Supervisors Approve Travel Reimbursement Increase Despite Acknowledging Possible ‘Blowback’

Michelle Bushnell in her white pickup with Whale Gulch Volunteer Fire Company Chief and company in 2023 discussing the state of the road to their School. It can take a couple hours to travel from the southwestern tip of her district near Whale Gulch* to the northeastern reach past Bridgeville. [Photo by Pamela Lauer]
Though public “blowback” to it was alluded to, increases in travel expense reimbursements to Humboldt County supervisors has gotten approval.
A majority of the Board of Supervisors voted for the annual increases, which amount to 7.5 percent for the next fiscal year plus an additional $5,000 annually for supervisors in larger districts.
The current annual travel allowance is $10,300 per supervisor, a level that hasn’t changed in about 10 years.
The increase proposal was agendized by Supervisor Michelle Bushnell, whose Second District is one of the larger ones.
Bushnell is over the $10,300 annual reimbursement limit and she said “this is always a hard discussion to have” but the amount needs to be evaluated.
“I’ve really drawn back from going on some conferences that I’ve wanted to because I know that my mileage often exceeds that,” she said, adding the proposal is a “fair conversation” to have.
She also nodded to controversy about it, saying it “gets beat up in the media, which is not fair” but “it is the work we do for the county” and gas prices are rising.
Board Chair Mike Wilson noted that travel in his district — which is largely made up of Arcata and its greater area – and the Eureka-centric District 4 involves much less distance than districts 1, 2 and 5.
“The differential between the districts in terms of travel budget has only grown,” he said. “What I mean by that is for two of us, most of our population and the issues we deal with are fairly close to where we live.”
There are public objections when supervisors vote to increase their pay and reimbursements but Supervisor Natalie Arroyo vouched for the return on investment.
“This item often gets a lot of blowback and I understand where people are coming from, but I also want to say that this is travel for us to attend trainings, meet with colleagues around the state and discuss policy approaches that they’re taking,” she said. “I have really valued the opportunities to go and meet with folks outside of our community and learn how they’re doing things and so I appreciate that the opportunity exists, and I just want to speak to its value as a way of bringing back information to this community to see how we can improve.”
Bushnell’s comments about media fairness included allusions to “negativity” but she later clarified that “often the blowback is the comments and sometimes the headings are not always the friendliest but it is to capture the eye.”
Supervisor Steve Madrone’s District 5 is one of the larger ones and he said he’s foregone an annual allowance of $3,000 to attend the California State Association of Counties conference “so that I can have the funds to be able to do my district work.”
Madrone noted the status of the county budget.
“While our costs have gone up, our county budget is in really bad shape so I’m willing to live within the amount that I’m currently allocated,” he said.
“I’m very aware of the costs, the monies and I’m very conservative with it,” said Bushnell. “I am very active in my district and it’s a very large district as well.”
She said exceeding the travel reimbursement threshold has “been an issue for District 2 for quite some time.”
With Madrone voting against, the board voted to increase the current $10,300 level by 7.5 percent for the fiscal year beginning July 1, with increases of 2.5 percent in subsequent years.
That’s the across-the-board increase, with the larger district supervisors reimbursed up to $5,000 more per year.
*While Whale Gulch is barely over the line in Mendocino County, students from Humboldt County attend school there.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
You guys make over a $100,000 a year, but want us to keep paying for your out of area “business trips.”
Try using zoom. What ever information you need is on your computer or available thru phone calls or e-mail.
I wish I had a job where I could vote myself raises and up my travel expenses.
She can get tax deductions when she files her taxes like the rest of us. She has more income to work with than the average constituent. Her bs excuses expose her insular arrogance. Hilarious and not, she found that wise to comment. I find it dumbfounding she has stayed in office this long. The BOS do not care about anyone but enriching themselves. They’re sinking this ship and will keep the life rafts for themselves!
That “No Kings” rally should be pointed at this Board of Supervisors. Might accomplish something …
Not if the travel is otherwise reimbursed. This article doesn’t mention how this travel is calculated. But IRS does tax it as income if it exceeds the IRS limits. So maybe it’s the Madrone and Arroya who are doing well out of it? It would be nice if the article mentions how this allowance is actually taken.
Also you’re driving a $90,000 diesel rig that gets horrible gas mileage. Those trucks have a purpose, but that is not what you are using it for. At least hop in a Prius for the photo op before you go reaching in my pocket for gas money on a truck I could never afford.
I’m not sure why Bushnell was in her truck on the day of the photo, whether by choice, or necessity, but she normally drives a small, fuel efficient car.
Que her minion defenders
Cue her minion detractors first. Sheesh. I have never had anything to do with her, don’t live in her district, never been interested in pot growing (which apparently is all these comments are about) but it’s clear this has no bearing on the issue but is simply personal.
Do they pay that money ‘up front’ ?
Or do they…
Keep a logbook. Miles traveled, persons met with, reason for meeting, date, other reimbursable expenses.
Curious to know…
Do they take their family? Stay at 5 star hotels? Use county vehicles? Eat at the best places?
And is the reason for the travel a worthwhile benefit to Humboldt?
There’s usually a set “government rate” for hotel rooms that varies from city to city, but definitely won’t be enough for a five star hotel. Maybe a Radisson. This both keeps government officials/employees from using taxpayer money on fancy hotels, and keeps hotels from price gouging governments. Same for a set per diem amount for meals that varies by city. Family members are not covered for anything – if the official or employee has to fly and stay in a hotel on county (or city, or state) business and their spouse decides to come along, the spouse has to pay for their own plane tickets and meals, and any extra charges for having a second person in the hotel room.
Me too.
Natalie uses a little red spiral diary, Steve uses his iPhone, Rex crumples receipts and puts them in a Wheat Thins box in the truck glove box, and Michelle has her assistant embroider the miles and dates on a drape in an office in Whale Gulch. I had to make a bunch of calls to find that out for you.
And Mike submits a complete Excel spreadsheet!
At least Rex no longer uses an empty Skoal can…
Usually things like flights, hotels, conference registration, and rental cars are reserved and presumably paid for in advance (or those entities send an invoice or something)
Hotel rooms have a set “government rate” depending in the destination city, e.g. the hotel room rate for Eureka is half that of San Francisco: https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates/per-diem-rates-results?action=perdiems_report&city=&fiscal_year=2025&state=CA&zip=
Mileage and per diem amounts for meals are reimbursed after the employee/official returns from travel and submits paperwork and receipts. The mileage has to make sense – x miles between point A and point B, they won’t reimburse for side quests.
Of course they approved.
Corruption is the heartbeat of politics.
To give yourself a raise is a perk only politicians are given
Especially when the books are in the red
IDK about that. Most private companies either supply a vehicle or pay mileage when a private vehicle is used for company business. It’s usually a lot cheaper for a business that keeping dedicated vehicles. Only the cost of commuting to a business site is on the employee’s dime,
I’d feel sympathize with Bushnell more if she wasn’t sitting in a giant gas-guzzling truck.
Maybe make the mileage reimbursement available only for trips taken in fuel-efficient vehicles unless there is an actual need on any specific trip for a less-efficient mode of transportation.
Excellent point!! Why should we have to pay for someone’s grow-dozer!!!
Because she looks so cool in it. Riding into the impoverished backcountry where her lowly peasants reside in a shiny big white truck…like the savior she is!
Because a lot of fuel efficient vehicles can’t get up the back roads of outer Humboldt Co in various weather conditions? Because you aren’t paying for their vehicle anyway? They use their own vehicle bought for their own use in other than county business? Exactly how they use their travel allowance is not mentioned.
“Because a lot of fuel efficient vehicles can’t get up the back roads of outer Humboldt Co in various weather conditions?”
But phones and Zoom can…
So can Ai…
Most of us know that phones/zoom/digital connectivity isn’t exactly high quality or always viable out in the country. That said, fuel efficient and 4WD are not mutually exclusive ideas. No need for a massive work truck when your work doesn’t need you to haul a full bed of materials. They’re wonderful machines with specific purpose and a cultural indicator of our agricultural history. Not a practical commuter.
The “mileage” is a flat per mile amount for miles traveled, not number of gallons of gasoline used. Whether you’re driving a SmartCar or a growdozer, you’re getting reimbursed the same amount.
In other words, you see she has a need for more driving but object to her using her own vehicle as you don’t see the need for ever having a truck?
unless there is an actual need on any specific trip for a less-efficient mode of transportation
She could easily complete most of her travel needs in a fuel-efficient vehicle.
You ever drive that road to Whale Gulch school?
Driving on a difficult road could be one of the reasons to use a more sturdy vehicle.
There’s no reason we should be footing the bill for her to drive her giant, fuel-guzzling truck to Eureka, Bridgeville, or Shelter Cove– unless, of course, it’s as part of a response to a snowstorm.
Do you even know “we” are doing that? The times I had to use a vehicle to travel on business, I got the mileage reimbursed at the rate IRS allowed no matter what vehicle I was driving. And it might have covered gas if I was luckly but frankly not the many costs involved of owning a vehicle, no matter how good its mileage was. Certainly it did not cover the cost of a large vehicle.
I primarily see Bushnell driving a small, fuel efficient vehicle. That is an observation without data behind it, just what I see when our paths cross.
That’s some pretty key information that was left out of this article.
Jebs, this was Daniel’s report on a meeting—not an investigation into what vehicles supervisors drive day-to-day.
When I chose that photo, I was just looking for something that visually showed a supervisor out in a far corner of their district. It fit the story.
I didn’t expect the vehicle itself to become the focus, and that’s on me a bit—I forget sometimes that what feels ordinary in rural areas doesn’t always read that way to everyone.
Out where I live, a pickup isn’t really a statement—it’s just what works. I drive one, myself. Between dirt roads, hauling garbage, lumber, groceries, or a load of gravel, a small car often isn’t the best choice.
That said, I get your point about efficiency on trips where a truck might not be necessary. Though a trip out several miles of dirt road to Whale Gulch seems like a good time for a pickup to me.
It’s a fair question to ask whether a supervisor is spending their particular travel allowance wisely—just one that goes a bit beyond what this particular report about a meeting was trying to cover.
Jebs would have taken the bus.
A Tacoma is a pickup, she is driving a commercial truck. Anything that heavy is a registered commercial vehicle and everything about it costs quite a bit more even the registration itself.
I don’t agree with Jeb on much but using a picture of our supervisor in a gas guzzler to endorse a story about them voting to increase their own travel reimbursement is very bad Optics.. What I’d like to know is why our supervisors aren’t representing their constituents and telling their boss in Sacramento that his policies are destroying the ability of Californians to afford to live in this state. And I would say it takes a certain level of ignorance or arrogance to vote yourself a travel reimbursement increase in a county that is 12+ million dollars in debt and dying a not so slow death because of inflation and high unemployment rates. Especially if you’re someone who took advantage of your political connections to get a foot in the door of a Dying industry and own several businesses on top of it.. This seems like a subject we should all be able to Rally around..
Look, I don’t know what to say. Michelle is getting reimbursed the same rate–72.5 cents per mile–no matter if she is driving an armored vehicle or driving a Prius. https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/mar/17/today-supes-board-approves-increase-supervisors-tr/
So why is this bad optics? The taxpayers don’t pay by the amount of gas consumed. They pay by the mile and the miles don’t somehow multiply because she’s driving a truck. She’s choosing the vehicle that works for her and I don’t see how it is anybody’s business but hers.
Can anyone explain to me why the fuss?
Mostly just because they’re asking for more of our money to reimburse Them, It’s just bad Optics that’s all. What they should be doing instead of voting themselves other pay increase, is organize a counter offensive against the over-regulation that’s driving the prices up, you know represent their constituents like they are paid to do instead of asking their constituents to pay more because of their shitty policies..
Cmon Kim. If you go through whitethorn your end up doing a lot of Mendocino. And the gulch is mostly mendo
I’m not sure I understand your point.
That is in Mendocino isn’t it? Not her district
The road leading to it is in her district. Students attending the school are in her district.
It’s more comfy in an F-350 I’m sure.
However, it isn’t what the locals drive everyday she’s going to see out there because that would be insanely expensive and an incredible waste of resources.
And, since she uses her own vehicle, you think she should own two? One for the less frequent cases where you see a need for a less fuel efficient one and another to meet your requirements of fuel efficiency?
Actually, yes.
People who choose to live in rural areas need to make adjustments so that they’re not asking the rest of us to foot the bill for their lifestyle choices.
Having a second, fuel-efficient vehicle is a reasonable option.
This persistence is getting silly. People who represent those living in rural areas live in rural areas and must travel more. Are you really demanding rural people only elect people who “choose” not to live rurally because you think that is the only acceptable way ? I suggest rural people stop bring urban people food, raw materials, water or anything else they can’t supply for themselves. Want to take a bet on who dies first? Urbanism can not be self sufficient in anything. It is a market. It is a convenience. The only thing it produces on its own is blight.
Although the article doesn’t say how travel is reimbursed, it is extremely unlikely the County is “footing the bill” for anyone’s auto. If they are not simply handing over the money, in which case the Sups in small urban areas are making out like bandits. They are reimbursing it in some fashion. Likely with a mileage rate that doesn’t cover the expense of a real vehicle. And the vehicle owner eats the loss. Do you even care to ask?
Where did I say, or even suggest, let alone demand that rural people elect representatives who do not live rurally?
And are you really suggesting that people in Eureka, Arcata, or Fortuna would perish if not for the support they receive from Shelter Cove, Alderpoint, and Disnmore?
Maybe not perish but the current economic woes* after the cannabis crash that was primarily from the “hills,” has illuminated just how much the “hill people” were supporting the local economy.
*yes, I’m aware that there are multiple factors to the economic woes we’re facing, but surely you can’t deny the cannabis industry collapse is a major part of what we’re seeing in the Emerald Triangle.
The collapse of the Cannabis industry has absolutely contributed to the the economic hardships here.
We have yet to come anywhere close to replacing the billions of dollars that came from both rural outdoor grows and the hundreds (thousands, maybe?) of indoor grows in the towns.
My comment, however was in response to Yabut’s line, “I suggest rural people stop bring urban people food, raw materials, water or anything else they can’t supply for themselves.”
Small farming communities in the Central Valley might feed the people who live in town, but very little produce comes from most of the rural communities and homesteads around here.
That’s hilarious since you consistently ask other people to foot the bill for your lifestyle choices.
Oh, fine. I’m done working outside for the day so I’ll play along.
Which of my lifestyle choices am I asking other people to fund?
Personally, I do exactly that. I have a 4wf diesel truck, but also a 50mpg diesel jetta. Which one do you suppose is my daily (actually weekly) driver
As somebody who’s lived in Humboldt County my whole life I definitely owned two vehicles. My work truck which gets s*** gas mileage and a Subaru which we use to commute and go buy groceries with 2 hours from town because it’s cheaper.. Because I can’t vote myself a reimbursement increase on the taxpayers dime to cover overpriced gas that was caused by my fellow politicians. And instead of taking a very public stand against their policies that are causing the increase in prices, I simply make you offset the increased costs insted.
Every County employee could claim they need extra money cuz what they do is for the good of the County.
$3000 to attend a conference?!!! Oh but it’s the…California State Association of Counties conference- you wouldn’t understand. It’s when supervisors from all over the state get together to have a party on their taxpayers money and talk about how to do it again next year!! What a bunch of corrupt assholes. Yes- we are struggling hard. But these jerks keep taking taking taking from us….Thank you Steve Madrone for being decent!
They simply need a different system of a set per mile reimbursement, not an allowance, for local council business and a capped out of area travel budget. That takes care of the discrepancy in district size and could encourage fuel efficient vehicles too.
Of course people like to travel to conferences- they are rarely held in unfun places with few amenities- but they need to be aware of the costs to their constituents. And surely they aren’t interested in doing it as cheaply as they can. They don’t car pool, get group discounts on hotels or cheap airfare on budget airlines. If their discussions included ideas on saving on expenses, this article didn’t mention it but might go a bit towards damping the negative comments.
Mileage is already a set per mile amount, like when you get paid for your mileage for jury duty.
There are no consistently operating “budget” airlines here, so no, they can’t get cheap flights on a budget airline, everybody had to shell out whatever United is charging.
Nearly every conference arranges “group discounts” at the hotel where the conference is being held, or at nearby hotels. It’s called a “room block” – there’s also a set “government rate” for hotel rooms – they use this rate to determine what is reasonable for a given city: https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates/per-diem-rates-results?action=perdiems_report&city=&fiscal_year=2025&state=CA&zip=
While government employees usually can and sometimes do carpool, elected officials are usually unable to or are unable to have more than two officials from the same governing body in the same car, because then it becomes a “meeting” that is subject to the Brown Act and has to be open to the public, etc. – it’s easier to just not do it rather than have an uninterrupted livestream on zoom with public comment for the six hour drive from here to San Francisco.
Stop padding your big fat pockets and make everybody zoom in like the courthouse did during covid. This county can’t afford to cush your ass.
I will be so grateful when we finally rid ourselves of the certain folks on the BOS that were drug war profiteers. You know, the ones that activity destroyed our beautiful home with racketeering. Frankly, I doubt any MAGA such as Bohn and Bushnell have any connection to fiduciary responsibility.
It is amusing that these people, particularly Mrs Bushnell, want more money!
She does nothing good, but she does lead the charge when it comes to her own money, salary, graft etc…
An abrasive person in a large pickup, with plenty of thugs guarding her person…
She’s REALLY important, you know…
And nobody has more conflicts-of-interest than Michelle Bushnell…
It is truly amazing that the “least worst” candidate was elected at all, but you really need to work on getting rid of her toxic shit…
Good luck Humboldt! You are broke, but Michelle can buy plenty Diesel on your dime…
Absolutely unqualified, incompetent and corrupt… That’s Michelle Bushnell!
Lord help me. Those “thugs” are members of the Whale Gulch Fire Department…Bushnell was headed to the remote community that was only accessed by a poorly maintained dirt road. https://kymkemp.com/2023/02/03/humboldt-county-supervisor-michelle-bushnell-visits-whale-gulch-to-discuss-the-road-situation/
The school is in Mendocino County.
They can’t afford roads either…
Volunteer FD’s are laudable.
Humboldt County is chuck-hole deep in bad roads…
Paving costs $1,000,000 a mile…
I call this unnecessary travel in a world where she has an office, and everyone has Zoom…
I would like to categorically state that I disapprove of both Mr Bohn and Mrs Bushnell, and I have never felt the need to travel to “Whale Gulch”, although plenty of copy is dedicated to the place…
Yesterday, my spouse told me I looked like a homeless person…
I wasn’t offended as I have two homes…
There does not appear to be a road to “Whale Gulch” at all…
It appears to be ridiculous to waste time driving aimlessly about the county, but hell, you’re paying for it…
Nothing really ‘bad’ about that road.
Potholes if you come in via Redway/Briceland.
An interesting gravel & downhill stretch if you come in on Chemise Mountain road.
RAV4/CRV or Ford Exploder would handle it just fine.
If those rural residents had paid their taxes as opposed to participating in illegal activity they would have had better roads.
Every land owner I’ve ever known for over 50 years in Humboldt has paid their property taxes and still have potholes and dirt for roads.
I meant all the people that worked under the table for cash for over 50 years. Paying your fair share of Federal income provides needed money for infusion your community. The dope growers screwed us all over with racketeering. Their greed ran us into the ground.
That dude has a pretty long beard for a firefighter. Probably has a few stickers on his truck anyway
I don’t know the man with the longer beard. But I do know a firefighter in my community with a beard that long and he’s one of our most valuable members.
Visits to Whale Gulch is best as a “park your VW and walk in”. 😁
I’m thoroughly confused. Is this article about vehicle usage? Usually elected officials are allowed to lease or buy a car and it gets an exempt (E Plate) license plate. Business use only. The other option they drive their personal car and paid the standard mileage rate. The supervisors should be out driving around in their district without any restriction. (the majority of operating in a car is not the fuel cost is depreciation, maintenance insurance)
I had to deal with Michelle Bushnell Friday evening and I can just tell you that she is just a rude rude rude person!!!!
MB scares me. I’d never speak during Public Comment with her in the room unless I was ready for a real smackdown.
So typical CA government over regulates the gas companies to the point where we’re paying twice the national average because they literally have to ship our gas from the Bahamas to keep up with Supply demands.. and what do they do either exempt themselves from the same policies we have to follow or increase their reimbursement to compensate for the increased prices on our dime.. What a joke and we are the punchline..