California’s Latest COVID Information
Press release from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH):
Today, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) released the most recent statistics on COVID-19 and updates on the state’s pandemic response. The most up to date data is available on the state’s COVID-19 data dashboard.
Effective September 12, 2022, CDPH will transition to publicly reporting COVID-19 data one day a week. Specifically, data on COVID-19 cases, test positivity, hospitalizations, ICU numbers and availability, deaths and vaccine coverage will be reported on CDPH’s public dashboards (Tracking COVID-19 in California – Coronavirus COVID-19 Response) only on Thursdays. In addition, CDPH’s regular COVID-19 News Release will now be distributed weekly, also on Thursdays.
Statewide COVID-19 Data
Rates of cases, hospitalizations and deaths are highest among unvaccinated individuals and lowest among boosted individuals. This is true for all age groups. See additional data for unvaccinated and vaccinated cases, hospitalizations, and deaths.
Vaccinations
- 79,697,832 total vaccines administered.
- 80.2% of the population has been vaccinated with at least one dose.
- 7,588 people a day are receiving COVID-19 vaccination (average daily dose count over 7 days).
Cases
- California has 10,329,995 confirmed cases to date.
- Today’s average case count is 6,338 (average daily case count over 7 days).
- During July 2022, unvaccinated people were 2.6 times more likely to get COVID-19 than people who were vaccinated with at least a primary series.
Testing
- The testing positivity rate is 7.8% (average rate over 7 days).
Hospitalizations
- There are 2,865 hospitalizations statewide.
- There are 370 ICU patients statewide.
- During July 2022, unvaccinated people were 3.0 times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 than people who were vaccinated with at least a primary series.
Deaths
- There have been 94,558 COVID-19 deaths since the start of the pandemic.
- COVID-19 claims the lives of 30 Californians each day (average daily death count over 7 days).
- During July 2022, unvaccinated people were 3.6 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than people who were vaccinated with at least a primary series.
Upcoming Website Maintenance
CDPH will be performing scheduled server maintenance on Saturday, September 17 from approximately 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. During this time, all CDPH webpages will be unavailable.
ADDITIONAL UPDATES
Tracking COVID-19 Dashboard Update
Beginning today, Friday, September 9, CDPH has updated the Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Data feature on the Tracking COVID-19 in California state dashboard to expand the population to include age 5+, expand the timeline of data reported, and begin updating data on a monthly (instead of weekly) basis.
Slow the Spread: Get Vaccinated and Boosted for COVID-19
The risk for COVID-19 exposure and infection continues as a number of Californians remain unvaccinated and unboosted.
Real-world evidence continues to show that the vaccine prevents severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Public health officials urge Californians to get vaccinated and boosted as soon as possible.
It is recommended that every individual six months of age and older receive their primary COVID-19 vaccine series and booster dose, if eligible.
Find a vaccine near you by visiting myturn.ca.gov or calling 1-833-422-4255. The consent of a parent or legal guardian may be needed for those under age 18 to receive a vaccination. Visit Vaccinate All 58 to learn more about the safe and effective vaccines available for all Californians six months of age and older.
If you have COVID-19 symptoms, talk to a health care provider right away to learn if you qualify for treatment. You can also find Test to Treat locations that offer COVID-19 testing and free treatment. If you are uninsured, find free Test to Treat services at OptumServe sites.
Your Actions Save Lives
Protect yourself, family, friends and your community by following these prevention measures:
- Sign-Up for COVID-19 Policy Alerts: COVID-19 Policy Alerts provide up-to-date information regarding CDPH COVID-19 guidance and policy, including changes to orders, mandatory guidance and more. Registrants will receive prompt email alerts to updated guidance and policy available on our website as well as accompanying translations. Sign-up for the COVID-19 Policy Alerts emails today.
- Wear A Mask When Recommended or Required: Under California’s mask guidance, masks are strongly recommended for all individuals in most indoor settings. Masks are required for everyone in high transmission settings like emergency shelters, health care settings, correctional facilities, homeless shelters and long-term care facilities. Local jurisdictions may have additional requirements beyond the state requirements based on local conditions.
- Upgrade Your Mask: Good fit and filtration continue to be the best way to get the most out of your mask. The best masks for preventing COVID-19 include the N95, KN95 and KF94. If you don’t have access to one of these masks, wear a surgical mask or a surgical mask with a cloth mask on top. If you choose a fabric mask, opt for one with three or more cloth layers. No matter what kind of mask you wear, check the fit by avoiding gaps above the nose or on the sides.
- Isolation and Quarantine Guidance: CDPH no longer recommends quarantine for individuals who are exposed to COVID-19 and have no symptoms. For more information please see: Isolation and Quarantine Guidance. Additionally, CDPH added recommendations for workers in certain high-risk settings (healthcare settings, long-term care settings and shelters, among others).
- My Vaccine Record is an easy way to show vaccination status at venues or businesses that require proof of vaccination. Visit myvaccinerecord.cdph.ca.gov today to get your vaccine record.
- Recommendations if You’re Sick or Have Been Exposed: If you are experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 (fever, cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, muscle or body aches), or believe you have been exposed, get tested, call your health care provider, and stay home and away from others. Free, confidential testing is available statewide. Know what to do if you test positive for COVID-19 or have been exposed to COVID-19.
- Wash hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds.
- Travel Tips: Delay travel (both domestic and international) until you are fully vaccinated. See the CDC’s full travel guidance. If you decide to travel, the state’s travel advisory recommends that all travelers arriving in California test for COVID-19 within three to five days after arrival, regardless of their vaccination status.
- Add Your Phone to the Fight: Sign up for COVID-19 exposure notifications from CA Notify. Also, individuals who test positive for COVID-19 – including those who test at home – are able to alert others of a potential exposure more quickly and conveniently. Individuals can now initiate the notification process as soon as they are aware of their positive test result. For more information, please visit the “Notify Others” page on CA Notify.
- Answer the call or text if a contact tracer from the CA COVID Team or your local health department tries to connect.
- Check with your local health department about local conditions. Local health jurisdictions can implement protocols that are stricter than state guidance.
Tracking COVID-19 in California
- Data and Tools – Models and dashboards for researchers, scientists, and the public
- COVID-19 Age, Race & Ethnicity Data – Weekly updated Age, Race & Ethnicity data
- Health Equity Dashboard – See how COVID-19 highlights existing inequities in health
- Tracking Variants – Data on the variants California is currently monitoring
- Safe Schools for All Hub – Information about safe in-person instruction
- COVID-19 Wastewater Surveillance – Monitoring the virus that causes COVID-19
Preparing for a Healthy 2022-23 School Year
- The Safe Schools for All Hub consolidates key resources and information related to COVID-19 and schools.
- Learn more about the COVID-19 mitigation strategies to keep students, staff, and communities safe in the 2022-23 K-12 Schools Guidance.
- Get more information on changes to COVID-19 testing strategies for the 2022-23 school year in the 2022-23 K-12 Schools Testing Framework.
- The CDPH Testing Taskforce School Testing team has released a 2022-2023 K-12 Schools Testing Framework Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).
Health Care Workers
- As of September 8, local health departments have reported 179,514 confirmed positive cases in health care workers and 589 deaths statewide.
Testing Turnaround Time
- The testing turnaround time dashboard reports how long California patients are waiting for COVID-19 test results. During the week of August 28 to September 3, the average time patients waited for test results was 0.7 day. During this same time period, 90% of patients received test results in one day and 97% received them within two days.
Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C)
- As of September 1, there have been 1011 cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) reported statewide. MIS-C is a rare inflammatory condition associated with COVID-19 that can damage multiple organ systems. MIS-C can require hospitalization and be life threatening.
Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules
Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/
I just tested positive for donkey pox, the disease that’s killing America
#trump2024
Mother Nature
Just a reminder…
Take these steps to prevent heatstroke during hot weather:
Wear loosefitting, lightweight clothing. …
Protect against sunburn. …
Drink plenty of fluids. …
Take extra precautions with certain medications. .
Take it easy during the hottest parts of the day. …
Alert! Alert!
Wake up people…
How many times has the presentation of information been changed now, to conceal what they don’t want you to see?
Has it happened enough times that you should all be opening your eyes to it?
The claim hasn’t changed…
“Rates of cases, hospitalizations and deaths are highest among unvaccinated individuals and lowest among boosted individuals.”
But it has been a lie for many, many, months.
And now, even though they still claim the same old lie, they have eliminated the data that proves it’s a lie.
That is the updated method.
Now it’s just vaccinated vs unvaccinated data, showing unvaccinated outcomes being highest compared only the vaccinated.
The boosted aren’t even mentioned anymore, now that the boosted outcome have been consistently greater than the merely vaccinated outcomes for so long.
If they have combined them, and only use the term vaccinated now, then why is there an untrue, unverifiable claim that it’s the boosted outcomes that are still the lowest?
That is the same old lie.
Nothing has changed but that they have stopped showing the proof it’s a lie.
And if they just told the truth and said only it’s the vaccinated that have the lowest breakthrough cases hospitalizations and deaths, and didn’t lie and say it was the boosted that were the lowest, then it might rightly discourage boosters.
And they aren’t going to do that.
So they have to keep lying, and they have to hide the proof.
So that is what they have done.
It’s unacceptable.
I hope you see it to.
“The death rate among unvaccinated people is still far higher than that among the vaccinated even though vaccinated people now make up a significant proportion of deaths” . Refusing to think about data does not make it a lie.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-compare-covid-deaths-for-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-people/
Nooo,
You discredit yourself to not acknowledge the CDPH lie that is now even more deceptive and dishonest, as now being outside the realm of even possibly being verifiable.
The ongoing lie that CDPH is continuing to claim is true, that still isn’t true…and that’s now quite fantastical…
“Rates of cases, hospitalizations and deaths are highest among unvaccinated individuals and lowest among boosted individuals.””
Especially after apparently combining the “merely vaccinated” data with the “vaccinated and boosted” data, and eliminating the “boosted” category entirely, leaving only vaccinated vs unvaccinated data categories, in an effort to conceal the fact that the breakthrough “cases, hospitalizations, and deaths” are in fact, not the lowest among the “boosted”.
What part of, “a separate “boosted” category, nor “boosted” specific data, no longer exists, do you not understand?
And how is it that you do not understand that making a “boosted” specific claim, of any kind, is no longer even remotely relevant, or credible, even as a lie?
Any “boosted” claim is consequently totally bogus.
Not only is it still the same old lie, it has now been established as a ridiculous lie.
The “boosted”, can no longer be realistically compared, honestly or dishonestly, to any other category, as the “boosted” data category, no longer even exists.
Is that clear enough?
You can refuse to see it, But it’s still a lie.
Now it isn’t just a lie, it’s a stupid, idiotic lie.
It’s an insult to human intelligence!
And it’s coming from the Health experts we are supposed to be able to trust, at CDPH.
Clearly they are incompetent.
Nowhere is is mentioned that they have combined the “merely vaccinated” data with the “vaccinated and boosted” data, if that is what they have done.
I presume that it is what’s happened, as I don’t believe that they would have just eliminated the “vaccinated and also boosted” data.
Why haven’t they explained that, or admitted that is what they have done, and why they have done it?
And why do they keep lying that it’s the “boosted” that have the lowest breakthrough cases , hospitalizations, and deaths, when they don’t even differentiate “boosted” individuals in their graphs or data now?
??There is no longer even a category for “boosted”, yet they falsely claim that being “boosted” is the most advantageous, with no data evidence to back up, or to properly, refute the false claim.
It isn’t.
Being “Boosted” has been less advantageous, overall, for many, many, months…
Cheaters gonna cheat…
Liars gonna lie.
You are clearly, obviously, being duped.
Don’t fall for it!
This is the only thing I could find “explaining” their decision. It’s the final bullet point under the “chart information” tab.
///Calculating rates by vaccination and booster status is affected by several factors that make interpretation of recent trends especially difficult. Factors including immunity from prior infection, waning protection related to the amount of time since vaccination, and differences in prevention and testing behaviors by age and vaccination status, have a growing impact on data over time. Despite these limitations, data continue to show that COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduces risk of infection and severe disease. CDPH continues to evaluate ways to present this information in a way that better accounts for these limitations.///
It’s not much of an explanation of course.
The other thing I noticed in that tab is that it appears that “partially vaccinated” people aren’t counted at all. They explain that vaccinated means 2 weeks after completing your primary series of vaccination and unvaccinated means never having received any covid vaccine doses. So what of the folks who only got one shot? Interestingly, on the same page the state counts those people in the state’s don’t of vaccinated people
Thank you.
You have to read it like a real estate ad…
They state….
“Factors including immunity from prior infection, waning protection related to the amount of time since vaccination, and differences in prevention and testing behaviors by age and vaccination status, have a growing impact on data over time.”
– CDPH-
_____________________________________
That doesn’t explain why boosted data has shown the highest breakthroughs.
(It’s backwards.)
The “merely vaccinated” individuals represent the group that has gone the longest “time” “since vaccination” without an additional dose.
So they should be the ones that should have the highest rates, due to “waning”, but they are the ones with the lowest rates.
So that doesn’t add up.
The “merely vaccinated” are the ones with the lowest cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, not the “least waned” “boosted” individuals.
_____________________________________
They state…
“Calculating rates by vaccination and booster status is affected by several factors that make interpretation of recent trends especially difficult”
-CDPH-
________________________________________
Makes “interpretation” especially difficult for whom, exactly?
“Them”, or “us”?
I believe what they are saying is that “we”, (not “they”),are having “difficulty” “interpreting” data, (that clearly shows boosted individuals with higher rate of cases, hospitalizations, and at times, deaths), how they want us to interpret that data.
They want us to see it as a “selling point” or “advantage” in favor of the boosters, when it clearly shows it’s neither.
There are those, like me, that see it as neither.
And that’s why it’s now being concealed.
_____________________________________
They state…
“Despite these limitations, data continue to show that COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduces risk of infection and severe disease”
-CDPH-
_____________________________________
That’s right, data continue to show only “vaccination” significantly reduces risk of infection and severe disease.
(Doesn’t mention death.)
It’s telling that it does NOT say: “Data continues to show “boosted” significantly reduces risk of infection and severe disease,(nor deaths), compared to merely being vaccinated.
The old method data showed that if you are “boosted” you are actually at a greater risk of infection, hospitalizations and, at times, deaths, compared to being “merely vaccinated”.
I wasn’t having any problems or difficulty interpreting that data.
The CDPH, probably under the White House who were preparing for the new rollout, didn’t like the look, were ordered to “scrub it”.
But it’s even dirtier now.
It’s actually the dirtiest it’s ever been.
It’s the Biden Administration, that’s the only explanation.
Yes, it’s not really an explanation at all.
It makes me wonder who these people are that write these blurbs. Do they believe what they write? Do they not see the gaping whole in the logic? Do they actually want to communicate to the public?
They were forced to change the data.
As lawsuits spring up for “statistical manipulation” the “fake pushers” have to change their tactics.
There is a bill that is on Newsoms desk, I believe, that would punish doctors for providing false COVID-19 information.
Does this also apply to the “Doctors”, at the CDPH that are providing this false ” “lowest among boosted” information?
It should.
(I am not aware if Newsom has signed the bill, or vetoed it, yet.)
Why such short anti-gov comments?
Aim for more, longer, deeper, quote-ier, pamphlets.
You’ll really get some people convinced of your….ahem, stuff.
Get boosted.
I live boosted brah
Thank Jha.
I’ve reached out once again and asked for an explanation.
Thank you.
I hope you had a good day.
I’m not sure if you agree, but it sure seems to me like all the formatting changes that have concealed the facts more and more, and all the muddled messaging… must be creating some serious vaccine hesitancy…
The untrue “lowest among boosted” statement remains.
Yet “vaccinated and boosted data”, has been removed from both the press release text, and the graphs.
No mention whatsoever, that “vaccinated data” and “vaccinated and boosted data” have, or have not, been combined.
Yet it appears so, from the exclusion/ elimination, respectively, of “vaccinated and boosted” graph lines and related text.
(The updated method)
No “boosted” category claims, therefore, true or not, can “legitimately”, ( words to describe the conundrum fail me), be made, yet that’s exactly what the CDPH has done.
Good luck fact checking the CDPH lowest among “boosted” individuals” claim.
It’s still the same lie.
But the evidence has now been “scrubbed”….
(The updated method, has only eliminated the previously provided evidence that it’s a lie.)
Huge Red flag!
I think that it’s accurate to say that the updated method of “providing COVID-19 information, by vax status, with any claim of boosted being the most advantageous for any or all outcomes, is being presented fraudulently.
Just in time for the new untested booster rollout.
Caveo!
Thank you Kym. It’s nice to know there’s some journalist making an effort to keep public health honest.
I don’t understand why they choose to communicate this way treating people like they’re stupid doesn’t build trust. Yet our public health agencies at the state and federal level continue to treat the population like idiots who can’t possibly make sense of the full information and need to be just told what to do.
I hope we do get some answer from them eventually.
It’s Not Just You: Extreme Heat Is Making All of Us Really Cranky
And in some cases, downright angry.
“As temperatures rise, we can become more emotional and angrier,” Joshua Klapow, PhD, clinical psychologist and creator of Mental Drive, tells SELF. “But only as we move from relative comfort to relative discomfort. As we become more physically uncomfortable, our ability to manage our emotions is diminished.”
https://www.self.com/story/why-hot-weather-makes-you-angry/amp
Sleepy Joe called Brian May today and sent his condolences… “So sorry to hear your band has died, I really liked your music.”
Brian May responds, “No, you old sot, our Queen has died!”
Joe asks, “Well, who will be Queen now?”
Brian May said, “The Prince shall assume the throne.”
Joe says, “But I know he died and I was really a big fan of his music, too! Why, just a few summers ago fans destroyed his hometown of Minneapolis because they were so upset he had died.”
This has what to do with COVID information from the state?
Just about as much as the information you’re referring to…ba-dum-dum-sss?
I had symptoms on Sunday. Monday I tried to get a test/medicine. Was told I could get on Friday. I’m over it now.
Tests are available at CVS, Rite Aid or any similar store.
On Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, etc….
Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for covid tests.
“Tests are available at CVS, Rite Aid or any similar store.”
-The Real Brian-
________________________
Yeah, Brian, because, to stop the spread of COVID-19, if you think you are sick, the first place you should go is to a busy pharmacy or “any similar store”, right?
(And maybe you haven’t seen the price of gas?)
Why not just take the antigen test sent to you by the Biden Administration?
Oh, wait, that’s right, now I remember…
In Biden’s efforts to combat COVID-19, he has developed a shrewd new scheme, er, um, strategy, to drastically reduce reported cases, single handedly, with just the stroke of a pen…
He has put his foot down, rather, and put an immediate stop to the free distribution of home antigen tests….
(He’s so frugal)
Magically, that should work wonders on the case rates, right?
I feel better already, don’t you?
I can already see them plummeting…
I’m sure he will credit it to the success of his new booster scheme.
It’s all about timing.
Joe Biden did that…
Chicanery.
More political jackassery.
Folks don’t bother your President for
COVID tests…
Father Joe, with incredible foresight, has begrudgingly eliminated that option for us all…
Let’s go Brandon!
Yeah, Brian, because, to stop the spread of COVID-19, if you think you are sick, the first place you should go is to a busy pharmacy or “any similar store”, right?
Just that right there is enough to show your lack of critical thinking, and I know the rest of your comment won’t get better, so that’s that.
Send somebody to buy the test for you……duhhhhh
What days are you available?
Wear a good mask, be considerate, physical distancing.
Such old and simple concepts at this point.
Guest spends all day saying Covid doesn’t matter, but all of a sudden, everyone’s at risk from it!
(Of course it only matters only to make digs at Democrats, ignoring the higher RED death rates from Covid completely)
Nevermind that anyone with half a brain has a few tests laying around for when they DO have symptoms.
Nevermind that living with Covid is NOT that complex.
I was waiting at the pharmacy in cvs the other day and a woman came in to request a test.
They told her that you need an appointment to get a test at CVS and directed her to somewhere in eureka (I think the wharfinger building? That or the Adorni center) to get a walk in test.
Im not sure if there are other walk in testing sites or if other pharmacies will do them, but the CVS in mckinleyville is doing them by appointment only apparently
Buying home tests from these stores is the point I’m making.
Just thought it was useful information.
I don’t understand the value of the home tests. If you need proof of a negative/ positive test for some reason, I don’t think they’ll accept a home test. If you’re feeling so unwell that you would consider a home test, why not just begin whatever protocols you have for when you’re ill and skip whatever you’re thinking of doing. If you’re sick, why risk spreading it into your community whether it’s SARS-Cov-2 or some other respiratory virus.
It was/ is useful information.
Thank you.
If you’re sick, why risk spreading it into your community whether it’s SARS-Cov-2 or some other respiratory virus.
We don’t acknowledge sickness at the workplace in America, firstly.
2nd, I know you know that asymptomatic and presymptomatic spread accounts for a very large amount of spread.
A weekly home test is not a bad idea for people who are highly involved with people everyday.
Many employers will work to a capacity with home tests.
Now, going back to the point, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to bother a hospital for a simple test.
What’s the accuracy of a home test?
Even if we make the large assumption that someone is using it right?
I suppose there’s some logic in someone doing regular testing, but that’s not the circumstances we were talking about.
The FDA recommends taking 3 tests over 3-5 days to achieve 79 percent accuracy according to PBS (no link from them to the study they’re citing). Seems like you’d have to be testing every 3 days if your goal was a general surveillance.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/fda-recommends-taking-3-home-tests-if-exposed-to-covid-in-order-to-boost-accuracy
But, you failed to mention that, didn’t you?
You said,
“Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for covid tests.”
Did you mean,
“Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for,
[buying, home], covid tests.”?
(Absurd)
And you said,
Tests are available at CVS, Rite Aid or any similar store.
Did you mean,
[Home] Tests are available at CVS, Rite Aid or any similar store.
(Because that’s not what you said, even if it’s what you meant.)
And then you claim,
“Buying home tests from these stores is the point I’m making.”
Now you tell us…
Coulda fooled me…
You’re all over the chart.
(Your story ain’t adding up.)
And, much more importantly, what are the points that others were making, that you somehow missed?
Like, why did Biden stop the delivery of home tests like these?
So “cases” would come down?
“Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for,
[buying, home], covid tests.”?
I don’t care how many more quotes you use, you CAN NOT BUY tests from ANY HOSPITAL.
So that is not what I meant.
I meant:
DONT BOTHER YOUR HOSPITALS FOR COVID TESTING.
Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for covid tests.
https://kymkemp.com/2022/09/09/californias-latest-covid-information/#comment-1558867
That’s the quote, booster.
Who’s all over the place?
How many words, quotes and funky punctuation have you wasted warping a black hole around such a some statement as:
Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for covid tests.
So, you meant, “folks don’t bother your hospitals for covid test[ING]”,
that’s not what you said, but I knew that’s what you meant, already…
when you said,
“Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for covid “tests”. ”
But you see, you contradicted that, when you subsequently claimed,
“Buying home “tests” from these stores is the point I’m making.”
Because you said,
” “Tests” are available at CVS, Rite Aid or any similar store.
On Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, etc….
Folks, don’t bother your hospitals for covid “tests”.”
Can you not see that you are using the word “tests” to mean both “testing” and “tests”, and that “testing” is the only thing that is available at hospitals, but “tests” and “testing” are available at the pharmacies you listed?
So that when you said,
” “Tests” are available at CVS, Rite Aid or any similar store”. etc., that meant “testing”, same as you meant for the hospitals “tests” as you described them.
You say “tests” to mean one thing, and then you say “tests”, again, to mean something else, in the very same comment???
Yeah, you’re definitely all over the chart.
Any confusion is on you, not anyone else.
That’s my point.
And if you think using home “tests” for covid “testing” is such a great idea…
(see what I did there?)
… then why don’t you address the point of why would Biden have discontinued distribution and delivery of the home “tests” for home “testing”?
Do you think that was such a great idea?
Or not?
That was also my point.
Sorry to “test” you but you are “testing” me, and you seem to be getting a little “testy” about it…
Biden is your guy, so explain why is he withholding COVID home tests, simultaneously with his new booster rollout, (as if it wasn’t to “reduce cases”, for political gain.)
It might take a little actual thought though.
Without those home tests, how will Americans know whether the new booster campaign is working or not?
Oh that’s right, they won’t, but they will be fooled into thinking it is working, when it really isn’t.
Just like the previous rollouts.
Don’t miss your appointment.
“?”
Maybe California should release a weekly warning on number of people dying from fentanyl. Warnings to children and adults about a grain of sand causing your life to flash before eyes. Or maybe not…. it’s election time again and gotta get the public worried. Unfortunately for the public relations California government branch, the last dogsled passed the finish line a year ago and nobody is picking up the dogpiles anymore. Not even Gavins kids, they are telling their daddy to pick his own dogs crap up. Freedom Rules.
Who is paying for this to be published as news, our government? If so, disclose it! I suggest and I think the community should demand that all reporters follow the “ethical reporting” standards outlined on this website. If you disagree, tell me why. https://www.asha.org/practice/ethics/ethical-reporting/
The very first thing it says on this page is “press release from the California department of public health”. It’s not a mystery where this information originates or who pays to disseminate it.
This just in –
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206070
thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/ethically-unjustifiable-new-harvard-johns-hopkins-study-found-covid-19-vaccines-98-times-worse-disease/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking
Please don’t link to the gateway pundit
Very well. Maybe someone here can direct me to an article in the mainstream media that reports on this vital study. If any readers are college students, perhaps they can bring it to the attention of their college president. In the wake of this study, it becomes very clear that college vaccine mandates absolutely need to be abolished.