Pikeminnow Survey Shows ‘Big Drop’ in Population in 2019

This is a press release from the Eel River Recovery Project:

The Eel River Recovery Project (ERRP) completed its fourth annual assessment of the non-native Sacramento pikeminnow in a key index reach of the South Fork Eel River on July 18-19 and found that the population had dropped by more than half in 2019, when compared to the three previous years.  The findings suggest that high flow events may be a factor that limits the pikeminnow population, and may have shaped population dynamics over the 40 years since their introduction.

Sacramento pikeminnow close up. 7/18/19.

The Sacramento pikeminnow is the largest member of the minnow family in North America and was formerly known as the squawfish.  Introduced into Lake Pillsbury in 1979, this non-native predator spread throughout the 3600 square mile Eel River basin within a decade and attained a population that likely numbered well over 1 million.  They were perfectly suited to the warm stream temperatures characteristic of main Eel River channels that had been flattened and were filled in by the 1964 flood.

Studies by U.C. Davis and the U.S. Forest Service Redwood Sciences Lab in Arcata established that pikeminnow were a major predatory force threatening Eel River salmon and steelhead. Native Sacramento sucker and sculpin species were also recognized as severely depressed as a result of pikeminnow predation.  The 12-mile reach of the South Fork Eel River that extends from the mouth of Rattlesnake Creek to Standish Hickey Park in Mendocino County was chosen because it produces a large number of juvenile steelhead, coho salmon, and Chinook salmon. Studies also verified significant predation by pikeminnow on salmonids in this reach.

Phill Georgakakos of UC Berkeley and Americorp Stewards Kaitlin Southall and Jessica Comer from the Arcata BLM office take a break from dive survey. 7/18/19.

ERRP has a dedicated core of volunteers, including fisheries professionals that participate annually, so counts are fairly precise.  No fish under 4” are counted because they could easily be mistaken for California roach, which can be abundant.  Size classes of pikeminnow that divers count are 4-8”, 8-12”, 12-16” and greater than 16” long.  Pikeminnow over 16” are of greatest concern, because they develop huge mouths and are the most voracious predators.  Larger fish are also almost exclusively females and, as with other fish species, the number of eggs produced increases with size.

The 2019 dive count found a total of only 614 pikeminnow over 4” long in the index reach, less than half the average of the previous three years when the population ranged from 1173-1414.  The most dramatic drop was in the size classes less than 12”, which fell by 2/3.  This suggests that sustained high flows in late February 2019 may have swept the smaller fish downstream and caused widespread mortality.  While larger pikeminnow greater than 12” declined from 370 to 311, they still constitute a significant threat to native fishes in the index reach.

ERRP has applied for a Scientific Collectors Permit from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to harvest large adult pikeminnow in the index reach in late summer 2020.  Expert divers will be recruited to use Hawaiian sling spear guns and deploy in the deepest pools of the index reach where dive counts have shown fish greater than 16” to be congregated.  Spear fishing would take place annually for ten years, which is the life span of pikeminnow, and would result in their long-term suppression and the rebound of native fishes. Pikeminnow have site fidelity and typicaly do not move into other reaches. If the removal of pikeminnow in the index reach is successful in controlling the species, similar tactics could be employed throughout the Eel River basin.

A major decline in Eel River pikeminnow had occurred between 1994 and 2012. Otter predation appeared to be a major factor as their population expanded to capitalize on the substantial food base that the non-native fish supplied.  The 2019 findings, however, suggest that high flow years between 1995 and 2012 may also have contributed to the decrease in the pikeminnow population during that period.

Day-two dive team (l to r) Willie Grover, Will Lennox, Pat Higgins, Doug Parkinson, Alex Carey, Phill Georgakakos and guide Eric Stockwell. 7/19/19.

The 2019 pikeminnow monitoring and reporting was sponsored by the Northern California River Guides Association from its residual fund granted through the Humboldt Area Foundation.  ERRP would like to thank volunteer divers Phill Georgakakos and Alex Carey from the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) and Americorp Stewards Katelyn Southall and Jessica Coming with the Arcata Bureau of Land Management (BLM) office.  Seasoned ERRP volunteer Willie Grover was joined by new recruit Will Lennox, and professional fisheries biologists Doug Parkinson and Pat Higgins rounded out the team.

To read the full 2019 pikeminnow report, go to www.eelriverrecovery.org.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

16 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mike
Guest
Mike
6 years ago

Pikeminnow do more damage to the native fish population that pilsbury ever could, yet the friends of the eel seem to not care about that issue

Willie Caos-mayham
Guest
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

??Well then you should be happy that there declining. ?

Guest
Guest
Guest
6 years ago

FOE has put their back into water issues if I’m not mistaken. Nothing lives without good water.
Historically the Eel produced 75% of the salmon below Pillsbury. PM populations vary hole to hole, and holes are cooler. PM don’t like cooler. I have seen clouds of PM an acre in size on shallow flats.
These so called scientists are looking through a straw and trying to apply that view to the whole river. Doesn’t work. Drastic measures are needed to eliminate PM, and that will never happen because it takes consistency and dedication by many people. Study away guys, just like the previous generation did, but don’t think you are compiling data that is going to make a difference. Just another case of fiddling while Rome burns.
PMs eat their own, and we may be seeing the decline because there is no other food to support their numbers.
Lets just rename the river Squawfish River and be done with it. Works better than anything else that has been done to solve the problems of the Eel.
I participated in Eel River politics for years on an intimate and inside level. I gave up, when our elected officials turned whore to the water barons, then neutered DFG and changed their mission statement.
The tribes were in the best position to help the river, but they sold out.

Jacoby Creek Beauty
Guest
Jacoby Creek Beauty
6 years ago
Reply to  Guest

My eight year old son and I go to several holes on the lower South Fork and catch as many as we can. This year he caught a 24 inch long 12 inches around lunker. He was on the verge of tears, yelling like it was a prized salmon…he knew that he may have saved many salmon and steelhead.

Mike
Guest
Mike
6 years ago

They’re not declining, one year is statiscally irrelevant. All these people crying about water diversion hurting the fish, and yet there’s a solvable problem that could actually make a difference. As long as theres one pikeminnow left it’s preying On native fish

Faro
Guest
Faro
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

I wouldn’t say Pikeminnow are a solvable problem. They will never be completely eradicated and suppression could cost huge amounts of money indefinitely.

Dams are a solvable problem. This research seams to indicate that the high would flow events that would occur more often if the dams were removed would be very beneficial in keeping Pikeminnow populations in check.

Mike
Guest
Mike
6 years ago
Reply to  Faro

Ok so what’s your answer to drought years? You know like we just had for about 4 years straight. Drought equals low flow. That sounds like a good solution, how do I find the eye rolling emoji?

crimestopper2
Guest
crimestopper2
6 years ago

THERE SHOULD BE A BOUNTY ON ALL PIKE MINNOWS and no fishing license required. However, if you catch any salmonoides and attempt to keep them, then the fines begin and the immediate confiscation of your gear occurs.
Grundman’s in Rio Dell had a derby for years, but were stopped by the bleeding heart liberals because it was inhuman to allow fish to die out of water after caught.
WELL-BOOHOO -SSHOLES.
Fish and Game put these fish into Lake Pillsbury (as an idiotic error by the fish truck)and for 10+ years blamed it on sports fisherman using them as “bait”. How’s that for credibility-liers!!!!!!!
Fish and game would pay the bounty based on the fish’s HEAD size. So guess what LIBERALS -it died after losing it’s head. No suffering.

Smoked Pike minnow? Mmm
Guest
Smoked Pike minnow? Mmm
6 years ago
Reply to  crimestopper2

We should have the derby again. The official solution is spear fishing. Pike minnow are cagey. Whats the trick? Light tackle and little micro spoons? or what? Bread?
Leaving them on the river bar after being quickly dispatched, is good for otters, eagles, bear, and pigs! Besides good for Salmon, and Steelhead.

Cowabunga
Guest
Cowabunga
6 years ago

A derby sounds like a good idea to encourage the reduction of pike minnow. I have found the pike minnow (in the Sacramento river system) to be very fond of Velveeta cheese. They bite like crazy on Velveeta!

Jacoby Creek Beauty
Guest
Jacoby Creek Beauty
6 years ago

They love nightcrawlers. LOVE.

Sparkelmahn
Guest
Sparkelmahn
6 years ago

That is a NICE picture! Thank you, dive team, for your efforts.

HOJ in Training
Guest
HOJ in Training
6 years ago
Reply to  Sparkelmahn

I know! Americorp Stewards and Arcata BLM have some hotties working for them.

Larry P. Forman
Guest
Larry P. Forman
6 years ago

I caught a 5lb lunker close to shore line under 1st st. bridge in Cloverdale that l have pics of a couple years ago. Caught him lure fishing. 80% of the fish l catch in river are Squaw.

Jeffersonian
Guest
Jeffersonian
6 years ago

The population is down because they have eaten all the other kinds of juvenille fish, salmon, steelhead, lampreys, suckers, sturgeon. The dfw does nothing, the politicians do nothing. A blue ribbon stream gone with the wind.

Hypothesis Headlines...
Guest

Let me start off by saying that I commend the work of ERRP and the volunteers who are collecting pikeminnow data in the short index reach of South Fork Eel River and making efforts to reach the general public. It’s great that they have put in 4 years of consistent surveys and have a growing data set that can be used to help understand major changes in the population. It is also great that the group is trying to engage people throughout the watershed. That said, this “press release” (and other similar ones on Eel River fish surveys) and many of the conclusions being shared with the general public are really hypotheses based on limited data, anecdotal observations, and conjecture. For example, “A major decline in Eel River pikeminnow had occurred between 1994 and 2012. Otter predation appeared to be a major factor as their population expanded to capitalize on the substantial food base that the non-native fish supplied.” In reality, there are not data available that allow for a true assessment of population trends between 1994 and 2012. And, where is the data that show otter predation is a big factor other than a few observations of them eating pikeminnow? Also, the apparent change in counts between years could simply be due to changes in distribution of the minnow population due to factors such as water temperatures and high flows. Fish move, and pikeminnow like warmer water, so it’s entirely possible that a greater % of the population was further downstream in warmer reaches this year (which followed a wet winter/spring as the author pointed out). The point I’m trying to make is that there are many alternative explanations for the apparent findings and it is irresponsible and misleading to send out press releases with so much arm waving and strong conclusions. One would expect arm waiving and conjecture by the arm chair commentators on this site, but not from professional biologists. In my opinion, press releases in science should be reserved for notable findings based on extensive study/data and work that ideally has some level of peer review — not for every annual report.