Congress have introduced legislation that would cut federal funding for NPR and PBS, while potentially sparing rural stations. While KMUD has not taken an official stance on this proposal, our sister station KZYX in Mendocino County has spoken out.
Unlike KMUD, KZYX is both a community radio station and a public radio affiliate. In a recent report, News Director Elise Cox explained the financial stakes:
“KZYX’s financial relationship with NPR highlights the complexity of the funding picture. Federal dollars account for only about 1% of NPR’s budget, while member stations like KZYX contribute roughly 30%. This year alone, KZYX paid $71,000 in programming and satellite fees to NPR.”
That means if operational support from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) disappears, stations like KZYX could be forced to make significant cuts—including reconsidering their NPR affiliation. As Cox wrote, “everything is on the table” as the station prepares next year’s budget.
When asked whether Republicans might support a carve-out for rural stations while defunding national outlets, Congressman Doug LaMalfa told KZYX that was a possibility. “No one wants to swing an ax and cut everything,” he said.
While KMUD may be safe from immediate funding cuts, other cherished local stations like KEET-TV may not be. KEET provides outstanding programming that keeps our community informed and engaged—from trusted public affairs shows to local news and cultural storytelling. For many rural families, PBS member stations like KEET are essential. They offer free, high-quality educational content that helps children learn to read and thrive.
In response to the recent congressional hearing—and seeing the writing on the wall—I became a member of KEET, choosing to vote with my dollars. Their future shouldn’t be caught in the crossfire of politics.
KMUD & CPB
Redwood Community Radio—KMUD—is a proud recipient of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)’s Community Service Grant (CSG). These grants are awarded to noncommercial public radio and television stations that provide significant public service programming to their communities. CSG funding helps stations expand the quality and scope of their work across news, educational content, public affairs, cultural programming, and more.
To qualify for CPB support, applicant and recipient stations must meet rigorous annual standards related to legal compliance, management practices, staffing levels, financial transparency, and community accountability. KMUD meets these benchmarks by:
Employing multiple full-time staff
Hosting open public meetings for community oversight, including via our Board of Directors and Community Advisory Board
Maintaining open financial records
Adhering to strict recordkeeping, certification, and audit requirements
It’s worth noting that many community stations do not qualify for CPB funding because the CSG program functions as a matching grant. In order to receive CPB funds, stations must raise approx. $275,000 per year from their communities—through donations, in-kind contributions, and other grants. CPB funding then effectively matches that community support, recognizing and reinforcing stations with proven local impact.
The fact that KMUD is able to raise this level of support from our community—even during times of hardship and economic decline—is a true testament to the indispensable services we provide. We are deeply grateful to our supporters and their continued belief in our mission.
In conclusion, while there is still much uncertainty, especially as legal challenges against the Trump administration unfold in the courts in the coming weeks, one thing remains clear: KMUD will continue to serve our community with integrity, thoughtfulness, and dedication. The support we’ve received—from individual donors and from grant programs like the Ink People’s Humboldt Journalism Project, Press Forward, the Humboldt Area Foundation, and others—has put us in a strong position. But the future of community media depends on all of us.
We must all be vocal in reminding policymakers that independent media is essential—especially in rural areas where mainstream news outlets often fall short. Continued bipartisan support is critical to sustaining the services that community stations like KMUD provide.
I cannot thank our community enough for its unwavering support. Because of it, I will continue to do everything I can to protect our beloved airwaves—your voice in the Redwoods, People Powered Radio: KMUD.
Yours truly, Lauren Schmitt
PS- If you would like to support Redwood Community Radio, you can do so here: https://kmud.org/donate/
When you login the first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account's public profile information shared by the Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I agree
When you login the first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account's public profile information shared by the Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
57 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Guest
steven
1 year ago
PBS and NPR have provided educational and inspiring programs for decades.
Once again Trump trying to establish his authoritarian rule. He tried cutting funding his during his first term and was shut down then. Which will most likely happen again.
Govt funding for PBS is about 15%, and 1% for NPR. They both should be able to cut some “bloat” and survive. Besides, “Govt funding” suggests Socialistic funding for these two entities. No other broadcasters get Govt funding. Time to cut waste.
When “National Public Radio has corrected an online article that falsely asserted that documents from first son Hunter Biden’s laptop had been “discredited by U.S. intelligence.”, and published stories like “Firm That Contracted Steele Dossier Says It Was ‘Shocked’ By Findings on Trump”, and articles like this are run “I think the significance is enormous. I also think that you felt last night sort of a – both an acknowledging the significance, but also not sort of overdoing it. I mean, there was a lot of talk among her advisers about how much we play up the first woman president. And Obama didn’t have to say he was breaking this great civil rights barrier. But at the same time, I think when you saw her close the convention, saying, if there are any little girls out there up at night watching, I might be the first woman president, but you could be next. “, they have already shown they were incapable of telling the difference between journalism and propaganda.
Hello! People apparently can’t tell the difference between news, which is hardly ever ” inspiring”, and sermons directed at the choir, which are always meant to be “inspiring . What is a virtue in the one is an evil in the other. NPR squandered the public’s trust for social agendas. Being fine with that is also the opposite of virtue if resisting bias in a virtue in a public media.
Yes! Balance must be maintained. If you cover anti-racism you must also cover pro-racism. Against child labor? Better cover the pro-child labor ilk.Pollution? Give a equal voice to the polluters. No room for partisanship. Either your for or against us.
I heard you on the wireless back in ’52
Lying awake intently tuning in on you
If I was young it didn’t stop you coming through
Oh-a-oh
—
They took the credit for your second symphony
Rewritten by machine on new technology
And now I understand the problems you can see
—
Oh-a-oh
I met your children
Oh-a-oh
What did you tell them?
—
Video killed the radio star
Video killed the radio star
Pictures came and broke your heart
Oh-a-a-a oh
—
And now we meet in an abandoned studio
We hear the playback and it seems so long ago
And you remember the jingles used to go:
—
Oh-a-oh
You were the first one
Oh-a-oh
You were the last one
—
Video killed the radio star
Video killed the radio star
In my mind and in my car
We can’t rewind, we’ve gone too far
Oh-a-a-a oh
Oh-a-a-a oh
Guest
Al L Ivesmatr
1 year ago
535 million annually. Just a paltry amount….right……money can be better spent on feeding the poor and elderly, and housing homeless vets. The drone like news PBS provides is worthless snd biased. It is loved by Democrats because it toes their line, the “democracy” mob rule line. Drive to work in morning and tune into a drone monotonous voice overlayed with Classical music to add an aire of moral superiority to failed Big Brother notions. Brain programming to soothe enfeebled infant brains from the horrors of real information. Psyop to Patti Hearst them into believing the government is their cult leader daddy like Manson. “Yes sir, we shall do anything for the government, we are all one, but but the children, get Putin, go Ukraine, it takes a village—-not!, the climate will kill you, violent BLM protests in 2020 were for the common good, put on that dam mask, get the experimental shot or you will die and kill grandma you selfish individual thinker, Biden was sharp as a tack, men can have babies, border jumpers have due process because we say so – not, yea big brother…get Trump.”
What a joke. PBS is antiquated and useless. Rural areas have the internet, no need for more non free government taxpayer garbage because some fool thinks they will perish without Mozart and a moron on the radio telling them windmills are the answer. It shall be axed because food and shelter is more important than hivemind drone information provided by government morons telling you to join the borg. Another failed Democrat Marxist experiment gone bad. Go read a book because the government doesn’t want you to do that. You just might have an individual thought. Cannot have that! Dumbazzes. .
Al, I actually agree with you on one thing: feeding the poor and housing homeless veterans should be a bigger national priority. That’s something we could probably work together on, if the conversation wasn’t derailed by Mozart conspiracies and sci-fi references.
You paint a wild picture—apparently anyone who listens to NPR is a drone in a moral superiority cult led by Terry Gross and a cello. That’s creative, I’ll give you that. But out here in the real world, I know plenty of people—Republicans, Democrats, independents, and folks who don’t vote at all—who rely on PBS and NPR for calm, well-researched reporting, educational programming, and yes, the occasional symphony.
Public broadcasting isn’t the enemy of free thought. It’s one of the last remaining spaces not driven entirely by clicks, outrage, or ads for gold bars and survival buckets.
You want people to read books? Great—so do I. So does PBS. Maybe we’re not on opposite sides after all.
PBS is anything but antiquated. It’s modern and vibrant. I’ve been supporting it for years. Even though I have internet and can watch whatever I want, I love PBS for what they offer.
Have you ever watched “Nature” or “NOVA?” Amazing informative and actually educational programming. Mostly unbiased news, not just news/talk with constant “BREAKING NEWS ALERT” lower thirds, the PBS News Hour is about the most unbiased news program you can get. Excellent shows like “Tell Me More” with Kelly Corrigan is a really great interview program. Plus our local station KEET also has new from the BBC, from NHK Japan, DW from Germany.
KEET’s over the air signal really is high quality and it reaches places where people still don’t have internet access.
And if you do have internet access you can get tons of shows on pbs.org for free.
Public and community media are important to the wellbeing of our democracy. $535 for the CPB is a good deal.
Local radio is heard by locals and should be funded by locals. Eliminating funding from federal monies isn’t about control. It’s common sense and fiscal responsibility.
End the socialist creep that has permeated our Republic.
The only things we need the federal government for are to establish Justice and provide for our common Defence. Secure borders are paramount to our common defense. The Federal government needs to insure domestic Tranquility, too. So all these old, Marxist boomers running their mouths and sniveling on street corners once a month when their Ensure kicks in need to sit down and shut up. Your cacophony and tired, nonsensical, rhyming tropes are interfering with my tranquility.
That’s not how public goods work. I don’t personally use every road, public school, or emergency service my taxes support — but I still help pay for them because that’s part of living in a functioning society. Public broadcasting exists to inform the public, not to entertain everyone individually. If you only want to fund what benefits you, you’re not arguing for fairness — you’re arguing against community.
You can say that sort of action is selfish. You cannot label them as entirely selfish. For all you know the person goes without food to provide kibble for dogs.
I feel like that muppet Don Music who kept fucking up his piano bit, and then repeatedly smashes his head into the keys. ” Ill never get it right, never, Ill never get it right”!
Well, damn, he’s a great guy, I like dogs more than people a lot of times. However the fact remains If you say something selfish, and someone calls you selfish, forsooth.
I read your comment and had to snort—I’m an old boomer running a business in a rural area, and honestly, NPR is a bit of competition for my readers. Not direct competition, but folks only have so much time in a day for news, and if they spend part of it with NPR, that probably means less time on my site. And if they donate to NPR, they might not be as willing to donate to keep RHBB open.
And yet… I love what they do.
They casually drop into our kitchens and our cars and share the news, explain complicated stuff without yelling, and provide thoughtful reporting on everything from international affairs to what’s growing in someone’s garden.
Some of the shows I listen to (besides my favorite the news shows) as often as possible:
Planet Money (Hey, I might actually grasp how the economy works someday with their help.)
StoryCorps (I’ve cried and laughed more times than I can count listening to them or watching their animated shorts.)
Mountain Stage (I’m not even much of a musical person and I enjoy this.)
Car Talk (It’s in reruns, but it’ll still grab my attention—even though I barely care what a carburetor is.)
Fresh Air (Terry Gross is one of the best interviewers!)
Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me (I have to play along every time I can and see if I can outsmart the contestants.)
Calling that kind of programming “socialist creep” seems like a strange way to describe investing in a better-informed public. Educating the community isn’t a threat to our Republic—it’s one of the things that makes it stronger.
They’re not perfect, but they’re part of the patchwork of things that keep us connected, informed, and a lot smarter.
My favorite: NPR (through an Alaskan public radio station) did a nice feature on the death of Princess Grace (yeah, I’m old). I was building king crab pots in Kodiak and the station was on. The thing that sticks out to me was they played her favorite piece of music. Samuel Barber’s Adagio for Strings. I was raised on classical music, love Ralph Vaughn Williams, but somehow had missed this. It’s beautiful and haunting. It was played at FDR’s death, JFK’s death. Kind of the national mourning music. I learned all that because I wanted to know more about the piece. There is an annual big music festival in the United Kingdom and the Last Night was four days after 9/11. The British national mourning music is “Nimrod” by Elgar. But they played Adagio for Strings (a very American thing) in memory of those lost.
I learned of something beautiful because of NPR. There are still really cool moments like that on NPR (and it’s affiliates).
Socialist creep started with the crippled Marxist who thought he was king for 15 years in the early 20th century. My statement had nothing to do with a local station’s programming. But that local station doesn’t need tax dollars from people in Maine if they’re broadcasting in Garberville.
We all pay for things we don’t personally use — that’s how taxation in a functioning society works. Your preference not to fund something doesn’t make it unconstitutional or illegitimate. You’re free to argue against public broadcasting, but “I don’t use it, so I shouldn’t have to pay for it” isn’t a serious argument.
And YOU just interfered with my tranquility. But you must be a very sensitive individual and very generous donor to local radio to care so much.
Guest
Juanita
1 year ago
I used to be able to hear KEET on my radio before they stopped broadcastng. Now with the “modern” system that pleasure is denied me. I do not watch any television but NPR & KMUD are my window on the larger world.
You probably heard channel 6 KViQ on your radio, before the digital conversion (to HD). The audio channel for CH 6 is at the bottom end of the FM spectrum, 87.75MHz. Channel 13 would have been to high up to pick up on a “normal” radio.
Unfortunately being that complacent about sources is seriously self indulgent. Hearing only news that gives a soothing message is how the country got where we are.
I remember distinctly when Charlayne Hunter-Gault, who I had thoroughly respected, stopped her moderating dramatically on the News Hour after someone came from off stage to hand her a paper,to report as “breaking news” that Romney said in a secretly recorded campaign rally “”that 47 per cent of Americans believe they are victims” and are too dependent on government.””, which was not news, was taken out of context and a distortion of his speech. The eagerness, urgency and enthusiasm in which this spun quote was delivered was shocking to me. It was the first time I went to various sources independently to see if it could possibly be true. It was my first instance of disillusionment with PBS. And no one called her out on it, then or now.
After that I started checking multiple sources of news to see what was real and what was just the reporter’s personal ideas. The naivety of the Hollywood version of news reporting as hardhitting truth became and more clear. No one much seemed to care what facts were but interpretations were rampant on all sides. Almost no reporters would dare say Obama had lied in a speech when he clearly had or that he avoided saying what he should have said. It was like it became the job of the national media to protect him over the slightest issues as if the public was too stupid to judge without being told what to think.
And fools now wonder how a politically defective person like Trump won the last election. Well it took years of the national press prostituting itself over social agenda, killing every moderate politician along the way, to arrive at point that such defective losers like Biden seem normal. And here we are. Trump is the result of an avalanche of bad reporting and the public being agreeablewith it.. What is scary is that Trump is not likely to be the bottom either.
Guest
Unvaxxed and Overtaxed
1 year ago
“Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.”
how can it be independent of, if it is funded by? 🤔
It’s actually pretty simple – the gov’t recognizes the public service these organizations provide, so contributes to their funding without attempting to influence or control them.
The evidence of this is that Republicans control all three branches of government.
If government funding meant government control of programing,
NPR and PBS would be extremely Right Wing.
Yet another conspiracy theory falls apart with just a tiny bit of rational thought.
Consider that all for-profit radio and TV can air commercials. And do they ever!
From Inside Radio, a trade publication: According to the report, the radio industry came out of the election with a total of $326 million in political ad dollars. As in the past, broadcast television had the biggest share of all media ad spending. AdImpact says its $5.35 billion total accounted for 48% of the cycle’s total. However, it was the first time that broadcast TV’s share slid below 50%. https://www.insideradio.com/free/adimpact-s-final-count-says-radio-gained-326-million-in-political-ads-during-2024-cycle/article_f0c2a7e2-c67d-11ef-8bc3-5bcee9e96bef.html
Public radio and TV is not allowed to air commercials. As I understand it, when the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was created that was a consideration, that commercial media was going to be a money maker, while they also had a lot of shitty programming. The CPB was going to help create quality programming, including, but not limited, a lot of educational programming for children, shows that didn’t just sell junk food and toys.
Guest
Unvaxxed and Overtaxed
1 year ago
The CPB’s governing statute reflects principles of impartiality: the CPB may not “contribute to or otherwise support any political party.” 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3); see also id.396(e)(2).
”Redwood Community Radio—KMUD—is a proud recipient of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)’s Community Service Grant (CSG). “
there it is, CPB violated 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3), by using federal funding to give grants (contributing) to democrat/progressive public media. Case closed.
Whoa…that case isn’t even a starter. That’s not actually a violation of 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3). That section bars CPB from supporting any political party—not from funding stations whose coverage or listener base leans a certain way.
KMUD, like hundreds of other community stations, receives a Community Service Grant based on things like local programming, public access, and adherence to journalistic standards—not party affiliation. Unless someone can show they’re officially operating as an arm of a political party (and they’re not), there’s no case to be made under that statute.
Having a progressive tone or covering environmental or social issues doesn’t make a station partisan any more than covering agriculture or the stock market makes a station Republican. And frankly, there are some definitely not main stream Democrat shows being aired on KMUD–I’ve heard some opinions that make my progressive soul cry in anguish.
This isn’t “case closed”—it’s just how public media funding works.
Bla bla bla. Just a bunch of whining. I for one never listen to any of these stations, radio or TV. There’s virtually nothing but far left garbage on either one. Back in the early 70s, PBS was middle of the road broadcasting. That hasn’t been true for decades. It’s a disgrace to even call most of its content programming. It’s a waste of my tax dollars to pay for this utter crap.
I worked in a cubicle across from a guy who listened nonstop. Everything I heard was far left lunacy. I doubt it’s changed in the few years since I retired.
But the public hardly ever hear about “what happens after that” anyway. The general press loses interest faster than the public so limiting journalists is really a complaint by journalists (usually about angry journalists with an agenda rather than the news) about professional self persevation.
I believe in the sanctity of journalists but it’s hard to keep it up when they are so very contemptuous of the public they use claims of serving as justification.
Guest
The Real Guest
1 year ago
Should, “Counter Clockwise”, “Left Handed Spin”, be funded by the US government…???
I think, “NO”…!!!
Could the Counter Clockwise “Lefties” even recognize, “Left Handed Spin”…???
Or, after listening to so much counter rotational PBS and NPR, would it just seem perfectly “NORMAL”…
Here is a prime example of how thoroughly permeated with bullshit leftist spin and politically divisive and denialist misinformation and disinformation even our very own US Government National Institute of Health information is shamefully saturated with…
The question, for any and all of the Democrat, “Counter Revolutionists”, have the neutrality and critical thinking skills to properly discern, logically recognize, and then honestly acknowledge it…
Call it an exercise…
People don’t like tests…
But call it a test, if you like challenges…
Any takers…???
Lefties first…!!!
Does the NIH lean left…???
Does the NIH show CLEAR LEFT BIAS…???
You be the judge…
To me, this statement is easy to recognize as some pure Lefty bull shit..
If one can’t see it below, maybe one also can’t see the alleged biased Leftiness of NPR and PBS, if it so exists..
“In the past decade, depression has become more visible in the public conversation; depression has also become bound in national divides. We sought to assess (1) whether positive screen for depression is associated with political party affiliation and (2) whether use of mental health care varies by political affiliation. Positive screen for depression did not differ significantly for Republicans versus Democrats in Spring 2023. [25.2% of Democrats screened positive for depression, 20.5% of Republicans screened positive for depression.]
However, Republicans were less likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months. Depression is a bipartisan issue, and improving access to mental health care could be a priority that unites political groups during the upcoming election season.”
____________________________________________
Excerpt:
•Positive screen for depression did not differ significantly for Republicans versus Democrats in Spring 2023. However, Republicans were less likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months.•
………………………………………………..
Please locate and identify the areas of US Government provided, significant Leftist Twist and Spin, and then give an example of how it might be written, correctly, without even an equally applied Righty Twisted Spin…
Just for fun…
Hint:
[Spoiler Alert…]
“Positive screen for depression [differed] significantly for Republicans versus Democrats in Spring 2023, [25.2% vs 20.5%, respectively…!!!]. [Additionally], Democrats were [more] likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months.”
Why would the Government funded NIH have so clearly denied and downplayed the significant difference between Democrats and Republicans that screened positive for depression, AND then, SOOO tellingly COUNTERED WITH…
“However, Republicans were less likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months.”…!!!???
You see, even though the Democrats were nearly 20% more likely to have screened positive for depression, the NIH, tried to deny the significance of that, AND, added the clear deflection, dubious implication, and unnecessary stigmatism, that there was more untreated mental health with Republicans…
And that’s extremely clearly a very shady, Lefty NIH maneuver, not a Righty maneuver…
The question remains, can you see it…???
Or, more appropriately, can you somehow not see it…???
Mozart playing, soothing, infantile sedatives for the morning commute important “our democracy” citizen soldiers who have been told they have one mission, get the roadrunner at all costs. Boulders and Acme Co. be damned! Good luck with that. Darwin suggests PBS needs to be privately funded, like a 1 year old male wolf being pushed out of the pack. No longer needed. Go make your own way. Sink or swim Great Bear rainforest beach wolf. And just like that, PBS disappears, foreva. But, but, but, the childrennnnn…………nope, prehistoric news. They all have iPads and are watching Japanese Anime.
Fact is that government assistance truly is no longer needed to have public input on media , with all the advances in media production and access to airwaves we have today , you tube facebook etc there is no longer a cost that prohibits a person or group from getting their messaging out in front of the public like there was in the past when this program was created
Guest
SickofSocialists
1 year ago
NPR has not been “independent journalism” for decades.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
PBS and NPR have provided educational and inspiring programs for decades.
Once again Trump trying to establish his authoritarian rule. He tried cutting funding his during his first term and was shut down then. Which will most likely happen again.
Govt funding for PBS is about 15%, and 1% for NPR. They both should be able to cut some “bloat” and survive. Besides, “Govt funding” suggests Socialistic funding for these two entities. No other broadcasters get Govt funding. Time to cut waste.
By your reasoning, public education and fire safety services are also “socialistic.”
No other broadcasters receiving gov’t funding might just have something to do with their for profit status.
When “National Public Radio has corrected an online article that falsely asserted that documents from first son Hunter Biden’s laptop had been “discredited by U.S. intelligence.”, and published stories like “Firm That Contracted Steele Dossier Says It Was ‘Shocked’ By Findings on Trump”, and articles like this are run “I think the significance is enormous. I also think that you felt last night sort of a – both an acknowledging the significance, but also not sort of overdoing it. I mean, there was a lot of talk among her advisers about how much we play up the first woman president. And Obama didn’t have to say he was breaking this great civil rights barrier. But at the same time, I think when you saw her close the convention, saying, if there are any little girls out there up at night watching, I might be the first woman president, but you could be next. “, they have already shown they were incapable of telling the difference between journalism and propaganda.
Hello! People apparently can’t tell the difference between news, which is hardly ever ” inspiring”, and sermons directed at the choir, which are always meant to be “inspiring . What is a virtue in the one is an evil in the other. NPR squandered the public’s trust for social agendas. Being fine with that is also the opposite of virtue if resisting bias in a virtue in a public media.
https://nypost.com/2021/04/02/npr-issues-correction-after-claiming-hunter-biden-laptop-story-was-discredited-by-intelligence/
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/03/575259858/firm-that-contracted-steele-dossier-says-it-was-shocked-by-findings-on-trump
https://www.npr.org/2016/07/27/487620196/covering-hillary-clinton-a-candidate-forged-in-the-crucible-of-conflict
Yes! Balance must be maintained. If you cover anti-racism you must also cover pro-racism. Against child labor? Better cover the pro-child labor ilk.Pollution? Give a equal voice to the polluters. No room for partisanship. Either your for or against us.
PBS is great but NPR spews leftist and anti-American rhetoric daily…
I’m pretty sure that all news is phony.
KMUD is an anomaly, but they have an FM station in Lake County too…
I like Spotify, because nobody ever talks.
I had a Radio Show back in 1975-76…
Appropriate song. IMHO:
—
“Video Killed The Radio Star” (Buggles)
—
I heard you on the wireless back in ’52
Lying awake intently tuning in on you
If I was young it didn’t stop you coming through
Oh-a-oh
—
They took the credit for your second symphony
Rewritten by machine on new technology
And now I understand the problems you can see
—
Oh-a-oh
I met your children
Oh-a-oh
What did you tell them?
—
Video killed the radio star
Video killed the radio star
Pictures came and broke your heart
Oh-a-a-a oh
—
And now we meet in an abandoned studio
We hear the playback and it seems so long ago
And you remember the jingles used to go:
—
Oh-a-oh
You were the first one
Oh-a-oh
You were the last one
—
Video killed the radio star
Video killed the radio star
In my mind and in my car
We can’t rewind, we’ve gone too far
Oh-a-a-a oh
Oh-a-a-a oh
535 million annually. Just a paltry amount….right……money can be better spent on feeding the poor and elderly, and housing homeless vets. The drone like news PBS provides is worthless snd biased. It is loved by Democrats because it toes their line, the “democracy” mob rule line. Drive to work in morning and tune into a drone monotonous voice overlayed with Classical music to add an aire of moral superiority to failed Big Brother notions. Brain programming to soothe enfeebled infant brains from the horrors of real information. Psyop to Patti Hearst them into believing the government is their cult leader daddy like Manson. “Yes sir, we shall do anything for the government, we are all one, but but the children, get Putin, go Ukraine, it takes a village—-not!, the climate will kill you, violent BLM protests in 2020 were for the common good, put on that dam mask, get the experimental shot or you will die and kill grandma you selfish individual thinker, Biden was sharp as a tack, men can have babies, border jumpers have due process because we say so – not, yea big brother…get Trump.”
What a joke. PBS is antiquated and useless. Rural areas have the internet, no need for more non free government taxpayer garbage because some fool thinks they will perish without Mozart and a moron on the radio telling them windmills are the answer. It shall be axed because food and shelter is more important than hivemind drone information provided by government morons telling you to join the borg. Another failed Democrat Marxist experiment gone bad. Go read a book because the government doesn’t want you to do that. You just might have an individual thought. Cannot have that! Dumbazzes. .
You have been infected with the MAGA worm. It is curable. Seek help
One liners and platitudes.
😂💪
Al, I actually agree with you on one thing: feeding the poor and housing homeless veterans should be a bigger national priority. That’s something we could probably work together on, if the conversation wasn’t derailed by Mozart conspiracies and sci-fi references.
You paint a wild picture—apparently anyone who listens to NPR is a drone in a moral superiority cult led by Terry Gross and a cello. That’s creative, I’ll give you that. But out here in the real world, I know plenty of people—Republicans, Democrats, independents, and folks who don’t vote at all—who rely on PBS and NPR for calm, well-researched reporting, educational programming, and yes, the occasional symphony.
Public broadcasting isn’t the enemy of free thought. It’s one of the last remaining spaces not driven entirely by clicks, outrage, or ads for gold bars and survival buckets.
You want people to read books? Great—so do I. So does PBS. Maybe we’re not on opposite sides after all.
The more you know, the more you know, there’s things you do not know
PBS is anything but antiquated. It’s modern and vibrant. I’ve been supporting it for years. Even though I have internet and can watch whatever I want, I love PBS for what they offer.
Have you ever watched “Nature” or “NOVA?” Amazing informative and actually educational programming. Mostly unbiased news, not just news/talk with constant “BREAKING NEWS ALERT” lower thirds, the PBS News Hour is about the most unbiased news program you can get. Excellent shows like “Tell Me More” with Kelly Corrigan is a really great interview program. Plus our local station KEET also has new from the BBC, from NHK Japan, DW from Germany.
KEET’s over the air signal really is high quality and it reaches places where people still don’t have internet access.
And if you do have internet access you can get tons of shows on pbs.org for free.
Public and community media are important to the wellbeing of our democracy. $535 for the CPB is a good deal.
At the end of March 2025 our taxes have payed over $26million so Trump can go play golf at his resorts almost every weekend. And his family makes money off that.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/taxpayers-tab-trumps-second-term-133826954.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/17/trump-golf-taxes
Local radio is heard by locals and should be funded by locals. Eliminating funding from federal monies isn’t about control. It’s common sense and fiscal responsibility.
End the socialist creep that has permeated our Republic.
The only things we need the federal government for are to establish Justice and provide for our common Defence. Secure borders are paramount to our common defense. The Federal government needs to insure domestic Tranquility, too. So all these old, Marxist boomers running their mouths and sniveling on street corners once a month when their Ensure kicks in need to sit down and shut up. Your cacophony and tired, nonsensical, rhyming tropes are interfering with my tranquility.
You nailed it with the Marxist boomers
We are all locals
Then pay for the programming you want to listen to. As a taxpayer, I shouldn’t be obligated to pay for shit I don’t watch or listen to.
That’s not how public goods work. I don’t personally use every road, public school, or emergency service my taxes support — but I still help pay for them because that’s part of living in a functioning society. Public broadcasting exists to inform the public, not to entertain everyone individually. If you only want to fund what benefits you, you’re not arguing for fairness — you’re arguing against community.
If someone’s comment is that they are selfish, why is it an insult to say maga is selfish and you are clearly stating you are also?
You can say that sort of action is selfish. You cannot label them as entirely selfish. For all you know the person goes without food to provide kibble for dogs.
I feel like that muppet Don Music who kept fucking up his piano bit, and then repeatedly smashes his head into the keys. ” Ill never get it right, never, Ill never get it right”!
Well, damn, he’s a great guy, I like dogs more than people a lot of times. However the fact remains If you say something selfish, and someone calls you selfish, forsooth.
I read your comment and had to snort—I’m an old boomer running a business in a rural area, and honestly, NPR is a bit of competition for my readers. Not direct competition, but folks only have so much time in a day for news, and if they spend part of it with NPR, that probably means less time on my site. And if they donate to NPR, they might not be as willing to donate to keep RHBB open.
And yet… I love what they do.
They casually drop into our kitchens and our cars and share the news, explain complicated stuff without yelling, and provide thoughtful reporting on everything from international affairs to what’s growing in someone’s garden.
Some of the shows I listen to (besides my favorite the news shows) as often as possible:
Planet Money (Hey, I might actually grasp how the economy works someday with their help.)
StoryCorps (I’ve cried and laughed more times than I can count listening to them or watching their animated shorts.)
Mountain Stage (I’m not even much of a musical person and I enjoy this.)
Car Talk (It’s in reruns, but it’ll still grab my attention—even though I barely care what a carburetor is.)
Fresh Air (Terry Gross is one of the best interviewers!)
Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me (I have to play along every time I can and see if I can outsmart the contestants.)
Calling that kind of programming “socialist creep” seems like a strange way to describe investing in a better-informed public. Educating the community isn’t a threat to our Republic—it’s one of the things that makes it stronger.
They’re not perfect, but they’re part of the patchwork of things that keep us connected, informed, and a lot smarter.
My favorite: NPR (through an Alaskan public radio station) did a nice feature on the death of Princess Grace (yeah, I’m old). I was building king crab pots in Kodiak and the station was on. The thing that sticks out to me was they played her favorite piece of music. Samuel Barber’s Adagio for Strings. I was raised on classical music, love Ralph Vaughn Williams, but somehow had missed this. It’s beautiful and haunting. It was played at FDR’s death, JFK’s death. Kind of the national mourning music. I learned all that because I wanted to know more about the piece. There is an annual big music festival in the United Kingdom and the Last Night was four days after 9/11. The British national mourning music is “Nimrod” by Elgar. But they played Adagio for Strings (a very American thing) in memory of those lost.
I learned of something beautiful because of NPR. There are still really cool moments like that on NPR (and it’s affiliates).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQsgE0L450
I know. I feel like my mind is broadened beyond just the things I know I want to learn in whole areas that I didn’t know existed.
NOVA is great for that. The science program on PBS.
Socialist creep started with the crippled Marxist who thought he was king for 15 years in the early 20th century. My statement had nothing to do with a local station’s programming. But that local station doesn’t need tax dollars from people in Maine if they’re broadcasting in Garberville.
So by that logic no money from the taxes I pay should go to any freeway that I don’t ever drive on?
We all pay for things we don’t personally use — that’s how taxation in a functioning society works. Your preference not to fund something doesn’t make it unconstitutional or illegitimate. You’re free to argue against public broadcasting, but “I don’t use it, so I shouldn’t have to pay for it” isn’t a serious argument.
And YOU just interfered with my tranquility. But you must be a very sensitive individual and very generous donor to local radio to care so much.
I used to be able to hear KEET on my radio before they stopped broadcastng. Now with the “modern” system that pleasure is denied me. I do not watch any television but NPR & KMUD are my window on the larger world.
You probably heard channel 6 KViQ on your radio, before the digital conversion (to HD). The audio channel for CH 6 is at the bottom end of the FM spectrum, 87.75MHz. Channel 13 would have been to high up to pick up on a “normal” radio.
Unfortunately being that complacent about sources is seriously self indulgent. Hearing only news that gives a soothing message is how the country got where we are.
I remember distinctly when Charlayne Hunter-Gault, who I had thoroughly respected, stopped her moderating dramatically on the News Hour after someone came from off stage to hand her a paper,to report as “breaking news” that Romney said in a secretly recorded campaign rally “”that 47 per cent of Americans believe they are victims” and are too dependent on government.””, which was not news, was taken out of context and a distortion of his speech. The eagerness, urgency and enthusiasm in which this spun quote was delivered was shocking to me. It was the first time I went to various sources independently to see if it could possibly be true. It was my first instance of disillusionment with PBS. And no one called her out on it, then or now.
After that I started checking multiple sources of news to see what was real and what was just the reporter’s personal ideas. The naivety of the Hollywood version of news reporting as hardhitting truth became and more clear. No one much seemed to care what facts were but interpretations were rampant on all sides. Almost no reporters would dare say Obama had lied in a speech when he clearly had or that he avoided saying what he should have said. It was like it became the job of the national media to protect him over the slightest issues as if the public was too stupid to judge without being told what to think.
And fools now wonder how a politically defective person like Trump won the last election. Well it took years of the national press prostituting itself over social agenda, killing every moderate politician along the way, to arrive at point that such defective losers like Biden seem normal. And here we are. Trump is the result of an avalanche of bad reporting and the public being agreeablewith it.. What is scary is that Trump is not likely to be the bottom either.
“Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.”
how can it be independent of, if it is funded by? 🤔
It’s actually pretty simple – the gov’t recognizes the public service these organizations provide, so contributes to their funding without attempting to influence or control them.
The evidence of this is that Republicans control all three branches of government.
If government funding meant government control of programing,
NPR and PBS would be extremely Right Wing.
Yet another conspiracy theory falls apart with just a tiny bit of rational thought.
Consider that all for-profit radio and TV can air commercials. And do they ever!
From Inside Radio, a trade publication:
According to the report, the radio industry came out of the election with a total of $326 million in political ad dollars. As in the past, broadcast television had the biggest share of all media ad spending. AdImpact says its $5.35 billion total accounted for 48% of the cycle’s total. However, it was the first time that broadcast TV’s share slid below 50%.
https://www.insideradio.com/free/adimpact-s-final-count-says-radio-gained-326-million-in-political-ads-during-2024-cycle/article_f0c2a7e2-c67d-11ef-8bc3-5bcee9e96bef.html
Public radio and TV is not allowed to air commercials. As I understand it, when the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was created that was a consideration, that commercial media was going to be a money maker, while they also had a lot of shitty programming. The CPB was going to help create quality programming, including, but not limited, a lot of educational programming for children, shows that didn’t just sell junk food and toys.
The CPB’s governing statute reflects principles of impartiality: the CPB may not “contribute to or otherwise support any political party.” 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3); see also id.396(e)(2).
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/ending-taxpayer-subsidization-of-biased-media/
”Redwood Community Radio—KMUD—is a proud recipient of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)’s Community Service Grant (CSG). “
there it is, CPB violated 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3), by using federal funding to give grants (contributing) to democrat/progressive public media. Case closed.
Whoa…that case isn’t even a starter. That’s not actually a violation of 47 U.S.C. 396(f)(3). That section bars CPB from supporting any political party—not from funding stations whose coverage or listener base leans a certain way.
KMUD, like hundreds of other community stations, receives a Community Service Grant based on things like local programming, public access, and adherence to journalistic standards—not party affiliation. Unless someone can show they’re officially operating as an arm of a political party (and they’re not), there’s no case to be made under that statute.
Having a progressive tone or covering environmental or social issues doesn’t make a station partisan any more than covering agriculture or the stock market makes a station Republican. And frankly, there are some definitely not main stream Democrat shows being aired on KMUD–I’ve heard some opinions that make my progressive soul cry in anguish.
This isn’t “case closed”—it’s just how public media funding works.
It’s not about the Democrat “content”…
It’s about the Democrat “programming”…
Bla bla bla. Just a bunch of whining. I for one never listen to any of these stations, radio or TV. There’s virtually nothing but far left garbage on either one. Back in the early 70s, PBS was middle of the road broadcasting. That hasn’t been true for decades. It’s a disgrace to even call most of its content programming. It’s a waste of my tax dollars to pay for this utter crap.
How do you know so much about it if you never listen to it? Maybe if you removed your fingers from your ears, you would learn something.
I worked in a cubicle across from a guy who listened nonstop. Everything I heard was far left lunacy. I doubt it’s changed in the few years since I retired.
By the way, it’s #WorldPressFreedomDay.
But the public hardly ever hear about “what happens after that” anyway. The general press loses interest faster than the public so limiting journalists is really a complaint by journalists (usually about angry journalists with an agenda rather than the news) about professional self persevation.
I believe in the sanctity of journalists but it’s hard to keep it up when they are so very contemptuous of the public they use claims of serving as justification.
Should, “Counter Clockwise”, “Left Handed Spin”, be funded by the US government…???
I think, “NO”…!!!
Could the Counter Clockwise “Lefties” even recognize, “Left Handed Spin”…???
Or, after listening to so much counter rotational PBS and NPR, would it just seem perfectly “NORMAL”…
Here is a prime example of how thoroughly permeated with bullshit leftist spin and politically divisive and denialist misinformation and disinformation even our very own US Government National Institute of Health information is shamefully saturated with…
The question, for any and all of the Democrat, “Counter Revolutionists”, have the neutrality and critical thinking skills to properly discern, logically recognize, and then honestly acknowledge it…
Call it an exercise…
People don’t like tests…
But call it a test, if you like challenges…
Any takers…???
Lefties first…!!!
Does the NIH lean left…???
Does the NIH show CLEAR LEFT BIAS…???
You be the judge…
To me, this statement is easy to recognize as some pure Lefty bull shit..
If one can’t see it below, maybe one also can’t see the alleged biased Leftiness of NPR and PBS, if it so exists..
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39236212/#:~:text=Positive%20screen%20for%20depression%20did,in%20the%20past%2012%20months.
“In the past decade, depression has become more visible in the public conversation; depression has also become bound in national divides. We sought to assess (1) whether positive screen for depression is associated with political party affiliation and (2) whether use of mental health care varies by political affiliation. Positive screen for depression did not differ significantly for Republicans versus Democrats in Spring 2023. [25.2% of Democrats screened positive for depression, 20.5% of Republicans screened positive for depression.]
However, Republicans were less likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months. Depression is a bipartisan issue, and improving access to mental health care could be a priority that unites political groups during the upcoming election season.”
____________________________________________
Excerpt:
•Positive screen for depression did not differ significantly for Republicans versus Democrats in Spring 2023. However, Republicans were less likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months.•
………………………………………………..
Please locate and identify the areas of US Government provided, significant Leftist Twist and Spin, and then give an example of how it might be written, correctly, without even an equally applied Righty Twisted Spin…
Just for fun…
Hint:
[Spoiler Alert…]
“Positive screen for depression [differed] significantly for Republicans versus Democrats in Spring 2023, [25.2% vs 20.5%, respectively…!!!]. [Additionally], Democrats were [more] likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months.”
Why would the Government funded NIH have so clearly denied and downplayed the significant difference between Democrats and Republicans that screened positive for depression, AND then, SOOO tellingly COUNTERED WITH…
“However, Republicans were less likely to have received treatment for their mental health in the past 12 months.”…!!!???
You see, even though the Democrats were nearly 20% more likely to have screened positive for depression, the NIH, tried to deny the significance of that, AND, added the clear deflection, dubious implication, and unnecessary stigmatism, that there was more untreated mental health with Republicans…
And that’s extremely clearly a very shady, Lefty NIH maneuver, not a Righty maneuver…
The question remains, can you see it…???
Or, more appropriately, can you somehow not see it…???
Mozart playing, soothing, infantile sedatives for the morning commute important “our democracy” citizen soldiers who have been told they have one mission, get the roadrunner at all costs. Boulders and Acme Co. be damned! Good luck with that. Darwin suggests PBS needs to be privately funded, like a 1 year old male wolf being pushed out of the pack. No longer needed. Go make your own way. Sink or swim Great Bear rainforest beach wolf. And just like that, PBS disappears, foreva. But, but, but, the childrennnnn…………nope, prehistoric news. They all have iPads and are watching Japanese Anime.
#shittyslipper
Fact is that government assistance truly is no longer needed to have public input on media , with all the advances in media production and access to airwaves we have today , you tube facebook etc there is no longer a cost that prohibits a person or group from getting their messaging out in front of the public like there was in the past when this program was created
NPR has not been “independent journalism” for decades.
Shut that shit down.
How can this “attempt to silence independent journalism” happen unless it’s already dependent on public money?
The reggae redemption hour is kmud’s best contribution to the community.