Tsunami Causes Around $1 Million in Damage to Crescent City Harbor

A fishing vessel enters Crescent City Harbor this morning as seen on the Sunset Cam, while several vehicles remain parked near the launch ramp—despite an active tsunami warning still in place for Del Norte County.

A fishing vessel enters Crescent City Harbor Wednesday morning as seen on the Sunset Cam.

Crescent City Harbor took a hit from tsunami surge waves early Wednesday morning, July 31, following the 8.8-magnitude earthquake near Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula.

At approximately 2:40 a.m., a dock engineered as a “sacrificial dock” detached from its pilings, sank, and broke loose—exactly as designed to reduce broader harbor damage.

Harbormaster Mike Rademaker told SFGATE that initial estimates put the damage at $100,000. Now, Rademaker said, “It’s probably getting closer to $1 million.”

RHBB contributor Matt LaFever has the full story for SFGATECrescent City harbor quietly damaged by tsunami last week

 

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19 Please improve the conversation by disagreeing thoughtfully and backing your claims with facts
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
LiberaLunacy
Guest
LiberaLunacy
10 months ago

“$100,000… no, wait! $1 million dollars!”

Whatever you say, Dr. Dweebil.

Better start selling a lot of fish. Taxpayers aren’t gonna be on the hook for this bullshit anymore.

Angela Robinson
Member
Angela Robinson
10 months ago
Reply to  LiberaLunacy

Fishermen are taxpayers, too (and contribute to the local economy as well as federal and state taxes). If they are based out of Crescent city, they pay moorage fees. Actually even visiting boats are charged a fee (can’t say for sure the CC port does this, but all others I am familiar with do) as well. Charter fishing and whale watching out of Crescent City brings in much needed income to the county/city in lodging, etc. The personal federal taxes port users pay (aside from the business’ taxes), which speaking from personal experience can be quite hefty, especially in a good year, are, you know, are part of that taxpayers on the hook.

LiberaLunacy
Guest
LiberaLunacy
10 months ago

Great! Charge the tourists! Sell more fish! See more whales! Boat owners can get together and build a new dock. $100K… no! Wait! 1 million dollars!!! Riiiiggghhttt…

Angela Robinson
Member
Angela Robinson
10 months ago
Reply to  LiberaLunacy

I don’t think I should pay for any repairs on your road. Charge a toll, hold a bake sale…

And you clearly have no idea how little a million dollars go on marine structures. I’m impressed it’s that cheap.

Joe
Member
Joe
10 months ago

One million???!!! If you believe that HORSESHIT, I have bridge to sell!

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
10 months ago

One Million might build a Tsunami ‘gate’ across the entry to the boat basin.

No wait… this is Californika.

$3 million for a study. (Might involve meetings in Cancun Mexico.)
$5 million for engineering.
$2 million for a quarter mile pathway leading around the boat basin.
$500K for new artwork.
$200 K for new benches.
$150 K for pathway drainage.
$100 K (yearly) donation to the Sand-Dab Benevolent Fund.
$1.5 Million to Crescent City for green paint and curb fart-lets.
$10 Million for construction.
$15 Million for the subsequent take-down lawsuits
$5 million to take it down.

Go figure.

Lost Croat Outburst
Member
Lost Croat Outburst
10 months ago
Reply to  Bozo

I figure I’d rather spend millions on a White House Ballroom for el Presidente’ than on a harbor for the common folks, since many voted against themselves and for a dictatorship anyway. I mean, a majority voted for Trump, now live with it. Not my will, but thine be done.

deadmanwalkingwmd
Member
deadmanwalkingwmd
10 months ago
Reply to  Bozo

How about telling us where you got your numbers?

Humboldt
Member
Humboldt
10 months ago

For some reason, this website has not been loading images for the past few days.

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
10 months ago
Reply to  Humboldt

Dunno… it loaded several images that I posted today.
Photo is of a Tsunami Gate Barrier.
Far bigger than what the Crescent City harbor would need.

Capture23432432342432432
The Real Guest
Guest
The Real Guest
10 months ago
Reply to  Humboldt

Images have to be less than 1 mb….

Well, 1 mb is the upper limit, I believe…

Bozo
Guest
Bozo
10 months ago
Reply to  The Real Guest

I think that’s what it ‘used to be’.

Most new web servers: When you submit an image, the image procedures are cropping them down to an er… ‘reasonable size’.

Same thing with most modern email programs. It crops the image down.
No more ‘image too big/rejected’ messages.

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago
Reply to  Bozo

Still is. The error message “Maximum upload file size is 1mb 4MB” shows briefly after click/tap “Post Comment” if image filesize is too large (over 1MB).

Last edited 10 months ago
Bozo
Guest
Bozo
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

In that case, I wonder if it’s a difference in the browser/operating system.

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

Auto-resizing helps with not having to make size-compliant photos on your end. Part of the issue from a web server end is for, one, people’s phone camera settings. They usually have them set at MAX by default, so what you get is an HD photo, which is well over 10Mb, if not 50Mb, and measures 24×36 inches. It’s movie poster size. You can’t directly upload that in many places unless it’s resized, cropped, or saved in a format that hugely reduces file size, such as with JPEG and PDF. And now you get uploads that take all day on reduced bandwidths, or not at all. These stored photos also take up a huge amount of memory on others’ servers or cloud services. That costs money. 1-4mb is all anybody needs for decent quality photos on some comment page. If that. For example, ones I post here are ~2-300kb

melanopsin
Member
10 months ago

There are also online resizers such as https://imageresizer.com/ (I think Kym posted that link here someplace)

CsMisadventures
Guest
CsMisadventures
10 months ago
Reply to  melanopsin

I’ve used them. They’re handy if you don’t own some image editor app or software, or don’t want to. Also, phones where you might not have a “lite” version of an editor app.

Paul
Guest
Paul
10 months ago

What is a “sacrificial dock”? And why would any engineer build one when they could build a dolo breakwater? Water too deep?

https://thisbugslife.com/2021/11/21/dolosse-a-south-african-invention-used-over-the-world/