New Bill Requires CPUC to Map Local Broadband Access

Press release from the office of Assemblymember Jim Wood: 

Malachi Church with computer

[Stock Photo by Kym Kemp]

Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 2752, legislation authored by Assemblymember Jim Wood (D-Healdsburg) that would require the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to map local level data regarding broadband access, including addresses.

“This new law will ensure that broadband maps reflect the reality of access actually felt by Californians at the household level,” said Wood. “Currently, these maps overstate access to service, especially in rural, low-income and tribal communities. While an overwhelming majority of providers have complied and provided the CPUC with the appropriate level of granular data, some companies that, unfortunately, serve the largest number of customers, are not providing this level of data.”

Broadband maps informed by this granular, address-level data are essential to direct the resources and policy that will bring all of California online. This legislation builds on previous broadband expansion efforts, including AB 41 (Wood), to improve the maps that identify the level of broadband access statewide.

“Unfortunately, some corporate broadband providers have chosen not to build their networks in certain communities even when it’s profitable – but apparently not profitable enough for them,” said Wood. “Well enough of that. We need to know which communities are being snubbed, and this mapping requirement will help us understand that.”

Access to this data will support local, public and private efforts to make targeted investments and supplement ongoing state and federal efforts to build broadband infrastructure.

“California is currently investing billions in a statewide open-access middle fiber network. The transparency and data provided by this new law will allow us to better quantify the magnitude of the digital divide, so we can get people the service they need and deserve,” said Wood.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
grey fox
Member
1 year ago

Good idea, but the companies are going to continue doing what ever they want.

CPUC is business favorable and getting them to do something about the matter is another story.

grey fox
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  grey fox

PS: Is that photo one of the
redheaded Kemp clan?

Go apple 🍏

Last edited 1 year ago
Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
1 year ago

Maybe not having broadband is a plus , sometimes info isn’t the best thing for people.

grey fox
Member
1 year ago
Reply to  Lone Ranger

Information good.

Disinformation bad.

Ben Round
Guest
Ben Round
1 year ago
Reply to  grey fox

Hold on there! I’m gonna fact check what you said! lol

Lone Ranger
Guest
Lone Ranger
1 year ago
Reply to  grey fox

Not sure about that grey fox, people still fuming about Trump, high blood pressure running rampant because of his 3 year old tweets. People still talking about the has-been.

Just a Guy
Guest
Just a Guy
1 year ago

Verizon is the company they should e looking at. By getting rid of 3g and not upgrading to 5g they have silently gone down the tubes for reception. You can’t even get reception in town in a lot of places anymore. I can’t believe Cal poly would double down when half the town doesn’t have service. The rural coverage is even worse. All the while still charging monthly fees like a car payment. I pay 300 a month for a family of 3 and am stuck in their contracts and crappy service.

Nooo
Guest
Nooo
1 year ago
Reply to  Just a Guy

Something has really, really changed. Verizon is my only choice because, while T mobile’s map says it reaches here, it doesn’t and never has. It does as about 600 ft on the other side of the ridge but not here. Roaming was possible but no longer even that.

Meanwhile, while Verizon had passable connection here, it would get much better in Eureka. Now the connection is much worse in Eureka. And their maps are total fiction. I hope there’s fines involved in misrepresentation, because truly they don’t care about their reputations.

Grumpy
Guest
Grumpy
1 year ago

Internet sucks in the Pines, wait did this send