Hum CO. Supervisors Approve Changes to Cannabis Equity Grants, Express Concerns About Possible Funding for Non-County Recipients

Image of Galactic Farms during storm Hillary, with smoke filled skies from one of many nearby fires,

Galactic Farms during Tropical Storm Hillary, with smoke filled skies from one of many nearby fires, [Photo by Indy Riggs]

Stuck in between a rock and a hard place, Tuesday, the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 (with Supervisor Mike Wilson dissenting) to approve state mandated changes that alter the eligibility requirements for the Trellis Equity Grant cannabis program. The equity grant program aims to serve state cannabis entrepreneurs who were impacted by the criminalization of cannabis, with funding to help them establish compliant businesses post legalization.

Humboldt County Growers Alliance (HCGA) wrote in a response to the County’s staff report on the program, “Since 2019, Humboldt County has secured over $9 million in state funds to support local equity operators who have been negatively impacted by cannabis criminalization,” adding, “Humboldt’s effectiveness in distributing these funds stands as a testament to the commitment by your Board and staff to local equity operators, and these resources have been instrumental in enabling many cannabis operators to stay afloat in the face of collapsing wholesale prices for cannabis.”

Indy Riggs owner of Galactic Farms agreed stating, “Trellis has been invaluable to myself and numerous other farmers. It has helped me develop my farm, my brand, and products.”

What’s Changed and Why?

Image of Galactic Farms during storm Hillary, with smoke filled skies from one of many nearby fires, by Indy Riggs

Local micro cannabis farm, Galactic Farms, during Tropical Storm Hillary, with smoke filled skies from one of many nearby fires. [Photo by Indy Riggs]

Director of Economic Development for Humboldt County, Scott Adair, who oversees the Trellis program said, “It is important, I feel, to clarify these changes were not supported by the county, county staff or the Board [of Supervisors]” but instead was “a required change of [the Governor’s Office of Economic Development] administering the state equity program.”

Peggy Murphy, Economic Development Coordinator for the County’s Economic Development Team explained that approving the changes to the grant program is required for the County to remain eligible for state equity funding, and to secure Trellis Grant award money that is already set to be distributed to local cannabis business owners. 

Murphy said at the Board of Supervisor’s Meeting Tuesday, “If the Board did not accept the state mandated changes, we would not be able to accept the 1.2 million.”

Murphy detailed there were not only challenges for rural communities in implementing the new policy, but also stated in the board meeting, “It’s a one size fits all program that’s more suited for urban areas.”

For example, it may make sense to encourage a cannabis business owner from Oakland to obtain equity grants to help to open up shop in San Francisco. However, Murphy warned of potential issues locally with the removal of residency for eligibility. 

Summary of what the state is requesting for the new eligibility requirements

In order to qualify one has to live in the county for five years during the height of the war on drugs from 1971-2016, but the new policy does not require them to currently reside here.

If we no longer require one to currently live in the county, Murphy told the Board, “We could be funding somebody from another county or state that’s just an owner here…. Which did not seem to be the intent of the Board.”

Murphy also told the Board she also wanted clarity with the state that businesses would also need to be located in Humboldt, as the language was unclear.

“I think the reality of the program for us at the local and state level is that they are building the ship as they sail it,” Murphy told us, adding, “It was a hard decision [for the board] regardless…We do what we can with what we have and it’s better to accept the funding. In the long run I think the decision was the best one the Board could have made.”

Murphy explained that before Measure S taxes were put on hold by the Board, the County was providing significant funding for the program initially from Measure S cannabis taxes. 

Supervisor Rex Bohn stated at the meeting, “We brought in close to $58 million in local taxes, which was a great balancing act for our budget.”

However, an important fiscal change to the Trellis program is a 1-1 match for over $500,000 of county funding to state funding. So for example if $1,000,000 in grants were distributed one round, $250,000 would need to be paid by the county.

Murphy said, “Fifteen million was in the state budget for annual allocation for equity at first. We were one of the first programs to have equity assessments to give out money.” 

However now grant funding comes primarily from the state, and with more jurisdictions requesting equity funding, those state funds are stretched thin.

This 1-1 match in funding is not just an increase if grants exceed $500,000, but increases staff costs and resources to administer the program beyond what is currently provided by the state, which Scott Adair expressed was already insufficient for the current workload.

These changes will increase cost burdens for the county, which District …Board of Supervisor Mike Wilson expressed concern for, and he requested an administrative costs analysis.

Peggy Murphy illustrated it would “cause a significant impact, having to review the applications again to see if they still qualify.”

Adair said the match in county funding comes into effect for the next round and the fee their office receives does not cover the current staff costs, elaborating, “We get a small fee for administering it and we are presently being audited for all equity payments.”

Adair said considerations should also be made for 1-1 funding modifications “which will be needed to sustain and request the funding in light of the budget crisis we face.”

While local cannabis industry conditions have slowed with permit applications to a virtual halt, Murphy added this is not true for the state, noting, “Across the state the number of Applicants is increasing each year.” 

Industry Stakeholders Take:

The state made these changes as an effort to iron out lingering issues with equity distribution in urban markets statewide.

Image of local micro cannabis farm, Galactic Farms by Indy Riggs

Image of local micro cannabis farm, Galactic Farms by Indy Riggs

Humboldt County Growers Alliance (HCGA) Policy Director Ross Gordon said that the county’s deliberation reflects a continued lack of clarity on what it means to be an equity operator in California. 

“The county and the state aren’t on the same page about what the definition of an equity cannabis business is” Gordon said. “And that’s understandable, because the impacts of cannabis prohibition have been so diverse and so widespread that it’s not easy to put a box around who’s in and who’s out.”

HCGA wrote in a letter to the Board, “While we have concerns regarding the new conditions imposed by GoBiz on Humboldt’s equity eligibility criteria, our understanding is that these conditions are beyond the county’s immediate control, and that today’s agenda item essentially focuses on whether Humboldt’s local equity program should continue in light of these restrictions. We believe it is critical that the answer to this question is “YES.” 

HCGA encouraged the Board to Adopt Option One.

Gordon said, “We don’t want people to question the equity program entirely because people may get the wrong Idea that the funding will go outside the county.” Gordon suggested, “Let’s look at who got the funds and see if out of towners got the funds. I think we will find the vast majority are going to local entrepreneurs.”

County Exceptions, Over Policy Modifications

During the Trellis discussion the Supervisors discussed how aspects that work for the state, may not work for our county. 

Madrone said during Tuesday’s Board meeting it seems the Board had no choice but to accept the program alterations, stating ”If we don’t accept the changes, it seems we can’t finalize our current awards, so that seems critical. But we can push back with the letter…stating what doesn’t work for our rural community and we would like them to consider modifications in the future.”

Second District Supervisor Michelle Bushnell agreed a letter should be drafted for the Governors office. However, she clarified, “Exceptions are better suited for our county, instead of modifications.” 

Supervisor Bushnell suggested  that an important exception would be to  “allow…our economic development team to make the conclusion themselves …allowing for them to determine that people in Humboldt County qualify.

Bushnell later made a motion to first adopt the Staff recommendation to, “Approve, and authorize” the continued participation in the Project Trellis Local Equity Program in the amount of $300,000 for the period of Jan. 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024.” (Full staff recommendation and report here.)

Additionally, Supervisor Bushnell requested staff draft the letter mentioned to send to the state to request considerations be made for our unique county, to better ensure resources are distributed equitably.

HCGA’s Ross Gordon told us there are legal matters surrounding the new policy that may be challenged in court, but said, “The County pushing back against the state is a positive outcome.”

Indy Riggs expressed his heart was warmed by the Board and staff’s advocacy Tuesday saying,As a small local farmer, I’m very grateful to have the support of our county government and greatly appreciate their vote on Tuesday. The continuation of the Trellis program is vital to equity applicants in Humboldt County. As the market continues to evolve and change, it is vital to have a functional local equity program which will continue to support our community through these shifting times. Our farmers will need support and in the long term this support will come back to our communities tenfold.”

Peggy Murphy said she understands some people felt it was overwhelming to apply for fee waivers through the Department of Cannabis Control, but wants to remind the community that the Trellis Grant application process is different. Murphy said, “When we do reopen applications, we encourage all of the cannabis community to apply even if you don’t think you will qualify, it is worth it to try.”

Watch the full Board of Supervisors meeting discussion on the matter featured at the August 22, 2023 meeting here.

Note: The publisher of Redheaded Blackbelt and her son received a Trellis grant for state fee waivers this last year. 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

25 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William
Guest
William
2 years ago

Small farmers who have lost insurance and have to go through the FAIR program are not allowed to grow.

Mr. Clark
Member
2 years ago

Ha, what a joke, the county thought they were going to make millions and billions of dollars in tax revenue off cannabis 10 years ago. And now look, we’re giving money to the growers what a joke.

Country Joe
Member
2 years ago

The nine most dangerous words in the English language are, I’m from the government and I’m here to help.

Joe Broni
Guest
Joe Broni
2 years ago
Reply to  Country Joe

Depends on who you ask. I always thought they were..
“my name is joe And i have internet access”

Country Joe
Member
2 years ago
Reply to  Joe Broni

Well hello Joe…

Shortjohnson
Guest
Shortjohnson
2 years ago

The county shot the golden goose. These programs don’t go far enough soon enough. So freakin much potential wasted. Quite similar to Mendo which has become the poster child of poor county management and lack of financial oversight

Last edited 2 years ago
I like stars
Guest
I like stars
2 years ago

Nichole – Are you still planning to update readers on the story of Shawn Lloyd and his seized tiny home?

Nichole Norris
Guest
Nichole Norris
2 years ago
Reply to  I like stars

Absolutely. I have one more overdue longer story that you will likely enjoy and then the update, while working out a negotiation in the meantime.

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
2 years ago
Reply to  Nichole Norris

Right on. Looking forward to it. Thanks for the reply.

Kicking Bull
Guest
Kicking Bull
2 years ago
Reply to  Nichole Norris

And the IJ suit/ case (interesting linguistics there..)

Nice to see you back on the blog.

Rodney Covington
Guest
Rodney Covington
2 years ago

This program is great for small farmers. The money was taken from many of them unfairly and then luckily re-distributed back to many of them. The county basically robbed many of the farms of all there wealth, now the entire county is suffering from their over-reach.

Ricky Bennis
Guest
Ricky Bennis
2 years ago

Not many of them. The already best-funded. You do better getting a trellis grant if you have a consultant you owe money to. I saw applications closed in Humboldt. I’m not really eligible anyway I guess because I never over extended, made bad decisions, took silly risks, pissed off neighbors, never tried selln boof on Haight! I’ve been cleaned out during the STABO years, but not CAUGHT!

Nichole Norris
Guest
Nichole Norris
2 years ago
Reply to  Ricky Bennis

You only need to have resided in Humboldt county for five years during the height of prohibition and have a licensed cannabis business as far as I am aware. You can apply on the next round and find out.

Ricky Bennis
Guest
Ricky Bennis
2 years ago
Reply to  Nichole Norris

Thanks! I’m not too proud to temper my pessimismo. I’ll give it a shot. If I get anything I will sneakily divert a hundo to the RHBB!

Last edited 2 years ago
Redwood Dan
Guest
Redwood Dan
2 years ago
Reply to  Ricky Bennis

Project Trellis does not support those who were adversely effected by the war on drugs if they are fast runners.

I am a robot
Guest
I am a robot
2 years ago

We were all (including the county gov’t) so much better off when cannabis was a crime

thetallone
Guest
thetallone
2 years ago
Reply to  I am a robot

Right. People were “impacted” by the war on drugs by being able to make a decent living.

notheone
Guest
notheone
2 years ago

I’m glad it’s helping some. In the past the county and state has taken so much and put small farms out of business. I would like to see some hard working farmers remain.

Farce
Guest
Farce
2 years ago
Reply to  notheone

Then you should consider going to….Oklahoma? Or perhaps check out your friends’ black-market grows in other counties. Not here…

That sauce
Guest
That sauce
2 years ago

Wilson is such a tool. Go hang out on the beautiful bum ridden arcata plaza you loser

WTF?
Guest
WTF?
2 years ago
Reply to  That sauce

He is a tool, literally. He’s a tool being used by ICLEI and the UN for Adgenda 21/2030.

https://icleiusa.org/iclei-leadership-letter-to-biden-harris-first-100-days/

Last name at the bottom of the page. He is in charge of working the UN climate goals into the county general plan.

Farce
Guest
Farce
2 years ago

This is no surprise. The corporate-favoring form of “legalization” that was drawn up by Napster dude was always a scam. Remember when Greasy Gavin came all the way to Garberville to see who he was scamming? “Okay, we’ll call it cannabis” and everybody worshipped him. Then he went home and called all his corporate buddies “Hey- you’ll never believe how easy this is going to be to take this thing away from these country bumpkin suckers!” Then he appointed everybody to the special non-elected Cannabis Control Board and they immediately decided behind closed doors to get rid of the 3 acre cap talked about in the actual proposition everybody voted for…”We shall be free! And safe!!” the suckers exclaimed. Well…every single decision has been made in favor of the MEGA- corporate grows and against the smaller old school growers. . So yes- this undesrable change is being forced down our local throats by the state. Zero surprise here. And it will get worse- not better. They do not care about you and they do not like you. Don’t fool yourself any longer. You are walking dead. Zombie farms working into oblivion soon to be ghost farms. The math is not gonna reverse- this is a trend that was easily foreseen by the actual language of the corporate “legalization” scheme. They want it all and they are taking it all away from you. And you are powerless to stop the system that is behind this corporate cash grab. You are being walked to the end line and you still cannot believe this is really happening….It is. Sorry but this is a dead-end alley that you chose. Maybe eke out another year or two? Walking dead…Enjoy being “free” and “safe”!

Grow up SoScum
Guest
Grow up SoScum
2 years ago
Reply to  Farce

Ok. But places like Colorado legalized first. There is not any of this pathetic cry baby tit for tat. Anyone can grow weed just as good if not better than humboldt.
so pathetic. Locals only in SoScum.

Legallettuce
Guest
2 years ago
Reply to  Grow up SoScum

//Anyone can grow weed just as good if not better than humboldt.//

No actually they can’t, they haven’t and definately won’t in my lifetime. Plenty of examples (competitions) and emerald triangle growers so far have not been displaced. Even in the Traditional Market busts internationally and the I-80 show bags labeled Cali weed.

Many of us growers have seen other buds grown in other states and clearly they have been weighed, measured and been found wanting! The plant and our lands are harmonious with each other.

In cannabis language my weather never got above 90 degrees. My plants have terpenes plants in other states burnt off. Imagine when that profile is dried and cured proper. We’re are not just talking science but fact as tested in competitions in state and worldwide.

Ricky Bennis
Guest
Ricky Bennis
2 years ago
Reply to  Farce

You are good at the Brutal Truth thing brother! What I realize, is that by avoiding the legal snake pit, you may be missing some of the actually funny-if-it-wasn’t-happening -to-you stuff! The whole hand wringing over how they can’t make this Trellis shit quite work… When meanwhile it’s all back filling for the most petty vindictive ridiculous conditions required on the ground: like what is the threshold for processing.. there was a fantasy that growers would have access to processor/distro services. I admitted to leafing and bucking at the farm, puttn the buds in a machine… Whoops. Now approaching Revokation Station…yet, I’m also supposed to have a pile of dried branches composting…never in a burn pile. Oh! But you have to put fencing around it because somebody in the Planning Dept. Watched Bambi, and now thinks deer eat dead dried weed branches!
Asphalt aprons! Somehow cannabis roots 1000 feet away NOW disrupts gravel near the pavement. One lazy renter makes more traffic in a week than a whole season of weed traffic. Yet the most important thing I can do to save the environment is blow out $15000 on a make-work project. Meanwhile, all the busy subdivision driveways with 100s of cars in and out each day? Nothing. No way to get the ones that count paved!… Oh unless we took a lesson from that distant populous, prosperous County way way to the East: Trinity Country, where in some flash of genius, their public works decided to pave the driveways they want done, as they pass, AS THEY PAVE THEIR COUNTY ROADS! Incredible supernatural insight!