A ‘Check-Up For the Entire Community’: Humboldt County Health Survey

Marian Strong of Humboldt County’s Public Health Branch
Seeking to tell the “story of community health,” a Humboldt County survey on healthcare needs will inform an updated Community Health Improvement Plan.
The survey and its significance was discussed by Marian Strong, a program coordinator with the county’s Public Health division, in an April 8 online presentation to the Community Economic Resilience Consortium.
“We’re trying to get the voices of the community to share with us what are they thinking about their health, what are their needs and what are the things that we’re doing well that we can leverage,” she said. “And then we take that information into community health improvement planning.”
The surveying concludes April 15 and Strong described it as being “like a check-up for the entire community.”
The information gives the county an idea of “the conditions that help residents thrive as well as the barriers that hold us back” and will be used to guide the improvement plan’s update.
The data will also be used by public agencies and organizations for “understanding what our residents in Humboldt County truly need.”
Strong said the last survey, completed about five years ago, identified four “priority areas” for the plan – suicide prevention, substance use, housing instability and homelessness and adverse childhood experiences.
The effort is done through a collaborative group, Live Well Humboldt, whose mission is “to help all residents live their happiest, healthiest lives” by “shaping resources, programs and services that support individuals, families and communities across the county,” Strong said.
Another aspect of the health improvement quest is an online information resource, the Community Health Data Dashboard.
It can be assessed at the same website where the survey can be taken, at livewellhumboldt.org.
“On the dashboard, we have accessible up-to-date data on key local, national and state health indicators,” Strong said. “It helps leaders, organizations and residents track progress and understand emerging needs.”
The data is important for efforts like gaining grant funding and the county is ambitiously aiming for a 10 percent survey response rate, which Strong described as “pretty high.”
“So far we’re doing all right, but we still need your help in getting that rate a bit higher,” she told the online audience, which included members of local governments and community organizations.
Gregg Foster of the Redwood Region Economic Development Commission, the meeting’s host, asked how the survey is used to implement healthcare improvements.
Strong said the previous survey and the current version of the improvement plan identified a troubling issue.
“We were able to identify that we have a very high rate of suicide in Humboldt County – 2.5 times the rate of California,” said Strong. “So looking at that, we say, okay, that’s a concern, what are the things that we can do to make that something that we share strategies and common goals on.”
Addressing needs can be done through outreach such as grant applications. “And then using those resources that come in, collectively, we can improve the systems,” said Strong.
She was asked if the survey data could help draw the state’s attention – and funding – to local issues.
Strong said it “potentially could” and gave an example of local policy stemming from the data.
She said the county’s retail tobacco licensing ordinance “started with understanding the problem and having the data” and “there was also support from the state.”
Kerry Venegas of Changing Tides Family Services is on the Live Well Humboldt Steering Committee and said the data “does actually guide a lot of the advocacy” of Changing Tides and other groups, and is helpful to cite when communicating with legislators.
She added that when it’s used in grant applications, it “really helps us be very specific and concrete about the needs in our community and to be able to back it up with data.”
Noting that the Consortium is “about economic resilience,” Foster linked community health to economic health.
“One of the selling points of any community, of course, is how healthy its population is,” he said, adding he’s hoping “there is progress being made on some of those things that we can use to talk up our community as a place to invest.”
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
Where is the survey?
Site highlighted in red, click it.
I did.
Its right in the artical in RED. Good luck. I did it.
I selected a lot of ”Id rather not say”. Its none of their business if I’m White or gay or a man. Otherwise i gave it full disclosure.
LOL, take the survey and be eligible for a $30 gift card………
.
.
We’re sorry. This document is not published.
I was not really after $30. But FFS…
I thought younwere making a ridiculous assertion but the site really does say that a person can get $30 for taking it. Dang what a canard.
Thank you so much for completing the survey!
Your response has been recorded.
We are offering survey participants the opportunity to receive a $30 gift card. To be eligible to receive a gift card, please provide your name and contact information via the google form linked below. If you are selected to receive a gift card, you will be contacted by DHHS Public Health.
This Google Form is not connected to your survey responses in any way. The information you provide will be used only to distribute gift cards to eligible participants.
Link to Google Form
Powered by Qualtrics
Lots of people will be unhappy about this. And will take the survey many times to see if it works.
I get the feeling this info will be used to justify more social justice programs, that are a waste of TAX monies. How will the survey sample a full range of citizens?
This is now happening in California. Federal Tax $$$ fund programs that are administered by State and local entities. There is little to zero oversight/no accountability. This makes for more administrative jobs and others like Social workers with little to zero accountability toward efficacy. It is a set-up for fraud.
If you thought Minnesota fraud was bad… wait for the exponentially worse from California. Locally in Humboldt County, with a large socialist funded economy, the result will likely be harsh. Folks whose jobs are dependent upon this “model” are looking at big problems.
Turns out that whole Minnesota fraud thing, like so many other Right-Wing talking points, was blown way out of proportion in order to score cheap political points.
“…Minnesota’s “error rate” – the percentage of overpayments or underpayments – in 2024 was 8.98%, lower than the national average of 10.93% and lower than the error rates of 33 other states.”
https://www.minnpost.com/national/washington/2026/01/snap-minnesotas-food-stamp-program-in-peril-as-trump-administration-says-its-subject-to-fraud/
As for your so-called “socialist funded [sic] economy”, keep in mind that a large portion of that includes schools and transportation projects.
Attempts to grow the economy in other ways, such as aquafarm project and the offshore wind farm, have also been stymied by people who blew things way out of proportion– or who sometimes just made shit up.
Nice try jebs but… a major fraudster in Minnesota took off. They are looking for him. California transportation: “the Train to Nowhere”. Public Schools: terrible stats on actually facilitating an education.
…and aquafarms and offshore winds are detrimental to the environment. Offshore Wind is inefficient, unsustainable, thus expensive. Both cannot get off the ground without taxpayer subsidies. You know this jebs. Who is just making shit up now jebs?
Ironic to the point of laughable that you would repeat the long-debunked claim of offshore wind being detrimental to the environment while simultaneously asking, Who is just making shit up now?
Similar for your claim that “Offshore Wind is inefficient, unsustainable, thus expensive.” Its sustainability is one of its biggest advantages, and something that sets it apart from polluting nonrenewable energy sources such as coal.
The cost of offshore wind is also already comparable to the cost of coal, https://digitalenergyby5.com/blog/oil-coal-vs-clean-energy-costs/ and the cost of renewables is coming down– unlike the rising and volatile costs of environmentally-damaging fossil fuels.
And, since we’re already subsidizing those unhealthy, planet-destroying energy sources, why not just spend that same money investing in something without all the downsides?
One big storm — where did the windmills go?
Based upon decades of evidence gathered from places with very big storms, they’d still be right where they were.
Oh, you mean those tiny windmills that are not offshore? Storms today are unprecedented in fury…>100mph winds @1000′; 50-75′ waves.
They get storms in other parts of the world too.
“Super Typhoon Ragasa has left a path of destruction in its wake across southeast Asia this week, while also slamming into China’s offshore wind fleet, including a pioneering twin-headed floating turbine… Envision reported that all the turbines “remained safe and stable under sustained winds even above 47 m/s. (105mph)” Chinese turbine maker Mingyang meanwhile reported that its fleet of 1,345 offshore wind turbines “remained intact” in the face of the typhoon. https://www.rechargenews.com/china/video-super-typhoon-slams-into-chinese-offshore-wind-farms/2-1-1877506
The North Sea also gets some pretty big storms, and there are lots of offshore wind turbines there too– both in deep and shallow water.
physical size matters
Nice try jebs. What is the lifespan of a turbine. Are turbine blades recyclable? They pretty massive and offshore. Cost that includes subsidies to modify the harbor and entrance to a place like Humboldt Bay? Offshore “bird choppers”? So many questions? Methinks you protest too much and one might be lead to wonder why?
“Planet destroying” energy sources… well turbines have what 200-400 gallons of lubricants, lubricating oil? Dang what if it starts leaking? Why wouldn’t you do something to save the world?
Oh my! “What if” a couple hundred gallons of lubricant spilled?
although, yes, that would be something to be addressed if it were to happen, considering that around 700,000,000 gallons of oil spills into the ocean annually https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/ea7402a23e714b70872de61946be202e , that would still be a huge step in the right direction.
You also seem to keep dancing around the 800 pound gorilla in the room: the CO2 from burning fossil fuels poses the greatest threat to the continuation of life as we know it on this planet since the Chicxulub impactor.
We need to move away from fossil fuels as rapidly as possible, and offshore wind factors to be a huge part of that solution.
Humboldt stands to benefit greatly from this part of the transition to clean energy, if only the paranoid NIMBYs would get out of the way.
Your argument lost all credibility with the name-calling.
Leave Arcata outta this (NIMBYs)
Hello? In 2024, who was even checking? The billions in fraud allegation from child care allotment came because no one was checking anything. Until someone outside showed up to find out the there was no child care going on at all, no one in Minnesota government even knew what was happening to the money they handed out. As it is, “recertification” for SNAP involved calling, asking questions and not even getting an actual signature.
But about a hundred individuals have already pledged guilty for fraud charges in the various Minnesota welfare fraud cases. “This is a cascade of systemic failures leading up to Tim Walz. Agency leaders appointed by Tim Walz willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet – even to the extent of threatening families of whistleblowers,” the post added. “These same leaders are not qualified for their jobs, instead getting leadership jobs via Tim Walz’s friendship so state government were left floundering.” A billion dollars not cheap even by Progressive standards of spending other people’s money. It can not be brushed off just because you say so.
https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/minnesota-somali-fraud-sentences-penalties-6a75b9
And had been aware of possibility of fraud for years before that. ” The Minnesota state auditor released on Mar. 13 (2019) report on the CCAP fraud allegations that began after a report from Fox 9 revealed as much as $100 million in taxpayer money had fraudulently been shipped to Somalia, after being given to Minnesota Daycare facilities.
The report is able to identify a serious rift between Minnesota’s Department of Human Services (DHS) and the CCAP. The CCAP manager of investigations identified more than 100 daycare centers under review for fraudulent practices, pinpointing the fraud rate at 50 percent of the $217 million paid to these child care centers. DHS did not like these conclusions from CCAP and hired their own independent investigators.
Among these concerns, the CCAP investigators also identified additional trends in the fraudulent CCAP centers that include identity falsification, false pay stubs, parent coercion and intimidation, and “staged” facilities for purposes of obtaining a CCAP license and in turn, money.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minnesota-human-services-employees-blame-walz-for-massive-fraud-in-state/ar-AA1Rr2TI
https://alphanews.org/child-care-fraud-confirmed-by-state-auditors-new-report/
https://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=cm_00051208
It’s an interesting tostrategy is to immediately discredit yourself by starting off with a blatant falsehood.
“By 2019, state prosecutors had charged at least a dozen Minnesotans and centers with defrauding the state’s child care program in the prior five years. After the 2019 report was issued, the state tightened oversight, including creating the Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) to take over child care licensing, oversight, and auditing. Last year, Minnesota passed a law to criminalize kickbacks for child care program enrollment referrals.” https://www.minnpost.com/other-nonprofit-media/2026/01/heres-whats-really-happening-with-child-care-fraud-in-minnesota-explained/
As for your claim that “someone outside showed up to find out the there was no child care going on at all”– that someone was Nick Shirley, a crackpot conspiracy theorist YouTube influencer.
And, as for his claims of fraud? “After the video was posted, investigators from the state Office of Inspector General conducted compliance visits to nine of the 10 centers in the video (one of the centers in the video has been closed for several years and has not received funds in that time). They found normal operations and children at all but one, which had not yet opened for the day.” (Same link as above.)
Nevertheless more than 60 people have been convicted or pled guilty to fraud in the Somali child caes cases. That is on record. It is not just a opinion about the quality of Shirley’s videos. As Factually puts it, “Yes: federal and state prosecutions connected to the broader Minnesota social-aid and Feeding Our Future scandals have produced dozens of convictions, including the conviction of Aimee Bock, the government’s described “mastermind,” and scores of Somali American providers who pleaded guilty or were found guilty at trial; precise totals vary across news outlets as the investigation and prosecutions continued into 2025–2026 .”
https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/somali-daycare-scandal-fraud-convictions-f51084
Likewise, it’s an interesting strategy to claim something is not fraud because all of it is not proven fraudulent. As your own link puts it- “Reporting shows ongoing investigations and a complex fraud landscape in Minnesota, but it does not confirm the full scope of Shirley’s claims linking dozens of centers and tens or hundreds of millions to deliberate schemes.” Contesting every bit of Shirley ‘s claims is not proving fraud never existed. It’s was not discrediting to reproduce the same reference in the link you used but refuse to reproduce the opinion piece that was passed off as fact finding when it fails to mention the fact that people were convicted.
I never said that fraud didn’t exist. I just pointed out that it was exaggerated by some on the Right to make it seem much more rampant than it was. And I debunked the claims that no one was doing anything about it until Shirley “exposed” it and Trump stepped in.
Oh really? Quite a retreat from saying I discredited myself as a strategy. It was just a little fraud, right? 60 convictions and counting little.
As far as I can read you never said anything about accusations nobody doing anything. But if you did, you would have been wrong there too. It seems it was even worse then the media said. It seems ” Jan. 20, 2022 — The FBI investigation becomes public when agents raid Feeding Our Future’s offices, Aimee Bock’s home and two dozen other homes and businesses.”
There’s this little gem- “June 24, 2021 — Ramsey County Judge John Guthmann finds MDE in contempt for moving too slowly on Feeding Our Future’s meal site applications and orders MDE to pay the nonprofit $47,500 in penalties and attorneys’ fees.
A group of meal site operators celebrate Bock’s short-lived legal victory with a party at Benadir Hall, a Minneapolis event venue later found to have been built with stolen taxpayer funds. Prosecutors would play video of the celebration at Bock’s 2025 trial.”
But that’s a miniscule piece of irony in a far larger sea. As Walz put it-““There’s not a single state employee that was implicated in doing anything that was illegal,” Walz says. “They simply didn’t do as much due diligence as they should have.” Shirley was late to the party but the party was still going on when he showed up. Yup a little malfeasance here and a little malfeasance there and soon you’re talking real money. But what the hay. It’s only right wing talking points.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/06/timeline-of-fraud-investigations-that-shaped-walz-tenure
Link provided for the $30.00 gift card does not link to anything!
It linked to the survey for me. I did not proceed further.
They could easily study this by looking at what causes patients to have to travel to another county to get medical care. This is just data mining.