U.S. Attorney’s Office Launches Conviction Integrity Committee to Review Innocence Claims

Press release from the Department of Justice: 

department of justice logoUnited States Attorney Ismail Ramsey today announced that the United States Attorney’s Office is establishing a new committee to review innocence claims brought by defendants convicted in the Northern District of California.  The Conviction Integrity Committee (Committee) will review and consider claims of factual innocence brought by defendants who were convicted in the Northern District of California.

The purpose of the Committee is to promote fairness and integrity at every stage of a criminal prosecution. It is designed to ensure that credible claims of factual innocence are investigated and addressed. Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Bornstein, who also is a Senior Litigation Counsel for the Northern District of California, will Chair the Committee whose members will include the United States Attorney, the First Assistant United States Attorney, and the Executive Assistant United States Attorney.  Additional members of the United States Attorney’s Office may participate in review of certain claims filed under the new program depending upon circumstances described in the policy.

In announcing this new program, United States Attorney Ramsey said that he and his office “are committed to ensure that any person who is actually innocent is not the subject of a wrongful conviction.”

The new process is partly modeled on committees that have been formed in other United States Attorney’s Offices including for the Southern District of New York, the Central District of California, and the District of Columbia. In the Northern District of California policy, decisions—including decisions on the merits and whether to reinvestigate a claim of actual innocence—are based only on an independent assessment of the facts and the law; factors such as a defendant’s choice of counsel, media coverage, or political influence play no role in the consideration of cases presented to the Committee.

An application to submit actual innocence claims to the Committee has been placed on the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California’s website. The process is afforded to all convicted persons regardless of the nature of the offense, whether there was a trial or plea bargain, and whether they are represented by an attorney. Priority may be given to convicted persons who are currently incarcerated or on parole or supervised release.

Facebooktwitterpinterestmail

Join the discussion! For rules visit: https://kymkemp.com/commenting-rules

Comments system how-to: https://wpdiscuz.com/community/postid/10599/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Let us come and reason together. Isaiah 1:18
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr. Clark
Member
Mr. Clark
4 days ago

Hmmm. So many questions.

Is this not the place for the appeals court?What will they say about J6 victims?What would they say about Trumps loan conviction in NY?Is this like a federal public defender?What about the ACLU?Will they go up against the FBI and ATF?

Last edited 4 days ago
Thanks for proving our point!D
Member
Thanks for proving our point!
3 days ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

🧌🧌🧌🧌🧌🧌

Paul Modic
Guest
Paul Modic
3 days ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

The J-6 convicted are on video, so not much doubt of guilt there.
Trump has millions, maybe billions, he can afford lawyers and get his cases reviewed up to the Supreme Court, obviously, that’s what he does with every issue, or tries to do.
(“In the halls of justice the only justice is in the halls.”–Lenny Bruce)
These reviews are mainly for poor folks who didn’t get good representation, and got caught up being convicted and serving time for crimes some didn’t commit,
every week or month or so we hear about another one finally getting out of
prison after years.

ABA
Guest
ABA
3 days ago
Reply to  Mr. Clark

“The United States Attorney’s Office is establishing a new committee to review innocence claims brought by defendants convicted in the Northern District of California.”

Reading the article might answer some of your questions. Heck, you don’t even need to read the whole article–it’s literally the first sentence!

Alf34
Guest
Alf34
4 days ago

As they great RBG said it is better that 100 guilty go free then 1 innocent be convicted.finally some good use of my taxes too make sure no innocent is serving time.it has been proven in multiple case studies that eyes witness testimony are the most unreliable.how about an swab an returned results.

I like stars
Guest
I like stars
4 days ago

Start with a survey of inmates. I’m pretty sure you’ll find nearly every one claims to be innocent.

Farce
Guest
Farce
3 days ago
Reply to  I like stars

Everybody in prison is innocent- it is truly amazing…